Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2010

01-06-2010 | Knee

Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients

Authors: Danilo Bruni, Francesco Iacono, Alessandro Russo, Stefano Zaffagnini, Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli, Simone Bignozzi, Laura Bragonzoni, Maurilio Marcacci

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 6/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

We performed a retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 nonconsecutive patients operated in our institute between February 1996 and March 2003 with a mean follow-up of 60 months to assess the efficiency of unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR) performed with a minimally invasive technique. The aim of this study was to correlate the clinical outcome with the pre- and post-operative alignment and with implant positioning on coronal and sagittal plane. Eighty-three nonconsecutive patients (60 males, 23 females) underwent cemented UKR (De Puy Preservation Uni with all-poly tibial component), for both medial OA (80 patients) and AVN of the medial femoral condyle (3 patients). All patients were available at final follow-up evaluation, and they all presented an evident varus alignment at pre-operative clinical and radiographic evaluation. At radiographic measurement, we considered a knee with femoro-tibial angle (FTA) > 175° as varus knee, 170° < FTA < 175° as normal knee and a knee with a FTA < 170° as a valgus knee. Moreover, we considered a tibial plateau angle (TPA) > 90° for valgus knee and a TPA < 90° for varus knee. According to Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scoring system, at a mean follow-up of 60 months, 61 (74%) cases were excellent (100-85 points), 15 (18%) cases were good (84-70 points) and 7 cases (8%) had fair results (<70 points). In our series, patients with an excellent clinical result presented a mean varus deformity of 7.2° (3.6°–10.8°) pre-operatively. According to literature, we demonstrated that a small amount of undercorrection with a small amount of residual varus deformity of 3°–5° is the goal to be reached in order to avoid both rapid degeneration of the nonreplaced compartment and the premature loosening of the replaced compartment. We performed a mean axial correction of 5° (SD 3.9°), leaving a mean axial varus deformity of 2.2° in the excellent group. In our series, the group with excellent results also showed a post-operative PTS of 7° (2.4°–11.6°), while mean pre-operative PTS was 6.5° (2.7°–10.3°). In this study, results have shown that minimally invasive UKR producing a small amount of varus undercorrection in selected patients with medial tibio-femoral osteoarthritis or moderate avascular necrosis of the medial femoral condyle provides excellent clinical and functional results. Overcorrection of varus malalignment with a UKR may produce both rapid degeneration of the lateral tibio-femoral compartment and the early failure of the replaced compartment.
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 277(Suppl):7–72 Ahlbäck S (1968) Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 277(Suppl):7–72
3.
go back to reference Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA et al (2008) Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 23:159–163CrossRefPubMed Aleto TJ, Berend ME, Ritter MA et al (2008) Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty leading to revision. J Arthroplasty 23:159–163CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2235–2239PubMed Argenson JN, Chevrol-Benkeddache Y, Aubaniac JM (2002) Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a three to ten-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84:2235–2239PubMed
5.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Parratte S, Flecher X et al (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: technique through a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:32–36PubMed Argenson JN, Parratte S, Flecher X et al (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: technique through a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 464:32–36PubMed
6.
go back to reference Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F et al (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:551–556CrossRefPubMed Banks SA, Fregly BJ, Boniforti F et al (2005) Comparing in vivo kinematics of unicondylar and bi-unicondylar knee replacements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:551–556CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH et al (2005) Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:60–66CrossRefPubMed Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH et al (2005) Early failure of minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with obesity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 440:60–66CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60CrossRefPubMed Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367:50–60CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ et al (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:999–1006CrossRefPubMed Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ et al (2005) Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:999–1006CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R et al (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:205–213PubMed Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R et al (1993) Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 295:205–213PubMed
11.
go back to reference Cartier P, Cheaib S (1987) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. 2–10 years of follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2:157–162CrossRefPubMed Cartier P, Cheaib S (1987) Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. 2–10 years of follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2:157–162CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit H et al (2009) Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement-does it matter? Knee 1 [Epub ahead of print] Chau R, Gulati A, Pandit H et al (2009) Tibial component overhang following unicompartmental knee replacement-does it matter? Knee 1 [Epub ahead of print]
13.
go back to reference Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F et al (2006) Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:108–115CrossRefPubMed Collier MB, Eickmann TH, Sukezaki F et al (2006) Patient, implant, and alignment factors associated with revision of medial compartment unicondylar arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:108–115CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK et al (1988) The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:692–701PubMed Goodfellow JW, Kershaw CJ, Benson MK et al (1988) The Oxford knee for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. The first 103 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 70:692–701PubMed
15.
