Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Abdominal Radiology 5/2011

01-10-2011

Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography

Authors: Christopher M. Buchach, David H. Kim, Perry J. Pickhardt

Published in: Abdominal Radiology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the rate and associated factors for acquiring a decubitus series at CT colonography (CTC), in addition to the standard supine and prone series.

Materials and methods

CTC examinations read centrally at one institution but performed at three different centers in 6,380 adults were reviewed to determine the frequency of an additional decubitus series. Results were analyzed according to study indication (primary screening vs. diagnostic for incomplete colonoscopy), practice site (academic vs. community), patient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and temporal variation. At all sites, the CT technologist determined the need for an additional decubitus series, with infrequent radiologist input in select cases.

Results

The frequency for the CT technologist to obtain a decubitus series at screening was 9.7% (578/5,952), compared with 22.9% (98/428) following failed colonoscopy (P < 0.001). The decubitus rate for screening at the academic center (9.4%, 550/5,871) was significantly lower than the community hospitals (34.6% combined, 28/81) (P < 0.001). The rate progressively increased with age, from 5.0% under age 50 to 28.0% over age 80. No significant difference was seen between men and women (10.3 vs. 9.2%), but a strong correlation existed with increased BMI, rising to >25% for BMI over 40. Marked temporal variation existed at the academic center, with quarterly rates ranging from 0 to 17%.

