Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 8/2014

01-08-2014 | Original article

Biologically effective dose and definitive radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer

Treatment gaps do affect the risk of biochemical failure

Authors: P. Sanpaolo, V. Barbieri, D. Genovesi

Published in: Strahlentherapie und Onkologie | Issue 8/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and purpose

It is not clear if prolongation of definitive external radiation therapy for prostate cancer has an effect on biochemical failure. The aim of this work was to evaluate whether the biologically effective dose (BED), and in particular the duration of radiotherapy, intended as overall treatment time, has an effect on biochemical failure rates and to develop a nomogram useful to predict the 6-year probability of biochemical failure.

Patients and methods

A total of 670 patients with T1–3 N0 prostate cancer were treated with external beam definitive radiotherapy, to a total dose of 72–79.2 Gy in 40–44 fractions. The computed BED values were treated with restricted cubic splines. Variables were checked for colinearity using Spearman’s test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR) rates. The Cox regression analysis was used to identify prognostic factors of biochemical relapse in the final most performing model and to create a nomogram. Concordance probability estimate and calibration methods were used to validate the nomogram.

Results

Neoadjuvant and concomitant androgen deprivation was administered to 475 patients (70 %). The median follow-up was 80 months (range 20–129 months). Overall, the 6-year FFBR rate was 88.3 %. BED values were associated with higher biochemical failure risk. Age, iPSA, risk category, and days of radiotherapy treatment were independent variables of biochemical failure.

