Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Pediatric Radiology 4/2004

01-04-2004 | Original Article

Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting

Authors: Mark J. Halsted, Hari Kumar, Jason J. Paquin, Stacy A. Poe, Judy A. Bean, John M. Racadio, Janet L. Strife, Lane F. Donnelly

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 4/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are few data regarding the frequency and type of diagnostic errors made by radiology residents and fellows (“trainees”). However, increasing interest in reducing medical errors highlights the need to analyze which areas of medical knowledge are most problematic for physicians-in-training, including radiology trainees. Once these areas are identified, they can be emphasized during training.

Objective

To quantify the diagnostic errors made by radiology trainees interpreting radiographs from a pediatric emergency department.

Materials and methods

A total of 23,273 dictations of emergency radiographs performed over a 1-year period at a pediatric hospital were analyzed for corrections after staff interpretation and for type and incidence of missed abnormalities by radiology trainees. Errors were categorized by type of pathology and anatomic region.

Results

Of the 80 errors detected, 90% were false negatives and 69% were recurrent. Most errors (69%) involved the diagnosis of fractures and/or dislocations. Sixty-one percent of all recurrent errors involved buckle, Salter II, avulsion, and transverse fractures—yet these cases constituted only 3% of all cases seen during the study period.

Conclusion

The most common errors made by radiology trainees can be identified. By targeting these errors, training programs can improve the quality and relevance of the education they provide.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system, vol xxi. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 287 Kohn LT, Corrigan J, Donaldson MS (2000) To err is human: building a safer health system, vol xxi. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 287
2.
go back to reference Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. National Academy Press, Washington, DC
3.
go back to reference Rhea JT, Potsaid MS, DeLuca SA (1979) Errors of interpretation as elicited by a quality audit of an emergency radiology facility. Radiology 132:277–280PubMed Rhea JT, Potsaid MS, DeLuca SA (1979) Errors of interpretation as elicited by a quality audit of an emergency radiology facility. Radiology 132:277–280PubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Guly HR (2002) Injuries initially misdiagnosed as sprained wrist (beware the sprained wrist). Emerg Med J 19:41–42CrossRefPubMed Guly HR (2002) Injuries initially misdiagnosed as sprained wrist (beware the sprained wrist). Emerg Med J 19:41–42CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Ikegami H (2003) Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus: solutions to recognizing a frequently overlooked fracture. J Trauma 54:713–717PubMed Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Ikegami H (2003) Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus: solutions to recognizing a frequently overlooked fracture. J Trauma 54:713–717PubMed
7.
go back to reference Erly WK, Berger WG, Krupinski E, et al (2002) Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. AJNR 23:103–107 Erly WK, Berger WG, Krupinski E, et al (2002) Radiology resident evaluation of head CT scan orders in the emergency department. AJNR 23:103–107
8.
go back to reference Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al (2003) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21:2574–2582CrossRefPubMed Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L, et al (2003) Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 21:2574–2582CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Langendijk HA, Lamers RJ, ten Velde GP, et al (1998) Is the chest radiograph a reliable tool in the assessment of tumor response after radiotherapy in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:1037–1045CrossRefPubMed Langendijk HA, Lamers RJ, ten Velde GP, et al (1998) Is the chest radiograph a reliable tool in the assessment of tumor response after radiotherapy in nonsmall cell lung carcinoma? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:1037–1045CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Pujol JL, Demoly P, Daures JP, et al (1992) Chest tumor response measurement during lung cancer chemotherapy. Comparison between computed tomography and standard roentgenography. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:1149–1154PubMed Pujol JL, Demoly P, Daures JP, et al (1992) Chest tumor response measurement during lung cancer chemotherapy. Comparison between computed tomography and standard roentgenography. Am Rev Respir Dis 145:1149–1154PubMed
11.
go back to reference Lal NR, Murray UM, Eldevik OP, et al (2000) Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents. AJNR 21:124–129 Lal NR, Murray UM, Eldevik OP, et al (2000) Clinical consequences of misinterpretations of neuroradiologic CT scans by on-call radiology residents. AJNR 21:124–129
12.
go back to reference Carney E, Kempf J, DeCarvalho V, et al (2003) Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level I trauma center. AJR 181:367–373 Carney E, Kempf J, DeCarvalho V, et al (2003) Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level I trauma center. AJR 181:367–373
13.
go back to reference Wechsler RJ, Spettell CM, Kurtz AB, et al (1996) Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 199:717–720PubMed Wechsler RJ, Spettell CM, Kurtz AB, et al (1996) Effects of training and experience in interpretation of emergency body CT scans. Radiology 199:717–720PubMed
14.
go back to reference Roszler MH, McCarroll KA, Rashid T, et al (1991) Resident interpretation of emergency computed tomographic scans. Invest Radiol 26:374–376PubMed Roszler MH, McCarroll KA, Rashid T, et al (1991) Resident interpretation of emergency computed tomographic scans. Invest Radiol 26:374–376PubMed
15.
go back to reference Wysoki MG, Nassar CJ, Koenigsberg RA, et al (1998) Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. Radiology 208:125–128PubMed Wysoki MG, Nassar CJ, Koenigsberg RA, et al (1998) Head trauma: CT scan interpretation by radiology residents versus staff radiologists. Radiology 208:125–128PubMed
Metadata
Title
Diagnostic errors by radiology residents in interpreting pediatric radiographs in an emergency setting
Authors
Mark J. Halsted
Hari Kumar
Jason J. Paquin
Stacy A. Poe
Judy A. Bean
John M. Racadio
Janet L. Strife
Lane F. Donnelly
Publication date
01-04-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 4/2004
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1150-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2004

Pediatric Radiology 4/2004 Go to the issue