Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Practical Application

Analytical strategies for characterizing chemotherapy diffusion with patient-level population-based data

Authors: Dr Cami S. Sima, Katherine S. Panageas, Glenn Heller, Deborah Schrag

Published in: Applied Health Economics and Health Policy | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

To inform assessments of the quality of cancer care, we describe analytical approaches to characterizing trends in diffusion of chemotherapy drugs subsequent to their US FDA approval. The economics and medical literature provide two distinct sets of empirical methods for investigating diffusion of innovations: aggregate models, which use the level of market penetration as an estimator of diffusion; and disaggregate models, which evaluate diffusion based on the time required for different individual units to adopt innovations. When patient-level population-based data are available, disaggregate methods make the best use of the available information. We propose a method that employs time-to-event techniques to describe the probability of utilization of a drug within a specified timeframe subsequent to the diagnosis of cancer. By mapping the relationship between this probability and calendar time of a patient’s diagnosis, we can assess trends in diffusion. Our approach accounts for the dependent censoring for death, as well as for the clustering of patients within physicians. The method proposed is illustrated using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data applied to two case studies: gemcitabine, approved for stage III/IV pancreatic cancer; and irinotecan, approved as a second-line therapy for stage IV colorectal cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Patt DA, Duan Z, Fang S, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia after adjuvant breast cancer therapy in older women: understanding risk. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3871–6PubMedCrossRef Patt DA, Duan Z, Fang S, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia after adjuvant breast cancer therapy in older women: understanding risk. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3871–6PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Pinder MC, Duan Z, Goodwin JS, et al. Congestive heart failure in older women treated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3808–15PubMedCrossRef Pinder MC, Duan Z, Goodwin JS, et al. Congestive heart failure in older women treated with adjuvant anthracycline chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2007; 25: 3808–15PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Robertson M, George T, Chang M, et al. A case-control study evaluating differences in resource utilization between diabetic and non-diabetic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy [abstract]. J Clin Oncol ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 2006; 24: 6126 Robertson M, George T, Chang M, et al. A case-control study evaluating differences in resource utilization between diabetic and non-diabetic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy [abstract]. J Clin Oncol ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings 2006; 24: 6126
4.
go back to reference Ng W, Gabriel G, Moylan E. Predictive factors for the underutilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer in Southwestern Sydney [abstract]. J Clin Oncol ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (post-meeting edition) 2006; 24(18 Suppl.): 6070 Ng W, Gabriel G, Moylan E. Predictive factors for the underutilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer in Southwestern Sydney [abstract]. J Clin Oncol ASCO Annual Meeting Proceedings (post-meeting edition) 2006; 24(18 Suppl.): 6070
5.
go back to reference Schrag D. The price tag on progress: chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 317–9PubMedCrossRef Schrag D. The price tag on progress: chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 317–9PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Dybdahl T, Andersen M, Kragstrup J, et al. General practitioners’ adoption of new drugs and previous prescribing of drugs belonging to the same therapeutic class: a pharmacoepidemiological study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 60: 526–33PubMedCrossRef Dybdahl T, Andersen M, Kragstrup J, et al. General practitioners’ adoption of new drugs and previous prescribing of drugs belonging to the same therapeutic class: a pharmacoepidemiological study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2005; 60: 526–33PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Peay MY, Peay ER. The role of commercial sources in the adoption of a new drug. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 1183–9PubMedCrossRef Peay MY, Peay ER. The role of commercial sources in the adoption of a new drug. Soc Sci Med 1988; 26: 1183–9PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Stoneman P, Karshenas M. The diffusion of new technology: extensions to theory and evidence. In: Swann P, editor. New technologies and the firm: innovation and competition. London and New York: Routledge, 1993: 177–200 Stoneman P, Karshenas M. The diffusion of new technology: extensions to theory and evidence. In: Swann P, editor. New technologies and the firm: innovation and competition. London and New York: Routledge, 1993: 177–200
9.
go back to reference Baptista R. The diffusion of process innovations: a selective review. Int J Econ Business 1999; 6: 107–30CrossRef Baptista R. The diffusion of process innovations: a selective review. Int J Econ Business 1999; 6: 107–30CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 1957; 48: 501–22CrossRef Griliches Z. Hybrid corn: an exploration in the economics of technological change. Econometrica 1957; 48: 501–22CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Mansfield E. Industrial research and technological innovation. New York: Norton, 1968 Mansfield E. Industrial research and technological innovation. New York: Norton, 1968
12.
