Skip to main content
Top
Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 5/2012

01-10-2012 | Original Research Article

Antihypertensive Effects of Olmesartan Compared with Other Angiotensin Receptor Blockers

A Meta-Analysis

Authors: Long Wang, Jian-wei Zhao, Bing Liu, Duo Shi, Dr Zui Zou, MD, Dr Xue-yin Shi, MD

Published in: American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives: Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists (angiotensin receptor blockers [ARBs]) have been shown to be effective and well tolerated in hypertensive patients. Olmesartan is the seventh angiotensin receptor blocker licensed by the US Food and Drug Administration. The aim of this meta-analysis was to determine the efficacy and tolerability of olmesartan medoxomil in comparison with other ARBs.
Data Sources: Reports of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of olmesartan versus other ARBs were identified through a systematic search of PubMed (up to July 2010), EMBASE (1980 to July 2010), SinoMed (up to July 2010), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Cochrane Library Issue 7,2010).
Review Methods: Pertinent studies were selected through extensive searches of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and SinoMed. Two of the authors abstracted data from the identified studies independently. Criteria for inclusion in our meta-analyses were randomized clinical trials in which patients were receiving an ARB and outcome data for blood pressure reduction or the incidence of adverse events were available. Quantitative and qualitative analyses of data from all RCTs meeting the criteria were performed. Our meta-analysis was undertaken according to the Quality of Reporting Meta-analyses (QUOROM) statement.
Results: Twenty-two studies with data from 4892 patients were considered for analyses. Olmesartan provided greater diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) reductions compared with losartan (DBP: 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59, 2.62; SBP: 95% CI 0.46, 5.92). Olmesartan provided greater SBP reductions compared with valsartan (95% CI 0.29, 3.16). Similar blood pressure response rates and incidence of adverse events were found with losartan, valsartan, candesartan, and irbesartan.
Conclusion: Olmesartan provides better antihypertensive efficacy than losartan and valsartan and has no association with an increased risk of adverse events in comparison with losartan, valsartan, candesartan, and irbesartan.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wilkins Campbell NR, Joffres MR, et al. Blood pressure in Canadian adults. Health Rep 2010 Mar; 21 (1): 37–46 Wilkins Campbell NR, Joffres MR, et al. Blood pressure in Canadian adults. Health Rep 2010 Mar; 21 (1): 37–46
2.
3.
go back to reference Theodoratou D, Maniadakis N, Fragoulakis V, et al. Analysis of published economic evaluations of angiotensin receptor blockers. Hellenic J Cardiol 2009 Mar–Apr; 50 (2): 105–18PubMed Theodoratou D, Maniadakis N, Fragoulakis V, et al. Analysis of published economic evaluations of angiotensin receptor blockers. Hellenic J Cardiol 2009 Mar–Apr; 50 (2): 105–18PubMed
4.
go back to reference Catanzaro DF, Frishman WH. Angiotensin receptor blockers for management of hypertension. South Med J 2010 Jul; 103 (7): 669–73PubMedCrossRef Catanzaro DF, Frishman WH. Angiotensin receptor blockers for management of hypertension. South Med J 2010 Jul; 103 (7): 669–73PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Scott LJ, McCormack PL. Olmesartan medoxomil: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 2008; 68 (9): 1239–72PubMedCrossRef Scott LJ, McCormack PL. Olmesartan medoxomil: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs 2008; 68 (9): 1239–72PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Zhang YW, Ding R, Wu ZG. The effects and safety of mild and moderate primary hypertension treated with olmesartan medoxomil. World Clinical Drugs 2006; 27 (10): 585–8 Zhang YW, Ding R, Wu ZG. The effects and safety of mild and moderate primary hypertension treated with olmesartan medoxomil. World Clinical Drugs 2006; 27 (10): 585–8
7.
go back to reference Jing S, Sun NL, Ke YN. Effects and safety of mild and moderate primary hypertension treated with olmesartan medoxomil tablet. Chin J Clin Pharmaco 2006; 22 (1): 3–6 Jing S, Sun NL, Ke YN. Effects and safety of mild and moderate primary hypertension treated with olmesartan medoxomil tablet. Chin J Clin Pharmaco 2006; 22 (1): 3–6
8.
go back to reference Giles TD, Oparil S, Silfani TN, et al. Comparison of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, and valsartan in patients with essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2007 Mar; 9 (3): 187–95CrossRef Giles TD, Oparil S, Silfani TN, et al. Comparison of increasing doses of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, and valsartan in patients with essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2007 Mar; 9 (3): 187–95CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fogari R, Zoppi A, Mugellini A, et al. Hydrochlorothiazide added to valsartan is more effective than when added to olmesartan in reducing blood pressure in moderately hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by monotherapy. Adv Ther 2006 Sep–Oct; 23 (5): 680–95PubMedCrossRef Fogari R, Zoppi A, Mugellini A, et al. Hydrochlorothiazide added