Skip to main content
Top

15-04-2024 | Acute Coronary Syndrome | Interventional Cardiology (SR Bailey and T Helmy, Section Editors)

Drug-Coated Balloon in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Ready for the Prime Time?

Authors: Simone Fezzi, Sara Malakouti, Jegan Sivalingam, Jacinthe Khater, Flavio Ribichini, Bernardo Cortese

Published in: Current Cardiology Reports

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are a major global health concern. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with new-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) has been endorsed as safe and effective in the management of culprit and non-culprit lesions of ACS. However, permanent metallic implants may have drawbacks, including the need for prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and the risk of long-term stent-related complications. An alternative approach using drug-coated balloons (DCBs) is gaining growing interest, having the potential of delivering therapy directly to vulnerable plaques, avoiding the need for permanent metallic implants, and potentially allowing for better long-term medical treatment. Despite limited evidence, DCB is being explored in several patients’ subgroups. This review aims to discuss the existing evidence regarding DCB in ACS management.

Recent Findings

DCB appears to be a promising strategy in the management of ACS, showing comparable angiographic and clinical results as compared to new-generation DES in relatively small clinical trials or large prospective registries. The advantage of avoiding permanent implants is particularly appealing in this setting, where DCB has the potential of delivering anti-atherogenic local therapy directly to vulnerable plaques still amenable to atherogenic regression. This review seeks to underline the theoretical background of DCB use and reports the available evidence in its support in the specific setting of ACS.

Summary

In the context of ACS, the use of DCB is highly attractive, offering a dedicated anti-atherogenic local therapy, capable of addressing a broad range of vulnerable plaques and patients.