Conclusion

A prolongation of RT (lower BED values) is associated with an increased risk of biochemical failure. The nomogram may be helpful in decision making for the individual patient.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Duncan W, MacDougall RH, Kerr GR (1996) Adverse effect of treatment gaps in the outcome of radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 41:203–207PubMedCrossRef Duncan W, MacDougall RH, Kerr GR (1996) Adverse effect of treatment gaps in the outcome of radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer. Radiother Oncol 41:203–207PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Chatani M, Matayoshi Y, Masaki N et al (1997) Radiation therapy for early glottic carcinoma (T1N0M0). Strahlenther Onkol 173:502–506PubMedCrossRef Chatani M, Matayoshi Y, Masaki N et al (1997) Radiation therapy for early glottic carcinoma (T1N0M0). Strahlenther Onkol 173:502–506PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Manapov F, Klöcking S, Niyazi M et al (2012) Chemoradiotherapy duration correlates with overall survival in limited disease SCLC patients with poor initial performance status who successfully completed multimodality treatment. Strahlenther Onkol 188:29–34PubMedCrossRef Manapov F, Klöcking S, Niyazi M et al (2012) Chemoradiotherapy duration correlates with overall survival in limited disease SCLC patients with poor initial performance status who successfully completed multimodality treatment. Strahlenther Onkol 188:29–34PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference D’Ambrosio DJ, Li T, Horwitz EM et al (2008) Does treatment duration affect outcome after radiotherapy for prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:1402–1407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef D’Ambrosio DJ, Li T, Horwitz EM et al (2008) Does treatment duration affect outcome after radiotherapy for prostate cancer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 72:1402–1407PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Thames HD, Kuban D, Levy LB et al (2010) The role of overall treatment time in the outcome of radiotherapy of prostate cancer: an analysis of biochemical failure in 4839 men treated between 1987 and 1995. Radiother Oncol 96:6–12PubMedCrossRef Thames HD, Kuban D, Levy LB et al (2010) The role of overall treatment time in the outcome of radiotherapy of prostate cancer: an analysis of biochemical failure in 4839 men treated between 1987 and 1995. Radiother Oncol 96:6–12PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lai PP, Pilepich MV, Krall JM et al (1991) The effect of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 75-06 experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:925–933PubMedCrossRef Lai PP, Pilepich MV, Krall JM et al (1991) The effect of overall treatment time on the outcome of definitive radiotherapy for localized prostate carcinoma: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 75-06 experience. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21:925–933PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin SB et al (1998) Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:491–500PubMedCrossRef Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin SB et al (1998) Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 41:491–500PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Fowler JF (1989) The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 62:679–694PubMedCrossRef Fowler JF (1989) The linear-quadratic formula and progress in fractionated radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 62:679–694PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Dale RG (1985) The application of the linear quadratic theory to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 59:515–528CrossRef Dale RG (1985) The application of the linear quadratic theory to fractionated and protracted radiotherapy. Br J Radiol 59:515–528CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Williams SG, Taylor JMG, Liu N et al (2007) Use of individual fraction size data from 3756 patients to directly determine the ratio of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:24–33PubMedCrossRef Williams SG, Taylor JMG, Liu N et al (2007) Use of individual fraction size data from 3756 patients to directly determine the ratio of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 68:24–33PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Miles EF, Lee WR (2008) Hypofractionation for prostate cancer: a critical review. Semin Radiat Oncol 18:41–47PubMedCrossRef Miles EF, Lee WR (2008) Hypofractionation for prostate cancer: a critical review. Semin Radiat Oncol 18:41–47PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lukka H, Hayter C, Julian JA et al (2005) Randomized trial comparing two fractionation schedules for patients with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:6132–6138PubMedCrossRef Lukka H, Hayter C, Julian JA et al (2005) Randomized trial comparing two fractionation schedules for patients with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:6132–6138PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Yeoh EE, Fraser RJ, McGowan RE et al (2003) Evidence for efficacy without increased toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: early results of a phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:943–955PubMedCrossRef Yeoh EE, Fraser RJ, McGowan RE et al (2003) Evidence for efficacy without increased toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: early results of a phase III randomized trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 55:943–955PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Barbieri V, Sanpaolo P, Genovesi D (2011) Interval between breast-conserving surgery and start of radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer is not predictive of local recurrence: a single-institution experience. Clin Breast Cancer 11:114–120PubMedCrossRef Barbieri V, Sanpaolo P, Genovesi D (2011) Interval between breast-conserving surgery and start of radiation therapy in early-stage breast cancer is not predictive of local recurrence: a single-institution experience. Clin Breast Cancer 11:114–120PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dale RG, Henfry JH, Jones B (2002) Practical methods for compensating for missed treatment days in radiotherapy, with particular reference to head and neck schedule. Clin Oncol 14:382–393CrossRef Dale RG, Henfry JH, Jones B (2002) Practical methods for compensating for missed treatment days in radiotherapy, with particular reference to head and neck schedule. Clin Oncol 14:382–393CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Roach M III, Hanks G, Thames H Jr et al (2006) Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:965–974PubMedCrossRef Roach M III, Hanks G, Thames H Jr et al (2006) Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65:965–974PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Hall ET (1999) Fractionation and protraction of radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:1095–1101PubMedCrossRef Brenner DJ, Hall ET (1999) Fractionation and protraction of radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 43:1095–1101PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hiratsuka J, Yoshimasa J, Yoshida K et al (2004) Clinical results of combined treatment conformal high dose rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy using staging lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:684–690PubMedCrossRef Hiratsuka J, Yoshimasa J, Yoshida K et al (2004) Clinical results of combined treatment conformal high dose rate iridium-192 brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy using staging lymphadenectomy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 59:684–690PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark BD (1996) Multivariate prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef Harrell FE, Lee KL, Mark BD (1996) Multivariate prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors. Stat Med 15:361–387PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gonen M, Heller G (2005) Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazard regression. Biometrika 92:965–970CrossRef Gonen M, Heller G (2005) Concordance probability and discriminatory power in proportional hazard regression. Biometrika 92:965–970CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Horwitz EM, Vicini FA, Ziaja EL et al (1997) An analysis of clinical and treatment related prognostic factors on outcome using biochemical control as an end-point in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiaton. Radiother Oncol 44:223–228PubMedCrossRef Horwitz EM, Vicini FA, Ziaja EL et al (1997) An analysis of clinical and treatment related prognostic factors on outcome using biochemical control as an end-point in patients with prostate cancer treated with external beam irradiaton. Radiother Oncol 44:223–228PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Liauw SL, Liauw SH (2011) Prolongation of total treatment time because of infrequently missed days of treatment is not associated with inferior biochemical outcome after dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:751–757PubMedCrossRef Liauw SL, Liauw SH (2011) Prolongation of total treatment time because of infrequently missed days of treatment is not associated with inferior biochemical outcome after dose-escalated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 81:751–757PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Miralbell R, Robert SA, Zubizarreta E et al (2012) Dose-fraction sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9–2.2) Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e17–e24PubMedCrossRef Miralbell R, Robert SA, Zubizarreta E et al (2012) Dose-fraction sensitivity of prostate cancer deduced from radiotherapy outcomes of 5969 patients in seven international institutional datasets: α/β = 1.4 (0.9–2.2) Gy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:e17–e24PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Sun L, Cabarcas SM, Farrar WL (2011) Radioresistance and cancer stem cells: survival of the fittest. J Carcinogene Mutagene S1:004. doi:10.4172/2157-2518.S1-004 Sun L, Cabarcas SM, Farrar WL (2011) Radioresistance and cancer stem cells: survival of the fittest. J Carcinogene Mutagene S1:004. doi:10.4172/2157-2518.S1-004
Metadata
Title
Biologically effective dose and definitive radiation treatment for localized prostate cancer
Treatment gaps do affect the risk of biochemical failure
Authors
P. Sanpaolo
V. Barbieri
D. Genovesi
Publication date
01-08-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie / Issue 8/2014
Print ISSN: 0179-7158
Electronic ISSN: 1439-099X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-014-0642-0

Other articles of this Issue 8/2014

Strahlentherapie und Onkologie 8/2014 Go to the issue