Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects

Authors: Denis Brajkovic, Bozidar Brkovic, Marija Milic, Vladimir Biocanin, Elena Krsljak, Dragica Stojic

Published in: Clinical Oral Investigations | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Objectives

The main purpose of this prospective, double-blind, randomized study was to evaluate anaesthetic parameters, postoperative analgesia and vasoactive properties of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine for lower third molar surgery.

Material and methods

Sixty patients (ASA I) were scheduled for lower third molar surgery under inferior alveolar nerve block, lingual nerve block and buccal nerve block (mandibular nerve blocks) obtained with 3 ml of 0.5 % levobupivacaine and 3 ml of 0.5 % bupivacaine. Success rate, onset and duration of three nerve bocks were evaluated by electrical pulp testing, pinprick testing and signs of soft tissue anaesthesia (patient-reported numbness). Intensity of intraoperative anaesthesia and postoperative analgesia were measured with visual analogue scale (VAS) and numeric rating scale (NRS). The time of first postoperative pain reported and analgesic consumption were also recorded. The laser Doppler flowmetry was used for the measurement of the first premolar pulpal blood flow.

Results

There were no differences between levobupivacaine and bupivacaine regarding the success rate, onset and duration of mandibular nerve blocks as well as intensity of postoperative analgesia and analgesic consumption. Intensity of intraoperative anaesthesia and duration of postoperative analgesia were significantly higher in the levobupivacaine than in the bupivacaine group. Both anaesthetics showed similar biphasic vasoactive effect.

Conclusions

Levobupivacaine 0.5 % achieved superiority over bupivacaine 0.5 % in the intensity of intraoperative anaesthesia and duration of postoperative analgesia for lower third molar surgery under the mandibular nerve blocks.

