Top

Published in:

01-10-2012 | Invited Review

Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective

Authors: Hans-Göran Tiselius, Christian G. Chaussy

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 5/2012

Abstract

The present review summarizes the most important considerations and steps for an optimal result of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. The relationship between shockwave path, geometry and anatomical conditions is of utmost importance. Selection of appropriate treatment variables in terms of shockwave number, power and frequency, is an important prerequisite for proper disintegration and prevention of complications. Several supportive measures such as inversion therapy, citrate therapy, high diuresis, α-receptor antagonists, chemolysis and recurrence preventive measures are important parts of the management of this group of patients in order to avoid problems with residual fragments and new stone formation. Proper understanding of these factors as well as of the physics of shockwaves is necessary for a successful application of this non-invasive technology treatment concept.

Chaussy C, Schmiedt E, Jocham D, Brendel W, Forssman B, Walther V (1982) First clinical experience with extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. J Urol 127:417–420PubMed

Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmied E (1980) Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2(8207):1265–1268PubMedCrossRef

Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev Oct 7. CD007044

Jung H, Nørby B, Osther P (2006) Retrograde intrarenal stone surgery for extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy-resistant kidney stones. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40:380–384PubMedCrossRef

Penn HA, DeMarco RT, Sherman AK, Gatti JM, Murphy JP (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal calculi. J Urol 182:1824–1827PubMedCrossRef

Turna B, Ekren F, Nazli O, Akbay K, Altay B, Ozyurt C, Cikili N (2007) Comparative results of shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi in upper, middle, and lower calices. J Endourol 21:951–956PubMedCrossRef

Knoll T, Fritsche HM, Rassweiler JJ (2011) Medical and economic aspects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Aktuelle Urol 42:363–367PubMedCrossRef

Deem S, Defade B, Modak A, Emmett M, Martinez F, Davalos J (2011) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for moderate sized kidney stones. Urology 78:739–743PubMedCrossRef

Miernik A, Wilhelm K, Ardelt P, Bulla S, Schoenthaler M (2012) Modern urinary stone therapy: is the era of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at an end? Urol A 51:372–378CrossRef

10.

Bader MJ, Eisner B, Porpiglia F, Preminger GM, Tiselius HG (2012) Contemporary management of ureteral stones. Eur Urol 61:764–772PubMedCrossRef

11.

Tiselius H-G (2012) Shock-wave treatment of renal calculi (chap 51). In: Smith AD, Badlani GH, Preminger GM, Kavoussi LR (eds) Smith’s textbook of endourology, 3rd edn. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 576–597CrossRef

12.

Preminger G, Tiselius H-G, Assimos D, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci m, Knoll T, Lingeman J, Nakada S, Pearle M, Sarica K, Türk C, Wolf JJ (2007) 2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. Eur Urol 52:1610–1631PubMedCrossRef

13.

Tiselius HG (2005) Removal of ureteral stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopic procedures. What can we learn from the literature in terms of results and treatment efforts? Urol Res 33:185–190PubMedCrossRef

14.

Cass AS (1995) Comparison of first generation (Dornier HM3) and second generation (Medstone STS) lithotriptors: treatment results with 13,864 renal and ureteral calculi. J Urol 153:588–592PubMedCrossRef

15.

Graber SF, Danuser H, Hochreiter WW, Studer UE (2003) A prospective randomized trial comparing 2 lithotriptors for stone disintegration and induced renal trauma. J Urol 169:54–57PubMedCrossRef

16.

Aksoy Y, Ziypak T, Yapanoglu T (2009) Comparison of the effectiveness and safety of MPL 9000 and Lithostar Modularis shockwave lithotriptors: treatment results of 263 children. Urol Res 37:111–116PubMedCrossRef

17.

Egilmez T, Tekin MI, Gonen M, Kilinc F, Goren R, Ozkardes H (2007) Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: experience with 2670 patients. J Endourol 21:23–27PubMedCrossRef

18.

