Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Public Health
Published in: BMC Public Health 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Language Development | Research

Mobile device screen time is associated with poorer language development among toddlers: results from a large-scale survey

Authors: Signe Boe Rayce, Gunhild Tidemann Okholm, Trine Flensborg-Madsen

Published in: BMC Public Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Despite young children’s widespread use of mobile devices, little research exists on this use and its association with children’s language development. The aim of this study was to examine the associations between mobile device screen time and language comprehension and expressive language skills. An additional aim was to examine whether three factors related to the domestic learning environment modify the associations.

Methods

The study uses data from the Danish large-scale survey TRACES among two- and three-year-old children (n = 31,125). Mobile device screen time was measured as time spent on mobile devices on a normal day. Measurement of language comprehension and expressive language skills was based on subscales from the Five to Fifteen Toddlers questionnaire. Multivariable linear regression was used to examine the association between child mobile device screen time and language development and logistic regression to examine the risk of experiencing significant language difficulties. Joint exposure analyses were used to examine the association between child mobile device screen time and language development difficulties in combination with three other factors related to the domestic learning environment: parental education, reading to the child and child TV/PC screen time.

Results

High mobile device screen time of one hour or more per day was significantly associated with poorer language development scores and higher odds for both language comprehension difficulties (1–2 h: AOR = 1.30; ≥ 2 h: AOR = 1.42) and expressive language skills difficulties (1–2 h: AOR = 1.19; ≥ 2 h: AOR = 1.46). The results suggest that reading frequently to the child partly buffers the negative effect of high mobile device screen time on language comprehension difficulties but not on expressive language skills difficulties. No modifying effect of parental education and time spent by the child on TV/PC was found.