go back to reference Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 102–11PubMedCrossRef Ash J. Organizational factors that influence information technology diffusion in academic health sciences centers. J Am Med Inform Assoc 1997; 4: 102–11PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Brancheau JC, Wetherbe JC. The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Inf Sys Res 1990; 1: 115–43CrossRef Brancheau JC, Wetherbe JC. The adoption of spreadsheet software: testing innovation diffusion theory in the context of end-user computing. Inf Sys Res 1990; 1: 115–43CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gatignon H, Robertson TS. Technology diffusion: an empirical test of competitive effects. J Mark 1989; 53: 35–49CrossRef Gatignon H, Robertson TS. Technology diffusion: an empirical test of competitive effects. J Mark 1989; 53: 35–49CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Geroski PA. Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy 29: 603–25 Geroski PA. Models of technology diffusion. Research Policy 29: 603–25
17.
go back to reference Heckman J, Burton S. Econometric duration analysis. J Econom 1984; 24: 63–32CrossRef Heckman J, Burton S. Econometric duration analysis. J Econom 1984; 24: 63–32CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hannan T, McDowell J. Rival precedence and the dynamics of technology adoption. Econometrica 1987; 54: 155–71 Hannan T, McDowell J. Rival precedence and the dynamics of technology adoption. Econometrica 1987; 54: 155–71
19.
go back to reference Rose N, Jaskow P. The diffusion of new technology: evidence from the electric utility industry. Rand JEcon 1990;21: 354–73CrossRef Rose N, Jaskow P. The diffusion of new technology: evidence from the electric utility industry. Rand JEcon 1990;21: 354–73CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Feuer EJ, Frey CM, Brawley OW, et al. After a treatment breakthrough: a comparison of trial and population-based data for advanced testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 368–77PubMed Feuer EJ, Frey CM, Brawley OW, et al. After a treatment breakthrough: a comparison of trial and population-based data for advanced testicular cancer. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 368–77PubMed
21.
go back to reference Knopf KB, Warren JL, Feuer EJ, et al. Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 563–71PubMedCrossRef Knopf KB, Warren JL, Feuer EJ, et al. Bowel surveillance patterns after a diagnosis of colorectal cancer in Medicare beneficiaries. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 563–71PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Harlan LC, Clegg LX, Abrams J, et al. Community-based use of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early-stage breast cancer: 1987–2000. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 872–7PubMedCrossRef Harlan LC, Clegg LX, Abrams J, et al. Community-based use of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early-stage breast cancer: 1987–2000. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 872–7PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Mariotto AB, Feuer EJ, Harlan LC, et al. Dissemination of adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States using estrogen receptor information: 1975–1999. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2006; 7–15 Mariotto AB, Feuer EJ, Harlan LC, et al. Dissemination of adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy and tamoxifen for breast cancer in the United States using estrogen receptor information: 1975–1999. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2006; 7–15
24.
go back to reference Cronin KA, Yu B, Krapcho M, et al. Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16: 701–12PubMedCrossRef Cronin KA, Yu B, Krapcho M, et al. Modeling the dissemination of mammography in the United States. Cancer Causes Control 2005; 16: 701–12PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Baker LC, Wheeler SK. Managed care and technology diffusion: the case of MRI. Health Aff (Millwood) 1998; 17: 195–207CrossRef Baker LC, Wheeler SK. Managed care and technology diffusion: the case of MRI. Health Aff (Millwood) 1998; 17: 195–207CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Baker LC. Managed care and technology adoption in health care: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. J Health Econ 2001; 20: 395–421PubMedCrossRef Baker LC. Managed care and technology adoption in health care: evidence from magnetic resonance imaging. J Health Econ 2001; 20: 395–421PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Baker LC, Atlas SW. Relationship between HMO market share and the diffusion and use of advanced MRI technologies. J Am Coll Radiol 2004; 1: 478–87PubMedCrossRef Baker LC, Atlas SW. Relationship between HMO market share and the diffusion and use of advanced MRI technologies. J Am Coll Radiol 2004; 1: 478–87PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Baker LC, Brown ML. Managed care, consolidation among health care providers, and health care: evidence from mammography. Rand J Econ 1999; 30: 351–74PubMedCrossRef Baker LC, Brown ML. Managed care, consolidation among health care providers, and health care: evidence from mammography. Rand J Econ 1999; 30: 351–74PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Baker LC, Phibbs CS. Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: the adoption of neonatal intensive care. Rand J Econ 2002; 33: 524–48PubMedCrossRef Baker LC, Phibbs CS. Managed care, technology adoption, and health care: the adoption of neonatal intensive care. Rand J Econ 2002; 33: 524–48PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–81CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 1958; 53: 457–81CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Satagopan JM, Ben-Porat L, Berwick M, et al. A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 1229–35PubMedCrossRef Satagopan JM, Ben-Porat L, Berwick M, et al. A note on competing risks in survival data analysis. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 1229–35PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Interscience, 2002CrossRef Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time data. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley-Interscience, 2002CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1988; 16: 1141–54CrossRef Gray RJ. A class of K-sample tests for comparing the cumulative incidence of a competing risk. Ann Stat 1988; 16: 1141–54CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Efron B, Tibshirani R. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. In: Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall, 1993: 178–201 Efron B, Tibshirani R. Better bootstrap confidence intervals. In: Efron B, Tibshirani R. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton (FL): Chapman & Hall, 1993: 178–201