Seitz C, Martini T, Berner L, Signorello D, Galantini A, Pycha A (2008) Efficacy and treatment outcome of a new electromagnetic lithotripter for upper urinary tract calculi. J Endourol 22:2519–2525PubMedCrossRef

19.

Elkoushy MA, Hassan JA, Morehouse DD, Anidjar M, Andonian S (2011) Factors determining stone-free rate in shock wave lithotripsy using standard focus of Storz Modulith SLX-F2 lithotripter. Urology 78:759–763PubMedCrossRef

20.

Sighinolfi MC, Micali S, De Stefani S, Pini GA, Rivalta M, Cianci F, Bianchi G (2011) How effective is extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of ureteral stones with Dornier Lithotripter S EMSE 220F-XXP? A prospective and preliminary assessment. Surg Endosc 25:943–946PubMedCrossRef

21.

Rassweiler JJ, Knoll T, Köhrmann KU, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE, Cleveland RO, Bailey MR, Chaussy C (2011) Shock wave technology and application: an update. Eur Urol 59:784–796PubMedCrossRef

22.

Dhar NB, Thornton J, Karafa MT, B SS (2004) A multivariate analysis of risk factors associated with subcapsular hematoma formation following electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 172:2271–2274PubMedCrossRef

23.

Loske AM (2007) Shock wave physics for urologists. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico, pp 55–115 (ISBHN 978-970-32-4377-8)

24.

Fischer N, Rübben H, Hofsäss S, Forssmann B, Schockenhof B, Giani G (1987) Painless extra-corporal shock wave lithotripsy using the HM3 Dornier lithotripter. Urol A 26:29–32

25.

Honeck P, Häcker A, Alken P, Michel MS, Knoll T (2006) Shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for distal ureteral calculi: a prospective study. Urol Res 34:190–192PubMedCrossRef

26.

Wang R, Faerber GJ, Roberts WW, Morris DS, Wolf JS Jr (2009) Single-center North American experience with wolf Piezolith 3000 in management of urinary calculi. Urology 73:958–963PubMedCrossRef

27.

Zanetti G (2011) Ureteral stones: SWL treatment. Arch Ital Urol Androl 83:10–13PubMed

28.

Mezentsev VA (2009) Meta-analysis of the efficacy of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs vs. opioids for SWL using modern electromagnetic lithotripters. Int Braz J Urol 35:293–297PubMedCrossRef

29.

Bilir A, Gulec S, Turgut M, Cetinkaya D, Erkan A, Kurt I (2008) Lornoxicam in extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy: comparison with tenoxicam and placebo in terms of analgesic consumption. Scand J Urol Nephrol 42:143–147PubMedCrossRef

30.

Sizlan A, Cekmen N, Bedir S, Yanarates O, Ozhan MO, Cosar A (2011) Comparison of alfentanil and remifentanil infusions in combination with propofol for the outpatient extra-corporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Bratisl Lek Listy 112:380–384PubMed

31.

Tiselius HG (2008) How efficient is extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy with modern lithotripters for removal of ureteral stones? J Endourol 22:249–255PubMedCrossRef

32.

Tayib AM, Mosli HA, Farsi HM, Atwa MA, Saada HA (2008) Shock wave lithotripsy in patients with renal calculi. Saudi Med J 29:1180–1183PubMed

33.

Ozkan F, Erdemir F, Erkorkmaz U, Kaya Z, Senayli Y, Parlaktas BS (2011) Comparison of three different analgesic protocols during shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol (Nov 8, Epub ahead of print)

34.

Madbouly K, Alshahrani S, Al-Omair T, Matrafi HA, Mansi M (2011) Efficacy of local subcutaneous anesthesia versus intramuscular opioid sedation in extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: a randomized study. J Endourol 25:845–849PubMedCrossRef

35.

Kumar A, Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Wadhwa P (2007) Comparison of three analgesic regimens for pain control during shockwave lithotripsy using Dornier Delta Compact lithotripter: a randomized clinical trial. J Endourol 21:578–782PubMedCrossRef

36.

