Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2008

01-12-2008 | Knee

The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Authors: Ralf E. Rosenberger, Christian Fink, Sebastian Quirbach, Rene Attal, Katja Tecklenburg, Christian Hoser

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 12/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

The success of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is highly dependent on the accuracy of the component alignment. Objective of the present study was to evaluate the immediate effect of image-free computer navigation technology on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive UKA. This study reviews 40 patients with primary isolated arthritis of the medial compartment of the knee that underwent unicompartmental knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach. A cohort of the 20 most recent consecutive UKA’s implanted with standard instrumentation was followed by a cohort of the very first 20 consecutive cases after conversion to the navigated technique. There was no variability regarding implant (Oxford™ meniscal unicompartmental knee system—Biomet Orthopedics, Inc., Warsaw, Indiana 46580, USA), surgeons and surgical technique, except for the use of the navigation system (Treon plus™—Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, MI, USA). The axis alignment and accuracy of implant positioning was measured on postoperative long-leg standing radiographs and standard lateral X-rays with regard to the valgus angle and the coronal and sagittal component angle. In addition, preoperative deformities of the mechanical leg axis, tourniquet time, age, gender, and body mass index were correlated. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS 14.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) software package. Optimal implant alignment including all measurements in the desired angular range was significantly (P = 0.041) higher in the navigated cohort. Navigation eliminated outliers in the frontal mechanical alignment and coronal orientation of the femoral component totally and significantly (P < 0.02). Furthermore, navigation narrowed the range of outliers in all other planes of component orientation. There were no statistically significant differences in the mean numerical values between the cohorts, except for the frontal mechanical alignment (P < 0.009) and coronal tibial alignment (P < 0.037). The average tourniquet time was increased by 10.95 min in the navigated cohort. Our results indicate that navigation immediately improves accuracy of bone cuts and reduces the number of outliers with implementation in UKA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kort NP, van Raay JJ, van Horn JJ (2007) The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(4):356–360PubMedCrossRef Kort NP, van Raay JJ, van Horn JJ (2007) The Oxford phase III unicompartmental knee replacement in patients less than 60 years of age. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(4):356–360PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB (1998) Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 13(4):373–379PubMedCrossRef Tabor OB Jr, Tabor OB (1998) Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 13(4):373–379PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Thornhill TS (1986) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:121–131PubMed Thornhill TS (1986) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:121–131PubMed
4.
go back to reference Sanchis-Alfonso V (2007) Severe metallosis after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(4):361–364PubMedCrossRef Sanchis-Alfonso V (2007) Severe metallosis after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15(4):361–364PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983–989PubMedCrossRef Murray DW, Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ (1998) The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80(6):983–989PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Scott RD (2006) Three decades of experience with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mistakes made and lessons learned. Orthopedics 29(9):829–831PubMed Scott RD (2006) Three decades of experience with unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: mistakes made and lessons learned. Orthopedics 29(9):829–831PubMed
7.
go back to reference Sanchis-Alfonso V, Alcacer-Garcia J (2001) Extensive osteolytic cystlike area associated with polyethylene wear debris adjacent to an aseptic, stable, uncemented unicompartmental knee prosthesis: case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(3):173–177PubMedCrossRef Sanchis-Alfonso V, Alcacer-Garcia J (2001) Extensive osteolytic cystlike area associated with polyethylene wear debris adjacent to an aseptic, stable, uncemented unicompartmental knee prosthesis: case report. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9(3):173–177PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A (1992) Polyethylene wear of the PCA unicompartmental knee. Prospective 5 (4–8) year study of 120 arthrosis knees. Acta Orthop Scand 63(3):260–262PubMedCrossRef Lindstrand A, Stenstrom A (1992) Polyethylene wear of the PCA unicompartmental knee. Prospective 5 (4–8) year study of 120 arthrosis knees. Acta Orthop Scand 63(3):260–262PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Argenson JN, Parratte S (2006) The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:137–142PubMedCrossRef Argenson JN, Parratte S (2006) The unicompartmental knee: design and technical considerations in minimizing wear. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:137–142PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Berger R et al (2006) The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:285–286PubMedCrossRef Berger R et al (2006) The progression of patellofemoral arthrosis after medial unicompartmental replacement: results at 11 to 15 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res 452:285–286PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279–282PubMedCrossRef McAuley JP, Engh GA, Ammeen DJ (2001) Revision of failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 392:279–282PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Palmer SH, Morrison PJ, Ross AC (1998) Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:143–148PubMedCrossRef Palmer SH, Morrison PJ, Ross AC (1998) Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 350:143–148PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Scott RD (2003) UniSpacer: insufficient data to support its widespread use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:164–166PubMedCrossRef Scott RD (2003) UniSpacer: insufficient data to support its widespread use. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:164–166PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Hallock RH (2003) The UniSpacer knee system: have we been there before? Orthopedics 26(9):953–954PubMed Hallock RH (2003) The UniSpacer knee system: have we been there before? Orthopedics 26(9):953–954PubMed
15.
go back to reference Minas T (2001) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S349–S361 Minas T (2001) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for focal chondral defects of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S349–S361
16.
