Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 2/2005

01-05-2005 | Original Paper

Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography

Authors: Khaled Z. Sheir, Osama Mansour, Khaled Madbouly, Emad Elsobky, Mohamed Abdel-Khalek

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 2/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Various techniques for noncontrast spiral computerized tomography (NCCT) were utilized for the determination of the Hounsefield unit (HU) values of various types of urinary calculi with the aim of determining the best technique for distinguishing various stones compositions. A total of 130 urinary stones, obtained from patients who underwent open surgery, were scanned with a multidetector row scanner using 1.25 mm collimation at two energy levels of 100 and 120 kV at 240 mA. Two post-scanning protocols were used for the HU value assignment, tissue and bone windows, for both kV values. In both protocols, three transverse planes were defined in each stone, one near the top, one in the middle, and one near the bottom. Three regions of interest (ROI) were obtained in each plane. The absolute HU value was determined by three methods: the mean of the nine ROI, the mean of the central three ROI, and the central ROI in the middle plane. Determination of the stones’ composition was performed using the absolute HU value measured at 120 kV, the dual CT values (HU values at 100 kV−HU values at 120 kV), and HU values/stone volume ratio (HU density). All stones were analyzed by x-ray diffraction to determine their chemical composition. After the exclusion of groups with few calculi, 47 pure stones [25 uric acid (UA), 15 calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM), seven struvite], and 60 mixed stones [15 COM 60–90%+hydroxyl apatite (HA), 14 COM 40–90%+UA, 21 UA+COM <40%, ten mixed struvite+COM+hydroxyl apatite] were included in the statistical analysis. From the least to the most dense, the pure stone types were UA, struvite, COM. Mixed UA+COM<40% calculi were less dense but insignificantly different from pure UA, while when the COM ratio was ≥40% their density became higher than and significantly different from pure UA, and less than but not significantly differentiated from pure COM. Mixed COM+HA were the most dense stones. Using the absolute HU values at 120 kV and HU density, we could distinguish, with statistical significance, all pure types from each other, pure UA from all mixed calculi except UA+COM <40%, pure COM from mixed UA+COM <40%, and pure struvite from all mixed stones except mixed struvite stones. Dual CT values were not as good as absolute HU values and HU density in the determination of stone composition. These results demonstrate that absolute HU values and HU density derived from CT scanning using a small collimation size could uncover statistically significant differences among all pure and most of the mixed urinary stones. This permits more accuracy in the prediction of stone composition. Moreover, this technique permits diagnostic conclusions on the basis of single CT evaluation.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT (1996) Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 97 Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S, Rosenfield AT (1996) Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166: 97
2.
go back to reference Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159: 735CrossRefPubMed Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159: 735CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Youssefzadeh D, Katz DS, Lumerman JH (1999) Unenhanced helical CT in the evaluation of suspected renal colic. AUA Update Series 18: lesson 26 Youssefzadeh D, Katz DS, Lumerman JH (1999) Unenhanced helical CT in the evaluation of suspected renal colic. AUA Update Series 18: lesson 26
4.
go back to reference Federle MP, McAninch JW, Kaiser JA, Goodman PC, Roberts J, Mall JC (1981) Computed tomography of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 136: 255 Federle MP, McAninch JW, Kaiser JA, Goodman PC, Roberts J, Mall JC (1981) Computed tomography of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 136: 255
5.
go back to reference Newhouse JH, Prien EL, Amis ESJr, Dretler SP, Pfister RC (1984) Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142: 545 Newhouse JH, Prien EL, Amis ESJr, Dretler SP, Pfister RC (1984) Computed tomographic analysis of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 142: 545
6.
go back to reference Ramakumar S, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Bender CE, Erickson SB, Wilson DM, Segura JW (1999) Prediction of stone composition from plain radiographs: a prospective study. J Endourol 13: 397 Ramakumar S, Patterson DE, LeRoy AJ, Bender CE, Erickson SB, Wilson DM, Segura JW (1999) Prediction of stone composition from plain radiographs: a prospective study. J Endourol 13: 397
7.
go back to reference Mitchenson HD, Zamenhof RG, Bankoff MS, Prien EL (1983) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. J Urol 130: 814 Mitchenson HD, Zamenhof RG, Bankoff MS, Prien EL (1983) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by computerized tomography. J Urol 130: 814
8.
go back to reference Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159: 673CrossRefPubMed Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159: 673CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58: 170CrossRefPubMed Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58: 170CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak, M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55: 816CrossRefPubMed Nakada SY, Hoff DG, Attai S, Blankenbaker D, Pozniak, M (2000) Determination of stone composition by noncontrast spiral computed tomography in the clinical setting. Urology 55: 816CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Saw KC, McAteer JA, Mange AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE, Williams JC (2000) Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR Am Roentgenol 175: 329 Saw KC, McAteer JA, Mange AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE, Williams JC (2000) Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR Am Roentgenol 175: 329
12.
go back to reference Hillman BJ, Drach GW, Tracy P, Gaines JA (1984) Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi. AJR Am Roentgenol 142: 549 Hillman BJ, Drach GW, Tracy P, Gaines JA (1984) Computed tomographic analysis of renal calculi. AJR Am Roentgenol 142: 549
Metadata
Title
Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography
Authors
Khaled Z. Sheir
Osama Mansour
Khaled Madbouly
Emad Elsobky
Mohamed Abdel-Khalek
Publication date
01-05-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 2/2005
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-004-0454-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2005

Urolithiasis 2/2005 Go to the issue