go back to reference Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Dodd C et al (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford Goodfellow J, O’Connor J, Dodd C et al (2006) Unicompartmental arthroplasty with the Oxford knee. Oxford University Press, Oxford
16.
go back to reference Griffin T, Rowden N, Morgan D et al (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a systematic study. ANZ J Surg 77:214–221CrossRefPubMed Griffin T, Rowden N, Morgan D et al (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for the treatment of unicompartmental osteoarthritis: a systematic study. ANZ J Surg 77:214–221CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Gulati A, Chau R, Simspon DJ et al (2009) Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 16:196–199CrossRefPubMed Gulati A, Chau R, Simspon DJ et al (2009) Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 16:196–199CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E et al (2006) Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:98–107CrossRefPubMed Hamilton WG, Collier MB, Tarabee E et al (2006) Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21:98–107CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hasegawa Y, Ooishi Y, Shimizu T et al (1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:183–187CrossRefPubMed Hasegawa Y, Ooishi Y, Shimizu T et al (1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial gonarthrosis: 5 to 9 years follow-up evaluation of 77 knees. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:183–187CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:506–511PubMed Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Posterior slope of the tibial implant and the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:506–511PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165CrossRefPubMed Hernigou P, Deschamps G (2004) Alignment influences wear in the knee after medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 423:161–165CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Hopgood P, Martin CP, Rae PJ (2004) The effect of tibial implant size on post-operative alignment following medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 11:385–388CrossRefPubMed Hopgood P, Martin CP, Rae PJ (2004) The effect of tibial implant size on post-operative alignment following medial unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 11:385–388CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Howe DJ, Taunton OD Jr, Engh GA (2004) Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2283–2286PubMed Howe DJ, Taunton OD Jr, Engh GA (2004) Retained cement after unicondylar knee arthroplasty. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:2283–2286PubMed
24.
go back to reference Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1329–1337PubMed Insall J, Aglietti P (1980) A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:1329–1337PubMed
25.
go back to reference Ivarsson I, Gillquist J (1991) Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 266:139–144PubMed Ivarsson I, Gillquist J (1991) Rehabilitation after high tibial osteotomy and unicompartmental arthroplasty. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 266:139–144PubMed
26.
go back to reference Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 221:278–285PubMed Kennedy WR, White RP (1987) Unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Postoperative alignment and its influence on overall results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 221:278–285PubMed
27.
go back to reference Knutson K, Jonsson G, Andersen JL et al (1981) Deformation and loosening of the tibial component in knee arthroplasty with unicompartmental endoprostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 53:667–673 Knutson K, Jonsson G, Andersen JL et al (1981) Deformation and loosening of the tibial component in knee arthroplasty with unicompartmental endoprostheses. Acta Orthop Scand 53:667–673
28.
go back to reference Kozinn SC, Marx C, Scott RD (1989) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5–6 years follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component. J Arthroplasty 4(Suppl):S1–S10CrossRefPubMed Kozinn SC, Marx C, Scott RD (1989) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5–6 years follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component. J Arthroplasty 4(Suppl):S1–S10CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Larsson SE, Larsson S, Lundkvist S (1988) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective consecutive series followed for six to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:174–181PubMed Larsson SE, Larsson S, Lundkvist S (1988) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A prospective consecutive series followed for six to 11 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 232:174–181PubMed
30.
go back to reference Lindstrand A, Stenström A, Ryd L et al (2000) The introduction period of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is critical: a clinical, clinical multicentered, and radiostereometric study of 251 Duracon unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:608–616CrossRefPubMed Lindstrand A, Stenström A, Ryd L et al (2000) The introduction period of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is critical: a clinical, clinical multicentered, and radiostereometric study of 251 Duracon unicompartmental knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 15:608–616CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lootvoet L, Burton P, Himmer O et al (1997) A unicompartmental knee prosthesis: the effect of the positioning of the tibial plate on the functional results. Acta Orthop Belg 63:94–101PubMed Lootvoet L, Burton P, Himmer O et al (1997) A unicompartmental knee prosthesis: the effect of the positioning of the tibial plate on the functional results. Acta Orthop Belg 63:94–101PubMed
32.
go back to reference Mariani EM, Bourne MH, Jackson RT et al (2007) Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:81–84CrossRefPubMed Mariani EM, Bourne MH, Jackson RT et al (2007) Early failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:81–84CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Meek RM, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am 19:1–200 Meek RM, Masri BA, Duncan CP (2004) Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: rationale and correct indications. Orthop Clin North Am 19:1–200
34.
go back to reference Mullaji AB, Sharma A, Marawar S (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional recovery and radiographic results with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty 22:7–11CrossRefPubMed Mullaji AB, Sharma A, Marawar S (2007) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: functional recovery and radiographic results with a minimally invasive technique. J Arthroplasty 22:7–11CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Müller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M et al (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:6–301 Müller PE, Pellengahr C, Witt M et al (2004) Influence of minimally invasive surgery on implant positioning and the functional outcome for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29:6–301
