Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 7/2012

01-07-2012 | Pictorial Essay

Hepatoblastoma imaging with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—typical, atypical, pre- and post-treatment evaluation

Authors: Arthur B. Meyers, Alexander J. Towbin, James I. Geller, Daniel J. Podberesky

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 7/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Gadoxetate disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA) is a hepatobiliary MRI contrast agent widely used in adults for characterization of liver tumors and increasingly used in children. Hepatoblastoma is the most common primary hepatic malignancy of childhood. In this review, we describe our experience with this agent both before and after initiating therapy in children with hepatoblastoma.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB et al (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR 195:13–28PubMedCrossRef Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB et al (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR 195:13–28PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Cruite I, Schroeder M, Merkle EM et al (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver. AJR 195:29–41PubMedCrossRef Cruite I, Schroeder M, Merkle EM et al (2010) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 2, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the cirrhotic liver. AJR 195:29–41PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Meyers AM, Towbin AJ, Serai A et al (2011) Characterization of pediatric liver lesions with gadoxetate disodium. Pediatr Radiol 41:1183–1197PubMedCrossRef Meyers AM, Towbin AJ, Serai A et al (2011) Characterization of pediatric liver lesions with gadoxetate disodium. Pediatr Radiol 41:1183–1197PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Reiser MF et al (2007) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:43–52PubMedCrossRef Zech CJ, Herrmann KA, Reiser MF et al (2007) MR imaging in patients with suspected liver metastases: value of liver-specific contrast agent Gd-EOB-DTPA. Magn Reson Med Sci 6:43–52PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Choi JY, Kim MJ, Park YM et al (2011) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological characteristics. AJR 197:399–405PubMedCrossRef Choi JY, Kim MJ, Park YM et al (2011) Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI of hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation with histological characteristics. AJR 197:399–405PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Goodwin MD, Dobson JE, Sirlin CB et al (2011) Diagnostic challenges and pitfalls in MR imaging with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. Radiographics 31:1547–1568CrossRef Goodwin MD, Dobson JE, Sirlin CB et al (2011) Diagnostic challenges and pitfalls in MR imaging with hepatocyte-specific contrast agents. Radiographics 31:1547–1568CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Marrone G, Maggiore G, Carollo V et al (2011) Biliary cystadenoma with bile duct communication depicted on liver-specific contrast agent-enhanced MRI in a child. Pediatr Radiol 41:121–124PubMedCrossRef Marrone G, Maggiore G, Carollo V et al (2011) Biliary cystadenoma with bile duct communication depicted on liver-specific contrast agent-enhanced MRI in a child. Pediatr Radiol 41:121–124PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tamrazi A, Vasanawala SS (2011) Functional hepatobiliary MR imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 22:1250–1258CrossRef Tamrazi A, Vasanawala SS (2011) Functional hepatobiliary MR imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol 22:1250–1258CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Das CJ, Dhingra S, Gupta AK et al (2009) Imaging of paediatric liver tumours with pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 64:1015–1025PubMedCrossRef Das CJ, Dhingra S, Gupta AK et al (2009) Imaging of paediatric liver tumours with pathological correlation. Clin Radiol 64:1015–1025PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Imbach P (2006) Hepatic tumors. In: Imbach P, Kuhne T, Arceci RJ (eds) Pediatric oncology: a comprehensive guide. Springer, New York, pp 187–191CrossRef Imbach P (2006) Hepatic tumors. In: Imbach P, Kuhne T, Arceci RJ (eds) Pediatric oncology: a comprehensive guide. Springer, New York, pp 187–191CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chung EM, Lattin GE, Cube R et al (2011) Pediatric liver masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation part 2. Malignant tumors. Radiographics 31:483–507PubMedCrossRef Chung EM, Lattin GE, Cube R et al (2011) Pediatric liver masses: radiologic-pathologic correlation part 2. Malignant tumors. Radiographics 31:483–507PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Roebuck DJ, Aronson D, Clapuyt P et al (2005) PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group. Pediatr Radiol 37:123–132CrossRef Roebuck DJ, Aronson D, Clapuyt P et al (2005) PRETEXT: a revised staging system for primary malignant liver tumours of childhood developed by the SIOPEL group. Pediatr Radiol 37:123–132CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Vogel TJ, Kummel S, Hammerstingl R et al (1996) Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology 200:59–67 Vogel TJ, Kummel S, Hammerstingl R et al (1996) Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd-EOB-DTPA and Gd-DTPA. Radiology 200:59–67
15.
go back to reference Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Shamsi K et al (1996) Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology 199:177–183PubMed Reimer P, Rummeny EJ, Shamsi K et al (1996) Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence. Radiology 199:177–183PubMed
16.
go back to reference Towbin AJ, Luo GG, Yin H et al (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatr Radiol 41:341–349PubMedCrossRef Towbin AJ, Luo GG, Yin H et al (2010) Focal nodular hyperplasia in children, adolescents, and young adults. Pediatr Radiol 41:341–349PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Asbach P, Klessen C, Koch M et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging findings of atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Clin Imaging 31:244–252PubMedCrossRef Asbach P, Klessen C, Koch M et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging findings of atypical focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Clin Imaging 31:244–252PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Christison-Lagay ER, Burrows PE, Alomari A et al (2007) Hepatic hemangiomas: subtype classification and development of a clinical practice algorithm and registry. J Pediatr Surg 42:62–67PubMedCrossRef Christison-Lagay ER, Burrows PE, Alomari A et al (2007) Hepatic hemangiomas: subtype classification and development of a clinical practice algorithm and registry. J Pediatr Surg 42:62–67PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Watanabe H et al (2010) Hepatic hemangioma and metastasis: differentiation with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI. AJR 195:941–946PubMedCrossRef Goshima S, Kanematsu M, Watanabe H et al (2010) Hepatic hemangioma and metastasis: differentiation with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced 3-T MRI. AJR 195:941–946PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Prokurat A, Kluge P, Kosciesza A et al (2002) Transitional liver cell tumors (TLCT) in older children and adolescents: a novel group of aggressive hepatic tumors expressing beta-catenin. Med Pediatr Oncol 39:510–518PubMedCrossRef Prokurat A, Kluge P, Kosciesza A et al (2002) Transitional liver cell tumors (TLCT) in older children and adolescents: a novel group of aggressive hepatic tumors expressing beta-catenin. Med Pediatr Oncol 39:510–518PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Hepatoblastoma imaging with gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI—typical, atypical, pre- and post-treatment evaluation
Authors
Arthur B. Meyers
Alexander J. Towbin
James I. Geller
Daniel J. Podberesky
Publication date
01-07-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 7/2012
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-012-2366-6

Other articles of this Issue 7/2012

Pediatric Radiology 7/2012 Go to the issue