Seitz C, Fritsche HM, Siebert T, Martini T, Wieland WF, Pycha A, Burger M (2009) Novel electromagnetic lithotriptor for upper tract stones with and without a ureteral stent. J Urol 182:1424–1429PubMedCrossRef

37.

Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C (2009) New trends in shock wave application regarding technology and treatment strategy. In: Loske A (ed) New trends in shock wave application to medicine and biotechnology. Research Signpost, pp 1–19

38.

Bergsdorf T, Thuerhoff S, Chaussy C (2010) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. In: Chaussy C, Haupt G, Jocham D, Koermann KU (eds) Therapeutic energy applications in urology II. Thieme, New York, pp 8–16

39.

Zilberman D, Tsivian M, Lipkin ME, Ferrandino MN, Frush DP, Paulson DK, Preminger GM (2011) Low dose computerized tomography for detection of urolithiasis—its effectiveness in the setting of the urologic clinic. J Urol 185:910–914PubMedCrossRef

40.

Pichanlikov YA, Neucks JS, Von Der Haar RJ (2006) Air pockets trapped during routine coupling in dry head lithotripsy can significantly decrease the delivery of shock wave energy. J Urol 176:2706–2710CrossRef

41.

Jain A, Shah TK (2007) Effect of air bubbles in the coupling medium on efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 51:1680–1686PubMedCrossRef

42.

Bergsdorf T, Chaussy C, Thuerhoff S (2009) The significance of accurate shock wave coupling in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 23:1042

43.

Bohris C, Roosen A, Dickmann M, Hocaoglu Y, Sandner S, Bader M, Stief CG, Walther S (2012) Monitoring the coupling of the lithotripter therapy head with skin during routine shock wave lithotripsy with a surveillance camera. J Urol 187:157–163PubMedCrossRef

44.

Coleman AJ, Saunders J, Crum LA, Dyson M (1987) Acoustic cavitation generated by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripter. Ultrasound Med Biol 13:69–76PubMedCrossRef

45.

Pishchalnikov YA, McAteer JA, Williams JCJ, Pishchalnikova IV, Vonderhaar RJ (2006) Why stones break better at slow shockwave rates than at fast rates: in vitro study with a research electrohydraulic lithotripter. J Endourol 20:537–541PubMedCrossRef

46.

Pishchalnikov YA, Sapozhnikov OA, Bailey MR, Williams JC Jr, RO C, Colonius T, Crum LA, Evan AP, McAteer JA (2003) Cavitation bubble cluster activity in the breakage of kidney stones by lithotripter shockwaves. J Endourol 17:435–446PubMedCrossRef

47.

Li WM, Wu WJ, Chou YH, Liu CC, Wang CJ, Huang CH, Lee YC (2007) Clinical predictors of stone fragmentation using slow-rate shock wave lithotripsy. Urol Int 79:124–128PubMedCrossRef

48.

Yilmaz E, Batislam E, Basar M, Tuglu D, Mert C, Basar H (2005) Optimal frequency in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: prospective randomized study. Urology 66:1160–1164PubMedCrossRef

49.

Gillitzer R, Neisius A, Wöllner J, Hampel C, Brenner W, Bonilla AA, Thüroff J (2009) Low-frequency extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy improves renal pelvic stone disintegration in a pig model. BJU Int 103:1284–1288PubMedCrossRef

50.

Honey RJ, Schuler TD, Ghiculete D, PK T (2009) A randomized, double-blind trial to compare shock wave frequencies of 60 and 120 shocks per minute for upper ureteral stones. J Urol 182:1418–1423PubMedCrossRef

51.

Madbouly K, El-Tiraifi AM, Seida M, El-Faqih SR, Atassi R, Talic RF (2005) Slow versus fast shock wave lithotripsy rate for urolithiasis: a prospective randomized study. J Urol 173:127–130PubMedCrossRef

52.

Pace KT, Ghiculete D, Harju M, Honey RJ (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy at 60 or 120 shocks per minute: a randomized, double-blind trial. J Urol 174:595–599PubMedCrossRef

53.