go back to reference Barnes CL et al (2006) Treatment of medial compartment arthritis of the knee: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 21(7):950–956PubMedCrossRef Barnes CL et al (2006) Treatment of medial compartment arthritis of the knee: a survey of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. J Arthroplasty 21(7):950–956PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bert JM (1998) 10-year survivorship of metal-backed, unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13(8):901–905PubMedCrossRef Bert JM (1998) 10-year survivorship of metal-backed, unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13(8):901–905PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11(7):782–788PubMedCrossRef Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP (1996) Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 11(7):782–788PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Reed SC, Gollish J (1997) The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12(6):677–682PubMedCrossRef Reed SC, Gollish J (1997) The accuracy of femoral intramedullary guides in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 12(6):677–682PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Simmons ED Jr et al (1991) The accuracy of tibial intramedullary alignment devices in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6(1):45–50PubMedCrossRef Simmons ED Jr et al (1991) The accuracy of tibial intramedullary alignment devices in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 6(1):45–50PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Dennis DA et al (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef Dennis DA et al (1993) Intramedullary versus extramedullary tibial alignment systems in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 8(1):43–47PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Maestro A et al (1998) Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 13(5):552–558PubMedCrossRef Maestro A et al (1998) Influence of intramedullary versus extramedullary alignment guides on final total knee arthroplasty component position: a radiographic analysis. J Arthroplasty 13(5):552–558PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr (1995) The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:117–121PubMed Teter KE, Bregman D, Colwell CW Jr (1995) The efficacy of intramedullary femoral alignment in total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:117–121PubMed
24.
go back to reference Ritter MA et al (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156 Ritter MA et al (1994) Postoperative alignment of total knee replacement. Its effect on survival. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:153–156
25.
go back to reference Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(1):40–45PubMed Jenny JY, Boeri C (2003) Unicompartmental knee prosthesis implantation with a non-image-based navigation system: rationale, technique, case-control comparative study with a conventional instrumented implantation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(1):40–45PubMed
26.
27.
go back to reference Sparmann M et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830–835PubMed Sparmann M et al (2003) Positioning of total knee arthroplasty with and without navigation support. A prospective, randomised study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85(6):830–835PubMed
28.
go back to reference Romanowski MR, Repicci JA (2002) Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15(1):17–22PubMed Romanowski MR, Repicci JA (2002) Minimally invasive unicondylar arthroplasty: eight-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 15(1):17–22PubMed
29.
go back to reference Hamilton WG et al (2006) Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2):98–107PubMedCrossRef Hamilton WG et al (2006) Incidence and reasons for reoperation after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 21(6 Suppl 2):98–107PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Haaker RG et al (2006) Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation. Orthopade 35(10):1073–1079PubMedCrossRef Haaker RG et al (2006) Minimally invasive unicondylar knee replacement with computer navigation. Orthopade 35(10):1073–1079PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Statistical package for the social sciences. Version 15.0 Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc Statistical package for the social sciences. Version 15.0 Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc
32.
go back to reference Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67–72PubMedCrossRef Petersen TL, Engh GA (1988) Radiographic assessment of knee alignment after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 3(1):67–72PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bach CM et al (2001) Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 385:144–150PubMedCrossRef Bach CM et al (2001) Radiographic assessment in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 385:144–150PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 13(8):861–868PubMed Krackow KA, Pepe CL, Galloway EJ (1990) A mathematical analysis of the effect of flexion and rotation on apparent varus/valgus alignment at the knee. Orthopedics 13(8):861–868PubMed
35.
go back to reference Swanson KE et al (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–252PubMedCrossRef Swanson KE et al (2000) Does axial limb rotation affect the alignment measurements in deformed limbs? Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:246–252PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Skolnick MD, Bryan RS, Peterson LF (1975) Unicompartmental polycentric knee arthroplasty: description and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:208–214PubMedCrossRef Skolnick MD, Bryan RS, Peterson LF (1975) Unicompartmental polycentric knee arthroplasty: description and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 112:208–214PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Shrive NG (1974) British Patent Application No. 49794/74 Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ, Shrive NG (1974) British Patent Application No. 49794/74
38.
go back to reference Berry DJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty is better than a conventional jig-based technique in terms of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(11):2573PubMed Berry DJ (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty is better than a conventional jig-based technique in terms of component alignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(11):2573PubMed
39.
go back to reference Bathis H et al (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(5):682–687PubMedCrossRef Bathis H et al (2004) Alignment in total knee arthroplasty. A comparison of computer-assisted surgery with the conventional technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(5):682–687PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Chauhan SK et al (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):372–377PubMedCrossRef Chauhan SK et al (2004) Computer-assisted knee arthroplasty versus a conventional jig-based technique. A randomised, prospective trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(3):372–377PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Bonutti PM et al (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):26–32PubMed Bonutti PM et al (2004) Minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(Suppl 2):26–32PubMed
42.
go back to reference Kolettis GT et al (1994) Safety of 1-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:102–109PubMed Kolettis GT et al (1994) Safety of 1-stage bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:102–109PubMed
43.
go back to reference Caillouette JT, Anzel SH (1990) Fat embolism syndrome following the intramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:198–199PubMed Caillouette JT, Anzel SH (1990) Fat embolism syndrome following the intramedullary alignment guide in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 251:198–199PubMed
44.
go back to reference Kalairajah Y et al (2006) Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):198–202PubMedCrossRef Kalairajah Y et al (2006) Are systemic emboli reduced in computer-assisted knee surgery? A prospective, randomised, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(2):198–202PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The immediate effect of navigation on implant accuracy in primary mini-invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
Authors
Ralf E. Rosenberger
Christian Fink
Sebastian Quirbach
Rene Attal
Katja Tecklenburg
Christian Hoser
Publication date
01-12-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 12/2008
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-008-0618-7

Other articles of this Issue 12/2008

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 12/2008 Go to the issue