Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2024

24-01-2024 | Letrozole | Review

Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Does it result in more breast-conserving surgery?

Authors: Merel E. van de Loo, Layla Andour, Anne E. van Heesewijk, Hendrika M. Oosterkamp, Gerrit-Jan Liefers, Marieke E. Straver

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with locally advanced endocrine positive tumors who will not benefit from chemotherapy can be treated by either primary surgery or neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET). How often does NET result in breast-conserving surgery (BCS)?

Methods

We conducted a literature search in PubMed and Embase, to identify articles on surgical treatment after NET.

Results

In 19 studies the pathological complete response (pCR) rate was reported after NET; an overall pCR rate of 1% was found. Compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), the BCS rate was significantly higher after NET (OR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.51–0.69; P < 0.00001). The surgical conversion rate was reported in eight studies [4–75.9%], with a mean of 30.2%.

Conclusion

This review found that one out of three patients becomes eligible for BCS after treatment with NET.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Burstein HJ et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 6(5):243–246PubMedPubMedCentral Burstein HJ et al (2010) American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline update on adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. J Oncol Pract 6(5):243–246PubMedPubMedCentral
2.
go back to reference Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9(1):R6PubMedPubMedCentral Dunnwald LK, Rossing MA, Li CI (2007) Hormone receptor status, tumor characteristics, and prognosis: a prospective cohort of breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res 9(1):R6PubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Perloff M, Lesnick GJ (1982) Chemotherapy before and after mastectomy in stage III breast cancer. Arch Surg 117(7):879–881PubMed Perloff M, Lesnick GJ (1982) Chemotherapy before and after mastectomy in stage III breast cancer. Arch Surg 117(7):879–881PubMed
4.
go back to reference Schick P et al (1983) Preoperative chemotherapy followed by mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 22(4):278–282PubMed Schick P et al (1983) Preoperative chemotherapy followed by mastectomy for locally advanced breast cancer. J Surg Oncol 22(4):278–282PubMed
5.
go back to reference Fisher B et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15(7):2483–2493PubMed Fisher B et al (1997) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol 15(7):2483–2493PubMed
6.
go back to reference Mauriac L et al (1991) Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm. Results of a randomized trial in a single centre. Ann Oncol 2(5):347–354PubMed Mauriac L et al (1991) Effects of primary chemotherapy in conservative treatment of breast cancer patients with operable tumors larger than 3 cm. Results of a randomized trial in a single centre. Ann Oncol 2(5):347–354PubMed
7.
go back to reference Mauriac L et al (1999) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS) 10(1):47–52 Mauriac L et al (1999) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for operable breast carcinoma larger than 3 cm: a unicentre randomized trial with a 124-month median follow-up. Institut Bergonié Bordeaux Groupe Sein (IBBGS) 10(1):47–52
8.
go back to reference Semiglazov VF et al (2007) Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer 110(2):244–254PubMed Semiglazov VF et al (2007) Phase 2 randomized trial of primary endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Cancer 110(2):244–254PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cardoso F et al (2016) 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375(8):717–729PubMed Cardoso F et al (2016) 70-gene signature as an aid to treatment decisions in early-stage breast cancer. N Engl J Med 375(8):717–729PubMed
10.
go back to reference Sparano JA et al (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379(2):111–121PubMedPubMedCentral Sparano JA et al (2018) Adjuvant chemotherapy guided by a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 379(2):111–121PubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Reis J et al (2020) Accuracy of breast MRI in patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with clinical and pathological assessments. Breast Cancer Res Treat 184(2):407–420PubMedPubMedCentral Reis J et al (2020) Accuracy of breast MRI in patients receiving neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: comprehensive imaging analysis and correlation with clinical and pathological assessments. Breast Cancer Res Treat 184(2):407–420PubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Chiba A et al (2017) Trends in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy use and impact on rates of breast conservation in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a national cancer data base study. Ann Surg Oncol 24(2):418–424PubMed Chiba A et al (2017) Trends in neoadjuvant endocrine therapy use and impact on rates of breast conservation in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: a national cancer data base study. Ann Surg Oncol 24(2):418–424PubMed
13.
go back to reference Yalcin B (2013) Overview on locally advanced breast cancer: defining, epidemiology, and overview on neoadjuvant therapy. Exp Oncol 35(4):250–252PubMed Yalcin B (2013) Overview on locally advanced breast cancer: defining, epidemiology, and overview on neoadjuvant therapy. Exp Oncol 35(4):250–252PubMed
14.
go back to reference Higgins JPT et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928PubMedPubMedCentral Higgins JPT et al (2011) The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 343:d5928PubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Sterne JA et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919PubMedPubMedCentral Sterne JA et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919PubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference von Elm E et al (2014) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12(12):1495–1499 von Elm E et al (2014) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12(12):1495–1499
