Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2013

01-11-2013 | Knee

Flexion and extension laxity after medial, mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between a spacer- and a tension-guided technique

Authors: A. M. ten Ham, P. J. C. Heesterbeek, D. B. van der Schaaf, W. C. H. Jacobs, A. B. Wymenga

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

In a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), stability is of utmost importance to promote knee function and to prevent dislocation of the insert. Gap balancing can be guided by the use of spacers or a tensioner. The goal of this study is to compare laxity of a tension-guided implantation technique versus a spacer-guided technique for medial UKA with a mobile bearing. Also clinical function was compared between the groups.

Methods

The tension-guided UKA system (BalanSys™, Mathys Ltd, Bettlach, Switzerland) was compared with a retrospective group with a spacer-guided system (Oxford, Biomet Ltd, Bridgend, UK). A total of 30 tension-guided medial UKAs were implanted and compared with 35 spacer-guided medial prostheses. In both groups, valgus laxity was measured at least 4 months postoperatively in extension and 70° flexion using stress radiographs. Knee Society Scores (KSS) were obtained at the 6-month follow-up.

Results

Valgus laxity in flexion was significantly higher in the tension-guided group compared with the spacer-guided group: 3.9° (SD 1.8°) versus 2.4° (SD 1.2°), respectively, P < 0.001). In extension, valgus laxity was significantly different: 1.8° (SD 1.0°) in the tension-guided group compared with 2.7° (SD 0.9°) in the spacer-guided group (P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the KSS for the two groups (n.s.).

Conclusions

The tensor-guided system resulted in significantly more valgus laxity in flexion compared with the spacer-guided system. However, in extension, the situation was reversed: the tension-guided system resulted in less valgus laxity than the spacer-guided system. Clinically, there were no differences between the groups. The valgus laxity found with the spacer-guided system better approximates the valgus laxity values of the healthy elderly.

Level of evidence

Lower quality prospective cohort study (<80 % follow-up, patients enrolled at different time points in disease), Level II.
Literature
1.
Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310PubMedCrossRef
2.
Campbell D, Schuster AJ, Pfluger D, Hoffmann F (2010) Unicondylar knee replacement with a new tensioner device: clinical results of a multicentre study on 168 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:727–732PubMedCrossRef
3.
Eriksson K, Sadr-Azodi O, Singh C, Osti L, Bartlett J (2010) Stress radiography for osteoarthritis of the knee: a new technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1356–1359PubMedCrossRef
4.
Gleeson RE, Evans R, Ackroyd CE, Webb J, Newman JH (2004) Fixed or mobile bearing unicompartmental knee replacement? A comparative cohort study. Knee 11:379–384PubMedCrossRef
5.
Heesterbeek PJ, Keijsers NL, Wymenga AB (2010) Ligament releases do not lead to increased postoperative varus-valgus laxity in flexion and extension: a prospective clinical study in 49 TKR patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:187–193PubMedCrossRef
6.
Heesterbeek PJ, Verdonschot N, Wymenga AB (2008) In vivo knee laxity in flexion and extension: a radiographic study in 30 older healthy subjects. Knee 15:45–49PubMedCrossRef
7.
Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Takeda M, Walker SA, Komistek RD (2007) Effect of knee laxity on in vivo kinematics of meniscal-bearing knee prostheses. Knee 14:269–274PubMedCrossRef
8.
Markolf KL, Mensch JS, Amstutz HC (1976) Stiffness and laxity of the knee–the contributions of the supporting structures. A quantitative in vitro study. J Bone Jt Surg Am 58:583–594
9.
Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA, Murray DW (2011) Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Jt Surg Br 93:198–204
10.
Price AJ, Svard U (2011) A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:174–179PubMedCrossRef
11.
Romero J, Stahelin T, Binkert C, Pfirrmann C, Hodler J, Kessler O (2007) The clinical consequences of flexion gap asymmetry in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:235–240PubMedCrossRef
12.
Scuderi GR (2005) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causality and solution. J Arthroplasty 20:23–26PubMedCrossRef
13.
Stähelin T, Kessler O, Pfirrmann C, Jacob HA, Romero J (2003) Fluoroscopically assisted stress radiography for varus-valgus stability assessment in flexion after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 18:513–515PubMedCrossRef
14.
Svard UC, Price AJ (2001) Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Jt Surg Br 83:191–194CrossRef
15.
van Hal CT, van Hellemondt GG, Wymenga AB, Jacobs WC (2007) The anterior-posterior laxity after total knee arthroplasty inserted with a ligament tensor. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1019–1022PubMedCrossRef
16.
Van Hal CTH, Tuinenga H, Jacobs WCH, Wymenga AB (2005) Een objectieve en betrouwbare meetmethode voor het bepalen van de mediale en laterale stabiliteit van een totaleknieprothese in flexie. Nederlands Tijdschrijft voor Orthopaedie 12:200–205
17.
Wyss T, Schuster AJ, Christen B, Wehrli U (2008) Tension controlled ligament balanced total knee arthroplasty: 5-year results of a soft tissue orientated surgical technique. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:129–135PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Flexion and extension laxity after medial, mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a comparison between a spacer- and a tension-guided technique
Authors
A. M. ten Ham
P. J. C. Heesterbeek
D. B. van der Schaaf
W. C. H. Jacobs
A. B. Wymenga
Publication date
01-11-2013
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2013
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2021-7

Other articles of this Issue 11/2013

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2013 Go to the issue

Knee

Improved accuracy in computer-assisted unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis

Knee

The treatment of acquired patella baja with proximalize the tibial tuberosity

Knee

Early migration of the cemented tibial component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study

Knee

Medial femoral head border is a reliable and reproducible reference for axis determination for femoral component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Knee

Effect of foot rotation on the mechanical axis and correlation between knee and whole leg radiographs

Editorial

Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: what’s new?