Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 3/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Paper

Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors?

Authors: Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl, Tuna Mut, Patrick Krombach, Maurice Stephan Michel, Thomas Knoll

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

New generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer an improved deflection mechanism and a stiffer sheath compared to their predecessors. We aimed to determine if these improvements in design lead to a higher efficacy in the treatment of nephrolithiasis. Ninety patients with upper urinary tract calculi were included into a retrospective analysis. Twenty-nine cases were treated with the conventional flexible ureterorenoscope (11274 AA, Karl Storz Endoscopy, Germany) and 61 cases were treated with the new generation device (Flex-X, Karl Storz Endoscopy). Patients’ and stone characteristics, intraoperative data, treatment success and complications were retrieved from the charts and compared between the two groups. Preoperative data were comparable in both groups. Whereas stone access was also comparable (97 vs. 100%; n.s.), immediate treatment success was significantly higher for the new flexible scope (70 vs. 38%; p = 0.003). For the subgroup of lower pole stones, stone access was possible in 94 versus 100% (n.s.) and treatment success was 31 versus 69% (p = 0.0004) for the conventional and the new generation device, respectively. No major complications were observed, minor complications were comparable in both groups. Our study suggests an advantage of the new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes compared to their predecessors. They offer an increased stone free rate especially in the treatment of lower pole stones. It seems therefore advisable to switch to the latest generation flexible devices.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T et al (1971) Clinical applications of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscopy. Urol Int 26:97–104PubMedCrossRef Takayasu H, Aso Y, Takagi T et al (1971) Clinical applications of fiber-optic pyeloureteroscopy. Urol Int 26:97–104PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E et al (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164:1164–1168PubMedCrossRef Afane JS, Olweny EO, Bercowsky E et al (2000) Flexible ureteroscopes: a single center evaluation of the durability and function of the new endoscopes smaller than 9Fr. J Urol 164:1164–1168PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Johnson GB, Portela D, Grasso M (2006) Advanced ureteroscopy: wireless and sheathless. J Endourol 20:552–555PubMedCrossRef Johnson GB, Portela D, Grasso M (2006) Advanced ureteroscopy: wireless and sheathless. J Endourol 20:552–555PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Wendt-Nordahl G, Trojan L, Alken P et al (2007) Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application. J Endourol 21:1439–1444PubMedCrossRef Wendt-Nordahl G, Trojan L, Alken P et al (2007) Ureteroscopy for stone treatment using new 270 degrees semiflexible endoscope: in vitro, ex vivo, and clinical application. J Endourol 21:1439–1444PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K et al (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68:276–279PubMedCrossRef Traxer O, Dubosq F, Jamali K et al (2006) New-generation flexible ureterorenoscopes are more durable than previous ones. Urology 68:276–279PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Johnson GB, Grasso M (2004) Exaggerated primary endoscope deflection: initial clinical experience with prototype flexible ureteroscopes. BJU Int 93:109–114PubMedCrossRef Johnson GB, Grasso M (2004) Exaggerated primary endoscope deflection: initial clinical experience with prototype flexible ureteroscopes. BJU Int 93:109–114PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Pasqui F, Dubosq F, Tchala K et al (2004) Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. Eur Urol 45:58–64PubMedCrossRef Pasqui F, Dubosq F, Tchala K et al (2004) Impact on active scope deflection and irrigation flow of all endoscopic working tools during flexible ureteroscopy. Eur Urol 45:58–64PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chiu KY, Cai Y, Marcovich R et al (2004) Are new-generation flexible ureteroscopes better than their predecessors? BJU Int 93:115–119PubMedCrossRef Chiu KY, Cai Y, Marcovich R et al (2004) Are new-generation flexible ureteroscopes better than their predecessors? BJU Int 93:115–119PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cannon GM, Smaldone MC, Wu HY et al (2007) Ureteroscopic management of lower-pole stones in a pediatric population. J Endourol 21:1179–1182PubMedCrossRef Cannon GM, Smaldone MC, Wu HY et al (2007) Ureteroscopic management of lower-pole stones in a pediatric population. J Endourol 21:1179–1182PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Grasso M, Ficazzola M (1999) Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. J Urol 162:1904–1908PubMedCrossRef Grasso M, Ficazzola M (1999) Retrograde ureteropyeloscopy for lower pole caliceal calculi. J Urol 162:1904–1908PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Portis AJ, Rygwall R, Holtz C et al (2006) Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup. J Urol 175:2129–2133PubMedCrossRef Portis AJ, Rygwall R, Holtz C et al (2006) Ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for upper urinary tract calculi with active fragment extraction and computerized tomography followup. J Urol 175:2129–2133PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT et al (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater-is this the new frontier? J Urol 179:981–984PubMedCrossRef Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT et al (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater-is this the new frontier? J Urol 179:981–984PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Michel MS, Knoll T, Ptaschnyk T et al (2002) Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. Eur Urol 41:312–316PubMedCrossRef Michel MS, Knoll T, Ptaschnyk T et al (2002) Flexible ureterorenoscopy for the treatment of lower pole calyx stones: influence of different lithotripsy probes and stone extraction tools on scope deflection and irrigation flow. Eur Urol 41:312–316PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Ankem MK, Lowry PS, Slovick RW et al (2004) Clinical utility of dual active deflection flexible ureteroscope during upper tract ureteropyeloscopy. Urology 64:430–434PubMedCrossRef Ankem MK, Lowry PS, Slovick RW et al (2004) Clinical utility of dual active deflection flexible ureteroscope during upper tract ureteropyeloscopy. Urology 64:430–434PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Do new generation flexible ureterorenoscopes offer a higher treatment success than their predecessors?
Authors
Gunnar Wendt-Nordahl
Tuna Mut
Patrick Krombach
Maurice Stephan Michel
Thomas Knoll
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0331-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Urolithiasis 3/2011 Go to the issue