Conclusions

Mobile device screen time of one hour or more per day is associated with poorer language development among toddlers. Reading frequently to the child may have a buffering effect on language comprehension difficulties but not on expressive language skills difficulties.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Curtis PR, Frey JR, Watson CD, Hampton LH, Roberts MY. Language disorders and problem behaviors: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2018;142(2).
2.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. Pathways to reading: the role of oral language in the transition to reading. Dev Psychol. 2005;41(2):428–42.CrossRef
3.
Johnson CJ, Beitchman JH, Brownlie EB. Twenty-year follow-up of children with and without speech-language impairments: family, educational, occupational, and quality of life outcomes. Am J Speech-Language Pathol. 2010;19:51–65.CrossRef
4.
Raviv T, Kessenich M, Morrison FJ. A mediational model of the association between socioeconomic status and three-year-old language abilities: the role of parenting factors. Early Child Res Q. 2004;19(4):528–47.CrossRef
5.
Madigan S, Browne D, Racine N, Mori C, Tough S. Association between screen time and children’s performance on a developmental screening test. JAMA Pediatr. 2019;173(3):244–50.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
Duch H, Fisher EM, Ensari I, Harrington A. Screen time use in children under 3 years old: a systematic review of correlates. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10(1):1–10.CrossRef
7.
Haughton C, Aiken M, Cheevers C. Cyber babies: the impact of emerging technology on the developing infant. Psychol Res. 2015;5(9):504–18.
8.
Taylor G, Monaghan P, Westermann G. Investigating the association between children’s screen media exposure and vocabulary size in the UK. J Child Media. 2018;12(1):51–65.CrossRef
9.
van den Heuvel M, Ma J, Borkhoff CM, Koroshegyi C, Dai DWH, Parkin PC, et al. Mobile media device use is associated with expressive language delay in 18-month-old children. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2019;40(2):99.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Rideout V. The common sense census: media use by kids age zero to eight. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media; 2020.
11.
Elias N, Sulkin I. Screen-assisted parenting: the relationship between toddlers’ screen time and parents’ use of media as a parenting tool. J Fam Issues. 2019;40(18):2801–22.CrossRef
12.
Christakis DA. The effects of infant media usage: what do we know and what should we learn? Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(1):8–16.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Madigan S, McArthur BA, Anhorn C, Eirich R, Christakis DA. Associations between screen use and child language skills: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(7):665–75.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Christakis DA, Gilkerson J, Richards JA, Zimmerman FJ, Garrison MM, Xu D, et al. Audible television and decreased adult words, infant vocalizations, and conversational turns: a population-based study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2009;163(6):554–8.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Mendelsohn AL, Berkule SB, Tomopoulos S, Tamis-LeMonda CS, Huberman HS, Alvir J, et al. Infant television and video exposure associated with limited parent-child verbal interactions in low socioeconomic status households. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162(5):411–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
16.
17.
Kildare CA, Middlemiss W. Impact of parents mobile device use on parent-child interaction: a literature review. Comput Hum Behav. 2017;75:579–93.CrossRef
18.
Hutton JS, Dudley J, Horowitz-Kraus T, DeWitt T, Holland SK. Associations between screen-based media use and brain white matter integrity in preschool-aged children. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174(1):e193869–193869.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Asikainen M, Kylliäinen A, Mäkelä TE, Saarenpää-Heikkilä O, Paavonen EJ. Exposure to electronic media was negatively associated with speech and language development at 18 and 24 months. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(11):3046–53.PubMedCrossRef
20.
Moon J, Cho SY, Lim SM, Roh JH, Koh MS, Kim YJ, et al. Smart device usage in early childhood is differentially associated with fine motor and language development. Acta Paediatr. 2019;108(5):903–10.PubMedCrossRef
21.
Jing M, Ye T, Kirkorian HL, Mares M. Screen media exposure and young children’s vocabulary learning and development: a meta-analysis. Child Dev. 2023;94(5):1398–418.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Linebarger DL, Vaala SE. Screen media and language development in infants and toddlers: an ecological perspective. Dev Rev. 2010;30(2):176–202.CrossRef
23.
Radesky JS, Christakis DA. Increased screen time: implications for early childhood development and behavior. Pediatr Clin. 2016;63(5):827–39.
24.
Domoff SE, Radesky JS, Harrison K, Riley H, Lumeng JC, Miller AL. A naturalistic study of child and family screen media and mobile device use. J Child Fam Stud. 2019;28(2):401–10.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Lin H-P, Chen K-L, Chou W, Yuan K-S, Yen S-Y, Chen Y-S, et al. Prolonged touch screen device usage is associated with emotional and behavioral problems, but not language delay, in toddlers. Infant Behav Dev. 2020;58:101424.PubMedCrossRef
26.
Dowdall N, Melendez-Torres GJ, Murray L, Gardner F, Hartford L, Cooper PJ. Shared picture book reading interventions for child language development: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Child Dev. 2020;91(2):e383–99.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Sundqvist A, Koch F-S, Birberg Thornberg U, Barr R, Heimann M. Growing up in a digital world–digital media and the association with the child’s language development at two years of age. Front Psychol. 2021;12:569920.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Pace A, Luo R, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM. Identifying pathways between socioeconomic status and language development. Annu Rev Linguist. 2017;3:285–308.CrossRef
29.
