Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Urolithiasis 3/2011

01-06-2011 | Original Paper

Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supin or prone

Authors: Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu, Mustafa Burak Hoscan, Mehmet Ilteris Tekin, Tufan Cicek, Bulent Ozturk, Hakan Ozkardes

Published in: Urolithiasis | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Shock Wave Lithotripsy (SWL) has become the preferred first-line approach to most patients with symptomatic urolithiasis. The purpose of this study is to assess the ideal patient position during SWL for the treatment of distal ureter stones. A total of 342 patients included in this retrospective study. 148 (108 men, 40 women) patients were included in the first group and were treated in supine position. The remaining 194 (143 men, 51 women) patients were included to second group and were treated in prone position. This study designed retrospectively. The procedure was accepted as a success if the patient was stone free or had only clinically insignificant fragments (≤3 mm) for 3 months or more after the last SWL session. Before SWL, the mean is one area in the first group was 61.32 mm2 while the mean stone area in the second group was 59.04 mm2 (p = 0.208). Mean energy, Mean energy maximum and mean number of applied shock waves of the first group was 4.65, 3.19 and 3,960, respectively. The same parameters in second group were 4.26, 3.03 and 2,953, respectively. These results show that there are statistically significant differences between two groups with respect to mean energy, mean energy maximum and mean number of applied shock waves (p = 0.003, p = 0.010, p = 0.000, respectively). Success rate was 85.1% in group 1 and 72.7% in group 2 (p = 0.006). Our results suggest that supine position is effective and better than prone position for SWL in patients with distal ureteric stones.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E (1980) Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2:1265–1268PubMedCrossRef Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmiedt E (1980) Extracorporeally induced destruction of kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2:1265–1268PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lingeman JE, Woods J, Toth PD et al (1989) The role of lithotripsy and its side effects. J Urol 141:793–797PubMed Lingeman JE, Woods J, Toth PD et al (1989) The role of lithotripsy and its side effects. J Urol 141:793–797PubMed
3.
go back to reference Holden D, Rao PN (1989) Ureteral stones: the results of primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 142:37–39PubMed Holden D, Rao PN (1989) Ureteral stones: the results of primary in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 142:37–39PubMed
4.
go back to reference Miller K, Fuchs G, Rassweiler J et al (1985) Treatment of ureteral stone disease: the role of ESWL and endourology. World J Urol 3:53–57CrossRef Miller K, Fuchs G, Rassweiler J et al (1985) Treatment of ureteral stone disease: the role of ESWL and endourology. World J Urol 3:53–57CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Graff J, Pastor J, Funke PJ et al (1988) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases. J Urol 139:513–516PubMed Graff J, Pastor J, Funke PJ et al (1988) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones: a retrospective analysis of 417 cases. J Urol 139:513–516PubMed
6.
go back to reference Egilmez T, Tekin MI, Gonen M et al (2007) Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: experience with 2670 patients. J Endourol 21:23–27PubMedCrossRef Egilmez T, Tekin MI, Gonen M et al (2007) Efficacy and safety of a new-generation shockwave lithotripsy machine in the treatment of single renal or ureteral stones: experience with 2670 patients. J Endourol 21:23–27PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Jenkins AD, Gillenwater JY (1988) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the prone position. Treatment of stones in the distal ureter or anomalous kidney. J Urol 139:911–915PubMed Jenkins AD, Gillenwater JY (1988) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the prone position. Treatment of stones in the distal ureter or anomalous kidney. J Urol 139:911–915PubMed
8.
go back to reference Ather MH (2001) Optimal minimally invasive treatment for ureteric stone. Braz J Urol 27:128–132 Ather MH (2001) Optimal minimally invasive treatment for ureteric stone. Braz J Urol 27:128–132
9.
go back to reference Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al (1997) Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158:1915–1921PubMedCrossRef Segura JW, Preminger GM, Assimos DG et al (1997) Ureteral Stones Clinical Guidelines Panel summary report on the management of ureteral calculi. J Urol 158:1915–1921PubMedCrossRef