Semins MJ, Trock BJ, Matlaga BR (2008) The effect of shock wave rate on the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. J Urol 179:194–197PubMedCrossRef

54.

Weiland D, Lee C, Ugarte R, Monga M (2007) Impact of shockwave coupling on efficacy of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 21:137–140PubMedCrossRef

55.

Evan AP, McAteer JA, Connors BA, Blomgren PM, Lingeman JE (2007) Renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy is significantly reduced by slowing the rate of shock wave delivery. BJU Int 100:624–627PubMedCrossRef

56.

Paterson R, Lifshitz DA, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, Connors BA, Fineberg NS, Williams JC Jr, McAteer JA (2002) Stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy is improved by slowing the shock wave rate: studies with a new animal model. J Urol 168:2211–2215PubMedCrossRef

57.

Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RW, Gao S, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy at 60 shock waves/min reduces renal injury in a porcine model. BJU Int 104(7):1004–1008PubMedCrossRef

58.

McAteer JA, Evan AP, Williams JCJr, Lingeman JE (2009) Treatment protocols to reduce renal injury during shock wave lithotripsy. Curr Opin Urol 19:192–195PubMedCrossRef

59.

Paterson R, Lifshitz D, Kuo R, Siqueira TJ, Lingeman J (2002) Shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for renal calculi. J Urol 28:291–301

60.

Handa RK, Bailey MR, Paun M, Gao S, Connors BA, Willis LR, Evan AP (2009) Pretreatment with low-energy shock waves induces renal vasoconstriction during standard shock wave lithotripsy (SWL): a treatment protocol known to reduce SWL-induced renal injury. BJU Int 103:1270–1274PubMedCrossRef

61.

Connors BA, Evan AP, Blomgren PM, Handa RK, Willis LR, Gao S (2009) Effect of initial shock wave voltage on shock wave lithotripsy-induced lesion size during step-wise voltage ramping. BJU Int 103:104–107PubMedCrossRef

62.

Zhou Y, Cocks FH, Preminger GM, Zhong P (2004) The effect of treatment strategy on stone comminution efficiency in shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 172:349–354PubMedCrossRef

63.

Ringdén I, Tiselius HG (2007) Composition and clinically determined hardness of urinary tract stones. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41:316–323PubMedCrossRef

64.

Landau E, Shenfeld O, Pode D, Shapiro A, Meretyk S, Katz G, Katz R, Duvdevani M, Hardak B, Cipele H, Hidas G, Yutkin V, Gofrit O (2009) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in prepubertal children: 22-year experience at a single institution with a single lithotriptor. J Urol 182(Suppl 4):1835–1839PubMedCrossRef

65.

Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FTJ, Nakada SY (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944PubMedCrossRef

66.

Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J, Ghiculete D, Chung DG, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT (2008) Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 72:765–769PubMedCrossRef

67.

Ather M, Shrestha B, Mehmood A (2009) Does ureteral stenting prior to shock wave lithotripsy influence the need for intervention in steinstrasse and related complications? Urol Int 83:222–225PubMedCrossRef

68.

Tiselius H-G, Alken P, Buck C, Gallucci M, Knoll T, Sarica K, Türk C (2009) Guidelines on urolithiasis. European Association of Urology Guidelines 2009 edition

69.

Vicentini FC, Mazzucchi E, Brito AH, Chedid Neto EA, Danilovic A, Srougi M (2011) Adjuvant tamsulosin or nifedipine after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for renal stones: a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Urology 78:1016–1021PubMedCrossRef

70.

Falahatkar S, Khosropanah I, Vajary AD, Bateni ZH, Khosropanah D, Allahkha HA (2011) Is there a role for tamsulosin after shock wave lithotripsy in the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi? J Endourol 25:495–498PubMedCrossRef

71.

Hussein MM (2010) Does tamsulosin increase stone clearance after shockwave lithotripsy of renal stones? A prospective, randomized controlled study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 44:27–31PubMedCrossRef

72.

Zhu Y, Duijvesz D, Rovers MM, Lock TM (2010) alpha-Blockers to assist stone clearance after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 106:256–261PubMedCrossRef

73.

