Published in:
01-01-2010 | Correspondence
Oral therapies for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension: a population-based cost-minimization analysis
Authors:
Marie-Claude Lefebvre, Elke Hunsche
Published in:
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
|
Issue 1/2010
Login to get access
Excerpt
Dranitsaris and Mehta[
1] reported that, for patients with New York Heart Association functional class (NYHA FC) II/III pulmonary arterial hypertension in Canada, ambrisentan provides the same clinical benefit and is less costly than the other endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), bosentan and sitaxentan, and therefore should be considered as the ERA of choice. Their findings were based on a cost-minimization analysis (CMA) and, as they acknowledge, “the primary requirement of a CMA is that all clinical outcomes be equivalent between comparator treatments.” …