Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2013

01-05-2013 | Knee

The posterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology

Authors: Tom Van Hoof, Michiel Cromheecke, Thomas Tampere, Katharina D’herde, Jan Victor, Peter C. M. Verdonk

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The bony insertion sites of the PCL have been studied and described extensively using 2D technology such as macroscopic images, plain radiograph, computerized tomography (CT) and MRI. The purpose of this study is to visualize both the tibial and the femoral bony insertion sites but also the soft tissue anatomy of the native PCL using novel 3D CT imaging. In addition, new concepts of best-fit cylinder and central axis are introduced and evaluated.

Methods

Nine unpaired knees of embalmed cadavers were used in this study. Following the dissection process, the PCL was injected with a contrast medium for computed tomography (CT) imaging. The obtained CT images were segmented and rendered in 3D allowing morphological and morphometric analysis of PCL. Femoral and tibial footprint surface area, best-fit PCL-cylinder intersection area, best-fit PCL-cylinder/footprint coverage ratio, best-fit PCL-cylinder central axis projections at the tibial and femoral footprint were used to describe the anatomy of the PCL.

Results

Mean footprint surface area of the tibial and femoral footprint were 189.1 and 293.3 mm², respectively. The mean diameter of the best-fit cylinder was 10.5 mm. The mean coverage of the best-fit cylinder on the tibial and femoral footprint was 76.5 and 46.5, respectively. The best-fit cylinder central axis was located in the anterolateral AL bundle footprint on the femur and more centrally in the PCL footprint on the tibia.