Hoff E. How social contexts support and shape language development. Dev Rev. 2006;26(1):55–88.CrossRef
30.
Määttä S, Kaukonen R, Vepsäläinen H, Lehto E, Ylönen A, Ray C, et al. The mediating role of the home environment in relation to parental educational level and preschool children’s screen time: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):1–11.CrossRef
31.
Weigel DJ, Lowman JL, Martin SS. Language development in the years before school: a comparison of developmental assets in home and child care settings. Early Child Dev Care. 2007;177(6–7):719–34.CrossRef
32.
33.
34.
Kadesjö B, Miniscalo C, Hagberg B, Haavisto A, Gillberg. Nordisk spørgeskema til vurdering af børns udvikling og adfærd. Småbørnsversion – for børn i alderen 2–5 år [Questionnaire for evaluation of development and behavior in 2–5 year old children] [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 27]. Available from: www.​5-15.​org/​download.
35.
Kadesjö B, Janois L-O, Korkman M, Mickelsson K, Strand G, Trillingsgaard A et al. Five-To-Fifteen-Revised (5-15R) [Internet]. 2017. Available from: www.5-15.org.
36.
Lambek R, Trillingsgaard A. Elaboration, validation and standardization of the five to fifteen (FTF) questionnaire in a Danish population sample. Res Dev Disabil. 2015;38:161–70.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Schachinger-Lorentzon U, Kadesjö B, Gillberg C, Miniscalco C. Children screening positive for language delay at 2.5 years: Language Disorder and developmental profiles. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018;14:3267.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
38.
Hill E, Calder S, Candy C, Truscott G, Kaur J, Savage B et al. Low language capacity in childhood: a systematic review of prevalence estimates. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023.
39.
Raaska H, Elovainio M, Sinkkonen J, Stolt S, Jalonen I, Matomäki J, et al. Adopted children’s language difficulties and their relation to symptoms of reactive attachment disorder: FinAdo study. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2013;34(3):152–60.CrossRef
40.
Statistics Denmark. Immigrants in Denmark [in Danish: Indvandrere i Danmark]. Copenhagen; 2008.
41.
Topp CW, Østergaard SD, Søndergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 well-being index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167–76.PubMedCrossRef
42.
Northside Partnership Doyle O, Team UGIPE. Preparing for Life collection: Evaluation of the Preparing for Life early childhood intervention, 2008–2015. [collection]. Version 1. Dublin; 2017.
43.
Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, et al. Strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Int J Surg. 2014;12(12):1500–24.PubMedCrossRef
44.
World Health Organization. Guidelines on physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep for children under 5 years of age. World Health Organization; 2019.
45.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Children and media tips from the American Academy of Pediatrics. 2018.
46.
Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL. Modern epidemiology. Volume 3. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Philadelphia; 2008.
47.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Confidence interval estimation of interaction. Epidemiology. 1992;452–6.
48.
McArthur BA, Tough S, Madigan S. Screen time and developmental and behavioral outcomes for preschool children. Pediatr Res. 2022;91(6):1616–21.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Vanderloo LM, Janus M, Omand JA, Keown-Stoneman CDG, Borkhoff CM, Duku E, et al. Children’s screen use and school readiness at 4–6 years: prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):1–11.CrossRef
50.
McArthur BA, Eirich R, McDonald S, Tough S, Madigan S. Screen use relates to decreased offline enrichment activities. Acta Paediatr. 2021;110(3):896–8.PubMedCrossRef
51.
Radesky JS, Eisenberg S, Kistin CJ, Gross J, Block G, Zuckerman B, et al. Overstimulated consumers or next-generation learners? Parent tensions about child mobile technology use. Ann Fam Med. 2016;14(6):503–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
52.
Brown A, Smolenaers E. Parents’ interpretations of screen time recommendations for children younger than 2 years. J Fam Issues. 2018;39(2):406–29.CrossRef
53.
Levine LE, Waite BM, Bowman LL, Kachinsky K. Mobile media use by infants and toddlers. Comput Hum Behav. 2019;94:92–9.CrossRef
54.
Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bornstein MH, Baumwell L, Melstein Damast A. Responsive parenting in the second year: specific influences on children’s language and play. Early Dev Parent Int J Res Pract. 1996;5(4):173–83.CrossRef
55.
Flensborg-Madsen T, Mortensen EL. Language development and intelligence in midlife. Br J Dev Psychol. 2019;37(2):269–83.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Metadata
Title
Mobile device screen time is associated with poorer language development among toddlers: results from a large-scale survey
Authors
Signe Boe Rayce
Gunhild Tidemann Okholm
Trine Flensborg-Madsen
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Public Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2458
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18447-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

BMC Public Health 1/2024 Go to the issue

Research

Evaluation of an online arts-based platform to support the health and well-being of older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey

Research

Perceptions and beliefs of community gatekeepers about genomic risk information in African cleft research

Research

Realization path and connotation of the Healthy China strategy: macroscopic perspective of dietary structure and the entry of individual health consciousness

Research

Modifiable lifestyle, mental health status and diabetic retinopathy in U.S. adults aged 18–64 years with diabetes: a population-based cross-sectional study from NHANES 1999–2018

Research

Demographic and socio-economic correlates of knowledge of the ovulatory cycle among tribal women in India: Evidence from the nationally representative survey (NFHS-5)

Research

The relationship between nighttime exercise and problematic smartphone use before sleep and associated health issues: a cross-sectional study