10.
11.
go back to reference Braun PM, Weber A, Michel MS et al (1998) Are auxiliary measures necessary in therapy of urolithiasis in children? J Endourol 12:1–8CrossRef Braun PM, Weber A, Michel MS et al (1998) Are auxiliary measures necessary in therapy of urolithiasis in children? J Endourol 12:1–8CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Göktaş S, Peşkircioğlu L, Tahmaz L et al (2000) Is there significance of the choice of prone versus supine position in the treatment of proximal ureter stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Eur Urol 38:618–620PubMedCrossRef Göktaş S, Peşkircioğlu L, Tahmaz L et al (2000) Is there significance of the choice of prone versus supine position in the treatment of proximal ureter stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? Eur Urol 38:618–620PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Guntekin E, Kukul E, Kayacan Z et al (1994) Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi. Int Urol Neph 26:13–16CrossRef Guntekin E, Kukul E, Kayacan Z et al (1994) Morbidity associated with patient positioning in extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of distal ureteral calculi. Int Urol Neph 26:13–16CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kurtz V, Müller-Sorg M, Federmann G (1999) Perforation of the small intestine after nephro-uretero-lithotripsy by ESWL—a rare complication. Chirung 70:306–307 Kurtz V, Müller-Sorg M, Federmann G (1999) Perforation of the small intestine after nephro-uretero-lithotripsy by ESWL—a rare complication. Chirung 70:306–307
15.
go back to reference Ahlawat RK, Bhandari M, Kumar A et al (1991) Treatment of ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the lithostar device. J Urol 146:737–741PubMed Ahlawat RK, Bhandari M, Kumar A et al (1991) Treatment of ureteral calculi with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy using the lithostar device. J Urol 146:737–741PubMed
16.
go back to reference Amiel J, Touabi K, Peyrottes A et al (1990) Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy in the treatment of calculi of the ureter. Apropos of a series of 143 cases. Ann Urol (Paris) 24:135–139 Amiel J, Touabi K, Peyrottes A et al (1990) Extracorporeal piezoelectric lithotripsy in the treatment of calculi of the ureter. Apropos of a series of 143 cases. Ann Urol (Paris) 24:135–139
17.
go back to reference Jenkins AD (1988) Dornier extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Urol Clin North Am 15:377–384PubMed Jenkins AD (1988) Dornier extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy for ureteral stones. Urol Clin North Am 15:377–384PubMed
18.
go back to reference Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N et al (2007) Comparison of the effect of body position, prone or supine, on the result of extracorpreal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with stones in the proximal ureter. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 18(2):200–205PubMed Zomorrodi A, Elahian A, Ghorbani N et al (2007) Comparison of the effect of body position, prone or supine, on the result of extracorpreal shock wave lithotripsy in patients with stones in the proximal ureter. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 18(2):200–205PubMed
19.
go back to reference Ackaert KS, Dik P, Lock MT et al (1989) Treatment of distal ureteral stones in the horse riding position. J Urol 142:955–957PubMed Ackaert KS, Dik P, Lock MT et al (1989) Treatment of distal ureteral stones in the horse riding position. J Urol 142:955–957PubMed
20.
go back to reference Becht E, Moll V, Neisius D et al (1988) Treatment of prevesical ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 139:916–918PubMed Becht E, Moll V, Neisius D et al (1988) Treatment of prevesical ureteral calculi by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Urol 139:916–918PubMed
21.
go back to reference Kose AC, Demirbas M (2004) The ‘modified prone position’: a new approach for treating pre-vesical stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. BJU Int 93:369–373PubMedCrossRef Kose AC, Demirbas M (2004) The ‘modified prone position’: a new approach for treating pre-vesical stones with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. BJU Int 93:369–373PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Shock wave lithotripsy for distal ureteric stones: supin or prone
Authors
Mustafa Okan Istanbulluoglu
Mustafa Burak Hoscan
Mehmet Ilteris Tekin
Tufan Cicek
Bulent Ozturk
Hakan Ozkardes
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Urolithiasis / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 2194-7228
Electronic ISSN: 2194-7236
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0322-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Urolithiasis 3/2011 Go to the issue