38.
go back to reference Davidson AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambrige University, 2003 Davidson AC, Hinkley DV. Bootstrap methods and their application. Cambridge: Cambrige University, 2003
39.
go back to reference Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2403–13PubMed Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, et al. Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 2403–13PubMed
40.
go back to reference Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Invest New Drugs 1994; 12: 29–34PubMedCrossRef Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, et al. Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Invest New Drugs 1994; 12: 29–34PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Conti JA, Kemeny NE, Saltz LB, et al. Irinotecan is an active agent in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 709–15PubMed Conti JA, Kemeny NE, Saltz LB, et al. Irinotecan is an active agent in untreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996; 14: 709–15PubMed
42.
go back to reference Costin D, Potmesil M. Preclinical and clinical development of camptothecins. Adv Pharmacol 1994; 29B: 51–72PubMedCrossRef Costin D, Potmesil M. Preclinical and clinical development of camptothecins. Adv Pharmacol 1994; 29B: 51–72PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Ohe Y, Sasaki Y, Shinkai T, et al. Phase I study and pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 with 5-day continuous infusion. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 972–4PubMedCrossRef Ohe Y, Sasaki Y, Shinkai T, et al. Phase I study and pharmacokinetics of CPT-11 with 5-day continuous infusion. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992; 84: 972–4PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al., on behalf of the Irinotecan Study Group. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 905–14PubMedCrossRef Saltz LB, Cox JV, Blanke C, et al., on behalf of the Irinotecan Study Group. Irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2000; 343: 905–14PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, et al. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 2002; 40: IV–3–18 Warren JL, Klabunde CN, Schrag D, et al. Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care 2002; 40: IV–3–18
48.
go back to reference Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care 2002; 40: IV–55–61 Warren JL, Harlan LC, Fahey A, et al. Utility of the SEER-Medicare data to identify chemotherapy use. Med Care 2002; 40: IV–55–61
49.
go back to reference Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, et al. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. Med Care 2000; 38: 411–21PubMedCrossRef Cooper GS, Yuan Z, Stange KC, et al. Agreement of Medicare claims and tumor registry data for assessment of cancer-related treatment. Med Care 2000; 38: 411–21PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Du XL, Key CR, Dickie L, et al. External validation of medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews. Med Care 2006; 44: 124–31PubMedCrossRef Du XL, Key CR, Dickie L, et al. External validation of medicare claims for breast cancer chemotherapy compared with medical chart reviews. Med Care 2006; 44: 124–31PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Lamont EB, Lauderdale DS, Schilsky RL, et al. Construct validity of medicare chemotherapy claims: the case of 5FU. Med Care 2002; 40: 201–11PubMedCrossRef Lamont EB, Lauderdale DS, Schilsky RL, et al. Construct validity of medicare chemotherapy claims: the case of 5FU. Med Care 2002; 40: 201–11PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Lamont EB, Herndon JE, Weeks JC, et al. Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 1080–3PubMedCrossRef Lamont EB, Herndon JE, Weeks JC, et al. Criterion validity of Medicare chemotherapy claims in Cancer and Leukemia Group B breast and lung cancer trial participants. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 1080–3PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference CPT standard edition: current procedural terminology. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association Press, 2007 CPT standard edition: current procedural terminology. Chicago (IL): American Medical Association Press, 2007
54.
go back to reference Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 1407–27PubMedCrossRef Edwards BK, Brown ML, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975–2002, featuring population-based trends in cancer treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005; 97: 1407–27PubMedCrossRef
55.
go back to reference Holford TR, Cronin KA, Mariotto AB, et al. Changing patterns in breast cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2006; 19–25 Holford TR, Cronin KA, Mariotto AB, et al. Changing patterns in breast cancer incidence trends. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2006; 19–25
56.
go back to reference Desiraju R, Nair H, Chintagunta P. Diffusion of new pharmaceutical drugs in developing and developed nations. Int J Res Mark 2004; 21: 341–57CrossRef Desiraju R, Nair H, Chintagunta P. Diffusion of new pharmaceutical drugs in developing and developed nations. Int J Res Mark 2004; 21: 341–57CrossRef
57.
go back to reference Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Statistical Assoc 1999; 94(446): 496–509CrossRef Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J Am Statistical Assoc 1999; 94(446): 496–509CrossRef
58.
go back to reference Faraggi D, Korn EL. Competing risks with frailty models when treatment affects only one failure type. Biometrika 1996; 83: 467–71CrossRef Faraggi D, Korn EL. Competing risks with frailty models when treatment affects only one failure type. Biometrika 1996; 83: 467–71CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Analytical strategies for characterizing chemotherapy diffusion with patient-level population-based data
Authors
Dr Cami S. Sima
Katherine S. Panageas
Glenn Heller
Deborah Schrag
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 1175-5652
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1896
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03256164

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy 1/2010 Go to the issue

Correspondence

The authors’ reply