Naja V, Agarwal MM, Mandal AK, Singh SK, Mavuduru R, Kumar S, Acharya NC, Gupta N (2008) Tamsulosin facilitates earlier clearance of stone fragments and reduces pain after shockwave lithotripsy for renal calculi: results from an open-label randomized study. Urology 72:1006–1011PubMedCrossRef

74.

Hiros MSH, Selimovic M, Sadovic S (2011) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and intravenous contrast media application for localization of radiolucent calculi. Med Arch 65:86–88

75.

Tiselius H-G (2011) Chemolytic treatment of patients with urinary tract stones. In: Rao NP, Preminger GM, Kavanagh JP (eds) Urinary tract stone disease. Springer, London, pp 627–637

76.

Tiselius H-G, Aronsen T, Bohgard S, Fredriksson M, Jonason EM, Olsson M, Sjöström K (2010) Is high diuresis an important prerequisite for successful SWL-disintegration of ureteral stones? Urol Res 38:143–146PubMedCrossRef

77.

Minkov N, Shumleva V, Pironkov A, Gotsev G, Voinikova I, Nicolov N (1988) A new method for the management of ureteral colic after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol 20:251–255PubMedCrossRef

78.

Robert M, Marotta J, Rakotomalala E, Muir G, Grasset D (1997) Piezoelectric extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of lower pole nephrolithiasis. Eur Urol 32:301–304PubMed

79.

Sugihara T, Yasunaga H, Horiguchi H, Nishimatsu H, Hirano Y, Matsuda S, Homma Y (2012) Renal haemorrhage risk after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: results from the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination Database. BJU Int (Epub ahead of print)

80.

Collado Serra A, Huguet Pérez J, Monreal García de Vicuña F, Rousaud Barón A, Izquierdo de la Torre F, Vicente Rodríguez J (1999) Renal hematoma as a complication of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Scand J Urol Nephrol 33:171–175

81.

Lemon SJ Jr, Crannage AJ (2011) Pharmacologic anticoagulation reversal in the emergency department. Adv Emerg Nurs J 33:212–223PubMed

82.

Alsaikhan B, Andonian S (2011) Shock wave lithotripsy in patients requiring anticoagulation or antiplatelet agents. Can Urol Assoc J 5:53–57PubMedCrossRef

83.

Lingeman JE, Woods JR, Nelson DR (1995) Commentary on ESWL and blood pressure. J Urol 154:2–4PubMedCrossRef

84.

Strohmaier WL, Bichler KH, Koch J, Balk N, Wilbert DM (1993) Protective effect of verapamil on shock wave induced renal tubular dysfunction. J Urol 150:27–29PubMed

85.

Strohmaier WL, Koch J, Balk N, Wilbert DM, Bichler KH (1994) Limitation of shock-wave-induced renal tubular dysfunction by nifedipine. Eur Urol 25:99–104PubMed

86.

Sarica K, Yencilek F (2008) Prevention of shockwave induced functional and morphological alterations: an overview. Arch Ital Urol Androl 80:27–33PubMed

87.

Laerum E, Ommundsen O, Gronseth J, Christiansen A, Fagertun H (1995) Oral diclophenac in the prophylactic treatment of recurrent renal colic. Eur Urol 28:108–111PubMed

88.

Seitz C, Liatsikos E, Porpiglia F, Tiselius H-G, Zwergel U (2009) Medical therapy to facilitate the passage of stones: what is the evidence? Eur Urol 56:455–471PubMedCrossRef

89.

Osman M, Alfano Y, Kamp S, Haecker A, Alken P, Michel M, Knoll T (2005) 5-year-follow-up of patients with clinically insignificant residual fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. Eur Urol 47:860–864PubMedCrossRef

90.

Rassweiler J, Renner C, Chaussy C, Thüroff S (2001) Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: an update. Eur Urol 39:187–199PubMedCrossRef

91.