Conclusions

The frequency for performing a third series at CTC varies considerably according to indication, practice site, patient age, BMI, and time. These results have important implications for clinical practice, including the need for improved training and feedback for CT technologists.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. New Engl J Med 349:2191–2200PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. New Engl J Med 359:1207–1217PubMedCrossRef Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, et al. (2008) Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. New Engl J Med 359:1207–1217PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. New Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, et al. (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. New Engl J Med 357:1403–1412PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, et al. (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661PubMedCrossRef Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung RK, et al. (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711PubMed Fletcher JG, Johnson CD, Welch TJ, et al. (2000) Optimization of CT colonography technique: prospective trial in 180 patients. Radiology 216:704–711PubMed
6.
go back to reference Chen SC, Lu DSK, Hecht JR, Kadell BM (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. Am J Roentgenol 172:595–599 Chen SC, Lu DSK, Hecht JR, Kadell BM (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. Am J Roentgenol 172:595–599
7.
go back to reference (2006) ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology (2006) ACR practice guideline for the performance of computed tomography (CT) colonography in adults. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology
8.
go back to reference Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:1491–1496CrossRef Shinners TJ, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Jones DA, Olsen CH (2006) Patient-controlled room air insufflation versus automated carbon dioxide delivery for CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 186:1491–1496CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ (2007) Screening CT colonography: how i do it. Am J Roentgenol 189:290–298CrossRef Pickhardt PJ (2007) Screening CT colonography: how i do it. Am J Roentgenol 189:290–298CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254:138–144PubMedCrossRef Borden ZS, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. (2010) Bowel preparation for CT colonography: blinded comparison of magnesium citrate and sodium phosphate for catharsis. Radiology 254:138–144PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, et al. (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. Am J Roentgenol 186:96–103CrossRef Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, et al. (2006) Automated insufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. Am J Roentgenol 186:96–103CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 189:774–779CrossRef Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 189:774–779CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2010) Colonic distention for CT colonography. In: Pickhardt PJ (ed) CT colonography: principles & practice of virtual colonoscopy. Philadelphia: Suanders, pp 131–147CrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ (2010) Colonic distention for CT colonography. In: Pickhardt PJ (ed) CT colonography: principles & practice of virtual colonoscopy. Philadelphia: Suanders, pp 131–147CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Choi M, Taylor AJ, VonBerge JL, Bartels CM, Pickhardt PJ (2005) Can the CT scout reliably assess for adequate colonic distention at CT colonography? Am J Roentgenol 184:21–22 Choi M, Taylor AJ, VonBerge JL, Bartels CM, Pickhardt PJ (2005) Can the CT scout reliably assess for adequate colonic distention at CT colonography? Am J Roentgenol 184:21–22
15.
go back to reference Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, et al. (2002) Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO2 insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO2 delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 56:190–194PubMedCrossRef Sumanac K, Zealley I, Fox BM, et al. (2002) Minimizing postcolonoscopy abdominal pain by using CO2 insufflation: a prospective, randomized, double blind, controlled trial evaluating a new commercially available CO2 delivery system. Gastrointest Endosc 56:190–194PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Robson NK, Lloyd M, Regan F (1993) The use of carbon-dioxide as an insufflation agent in barium enema—does it have a role. British J Radiol 66:197–198CrossRef Robson NK, Lloyd M, Regan F (1993) The use of carbon-dioxide as an insufflation agent in barium enema—does it have a role. British J Radiol 66:197–198CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2007) CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a practical approach for population screening. Radiol Clin North Am 45:361 (-+)PubMedCrossRef Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH (2007) CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a practical approach for population screening. Radiol Clin North Am 45:361 (-+)PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sanford MF, Pickhardt PJ (2006) Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1039–1047PubMedCrossRef Sanford MF, Pickhardt PJ (2006) Diagnostic performance of primary 3-dimensional computed tomography colonography in the setting of colonic diverticular disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:1039–1047PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA, van Holsbeeck BG, Lefere PA (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:768–777PubMedCrossRef Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA, van Holsbeeck BG, Lefere PA (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14:768–777PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ (2000) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2784–2787PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Gonzalez JD, Messina CR, Pollack BJ (2000) Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better. Am J Gastroenterol 95:2784–2787PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H (2008) CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. Am J Roentgenol 190:145–150CrossRef Yucel C, Lev-Toaff AS, Moussa N, Durrani H (2008) CT colonography for incomplete or contraindicated optical colonoscopy in older patients. Am J Roentgenol 190:145–150CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, et al. (1999) Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 172:913–918 Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, Farrell RJ, et al. (1999) Endoluminal CT colonography after an incomplete endoscopic colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 172:913–918
23.
go back to reference Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 173:561–564 Macari M, Berman P, Dicker M, Milano A, Megibow AJ (1999) Usefulness of CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 173:561–564
24.
go back to reference Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:774–779PubMedCrossRef Hanson ME, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pfau PR (2007) Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:774–779PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 244:471–478PubMedCrossRef Copel L, Sosna J, Kruskal JB, et al. (2007) CT colonography in 546 patients with incomplete colonoscopy. Radiology 244:471–478PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129:328–337PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129:328–337PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Radiation risk in perspective: position statement of the Health Physics Society: Health Physics Society, Adopted January 1996, revised August 2004 Radiation risk in perspective: position statement of the Health Physics Society: Health Physics Society, Adopted January 1996, revised August 2004
28.
go back to reference Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. (2003) Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:230–236PubMedCrossRef Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. (2003) Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:230–236PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Iqbal CW, Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, et al. (2008) Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch Surg 143:701–706PubMedCrossRef Iqbal CW, Cullinane DC, Schiller HJ, et al. (2008) Surgical management and outcomes of 165 colonoscopic perforations from a single institution. Arch Surg 143:701–706PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Menias CO (2008) Imaging evaluation of complications at optical colonoscopy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 37:165–177PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Menias CO (2008) Imaging evaluation of complications at optical colonoscopy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 37:165–177PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Levin TR (2007) Complications of colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 147:213–214 Levin TR (2007) Complications of colonoscopy. Ann Intern Med 147:213–214
32.
go back to reference Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, et al. (2008) Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 135:1899–1906PubMedCrossRef Rabeneck L, Paszat LF, Hilsden RJ, et al. (2008) Bleeding and perforation after outpatient colonoscopy and their risk factors in usual clinical practice. Gastroenterology 135:1899–1906PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Performing an additional decubitus series at CT colonography
Authors
Christopher M. Buchach
David H. Kim
Perry J. Pickhardt
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Abdominal Radiology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 2366-004X
Electronic ISSN: 2366-0058
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-010-9666-9

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

Abdominal Radiology 5/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.