Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 9/2018

01-09-2018 | Editorial

MAP of 65: target of the past?

Authors: Pierre Asfar, Peter Radermacher, Marlies Ostermann

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 9/2018

Login to get access

Excerpt

Septic shock is defined as sepsis with hypotension refractory to fluid challenge and requiring vasopressor support combined with an increase in arterial lactate reflecting impaired cellular energy metabolism and dysoxia. The use of vasoactive drugs to restore mean arterial pressure (MAP) is strongly recommended by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign [1] and the Task Force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM) on circulatory shock management and monitoring [2]. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43(3):304–377CrossRefPubMed Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, Kumar A, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Nunnally ME et al (2017) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 43(3):304–377CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(12):1795–1815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, Jaeschke R, Mebazaa A, Pinsky MR, Teboul JL et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40(12):1795–1815CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Varpula M, Tallgren M, Saukkonen K, Voipio-Pulkki L-M, Pettilä V (2005) Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 31:1066–1071CrossRefPubMed Varpula M, Tallgren M, Saukkonen K, Voipio-Pulkki L-M, Pettilä V (2005) Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med 31:1066–1071CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Dünser MW, Takala J, Ulmer H, Mayr VD, Luckner G, Jochberger S, Daudel F, Lepper P, Hasibeder WR, Jakob SM (2009) Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome. Intensive Care Med 35:1225–1233CrossRefPubMed Dünser MW, Takala J, Ulmer H, Mayr VD, Luckner G, Jochberger S, Daudel F, Lepper P, Hasibeder WR, Jakob SM (2009) Arterial blood pressure during early sepsis and outcome. Intensive Care Med 35:1225–1233CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Dünser MW, Ruokonen E, Pettilä V, Ulmer H, Torgersen C, Schmittinger CA, Jakob S, Takala J (2009) Association of arterial blood pressure and vasopressor load with septic shock mortality: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter trial. Crit Care Lond Engl 13:R181CrossRef Dünser MW, Ruokonen E, Pettilä V, Ulmer H, Torgersen C, Schmittinger CA, Jakob S, Takala J (2009) Association of arterial blood pressure and vasopressor load with septic shock mortality: a post hoc analysis of a multicenter trial. Crit Care Lond Engl 13:R181CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N, Mira JP, Dequin PF, Gergaud S, Weiss N et al (2014) High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 370(17):1583–1593CrossRefPubMed Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N, Mira JP, Dequin PF, Gergaud S, Weiss N et al (2014) High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med 370(17):1583–1593CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lamontagne F, Meade MO, Hebert PC, Asfar P, Lauzier F, Seely AJ, Day AG, Mehta S, Muscedere J, Bagshaw SM et al (2016) Higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in shock: a multicentrepilot randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 42(4):542–550CrossRefPubMed Lamontagne F, Meade MO, Hebert PC, Asfar P, Lauzier F, Seely AJ, Day AG, Mehta S, Muscedere J, Bagshaw SM et al (2016) Higher versus lower blood pressure targets for vasopressor therapy in shock: a multicentrepilot randomized controlled trial. Intensive Care Med 42(4):542–550CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Saugel B, Vincent JL, Wagner JY (2017) Personalized hemodynamic management. Curr Opin Crit Care 23(4):334–341CrossRefPubMed Saugel B, Vincent JL, Wagner JY (2017) Personalized hemodynamic management. Curr Opin Crit Care 23(4):334–341CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Panwar R, Lanyon N, Davies AR, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Bellomo R (2013) Mean perfusion pressure deficit during the initial management of shock—an observational cohort study. J Crit Care 28(5):816–824CrossRefPubMed Panwar R, Lanyon N, Davies AR, Bailey M, Pilcher D, Bellomo R (2013) Mean perfusion pressure deficit during the initial management of shock—an observational cohort study. J Crit Care 28(5):816–824CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ostermann M, Hall A, Crichton S (2017) Low mean perfusion pressure is a risk factor for progression of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients—a retrospective analysis. BMC Nephrol 18(1):151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Ostermann M, Hall A, Crichton S (2017) Low mean perfusion pressure is a risk factor for progression of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients—a retrospective analysis. BMC Nephrol 18(1):151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
MAP of 65: target of the past?
Authors
Pierre Asfar
Peter Radermacher
Marlies Ostermann
Publication date
01-09-2018
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 9/2018
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-018-5292-8

Other articles of this Issue 9/2018

Intensive Care Medicine 9/2018 Go to the issue