Tiselius H, Hellgren E, Andersson A, Borrud-Ohlsson A, Eriksson I (1999) Minimally invasive treatment of infection staghorn stones with shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis. Scand J Urol Nephrol 33:286–290PubMedCrossRef

92.

Ahlstrand C, Tiselius H (1993) Treatment of cystine urolithiasis by a combination of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and chemolysis. J Stone Dis 5:32–38PubMed

93.

Tiselius HG (2004) Recurrence prevention in patients with urinary tract stone disease. Sci World J 31:417–425

94.

Jarrar K, Boedeker R, Weidner W (1996) Struvite stones: long term follow up under metaphylaxis. Ann Urol (Paris) 30:112–117

95.

Tiselius H-G (2003) Epidemiology and medical management of stone disease. BJU Int 91:758–767PubMedCrossRef

96.

Tiselius HG (2010) New horizons in the management of patients with cystinuria. Curr Opin Urol 20(2):169–173PubMedCrossRef

97.

Hesse A, Tiselius H, Siener R, Hoppe R (2009) Crystals in the urinary sediment. In: Hesse A, Tiselius H, Siener R, Hoppe R (eds) Urinary stones, diagnosis, treatment and prevention of recurrence Karger, Basel, pp 213–215

98.

Sheir K, Mansour O, Madbouly K, Elsobky E, Abdel-Khalek M (2005) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography. Urol Res 33:99–104PubMedCrossRef

99.

Chevreau G, Troccaz J, Conort P, Renard-Penna R, Mallet A, Daudon M, Mozer P (2009) Estimation of urinary stone composition by automated processing of CT images. Urol Res 37:241–245PubMedCrossRef

100.

El-Nahas AR, El-Assmy AM, Mansour O, Sheir KZ (2007) A prospective multivariate analysis of factors predicting stone disintegration by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: the value of high-resolution noncontrast computed tomography. Eur Urol 51:1688–1693PubMedCrossRef

101.

Weld KJ, Montiglio C, Morris MS, Bush AC, Cespedes RD (2007) Shock wave lithotripsy success for renal stones based on patient and stone computed tomography characteristics. Urology 70:1043–1046PubMedCrossRef

102.

Zarse CA, McAteer JA, Tann M, Sommer AJ, Kim SC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, Lingeman JE, Evan AP, Williams JCJ (2004) Helical computed tomography accurately reports urinary stone composition using attenuation values: in vitro verification using high-resolution micro-computed tomography calibrated to Fourier transform infrared microspectroscopy. Urology 63:828–833PubMedCrossRef

103.

Tiselius HG (2009) Considerations on the management of patients with residual stone material after active removal of urinary tract stones. Turk J Urol 35:304–309

104.

Zilberman DE, Preminger GM (2009) Long-term results of percutaneous nephrolithotomy: does prophylactic medical stone management make a difference? J Endourol 23:1773–1776PubMedCrossRef

105.

Ahlstrand C, Tiselius HG (1987) Urine composition and stone formation during treatment with acetazolamide. Scand J Urol Nephrol 21:225–228PubMedCrossRef

106.

Pak CY (1999) Medical prevention of renal stone disease. Nephron 81(Suppl 1):60–65PubMedCrossRef

107.

Escribano J, Balaguer A, Pagone F, Feliu A, Roqué I, Figuls M (2009) Pharmacological interventions for preventing complications in idiopathic hypercalciuria. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 21:CD004754

108.

Tiselius HG (2005) Aetiological factors in stone formation. In: Davison AM, Cameron JS, Grünfeld J-P, Ritz E, Winearls CG, van Ypersele C (eds) Oxford textbook of clinical nephrology, 3rd edn edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1199–1223

109.

Lojanapiwat B, Tanthanuch M, Pripathanont C, Ratchanon S, Srinualnad S, Taweemonkongsap T, Kanyok S, Lammongkolkul S (2011) Alkaline citrate reduces stone recurrence and regrowth after shockwave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Braz J Urol 37:611–616PubMedCrossRef

110.