to valsartan is more effective than when added to olmesartan in reducing blood pressure in moderately hypertensive patients inadequately controlled by monotherapy. Adv Ther 2006 Sep–Oct; 23 (5): 680–95PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996 Feb; 17 (1): 1–12PubMedCrossRef Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996 Feb; 17 (1): 1–12PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Zou Z, Xu F, Wang L, et al. Antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of trandolapril/verapamil combination: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hum Hypertens 2010; 25 (3): 203–10PubMedCrossRef Zou Z, Xu F, Wang L, et al. Antihypertensive and renoprotective effects of trandolapril/verapamil combination: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Hum Hypertens 2010; 25 (3): 203–10PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999 Nov 27; 354 (9193): 1896–900 Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999 Nov 27; 354 (9193): 1896–900
13.
go back to reference Higgins JPT Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2. September 2009. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009 Higgins JPT Green S, editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, version 5.0.2. September 2009. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2009
14.
go back to reference Lv Y, Zou Z, Chen G, et al. Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Blood Press Monit 2010; 15 (4): 195–204PubMedCrossRef Lv Y, Zou Z, Chen G, et al. Amlodipine and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor combination versus amlodipine monotherapy in hypertension: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Blood Press Monit 2010; 15 (4): 195–204PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hu YR, Chen SX, Zhang J. Efficacy and safety of domestic olmesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science) 2009; 29 (11): 1359–62 Hu YR, Chen SX, Zhang J. Efficacy and safety of domestic olmesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science) 2009; 29 (11): 1359–62
16.
go back to reference He CZ, Lei XG, Zeng ZY. Efficacy of domestic olmesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Guangxi Med Univ 2008; 25 (6): 922–3 He CZ, Lei XG, Zeng ZY. Efficacy of domestic olmesartan in treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension. Guangxi Med Univ 2008; 25 (6): 922–3
17.
go back to reference Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001 Sep–Oct; 3 (5): 283–91, 318CrossRef Oparil S, Williams D, Chrysant SG, et al. Comparative efficacy of olmesartan, losartan, valsartan, and irbesartan in the control of essential hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2001 Sep–Oct; 3 (5): 283–91, 318CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Giles T, Oparil S. Comparison of ascending doses of olmesartan medoxomil (o), losartan potassium (l) and valsartan (v) in patients (pts) with essential hypertension (htn). Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (5): A56–60 Giles T, Oparil S. Comparison of ascending doses of olmesartan medoxomil (o), losartan potassium (l) and valsartan (v) in patients (pts) with essential hypertension (htn). Am J Hypertens 2005; 18 (5): A56–60
19.
go back to reference Kong Y, Chu SL, Du J. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science) 2008; 28 (2): 180–2 Kong Y, Chu SL, Du J. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ (Medical Science) 2008; 28 (2): 180–2
20.
go back to reference Zhu JR, Cai NS, Fan WH, et al. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2006 Oct; 34 (10): 877–81PubMed Zhu JR, Cai NS, Fan WH, et al. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil versus losartan potassium in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension [in Chinese]. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi 2006 Oct; 34 (10): 877–81PubMed
21.
go back to reference Hao TL, Zhang YZ. Effects of Olmesartan M edoxomil in Patients with Primary Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Journal of Medical Forum 2010; 31 (1): 12–4, 7 Hao TL, Zhang YZ. Effects of Olmesartan M edoxomil in Patients with Primary Hypertension and Left Ventricular Hypertrophy. Journal of Medical Forum 2010; 31 (1): 12–4, 7
22.
go back to reference Liu XF. Effects of mild and moderate primary hypertension treated with olmesartan. China modern doctor 2009; 47 (18): 228–31 Liu XF. Effects of mild and moderate primary hypertension treated with olmesartan. China modern doctor 2009; 47 (18): 228–31
23.
go back to reference Xi L, Tian F. Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan monotherapy in isolated systolic hypertension. Chinese journal of integrative medicine on cardio-/cerebrovascular disease 2009; 7 (12): 1391–2 Xi L, Tian F. Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of olmesartan monotherapy in isolated systolic hypertension. Chinese journal of integrative medicine on cardio-/cerebrovascular disease 2009; 7 (12): 1391–2
24.