36.
go back to reference Murray DW (2000) Unicompartmental knee replacement: now or never? Orthopedics 23:979–980PubMed Murray DW (2000) Unicompartmental knee replacement: now or never? Orthopedics 23:979–980PubMed
37.
go back to reference Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862–865CrossRefPubMed Newman JH, Ackroyd CE, Shah NA (1998) Unicompartmental or total knee replacement? Five-year results of a prospective, randomised trial of 102 osteoarthritic knees with unicompartmental arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:862–865CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K et al (2006) The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:54–60CrossRefPubMed Pandit H, Jenkins C, Barker K et al (2006) The Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement using a minimally-invasive approach. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:54–60CrossRefPubMed
40.
go back to reference Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB et al (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1968–1973PubMed Pennington DW, Swienckowski JJ, Lutes WB et al (2003) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients sixty years of age or younger. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:1968–1973PubMed
41.
go back to reference Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H et al (2001) Oxford hip and knee group. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:970–976CrossRefPubMed Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H et al (2001) Oxford hip and knee group. Rapid recovery after oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 16:970–976CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Ranawat CS, Shine JJ (1973) Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 94:185–195CrossRefPubMed Ranawat CS, Shine JJ (1973) Duo-condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 94:185–195CrossRefPubMed
43.
go back to reference Repicci JA, Eberle RW (1999) Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 8:20–27PubMed Repicci JA, Eberle RW (1999) Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 8:20–27PubMed
44.
go back to reference Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ et al (2002) The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:351–355 (Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84:1091)CrossRefPubMed Ridgeway SR, McAuley JP, Ammeen DJ et al (2002) The effect of alignment of the knee on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:351–355 (Erratum in: J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84:1091)CrossRefPubMed
45.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Faris PM, Thong AE et al (2004) Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:43–47CrossRefPubMed Ritter MA, Faris PM, Thong AE et al (2004) Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86:43–47CrossRefPubMed
46.
go back to reference Schai PA, Suh JT, Thornhill TS et al (1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2- to 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 13:365–372CrossRefPubMed Schai PA, Suh JT, Thornhill TS et al (1998) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in middle-aged patients: a 2- to 6-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 13:365–372CrossRefPubMed
47.
go back to reference Scott RD (2003) Unicondylar arthroplasty: redefining itself. Orthopedics 26:951–952PubMed Scott RD (2003) Unicondylar arthroplasty: redefining itself. Orthopedics 26:951–952PubMed
48.
go back to reference Shakespeare D, Ledger M, Kinzel V (2005) Accuracy of implantation of components in the Oxford knee using the minimally invasive approach. Knee 12:405–409CrossRefPubMed Shakespeare D, Ledger M, Kinzel V (2005) Accuracy of implantation of components in the Oxford knee using the minimally invasive approach. Knee 12:405–409CrossRefPubMed
49.
go back to reference Soavi R, Loreti I, Bragonzoni L et al (2002) A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:556–561CrossRefPubMed Soavi R, Loreti I, Bragonzoni L et al (2002) A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 17:556–561CrossRefPubMed
50.
go back to reference Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 6:1–72 Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD et al (1999) Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year follow up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 6:1–72
51.
go back to reference Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D et al (2001) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7–10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 8:187–194CrossRefPubMed Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ, Lazovic D et al (2001) High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental joint replacement in unicompartmental knee joint osteoarthritis: 7–10-year follow-up prospective randomised study. Knee 8:187–194CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Vince KG, Cyran LT (2004) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: new indications, more complications? J Arthroplasty 19:9–16CrossRefPubMed Vince KG, Cyran LT (2004) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: new indications, more complications? J Arthroplasty 19:9–16CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Weale AE, Murray DW, Baines J et al (2000) Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:996–1000CrossRefPubMed Weale AE, Murray DW, Baines J et al (2000) Radiological changes five years after unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:996–1000CrossRefPubMed
54.
go back to reference Webster KE, Wittwer JE, Feller JA (2003) Quantitative gait analysis after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 18:751–759CrossRefPubMed Webster KE, Wittwer JE, Feller JA (2003) Quantitative gait analysis after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 18:751–759CrossRefPubMed
55.
go back to reference Whiteside LA (2005) Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplasty 20:2–3CrossRefPubMed Whiteside LA (2005) Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last: three keys to success. J Arthroplasty 20:2–3CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Minimally invasive unicompartmental knee replacement: retrospective clinical and radiographic evaluation of 83 patients
Authors
Danilo Bruni
Francesco Iacono
Alessandro Russo
Stefano Zaffagnini
Giulio Maria Marcheggiani Muccioli
Simone Bignozzi
Laura Bragonzoni
Maurilio Marcacci
Publication date
01-06-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 6/2010
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-009-0895-9

Other articles of this Issue 6/2010

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 6/2010 Go to the issue