Arzoz-Fabregas M, Ibarz-Servio L, Blasco-Casares F, Ramon-Dalmau M, Ruiz-Marcellan FJ (2009) Can infundibular height predict the clearance of lower pole calyceal stone after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy? Int Braz J Urol 35:140–149PubMedCrossRef

111.

Danuser H, Müller R, Descoeudres B, Dobry E, Studer UE (2007) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower calyx calculi: how much is treatment outcome influenced by the anatomy of the collecting system? Eur Urol 52:539–546PubMedCrossRef

112.

Demikesen O, Yaycioglu O, Onal B, Kalkan M, Tansu N, Yalcin V, Kural AR, Solok V (2001) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for stones in abnormal urinary tract: analysis of results and comparison with normal urinary tracts. J Endourol 15:681–685CrossRef

113.

Elbahnasy AM, Clayman RV, Shalhav AI, Hoenig DM, Chandhoke PS, Lingeman JE, Denstedt JD, Kahn R, Assimos DG, Nakada SY (1998) Lower-pole caliceal stone clearance after shock wave lithotripsy, percutaneous nephrolithotomy, and flexible ureteroscopy: impact of radiographic spatial anatomy. J Endourol 12:113–119PubMedCrossRef

114.

Keeley FX, Moussa SA, Smith G, Tolley DA (1999) Clearance of lower-pole stones following shock wave lithotripsy: effect of the infundibulopelvic angle. Eur Urol 36:371–375PubMedCrossRef

115.

Leykamm L, Tiselius HG (2007) Observations on intrarenal geometry of the lower-caliceal system in relation to clearance of stone fragments after extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 21:386–392PubMedCrossRef

116.

Ng CF, Wong A, Tolley DA (2008) A single-center experience of the usefulness of caliceal-pelvic height in three different lithotripters. J Endourol 22:1409–1415PubMedCrossRef

117.

Sampaio FJ, Aragao AH (1994) Limitations of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for lower caliceal stones: anatomic insight. J Endourol 8:241–247PubMedCrossRef

118.

Streem S (1995) Long-term incidence and risk factors for recurrent stones following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy or percutaneous nephrostolithotomy/extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for infection related calculi. J Urol 153:584–587PubMedCrossRef

119.

Albanis S, Ather HM, Papatsoris AG, Masood J, Staios D, Sheikh T, Akhtar S, Buchholz N (2009) Inversion, hydration and diuresis during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: does it improve the stone-free rate for lower pole stone clearance? Urol Int 83:211–216PubMedCrossRef

120.

Chiong E, Hwee ST, Kay LM, Liang S, Kamaraj R, Esuvaranathan K (2005) Randomized controlled study of mechanical percussion, diuresis, and inversion therapy to assist passage of lower pole renal calculi after shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 65:1070–1074PubMedCrossRef

121.

Shah A, Harper JD, Cunitz BW, Wang YN, Paun M, Simon JC, Lu W, Kaczkowski PJ, Bailey MR (2012) Focused ultrasound to expel calculi from the kidney. J Urol 187:739–743PubMedCrossRef

122.

Soygur T, Arikan N, Kilic O, Suer E (2006) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in children: evaluation of the results considering the need for auxiliary procedures. J Pediatr Urol 2:459–463PubMedCrossRef

123.

Robertson WG (2006) Is prevention of stone recurrence financially worthwhile? Urol Res 34:157–161PubMedCrossRef

Title: Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective
Authors: Hans-Göran Tiselius
Christian G. Chaussy
Publication date: 01-10-2012
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Urolithiasis / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-012-0485-z

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Aspects on how extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy should be carried out in order to be maximally effective

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Spontaneous nephrocolic fistula secondary to a staghorn calculus

Effects of alfuzosin with methylprednisolone for spontaneous expulsion and pain control of lower ureteral stone

The efficacy and safety of ureteroscopy for ureteral calculi in pregnancy: our experience in 32 patients

Comparison of conventional radiography combined with ultrasonography versus nonenhanced helical computed tomography in evaluation of patients with renal colic

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys related to renal stone disease

Erratum to: Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys related to renal stone disease