Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Osteoporosis International 4/2018

Open Access 01-04-2018 | Original Article

Bisphosphonate use after clinical fracture and risk of new fracture

Authors: J. Bergman, A. Nordström, P. Nordström

Published in: Osteoporosis International | Issue 4/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Summary

Among older adults with a previous fracture, treatment for osteoporosis was initially associated with a higher risk of new fracture. However, the relative risk of new fracture decreased over time, a trend that is consistent with a beneficial effect, as treatment for osteoporosis is prescribed to reduce high fracture risks.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to examine whether bisphosphonate use is associated with a lower risk of new fracture after a clinical fracture in older adults.

Methods

Data were available for 3,329,400 adults in Sweden who were aged ≥ 50 years between 2006 and 2011. During this period, 260,353 sustained a clinical fracture and were naïve to bisphosphonates at the time. Those who subsequently received a bisphosphonate were matched to up to three others on sex, year of birth, and type and year of initial fracture. The final cohort comprised 83,104 adults (26.3% bisphosphonate users).

Results

During the period from initial fracture to initiation of bisphosphonate treatment, the incidence rate of any new clinical fracture was higher in those who later became bisphosphonate users than in those who remained nonusers (175.1 vs. 75.9 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio 2.30, 95% confidence interval 2.19 to 2.41). Similarly, during the first 6 months of treatment, the incidence rate was higher in bisphosphonate users than in nonusers (128.8 vs. 90.2 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio 1.41, 95% confidence interval 1.32 to 1.51). However, this difference decreased over time: by months 12 to 18, the incidence rate was similar in users and nonusers (59.3 vs. 55.3 per 1000 person-years; hazard ratio 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.91 to 1.16).

Conclusions

There was a decrease in the relative risk of new fracture during bisphosphonate treatment, a trend that is consistent with a beneficial treatment effect, as bisphosphonates are prescribed to reduce high fracture risks.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
8.
go back to reference Głuszko P, Lorenc RS, Karczmarewicz E et al (2014) Polish guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis: a review of 2013 update. Pol Arch Med Wewn 124:255–263PubMed Głuszko P, Lorenc RS, Karczmarewicz E et al (2014) Polish guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis: a review of 2013 update. Pol Arch Med Wewn 124:255–263PubMed
12.
go back to reference Makras P, Vaiopoulos G, Lyritis GP (2012) 2011 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in Greece. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 12:38–42PubMed Makras P, Vaiopoulos G, Lyritis GP (2012) 2011 guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in Greece. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 12:38–42PubMed
17.
go back to reference Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB et al (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348:1535–1541CrossRefPubMed Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB et al (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Lancet 348:1535–1541CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Reginster JY, Minne HW, Sorensen OH et al (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91CrossRefPubMed Reginster JY, Minne HW, Sorensen OH et al (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91CrossRefPubMed
24.
25.
go back to reference Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (2009) Cancer incidence in Sweden 2008. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (2009) Cancer incidence in Sweden 2008. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm
31.
go back to reference Slone D, Shapiro S, Miettinen OS et al (1979) Drug evaluation after marketing. Ann Intern Med 90:257–261CrossRefPubMed Slone D, Shapiro S, Miettinen OS et al (1979) Drug evaluation after marketing. Ann Intern Med 90:257–261CrossRefPubMed
41.
go back to reference Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (2014) Öppna jämförelser 2014: Hälso- och sjukvård - jämförelser mellan landsting. Del 2. Indikatorer om sjukdomar och behandlingar [Open comparisons 2014: Healthcare - comparisons of regions. Part 2. Indications of diseases and treatments]. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions (2014) Öppna jämförelser 2014: Hälso- och sjukvård - jämförelser mellan landsting. Del 2. Indikatorer om sjukdomar och behandlingar [Open comparisons 2014: Healthcare - comparisons of regions. Part 2. Indications of diseases and treatments]. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Stockholm
Metadata
Title
Bisphosphonate use after clinical fracture and risk of new fracture
Authors
J. Bergman
A. Nordström
P. Nordström
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer London
Published in
Osteoporosis International / Issue 4/2018
Print ISSN: 0937-941X
Electronic ISSN: 1433-2965
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-4367-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2018

Osteoporosis International 4/2018 Go to the issue