Graphical Abstract

A snapshot of the entire manuscript demonstrating DCB technology with potential benefits in ACS settings and particularly its role in vulnerable plaques with a scheme defining these vulnerable plaques and identifying the patient population who benefits the most from DCB approach treatment.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Grüntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:61–8.PubMedCrossRef Grüntzig AR, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis: percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:61–8.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference McKavanagh P, Zawadowski G, Ahmed N, Kutryk M. The evolution of coronary stents. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16:219–28.PubMedCrossRef McKavanagh P, Zawadowski G, Ahmed N, Kutryk M. The evolution of coronary stents. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2018;16:219–28.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e18–114.PubMed Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022;145:e18–114.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: third report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1391–402.PubMedCrossRef Jeger RV, Eccleshall S, Wan Ahmad WA, et al. Drug-coated balloons for coronary artery disease: third report of the International DCB Consensus Group. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:1391–402.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Madhavan MV, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, et al. Stent-related adverse events >1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:590–604.PubMedCrossRef Madhavan MV, Kirtane AJ, Redfors B, et al. Stent-related adverse events >1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:590–604.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Muller JE, Tofler GH, Stone PH. Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1989;79:733–43.PubMedCrossRef Muller JE, Tofler GH, Stone PH. Circadian variation and triggers of onset of acute cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 1989;79:733–43.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13–18.PubMedCrossRef Virmani R, Burke AP, Farb A, Kolodgie FD. Pathology of the vulnerable plaque. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:C13–18.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Arbab-Zadeh A, Fuster V. From detecting the vulnerable plaque to managing the vulnerable patient: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1582–93.PubMedCrossRef Arbab-Zadeh A, Fuster V. From detecting the vulnerable plaque to managing the vulnerable patient: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;74:1582–93.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Gaba P, Gersh BJ, Muller J, Narula J, Stone GW. Evolving concepts of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and the vulnerable patient: implications for patient care and future research. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20:181–96.PubMedCrossRef Gaba P, Gersh BJ, Muller J, Narula J, Stone GW. Evolving concepts of the vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque and the vulnerable patient: implications for patient care and future research. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023;20:181–96.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Dawson LP, Lum M, Nerleker N, Nicholls SJ, Layland J. Coronary atherosclerotic plaque regression: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:66–82.PubMedCrossRef Dawson LP, Lum M, Nerleker N, Nicholls SJ, Layland J. Coronary atherosclerotic plaque regression: JACC state-of-the-art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;79:66–82.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Byrne RA, Joner M, Alfonso F, Kastrati A. Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:13–23.PubMedCrossRef Byrne RA, Joner M, Alfonso F, Kastrati A. Drug-coated balloon therapy in coronary and peripheral artery disease. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014;11:13–23.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Tepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T, Heller S, Schwarzwälder U, Beregi J-P, Claussen CD, Oldenburg A, Scheller B, Speck U. Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:689–99.PubMedCrossRef Tepe G, Zeller T, Albrecht T, Heller S, Schwarzwälder U, Beregi J-P, Claussen CD, Oldenburg A, Scheller B, Speck U. Local delivery of paclitaxel to inhibit restenosis during angioplasty of the leg. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:689–99.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Tzafriri AR, Muraj B, Garcia-Polite F, Salazar-Martín AG, Markham P, Zani B, Spognardi A, Albaghdadi M, Alston S, Edelman ER. Balloon-based drug coating delivery to the artery wall is dictated by coating micro-morphology and angioplasty pressure gradients. Biomaterials. 2020;260:120337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tzafriri AR, Muraj B, Garcia-Polite F, Salazar-Martín AG, Markham P, Zani B, Spognardi A, Albaghdadi M, Alston S, Edelman ER. Balloon-based drug coating delivery to the artery wall is dictated by coating micro-morphology and angioplasty pressure gradients. Biomaterials. 2020;260:120337.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cioppa A, Stabile E, Popusoi G, et al. Combined treatment of heavy calcified femoro-popliteal lesions using directional atherectomy and a paclitaxel coated balloon: one-year single centre clinical results. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012;13:219–23.PubMedCrossRef Cioppa A, Stabile E, Popusoi G, et al. Combined treatment of heavy calcified femoro-popliteal lesions using directional atherectomy and a paclitaxel coated balloon: one-year single centre clinical results. Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2012;13:219–23.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Fanelli F, Cannavale A, Gazzetti M, Lucatelli P, Wlderk A, Cirelli C, d’Adamo A, Salvatori FM. Calcium burden assessment and impact on drug-eluting balloons in peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:898–907.PubMedCrossRef Fanelli F, Cannavale A, Gazzetti M, Lucatelli P, Wlderk A, Cirelli C, d’Adamo A, Salvatori FM. Calcium burden assessment and impact on drug-eluting balloons in peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37:898–907.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, Hecht HS, Ryan C, Rosenblum J, Cumberland DC, Murphy MC, Hansell HN, Hidalgo B. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1641–52.PubMedCrossRef Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, Hecht HS, Ryan C, Rosenblum J, Cumberland DC, Murphy MC, Hansell HN, Hidalgo B. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;19:1641–52.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2088–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63:2088–98.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Vos NS, Dirksen MT, Vink MA, van Nooijen FC, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Kiemeneij F, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, van der Schaaf RJ. Safety and feasibility of a PAclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty in Primary Percutaneous coronary intervention in Amsterdam (PAPPA): one-year clinical outcome of a pilot study. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:584–90.PubMedCrossRef Vos NS, Dirksen MT, Vink MA, van Nooijen FC, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Kiemeneij F, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, van der Schaaf RJ. Safety and feasibility of a PAclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty in Primary Percutaneous coronary intervention in Amsterdam (PAPPA): one-year clinical outcome of a pilot study. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:584–90.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Belkacemi A, Agostoni P, Nathoe HM, et al. First results of the DEB-AMI (drug eluting balloon in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial: a multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention with 6-month angiographic, intravascular, functional, and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2327–37.PubMedCrossRef Belkacemi A, Agostoni P, Nathoe HM, et al. First results of the DEB-AMI (drug eluting balloon in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction) trial: a multicenter randomized comparison of drug-eluting balloon plus bare-metal stent versus bare-metal stent versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention with 6-month angiographic, intravascular, functional, and clinical outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59:2327–37.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gobić D, Tomulić V, Lulić D, Židan D, Brusich S, Jakljević T, Zaputović L. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study. Am J Med Sci. 2017;354:553–60.PubMedCrossRef Gobić D, Tomulić V, Lulić D, Židan D, Brusich S, Jakljević T, Zaputović L. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study. Am J Med Sci. 2017;354:553–60.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference • Vos NS, Fagel ND, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Patterson MS, Piers LH, van der Schaaf RJ, Slagboom T, Vink MA. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction: the REVELATION randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1691–9. Findings of this study indicate that the DCB-only approach was not inferior to DES in terms of FFR, with no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes at 9-month follow-up; therefore, the DCB-only approach appeared to be a safe and feasible strategy for treating STEMI patients.PubMedCrossRef • Vos NS, Fagel ND, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Patterson MS, Piers LH, van der Schaaf RJ, Slagboom T, Vink MA. Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction: the REVELATION randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;12:1691–9. Findings of this study indicate that the DCB-only approach was not inferior to DES in terms of FFR, with no significant differences in terms of clinical outcomes at 9-month follow-up; therefore, the DCB-only approach appeared to be a safe and feasible strategy for treating STEMI patients.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Niehe SR, Vos NS, Van Der Schaaf RJ, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, Vink MA. Two-year clinical outcomes of the REVELATION study: sustained safety and feasibility of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022;34:E39–42.PubMed Niehe SR, Vos NS, Van Der Schaaf RJ, Amoroso G, Herrman J-PR, Patterson MS, Slagboom T, Vink MA. Two-year clinical outcomes of the REVELATION study: sustained safety and feasibility of paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty versus drug-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction. J Invasive Cardiol. 2022;34:E39–42.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Hao X, Huang D, Wang Z, Zhang J, Liu H, Lu Y. Study on the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloons in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:178.PubMedCrossRef Hao X, Huang D, Wang Z, Zhang J, Liu H, Lu Y. Study on the safety and effectiveness of drug-coated balloons in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;16:178.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Merinopoulos I, Gunawardena T, Corballis N, et al. Assessment of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon only angioplasty in STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:771–9.PubMedCrossRef Merinopoulos I, Gunawardena T, Corballis N, et al. Assessment of paclitaxel drug-coated balloon only angioplasty in STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:771–9.