17.
go back to reference Bennett JA (2005) The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT): guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Nurs Res 54(2):128–132PubMed Bennett JA (2005) The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT): guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Nurs Res 54(2):128–132PubMed
18.
go back to reference Gazet JC et al (1996) Assesssment of the effect of pretreatment with neoadjuvant therapy on primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 73(6):758–762PubMedPubMedCentral Gazet JC et al (1996) Assesssment of the effect of pretreatment with neoadjuvant therapy on primary breast cancer. Br J Cancer 73(6):758–762PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Pariser AC et al (2019) Utilization, duration, and outcomes of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178(2):419–426PubMed Pariser AC et al (2019) Utilization, duration, and outcomes of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in the United States. Breast Cancer Res Treat 178(2):419–426PubMed
20.
go back to reference Alba E et al (2012) Chemotherapy (CT) and hormonotherapy (HT) as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer patients: results from the GEICAM/2006-03, a multicenter, randomized, phase-II study. Ann Oncol 23(12):3069–3074PubMed Alba E et al (2012) Chemotherapy (CT) and hormonotherapy (HT) as neoadjuvant treatment in luminal breast cancer patients: results from the GEICAM/2006-03, a multicenter, randomized, phase-II study. Ann Oncol 23(12):3069–3074PubMed
21.
go back to reference Cottu P et al (2018) Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer. Ann Oncol 29(12):2334–2340PubMed Cottu P et al (2018) Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer. Ann Oncol 29(12):2334–2340PubMed
22.
go back to reference Dellapasqua S et al (2019) Neoadjuvant Degarelix versus triptorelin in premenopausal patients who receive letrozole for locally advanced endocrine-responsive breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 37(5):386–395PubMed Dellapasqua S et al (2019) Neoadjuvant Degarelix versus triptorelin in premenopausal patients who receive letrozole for locally advanced endocrine-responsive breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial. J Clin Oncol 37(5):386–395PubMed
23.
go back to reference Eiermann W et al (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12(11):1527–1532PubMed Eiermann W et al (2001) Preoperative treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer patients with letrozole: a randomized double-blind multicenter study. Ann Oncol 12(11):1527–1532PubMed
24.
go back to reference Ellis MJ et al (2011) Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 29(17):2342–2349PubMedPubMedCentral Ellis MJ et al (2011) Randomized phase II neoadjuvant comparison between letrozole, anastrozole, and exemestane for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-rich stage 2 to 3 breast cancer: clinical and biomarker outcomes and predictive value of the baseline PAM50-based intrinsic subtype–ACOSOG Z1031. J Clin Oncol 29(17):2342–2349PubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Grassadonia A et al (2014) Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors in elderly women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(5):1575–1582PubMedPubMedCentral Grassadonia A et al (2014) Long-term outcome of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors in elderly women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 21(5):1575–1582PubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Hojo T et al (2013) Use of the neo-adjuvant exemestane in post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial (PTEX46) to investigate the optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. Breast 22(3):263–267PubMed Hojo T et al (2013) Use of the neo-adjuvant exemestane in post-menopausal estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a randomized phase II trial (PTEX46) to investigate the optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. Breast 22(3):263–267PubMed
27.
go back to reference Johnston S et al (2019) Randomized phase II study evaluating palbociclib in addition to letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: PALLET trial. J Clin Oncol 37(3):178–189PubMed Johnston S et al (2019) Randomized phase II study evaluating palbociclib in addition to letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy in estrogen receptor-positive early breast cancer: PALLET trial. J Clin Oncol 37(3):178–189PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kim HJ et al (2020) Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 22(1):54PubMedPubMedCentral Kim HJ et al (2020) Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pre-menopausal patients with oestrogen receptor-positive and HER2-negative, lymph node-positive breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 22(1):54PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Krainick-Strobel UE et al (2008) Neoadjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer: a phase IIb/III trial to investigate optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer 8:62PubMedPubMedCentral Krainick-Strobel UE et al (2008) Neoadjuvant letrozole in postmenopausal estrogen and/or progesterone receptor positive breast cancer: a phase IIb/III trial to investigate optimal duration of preoperative endocrine therapy. BMC Cancer 8:62PubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference LeVasseur N et al (2019) Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer: results from a prospective institutional database. Clin Breast Cancer 19(6):e683–e689PubMed LeVasseur N et al (2019) Efficacy of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER-positive breast cancer: results from a prospective institutional database. Clin Breast Cancer 19(6):e683–e689PubMed
