Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine 6/2008

01-06-2008 | Original

Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement

Authors: Walter Knirsch, Oliver Kretschmar, Maren Tomaske, Kathrina Stutz, Nicole Nagdyman, Christian Balmer, Achim Schmitz, Dominique Béttex, Felix Berger, Urs Bauersfeld, Markus Weiss

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 6/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To compare the assessment of cardiac output (CO) in children using the noninvasive Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor (USCOM) with the invasive pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) thermodilution cardiac output measurement.

Design and setting

Prospective observational study in a tertiary center for pediatric cardiology of a university children's hospital.

Patients

Twenty-four pediatric patients with congenital heart disease without shunt undergoing cardiac catheterization under general anesthesia.

Measurements and results

CO was measured by USCOM using a suprasternal CO Doppler probe in children undergoing cardiac catheterization. USCOM data were compared to CO simultaneously measured by PAC thermodilution technique. Measurements were repeated three times within 5 min in each patient. A mean percentage error not exceeding 30% was defined as indicating clinical useful reliability of the USCOM. CO values measured by PAC ranged from 1.3 to 5.3 l/min (median 3.6 l/min). Bias and precision were −0.13 and 1.34 l/min, respectively. The mean percentage error of CO measurement by the USCOM compared to PAC thermodilution technique was 36.4% for USCOM.