go back to reference Brunner HR, Arakawa K. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil in achieving 24-hour blood pressure reductions and ambulatory blood pressure goals. Clin Drug Investig 2006; 26 (4): 185–93PubMedCrossRef Brunner HR, Arakawa K. Antihypertensive efficacy of olmesartan medoxomil and candesartan cilexetil in achieving 24-hour blood pressure reductions and ambulatory blood pressure goals. Clin Drug Investig 2006; 26 (4): 185–93PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Smith DH, Dubiel R, Jones M. Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005; 5 (1): 41–50PubMedCrossRef Smith DH, Dubiel R, Jones M. Use of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring to assess antihypertensive efficacy: a comparison of olmesartan medoxomil, losartan potassium, valsartan, and irbesartan. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs 2005; 5 (1): 41–50PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference He RM, Luo XY, Cao JM, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of domestic olmesartan monotherapy in mild or moderate essential hypertension. Shanghai Med J 2007; 30 (4): 245–51 He RM, Luo XY, Cao JM, et al. Antihypertensive efficacy and safety of domestic olmesartan monotherapy in mild or moderate essential hypertension. Shanghai Med J 2007; 30 (4): 245–51
27.
go back to reference Tsutamoto T, Nishiyama K, Yamaji M, et al. Comparison of the long-term effects of candesartan and olmesartan on plasma angiotensin II and left ventricular mass index in patients with hypertension. Hypertens Res 2010 Feb; 33 (2): 118–22PubMedCrossRef Tsutamoto T, Nishiyama K, Yamaji M, et al. Comparison of the long-term effects of candesartan and olmesartan on plasma angiotensin II and left ventricular mass index in patients with hypertension. Hypertens Res 2010 Feb; 33 (2): 118–22PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Destro M, Scabrosetti R, Vanasia A, et al. Comparative efficacy of valsartan and olmesartan in mild-to-moderate hypertension: results of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Adv Ther 2005 Jan–Feb; 22 (1): 32–43PubMedCrossRef Destro M, Scabrosetti R, Vanasia A, et al. Comparative efficacy of valsartan and olmesartan in mild-to-moderate hypertension: results of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Adv Ther 2005 Jan–Feb; 22 (1): 32–43PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Li W, Chen XL, Guan SM. Clinical efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. J Clin Cardiol (China) 2008; 24 (10): 737–9 Li W, Chen XL, Guan SM. Clinical efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. J Clin Cardiol (China) 2008; 24 (10): 737–9
30.
go back to reference Li W, Chen XL, Guan SM. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan and valsartan in young and middle-aged patients. Clin Med China 2009; 25 (7): 704–5 Li W, Chen XL, Guan SM. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan and valsartan in young and middle-aged patients. Clin Med China 2009; 25 (7): 704–5
31.
go back to reference Chen ZH, Gu Y, Liu QH, et al. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil tablet in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. Chin J New Drugs Clin Rem 2007; 26 (6): 440–2 Chen ZH, Gu Y, Liu QH, et al. Efficacy and safety of olmesartan medoxomil tablet in patients with mild to moderate primary hypertension. Chin J New Drugs Clin Rem 2007; 26 (6): 440–2
32.
go back to reference Zhang JH, Chen SC, Zhang SZ. Effect and safety of olmesartan medoxomil on treatment of essential hypertension. China Pharmacist 2008; 11 (11): 1354–5 Zhang JH, Chen SC, Zhang SZ. Effect and safety of olmesartan medoxomil on treatment of essential hypertension. China Pharmacist 2008; 11 (11): 1354–5
33.
go back to reference Conlin Pr Fau-Spence JD, Spence Jd Fau-Williams B, Williams B, Fau-Ribeiro AB, Ribeiro Ab Fau-Saito I, Saito I Fau-Benedict C, Benedict C Fau-Bunt AM, et al. Angiotensin II antagonists for hypertension: are there differences in efficacy? Am J Hypertens 2000; 13 (4 Pt 1): 418–26CrossRef Conlin Pr Fau-Spence JD, Spence Jd Fau-Williams B, Williams B, Fau-Ribeiro AB, Ribeiro Ab Fau-Saito I, Saito I Fau-Benedict C, Benedict C Fau-Bunt AM, et al. Angiotensin II antagonists for hypertension: are there differences in efficacy? Am J Hypertens 2000; 13 (4 Pt 1): 418–26CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Ross S, Akhras K, Zhang S, et al. Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 940–53PubMedCrossRef Ross S, Akhras K, Zhang S, et al. Discontinuation of antihypertensive drugs due to adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy 2001; 21: 940–53PubMedCrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Smith DH. Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension. Drugs 2008; 68 (9): 1207–25PubMedCrossRef Smith DH. Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension. Drugs 2008; 68 (9): 1207–25PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Nixon RM, Muller E, Lowy A, et al. Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach. Int J Clin Pract 2009 May; 63 (5): 766–75 Nixon RM, Muller E, Lowy A, et al. Valsartan vs. other angiotensin II receptor blockers in the treatment of hypertension: a meta-analytical approach. Int J Clin Pract 2009 May; 63 (5): 766–75
Metadata
Title
Antihypertensive Effects of Olmesartan Compared with Other Angiotensin Receptor Blockers
A Meta-Analysis
Authors
Long Wang
Jian-wei Zhao
Bing Liu
Duo Shi
Dr Zui Zou, MD
Dr Xue-yin Shi, MD
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 1175-3277
Electronic ISSN: 1179-187X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03261842

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs 5/2012 Go to the issue

Therapy In Practice

Tangier Disease