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Besic KM, Strozzi M, Margetic E, Bulum J, Kolaric B. Drug-eluting balloons in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Cardiol. 2015;65:203–7.PubMedCrossRef Besic KM, Strozzi M, Margetic E, Bulum J, Kolaric B. Drug-eluting balloons in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Cardiol. 2015;65:203–7.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Scheller B, Ohlow M-A, Ewen S, et al. Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial. EuroIntervention. 2020;15:1527–33.PubMedCrossRef Scheller B, Ohlow M-A, Ewen S, et al. Bare metal or drug-eluting stent versus drug-coated balloon in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the randomised PEPCAD NSTEMI trial. EuroIntervention. 2020;15:1527–33.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Mangner N, Farah A, Ohlow M-A, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: a prespecified analysis of BASKET-SMALL 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e011325.PubMedCrossRef Mangner N, Farah A, Ohlow M-A, et al. Safety and efficacy of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes: a prespecified analysis of BASKET-SMALL 2. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e011325.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow M-A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): 3-year follow-up of a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1504–10.PubMedCrossRef Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow M-A, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of drug-coated balloons versus drug-eluting stents for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): 3-year follow-up of a randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2020;396:1504–10.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference •• Cortese B, Testa L, Heang TM, et al. Sirolimus-coated balloon in an all-comer population of coronary artery disease patients: the EASTBOURNE Prospective Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:1794–803. Results of this large study suggest that sirolimus DCB is safe and feasible treatment approach for a wide range of coronary artery disease patients at midterm follow-up.PubMedCrossRef •• Cortese B, Testa L, Heang TM, et al. Sirolimus-coated balloon in an all-comer population of coronary artery disease patients: the EASTBOURNE Prospective Registry. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;16:1794–803. Results of this large study suggest that sirolimus DCB is safe and feasible treatment approach for a wide range of coronary artery disease patients at midterm follow-up.PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference • Laricchia A, Bossi I, Latini RA, et al. Sirolimus-coated balloon in acute and chronic coronary syndromes: subanalysis of the EASTBOURNE registry. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023;S1885–5857(23):00336–5. For the first time, the findings of this study suggest sirolimus DCB performs well in terms of acute and 1-year outcomes in both ACS and CCS. • Laricchia A, Bossi I, Latini RA, et al. Sirolimus-coated balloon in acute and chronic coronary syndromes: subanalysis of the EASTBOURNE registry. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023;S1885–5857(23):00336–5. For the first time, the findings of this study suggest sirolimus DCB performs well in terms of acute and 1-year outcomes in both ACS and CCS.
36.
go back to reference Shin E-S, Bang LH, Jun EJ, et al. Provisional drug-coated balloon treatment guided by physiology on de novo coronary lesion. Cardiol J. 2021;28:615–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Shin E-S, Bang LH, Jun EJ, et al. Provisional drug-coated balloon treatment guided by physiology on de novo coronary lesion. Cardiol J. 2021;28:615–22.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Rosenberg M, Waliszewski M, Chin K, et al. Prospective, large-scale multicenter trial for the use of drug-coated balloons in coronary lesions: the DCB-only All-Comers Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:181–8.PubMedCrossRef Rosenberg M, Waliszewski M, Chin K, et al. Prospective, large-scale multicenter trial for the use of drug-coated balloons in coronary lesions: the DCB-only All-Comers Registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93:181–8.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow M-A, et al. Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;392:849–56.PubMedCrossRef Jeger RV, Farah A, Ohlow M-A, et al. Drug-coated balloons for small coronary artery disease (BASKET-SMALL 2): an open-label randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;392:849–56.PubMedCrossRef
39.
go back to reference Gunawardena T, Corballis N, Merinopoulos I, Tsampasian V, Reinhold J, Eccleshall S, Vassiliou V. Acute vessel closure or major adverse cardiac events of drug-coated balloons and stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed. 2022;2:442–51.CrossRef Gunawardena T, Corballis N, Merinopoulos I, Tsampasian V, Reinhold J, Eccleshall S, Vassiliou V. Acute vessel closure or major adverse cardiac events of drug-coated balloons and stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BioMed. 2022;2:442–51.CrossRef
41.
go back to reference Hui L, Shin E-S, Jun EJ, et al. Impact of dissection after drug-coated balloon treatment of de novo coronary lesions: angiographic and clinical outcomes. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61:1004–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Hui L, Shin E-S, Jun EJ, et al. Impact of dissection after drug-coated balloon treatment of de novo coronary lesions: angiographic and clinical outcomes. Yonsei Med J. 2020;61:1004–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