Conclusion

This study is the first to describe the detailed anatomy of the human PCL with respect to its course and footprints using a 3D approach. It confirms the large difference between the tibial and the femoral footprint area with the former being significantly smaller. In addition, a large inter-patient variability is observed. The best-fit cylinder and central axis concept offer additional insights into the optimal tunnel placement at the tibia and femoral footprint in order to cover the largest portion of the native PCL soft tissue.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM, Edwards A (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:257–263PubMedCrossRef Amis AA, Gupte CM, Bull AM, Edwards A (2006) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament and the meniscofemoral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:257–263PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Bergfeld JA, Graham SM, Parker RD, Valdevit ADC, Kambic HE (2005) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single—and double-bundle tibial inlay technique. Am J Sports Med 33:976–981PubMedCrossRef Bergfeld JA, Graham SM, Parker RD, Valdevit ADC, Kambic HE (2005) A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single—and double-bundle tibial inlay technique. Am J Sports Med 33:976–981PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bowman KF Jr, Sekiya JK (2009) Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament and other ligaments of the knee. Oper Tech Sports Med 17:126–134CrossRef Bowman KF Jr, Sekiya JK (2009) Anatomy and biomechanics of the posterior cruciate ligament and other ligaments of the knee. Oper Tech Sports Med 17:126–134CrossRef
4.
go back to reference De Maeseneer M, Jager T, Vanderdood K, Van Roy P, Shahabpour M, Marcelis S (2003) Ultrasound during dissection of cadaveric specimens: a new method for obtaining ultrasound-anatomic correlations in musculoskeletal radiology. Eur Radiol 14:870–874CrossRef De Maeseneer M, Jager T, Vanderdood K, Van Roy P, Shahabpour M, Marcelis S (2003) Ultrasound during dissection of cadaveric specimens: a new method for obtaining ultrasound-anatomic correlations in musculoskeletal radiology. Eur Radiol 14:870–874CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:284–290PubMedCrossRef Edwards A, Bull AM, Amis AA (2007) The attachments of the fiber bundles of the posterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:284–290PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Feigl G, Fuchs A, Gries M, Hogan QH, Weninger B, Rosmarin W (2006) A supraomohyoidal plexus block designed to avoid complications. Surg Radiol Anat 28:403–408PubMedCrossRef Feigl G, Fuchs A, Gries M, Hogan QH, Weninger B, Rosmarin W (2006) A supraomohyoidal plexus block designed to avoid complications. Surg Radiol Anat 28:403–408PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Forsythe B, Harner C, Martins CA, Shen W, Lopes OV Jr, Fu FH (2009) Topography of the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):89–100PubMed Forsythe B, Harner C, Martins CA, Shen W, Lopes OV Jr, Fu FH (2009) Topography of the femoral attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Surgical technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(1):89–100PubMed
8.
go back to reference Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CA, Anderst W, Tashman S, Fu FH (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(6):1418–1426PubMedCrossRef Forsythe B, Kopf S, Wong AK, Martins CA, Anderst W, Tashman S, Fu FH (2010) The location of femoral and tibial tunnels in anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction analyzed by three-dimensional computed tomography models. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92(6):1418–1426PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Greiner P, Magnussen R, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E (2011) Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1876–1883PubMedCrossRef Greiner P, Magnussen R, Lustig S, Demey G, Neyret P, Servien E (2011) Computed tomography evaluation of the femoral and tibial attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament in vitro. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1876–1883PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Groscurth P, Eggli P, Kapfhammer J, Rager G, Hornung JP, Fasel JDH (2001) Gross anatomy in the surgical curriculum in Switzerland: improved cadaver preservation, anatomical models, and course development. Anat Rec (New Anat) 265:254–256CrossRef Groscurth P, Eggli P, Kapfhammer J, Rager G, Hornung JP, Fasel JDH (2001) Gross anatomy in the surgical curriculum in Switzerland: improved cadaver preservation, anatomical models, and course development. Anat Rec (New Anat) 265:254–256CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K (2006) A comparison of single—and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 25:568–571 Hatayama K, Higuchi H, Kimura M, Kobayashi Y, Asagumo H, Takagishi K (2006) A comparison of single—and double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: review of 20 cases. Am J Orthop 25:568–571
12.
go back to reference Kohen RB, Sekiya JK (2009) Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25:1470–1477PubMedCrossRef Kohen RB, Sekiya JK (2009) Single-bundle versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 25:1470–1477PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lorenz S, Elser F, Brucker PU, Obst T, Imhoff AB (2009) Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:683–690PubMedCrossRef Lorenz S, Elser F, Brucker PU, Obst T, Imhoff AB (2009) Radiological evaluation of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundle insertion sites of the posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:683–690PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Lopomo NF, Lacono F, Marcacci M (2007) KIN-Nav navigation system for kinematic assessment in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: features, use, and perspectives. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221(7):725–737PubMedCrossRef Martelli S, Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Lopomo NF, Lacono F, Marcacci M (2007) KIN-Nav navigation system for kinematic assessment in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: features, use, and perspectives. Proc Inst Mech Eng H 221(7):725–737PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:325–331PubMedCrossRef Morgan CD, Kalman VR, Grawl DM (1997) The anatomic origin of the posterior cruciate ligament: where is it? reference landmarks for PCL reconstruction. Arthroscopy 13:325–331PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A, Strobel MJ, Raschke MJ, Zantop T (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463PubMedCrossRef Petersen W, Lenschow S, Weimann A, Strobel MJ, Raschke MJ, Zantop T (2006) Importance of femoral tunnel placement in double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical analysis using a robotic/universal force-moment sensor testing system. Am J Sports Med 34:456–463PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pfirrmann CW, Oberholzer PA, Zanetti M, Boos N, Trudell DJ, Resnick D, Hodler J (2001) Selective nerve root blocks for the treatment of sciatica: evaluation of injection site and effectiveness. A study with patients and cadavers. Radiology 221:704–711PubMedCrossRef Pfirrmann CW, Oberholzer PA, Zanetti M, Boos N, Trudell DJ, Resnick D, Hodler J (2001) Selective nerve root blocks for the treatment of sciatica: evaluation of injection site and effectiveness. A study with patients and cadavers. Radiology 221:704–711PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shearn JT, Grood ES, Noyes FR et al (2004) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how bundle tension depends on femoral placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:381–386 Shearn JT, Grood ES, Noyes FR et al (2004) Two-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: how bundle tension depends on femoral placement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:381–386
19.
go back to reference Tajima G, Nozaki M, Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2009) Morphology of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(4):859–866PubMedCrossRef Tajima G, Nozaki M, Iriuchishima T, Ingham SJ, Shen W, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2009) Morphology of the tibial insertion of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(4):859–866PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1055–1059PubMedCrossRef Takahashi M, Matsubara T, Doi M, Suzuki D, Nagano A (2006) Anatomical study of the femoral and tibial insertions of the anterolateral and posteromedial bundles of human posterior cruciate ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1055–1059PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Van Dommelen BA, Fowler PJ (1989) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament. A review. Am J Sports Med 17:24–29CrossRef Van Dommelen BA, Fowler PJ (1989) Anatomy of the posterior cruciate ligament. A review. Am J Sports Med 17:24–29CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Van Hoof T, Gomes GT, Audenaert E, Verstraete K, Kerckaert I, D’Herde K (2008) 3D computerized model for measuring strain and displacement of the brachial plexus following placement of reverse shoulder prosthesis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 291:1173–1185CrossRef Van Hoof T, Gomes GT, Audenaert E, Verstraete K, Kerckaert I, D’Herde K (2008) 3D computerized model for measuring strain and displacement of the brachial plexus following placement of reverse shoulder prosthesis. Anat Rec (Hoboken) 291:1173–1185CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS (2004) Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Injury 35:1293–1299PubMedCrossRef Wang CJ, Weng LH, Hsu CC, Chan YS (2004) Arthroscopic single- versus double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft. Injury 35:1293–1299PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 39(8):1789–1799PubMedCrossRef Yasuda K, van Eck CF, Hoshino Y, Fu FH, Tashman S (2011) Anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, part 1: basic science. Am J Sports Med 39(8):1789–1799PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The posterior cruciate ligament: a study on its bony and soft tissue anatomy using novel 3D CT technology
Authors
Tom Van Hoof
Michiel Cromheecke
Thomas Tampere
Katharina D’herde
Jan Victor
Peter C. M. Verdonk
Publication date
01-05-2013
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2332-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 5/2013 Go to the issue