Conclusions

Our preliminary data demonstrate that cardiac output measurement in children using the USCOM does not reliably represent absolute CO values as compared to PAC thermodilution. Further studies must evaluate the impact of incorporating effective aortic valve diameters on CO measurement using the USCOM.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, Nunn GR, Gillis J, Winlaw DS (2005) Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 31:568–573PubMedCrossRef Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, Nunn GR, Gillis J, Winlaw DS (2005) Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 31:568–573PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Webster CS, Merry AF, Emmens DJ, Van Cotthem IC, Holland RL (2003) A prospective clinical audit of central venous catheter use and complications in 1000 consecutive patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 31:80–86PubMed Webster CS, Merry AF, Emmens DJ, Van Cotthem IC, Holland RL (2003) A prospective clinical audit of central venous catheter use and complications in 1000 consecutive patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 31:80–86PubMed
3.
go back to reference Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA (2005) Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 100:748–753PubMedCrossRef Critchley LA, Peng ZY, Fok BS, Lee A, Phillips RA (2005) Testing the reliability of a new ultrasonic cardiac output monitor, by using aortic flowprobes in anesthetized dogs. Anesth Analg 100:748–753PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV (2005) Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 94:287–291PubMedCrossRef Tan HL, Pinder M, Parsons R, Roberts B, van Heerden PV (2005) Clinical evaluation of USCOM ultrasonic cardiac output monitor in cardiac surgical patients in intensive care unit. Br J Anaesth 94:287–291PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N (2006) Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 20:315–319PubMedCrossRef Chand R, Mehta Y, Trehan N (2006) Cardiac output estimation with a new Doppler device after off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 20:315–319PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Knobloch K, Lichtenberg A, Winterhalter M, Rossner D, Pichlmaier M, Phillips R (2005) Non-invasive cardiac output determination by two-dimensional independent Doppler during and after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1479–1484PubMedCrossRef Knobloch K, Lichtenberg A, Winterhalter M, Rossner D, Pichlmaier M, Phillips R (2005) Non-invasive cardiac output determination by two-dimensional independent Doppler during and after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1479–1484PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P (2006) Measurement of cardiac output with a noninvasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Crit Care Resusc 8:309–314PubMed Chan JS, Segara D, Nair P (2006) Measurement of cardiac output with a noninvasive continuous wave Doppler device versus the pulmonary artery catheter: a comparative study. Crit Care Resusc 8:309–314PubMed
8.
go back to reference Knobloch K, Hubrich V, Rohmann P, Lupkemann M, Gerich T, Krettek C, Phillips R (2006) Feasibility of preclinical cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance in HEMS in thoracic pain-the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor. Air Med J 25:270–275PubMedCrossRef Knobloch K, Hubrich V, Rohmann P, Lupkemann M, Gerich T, Krettek C, Phillips R (2006) Feasibility of preclinical cardiac output and systemic vascular resistance in HEMS in thoracic pain-the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor. Air Med J 25:270–275PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Knobloch K, Hoeltke V, Jakob E, Vogt PM, Phillips R (2007) Non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in exercise testing. Int J Cardiol 2007 (epub ahead of print: 26 April) Knobloch K, Hoeltke V, Jakob E, Vogt PM, Phillips R (2007) Non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring in exercise testing. Int J Cardiol 2007 (epub ahead of print: 26 April)
10.
go back to reference Siu CW, Tse HF, Lee K, Chan HW, Yung C, Lee S, Lau CP (2007) Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization by ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30:50–55PubMedCrossRef Siu CW, Tse HF, Lee K, Chan HW, Yung C, Lee S, Lau CP (2007) Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization by ultrasonic cardiac output monitoring (USCOM) device. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 30:50–55PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet I:307–310 Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet I:307–310
12.
go back to reference Tibbals J, Hochmann M, Osborne A, Carter B (1992) Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs. Anaesth Intensive Care 20:326–331 Tibbals J, Hochmann M, Osborne A, Carter B (1992) Accuracy of the BoMED NCCOM3 bioimpedance cardiac output monitor during induced hypotension: an experimental study in dogs. Anaesth Intensive Care 20:326–331
13.
go back to reference Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH (1999) A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 15:85–91CrossRef Critchley LAH, Critchley JAJH (1999) A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit 15:85–91CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Dey I, Sprivulis P (2004) Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas 17:193–199 Dey I, Sprivulis P (2004) Emergency physicians can reliably assess emergency department patient cardiac output using the USCOM continuous wave Doppler cardiac output monitor. Emerg Med Australas 17:193–199
15.
go back to reference Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, Thomas JD, Newell J, King ME, Weyman AE (1992) New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:983–988PubMedCrossRef Nidorf SM, Picard MH, Triulzi MO, Thomas JD, Newell J, King ME, Weyman AE (1992) New perspectives in the assessment of cardiac chamber dimensions during development and adulthood. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:983–988PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gardin JM, Tobis JM, Dabestani A, Smith C, Elkayam U, Castleman E, White D, Allfie A, Henry WL (1985) Superiority of two-dimensional measurement of aortic vessel diameter in Doppler echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular stroke volume. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:66–74PubMedCrossRef Gardin JM, Tobis JM, Dabestani A, Smith C, Elkayam U, Castleman E, White D, Allfie A, Henry WL (1985) Superiority of two-dimensional measurement of aortic vessel diameter in Doppler echocardiographic estimates of left ventricular stroke volume. J Am Coll Cardiol 6:66–74PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Nottermann DA, Castello FV, Steinberg C, Greenwald BM, O'Loughlin JE, Gold JP (1989) A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children. J Pediatr 115:554–560CrossRef Nottermann DA, Castello FV, Steinberg C, Greenwald BM, O'Loughlin JE, Gold JP (1989) A comparison of thermodilution and pulsed Doppler cardiac output measurement in critically ill children. J Pediatr 115:554–560CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Tibby SM, McLuckie A (1995) Continuous haemodynamic monitoring in children: use of transoesophageal Doppler. Acta Paediatr 84:761–764PubMedCrossRef Murdoch IA, Marsh MJ, Tibby SM, McLuckie A (1995) Continuous haemodynamic monitoring in children: use of transoesophageal Doppler. Acta Paediatr 84:761–764PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cardiac output measurement in children: comparison of the Ultrasound Cardiac Output Monitor with thermodilution cardiac output measurement
Authors
Walter Knirsch
Oliver Kretschmar
Maren Tomaske
Kathrina Stutz
Nicole Nagdyman
Christian Balmer
Achim Schmitz
Dominique Béttex
Felix Berger
Urs Bauersfeld
Markus Weiss
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 6/2008
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-008-1030-y

Other articles of this Issue 6/2008

Intensive Care Medicine 6/2008 Go to the issue