Published in:
01-11-2008 | Original
Image reconstruction affects computer tomographic assessment of lung hyperinflation
Authors:
Andreas W. Reske, Harald Busse, Marcelo B. P. Amato, Matthias Jaekel, Thomas Kahn, Peter Schwarzkopf, Dierk Schreiter, Udo Gottschaldt, Matthias Seiwerts
Published in:
Intensive Care Medicine
|
Issue 11/2008
Login to get access
Abstract
Objectives
Lung hyperinflation may be assessed by computed tomography (CT). As shown for patients with emphysema, however, CT image reconstruction affects quantification of hyperinflation. We studied the impact of reconstruction parameters on hyperinflation measurements in mechanically ventilated (MV) patients.
Design
Observational analysis.
Setting
A University hospital-affiliated research Unit.
Patients
The patients were MV patients with injured (n = 5) or normal lungs (n = 6), and spontaneously breathing patients (n = 5).
Measurements and results
Eight image series involving 3, 5, 7, and 10 mm slices and standard and sharp filters were reconstructed from identical CT raw data. Hyperinflated (V
hyper), normally (V
normal), poorly (V
poor), and nonaerated (V
non) volumes were calculated by densitometry as percentage of total lung volume (V
total). V
hyper obtained with the sharp filter systematically exceeded that with the standard filter showing a median (interquartile range) increment of 138 (62–272) ml corresponding to approximately 4% of V
total. In contrast, sharp filtering minimally affected the other subvolumes (V
normal, V
poor, V
non, and V
total). Decreasing slice thickness also increased V
hyper significantly. When changing from 10 to 3 mm thickness, V
hyper increased by a median value of 107 (49–252) ml in parallel with a small and inconsistent increment in V
non of 12 (7–16) ml.
Conclusions
Reconstruction parameters significantly affect quantitative CT assessment of V
hyper in MV patients. Our observations suggest that sharp filters are inappropriate for this purpose. Thin slices combined with standard filters and more appropriate thresholds (e.g., −950 HU in normal lungs) might improve the detection of V
hyper. Different studies on V
hyper can only be compared if identical reconstruction parameters were used.