Clinical relevance

It seems that the plain levobupivacaine (0.5 %) could be an effective alternative to plain bupivacaine (0.5 %) in those dental procedures which require profound bone and soft tissue anaesthesia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Brown DL, Ransom DM, Hall JA, Leicht CH, Schroeder DR, Oford KP (1995) Regional anesthesia and local anesthetic-induced systemic toxicity: seizure frequency and accompanying cardiovascular changes. Anesth Analg 81:321–328PubMed Brown DL, Ransom DM, Hall JA, Leicht CH, Schroeder DR, Oford KP (1995) Regional anesthesia and local anesthetic-induced systemic toxicity: seizure frequency and accompanying cardiovascular changes. Anesth Analg 81:321–328PubMed
5.
go back to reference Leone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, Fanelli G (2008) Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetic, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed 79:92–105PubMed Leone S, Di Cianni S, Casati A, Fanelli G (2008) Pharmacology, toxicology, and clinical use of new long acting local anesthetic, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine. Acta Biomed 79:92–105PubMed
6.
go back to reference Werdehausen R, Braun S, Fazeli S, Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Bauer I, Stevens MF (2012) Lipophilicity but not stereospecificity is a major determinant of local anaesthetic-induced cytotoxicity in human T-lymphoma cells. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29:35–41. doi:10.1097/EJA.0b013e32834cd6c4 PubMedCrossRef Werdehausen R, Braun S, Fazeli S, Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Bauer I, Stevens MF (2012) Lipophilicity but not stereospecificity is a major determinant of local anaesthetic-induced cytotoxicity in human T-lymphoma cells. Eur J Anaesthesiol 29:35–41. doi:10.​1097/​EJA.​0b013e32834cd6c4​ PubMedCrossRef
7.
8.
go back to reference Aps C, Reynolds F (1978) An intradermal study of the local anaesthetic and vascular effects of the isomers of bupivacaine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 6:63–68PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Aps C, Reynolds F (1978) An intradermal study of the local anaesthetic and vascular effects of the isomers of bupivacaine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 6:63–68PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vanhoutte F, Vereecke J, Verbeke N, Carmeliet E (1991) Stereoselective effects of the enantiomers of bupivacaine on electrophysiological properties of the guinea-pig papillary muscle. Br J Pharmacol 103:1275–1278PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Vanhoutte F, Vereecke J, Verbeke N, Carmeliet E (1991) Stereoselective effects of the enantiomers of bupivacaine on electrophysiological properties of the guinea-pig papillary muscle. Br J Pharmacol 103:1275–1278PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mazoit JX, Boico O, Samii K (1993) Myocardial uptake of bupivacaine: pharmacodynamics of bupivacaine enantiomers in the isolated perfused rabbit heart. Anesth Analg 77:477–482PubMedCrossRef Mazoit JX, Boico O, Samii K (1993) Myocardial uptake of bupivacaine: pharmacodynamics of bupivacaine enantiomers in the isolated perfused rabbit heart. Anesth Analg 77:477–482PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Cox CR, Checketts MR, Mackenizie N, Scott NB, Bannister J (1998) Comparison of S(−) - bupivacaine with racemic (RS) – bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 80:594–598PubMedCrossRef Cox CR, Checketts MR, Mackenizie N, Scott NB, Bannister J (1998) Comparison of S(−) - bupivacaine with racemic (RS) – bupivacaine in supraclavicular brachial plexus block. Br J Anaesth 80:594–598PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Casati A, Chelly JE, Cerchierini E, Santorsola R, Nobili F, Grispigni C, Di Benedetto P, Torri G (2002) Clinical properties of levobupivacaine or racemic bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block. J Clin Anesth 14:111–114PubMedCrossRef Casati A, Chelly JE, Cerchierini E, Santorsola R, Nobili F, Grispigni C, Di Benedetto P, Torri G (2002) Clinical properties of levobupivacaine or racemic bupivacaine for sciatic nerve block. J Clin Anesth 14:111–114PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Novak-Jankovic V, Milan Z, Potocnik I, Stupnik T, Maric S, Stopar-Pintaric T, Kremzar B (2012) A prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison between multimodal thoracic paravertebral bupivacaine and levobupivacaine analgesia in patients undergoing lung surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26:863–867. doi:10.1053/.j.jvca.2012.01.050 PubMedCrossRef Novak-Jankovic V, Milan Z, Potocnik I, Stupnik T, Maric S, Stopar-Pintaric T, Kremzar B (2012) A prospective, randomized, double-blinded comparison between multimodal thoracic paravertebral bupivacaine and levobupivacaine analgesia in patients undergoing lung surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 26:863–867. doi:10.​1053/​.​j.​jvca.​2012.​01.​050 PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Huang YF, Pryor ME, Veering BT, Mather LE (1998) Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg 86:797–804PubMed Huang YF, Pryor ME, Veering BT, Mather LE (1998) Cardiovascular and central nervous system effects of intravenous levobupivacaine and bupivacaine in sheep. Anesth Analg 86:797–804PubMed
16.
go back to reference Bardsley H, Griswood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W (1998) A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharm 46:245–249CrossRef Bardsley H, Griswood R, Baker H, Watson N, Nimmo W (1998) A comparison of the cardiovascular effects of levobupivacaine and rac-bupivacaine following intravenous administration to healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharm 46:245–249CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Branco FP, Ranali J, Ambrosano GMB, Volpato MC (2006) A double-blind comparison of 0.5 % bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5 % levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for the inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:442–447. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2005.06.005 PubMedCrossRef Branco FP, Ranali J, Ambrosano GMB, Volpato MC (2006) A double-blind comparison of 0.5 % bupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 0.5 % levobupivacaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for the inferior alveolar nerve block. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 101:442–447. doi:10.​1016/​j.​tripleo.​2005.​06.​005 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Rood JP, Snowdon AT, Gennery BA (2002) Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:491–496. doi:10.1016/S0266-4356(02)00184-5 PubMedCrossRef Rood JP, Snowdon AT, Gennery BA (2002) Safety and efficacy of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief after surgical removal of impacted third molars: a comparison with lignocaine and adrenaline. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:491–496. doi:10.​1016/​S0266-4356(02)00184-5 PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Crincoli V, Di Bisceglie MB, Massaro M, Giuliani R, Favia G, Brienza N (2009) Postoperative pain relief after surgical removal of impacted third molars: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study to compare levobupivacaine and mepivacaine. J Orofac Pain 23:325–329PubMed Crincoli V, Di Bisceglie MB, Massaro M, Giuliani R, Favia G, Brienza N (2009) Postoperative pain relief after surgical removal of impacted third molars: a single-blind, randomized, controlled study to compare levobupivacaine and mepivacaine. J Orofac Pain 23:325–329PubMed
22.
go back to reference Ray K (1973) Local anaesthesia in dental surgery. In: Green RA (ed) Anaesthesia and analgesia in dentistry, 1st edn. HK Lewis & Co, Ltd, London, pp 295–343 Ray K (1973) Local anaesthesia in dental surgery. In: Green RA (ed) Anaesthesia and analgesia in dentistry, 1st edn. HK Lewis & Co, Ltd, London, pp 295–343
23.
go back to reference Teplitsky PE, Hablichek CA, Kushneriuk JS (1987) A comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine with respect to duration in the maxilla and mandible. J Can Dent Assoc 53:475–478PubMed Teplitsky PE, Hablichek CA, Kushneriuk JS (1987) A comparison of bupivacaine to lidocaine with respect to duration in the maxilla and mandible. J Can Dent Assoc 53:475–478PubMed
24.
go back to reference Volpato MC, Ranali J, Ramacciato JC, de Oliveira PC, Ambrosano GMB, Groppo FC (2005) Anesthetic efficacy of bupivacaine solutions in inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog 52:132–135PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Volpato MC, Ranali J, Ramacciato JC, de Oliveira PC, Ambrosano GMB, Groppo FC (2005) Anesthetic efficacy of bupivacaine solutions in inferior alveolar nerve block. Anesth Prog 52:132–135PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Malamed SF (2004) Clinical action of specific agents. In: Malamed SF (ed) Handbook of local anesthesia, 5th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 255–261 Malamed SF (2004) Clinical action of specific agents. In: Malamed SF (ed) Handbook of local anesthesia, 5th edn. Mosby, St. Louis, pp 255–261
27.
go back to reference Whiteside JB, Wildsmith JAW (2001) Developments in local anaesthetic drugs. Br J Anaesth 87:27–35PubMedCrossRef Whiteside JB, Wildsmith JAW (2001) Developments in local anaesthetic drugs. Br J Anaesth 87:27–35PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Foster RH, Markham A (2000) Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic. Drugs 59:551–579PubMedCrossRef Foster RH, Markham A (2000) Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic. Drugs 59:551–579PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schung SA (2001) Correction factor for comparison between levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:91CrossRef Schung SA (2001) Correction factor for comparison between levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine. Reg Anesth Pain Med 26:91CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Levobupivacaine vs. bupivacaine for third molar surgery: quality of anaesthesia, postoperative analgesia and local vascular effects
Authors
Denis Brajkovic
Bozidar Brkovic
Marija Milic
Vladimir Biocanin
Elena Krsljak
Dragica Stojic
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Clinical Oral Investigations / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 1432-6981
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3771
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1114-0

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Clinical Oral Investigations 5/2014 Go to the issue