31.
go back to reference Marcus DM et al (2013) Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is associated with comparable outcomes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in post-menopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Front Oncol 3:317PubMedPubMedCentral Marcus DM et al (2013) Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy is associated with comparable outcomes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in post-menopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Front Oncol 3:317PubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Milla-Santos A et al (2004) Anastrozole as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with hormone-dependent, locally-advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res 24(2C):1315–1318PubMed Milla-Santos A et al (2004) Anastrozole as neoadjuvant therapy for patients with hormone-dependent, locally-advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res 24(2C):1315–1318PubMed
33.
go back to reference Palmieri C et al (2014) NEOCENT: a randomised feasibility and translational study comparing neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with chemotherapy in ER-rich postmenopausal primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148(3):581–590PubMed Palmieri C et al (2014) NEOCENT: a randomised feasibility and translational study comparing neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with chemotherapy in ER-rich postmenopausal primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 148(3):581–590PubMed
34.
go back to reference Prat A et al (2020) Ribociclib plus letrozole versus chemotherapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, luminal B breast cancer (CORALLEEN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 21(1):33–43PubMed Prat A et al (2020) Ribociclib plus letrozole versus chemotherapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, luminal B breast cancer (CORALLEEN): an open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 21(1):33–43PubMed
35.
go back to reference Quenel-Tueux N et al (2015) Clinical and genomic analysis of a randomised phase II study evaluating anastrozole and fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients treated for large operable or locally advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 113(4):585–594PubMedPubMedCentral Quenel-Tueux N et al (2015) Clinical and genomic analysis of a randomised phase II study evaluating anastrozole and fulvestrant in postmenopausal patients treated for large operable or locally advanced hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer. Br J Cancer 113(4):585–594PubMedPubMedCentral
36.
go back to reference Smith IE et al (2005) Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5108–5116PubMed Smith IE et al (2005) Neoadjuvant treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer with anastrozole, tamoxifen, or both in combination: the Immediate Preoperative Anastrozole, Tamoxifen, or Combined with Tamoxifen (IMPACT) multicenter double-blind randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23(22):5108–5116PubMed
37.
go back to reference Thomas JS et al (2007) Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring. Histopathology 51(2):219–226PubMed Thomas JS et al (2007) Histopathology of breast carcinoma following neoadjuvant systemic therapy: a common association between letrozole therapy and central scarring. Histopathology 51(2):219–226PubMed
38.
go back to reference Thornton MJ et al (2019) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 26(10):3166–3177PubMedPubMedCentral Thornton MJ et al (2019) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive invasive lobular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 26(10):3166–3177PubMedPubMedCentral
39.
go back to reference Wright JL et al (2017) Locoregional and overall recurrence after neaodjuvant endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor+ HER2- breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 40(5):490–497PubMed Wright JL et al (2017) Locoregional and overall recurrence after neaodjuvant endocrine therapy versus chemotherapy in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor+ HER2- breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 40(5):490–497PubMed
40.
go back to reference Spring LM et al (2016) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2(11):1477–1486PubMedPubMedCentral Spring LM et al (2016) Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 2(11):1477–1486PubMedPubMedCentral
41.
go back to reference Cortazar P et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384(9938):164–172PubMed Cortazar P et al (2014) Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 384(9938):164–172PubMed
42.
go back to reference Kaufmann M et al (2006) Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (Primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol 24(12):1940–1949PubMed Kaufmann M et al (2006) Recommendations from an international expert panel on the use of neoadjuvant (Primary) systemic treatment of operable breast cancer: an update. J Clin Oncol 24(12):1940–1949PubMed
43.
go back to reference Ma CX et al (2017) NeoPalAna: neoadjuvant palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and Anastrozole for clinical stage 2 or 3 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23(15):4055–4065PubMedPubMedCentral Ma CX et al (2017) NeoPalAna: neoadjuvant palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and Anastrozole for clinical stage 2 or 3 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 23(15):4055–4065PubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment in hormone receptor-positive breast cancer: Does it result in more breast-conserving surgery?
Authors
Merel E. van de Loo
Layla Andour
Anne E. van Heesewijk
Hendrika M. Oosterkamp
Gerrit-Jan Liefers
Marieke E. Straver
Publication date
24-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-023-07222-5

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 1/2024 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine