Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetologia 3/2007

01-03-2007 | Letter

Comment on: Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al (2006) Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 49:1711–1721

Author: E. Cerasi

Published in: Diabetologia | Issue 3/2007

Login to get access

Excerpt

To the Editor: The past decade has witnessed the introduction of numerous novel therapeutic agents for type 2 diabetes, from thiazolidinediones to engineered insulins, not to mention the incretin-based therapeutics that are on the verge of entering the market. Confronted with so many options, many physicians could feel confused and unsure regarding the choice of therapeutic agent. It may therefore be understandable that the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes have judged it necessary to generate a consensus statement on the subject, presented simultaneously in Diabetologia and Diabetes Care by Nathan et al. [1, 2]. Nevertheless, I regret that these two societies, which together exert the strongest influence on world diabetes opinion, decided to publish a consensus algorithm, because I believe that diabetes treatment is too complex to be reduced to a useful algorithm. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al (2006) Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 49:1711–1721PubMedCrossRef Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al (2006) Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 49:1711–1721PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al (2006) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 29:1963–1972PubMedCrossRef Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al (2006) Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 29:1963–1972PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kobayashi M, Yamazaki K, Hirao K et al (2006) The status of diabetes control and antidiabetic drug therapy in Japan—a cross-sectional survey of 17,000 patients with diabetes mellitus (JDDM 1). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 73:198–204PubMedCrossRef Kobayashi M, Yamazaki K, Hirao K et al (2006) The status of diabetes control and antidiabetic drug therapy in Japan—a cross-sectional survey of 17,000 patients with diabetes mellitus (JDDM 1). Diabetes Res Clin Pract 73:198–204PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Leibowitz G, Cerasi E (1996) Sulfonylurea treatment of NIDDM patients with cardiovascular disease: a mixed blessing? Diabetologia 39:503–514PubMed Leibowitz G, Cerasi E (1996) Sulfonylurea treatment of NIDDM patients with cardiovascular disease: a mixed blessing? Diabetologia 39:503–514PubMed
5.
go back to reference UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complication in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853CrossRef UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group (1998) Intensive blood glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complication in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837–853CrossRef
6.
go back to reference MacLean CD, Littenberg B, Kennedy AG (2006) Limitations of diabetes pharmacotherapy: results from the Vermont Diabetes Information System study. BMC Fam Pract 7:50PubMedCrossRef MacLean CD, Littenberg B, Kennedy AG (2006) Limitations of diabetes pharmacotherapy: results from the Vermont Diabetes Information System study. BMC Fam Pract 7:50PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Comment on: Nathan DM, Buse JB, Davidson MB et al (2006) Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetologia 49:1711–1721
Author
E. Cerasi
Publication date
01-03-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diabetologia / Issue 3/2007
Print ISSN: 0012-186X
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0428
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00125-006-0573-0

Other articles of this Issue 3/2007

Diabetologia 3/2007 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.