42.
go back to reference Cortese B, Di Palma G, Guimaraes MG, Piraino D, Orrego PS, Buccheri D, Rivero F, Perotto A, Zambelli G, Alfonso F. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for small coronary vessel disease: PICCOLETO II randomized clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2840–9.PubMedCrossRef Cortese B, Di Palma G, Guimaraes MG, Piraino D, Orrego PS, Buccheri D, Rivero F, Perotto A, Zambelli G, Alfonso F. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for small coronary vessel disease: PICCOLETO II randomized clinical trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020;13:2840–9.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Tang Y, Qiao S, Su X, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for small-vessel disease: the RESTORE SVD China randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2381–92.PubMedCrossRef Tang Y, Qiao S, Su X, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus drug-eluting stent for small-vessel disease: the RESTORE SVD China randomized trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:2381–92.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Basavarajaiah S, Handi S, Foley L, Watkin R, Freestone B, Pitt M, Lee K, Bhatia G, Ment G, Pulikal G. 125Incidence and outcomes of bailout stenting following use of drug coated balloon. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:ehz747.0041.CrossRef Basavarajaiah S, Handi S, Foley L, Watkin R, Freestone B, Pitt M, Lee K, Bhatia G, Ment G, Pulikal G. 125Incidence and outcomes of bailout stenting following use of drug coated balloon. Eur Heart J. 2019;40:ehz747.0041.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Khattak S, Liu B, Ishaq M, et al. 52 Incidence and outcomes of bailout stenting following use of sirolimus drug coated balloon. Heart. 2020;106:A41–2. Khattak S, Liu B, Ishaq M, et al. 52 Incidence and outcomes of bailout stenting following use of sirolimus drug coated balloon. Heart. 2020;106:A41–2.
46.
go back to reference Watanabe H, Morimoto T, Natsuaki M, et al. Comparison of clopidogrel monotherapy after 1 to 2 months of dual antiplatelet therapy with 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the STOPDAPT-2 ACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:407–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Watanabe H, Morimoto T, Natsuaki M, et al. Comparison of clopidogrel monotherapy after 1 to 2 months of dual antiplatelet therapy with 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome: the STOPDAPT-2 ACS randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2022;7:407–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Rissanen TT, Uskela S, Eränen J, et al. Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2019;394:230–9.CrossRef Rissanen TT, Uskela S, Eränen J, et al. Drug-coated balloon for treatment of de-novo coronary artery lesions in patients with high bleeding risk (DEBUT): a single-blind, randomised, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2019;394:230–9.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Scheller B, Rissanen TT, Farah A, et al. Drug-coated balloon for small coronary artery disease in patients with and without high-bleeding risk in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e011569.PubMedCrossRef Scheller B, Rissanen TT, Farah A, et al. Drug-coated balloon for small coronary artery disease in patients with and without high-bleeding risk in the BASKET-SMALL 2 trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15:e011569.PubMedCrossRef
50.
go back to reference Räsänen A, Kärkkäinen JM, Eranti A, Eränen J, Rissanen TT. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon-only strategy combined with single antiplatelet treatment in patients at high bleeding risk: single center experience of a novel concept. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101:569–78. PubMedCrossRef Räsänen A, Kärkkäinen JM, Eranti A, Eränen J, Rissanen TT. Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-coated balloon-only strategy combined with single antiplatelet treatment in patients at high bleeding risk: single center experience of a novel concept. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2023;101:569–78. PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference •• Cortese B, Serruys PW. Single-antiplatelet treatment after coronary angioplasty with drug-coated balloon. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e028413. Results of this study support the safety of the SAPT strategy with comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up and a significant reduction in the cumulative rate of BARC 2–5 bleeding risks in patients undergoing PCI with DCB and discharge on the DAPT regimen.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef •• Cortese B, Serruys PW. Single-antiplatelet treatment after coronary angioplasty with drug-coated balloon. J Am Heart Assoc. 2023;12:e028413. Results of this study support the safety of the SAPT strategy with comparable clinical outcomes at 12-month follow-up and a significant reduction in the cumulative rate of BARC 2–5 bleeding risks in patients undergoing PCI with DCB and discharge on the DAPT regimen.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Drug-Coated Balloon in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Ready for the Prime Time?
Authors
Simone Fezzi
Sara Malakouti
Jegan Sivalingam
Jacinthe Khater
Flavio Ribichini
Bernardo Cortese
Publication date
15-04-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Current Cardiology Reports
Print ISSN: 1523-3782
Electronic ISSN: 1534-3170
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-024-02037-2