Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Laser | Research

In vitro performance of an autocured universal adhesive system in bonding to dentin

Authors: Kota Kibe, Takashi Hatayama, Yasushi Shimada

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The successful integration of resin-based dental adhesives significantly impacts restorative dentistry, providing efficient and aesthetically pleasing caries treatments. Among various adhesives, one-step self-etching adhesives (1-SEAs) have gained popularity due to their simplicity and short application time. However, concerns have been raised regarding their bonding performance and marginal adaptation characteristics, which differ from two-step self-etching adhesives (2-SEAs) and three-step etch-and-rinse adhesives. Additionally, light-cured bonding materials may encounter challenges in deep cavities and inaccessible areas, necessitating extended light irradiation time. Autocured bonding materials are a potential solution, but limited comparative studies have been conducted on their performance.

Methods

In this in vitro study, we evaluated a new autocured universal bonding material (Bondmer Lightless 2) and compared the results with recent light-cured bonding materials. Microshear bond strength (μSBS) tests were performed on 25 human molars using five different combinations of adhesives and composite resins: Bondmer Lightless 2 with Estelite Bulk Fill Flow (BE group), Bondmer Lightless 2 with a prototype composite resin (BO group), Prime&Bond Universal with SDR flow + (PS group), Scotchbond Universal with Filtek Bulk Fill (SF group), and G-Premio Bond with Gracefil BulkFlo (GG group). The bond strengths and failure modes were assessed using a universal testing machine and scanning electron microscope (SEM), respectively. Marginal adaptation was evaluated using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) on 40 sound bovine maxillary incisors.

Results

The μSBS test showed no significant differences in bond strength among the tested groups. Most failure modes were observed at the bond interface between the adhesive and the dentin. The autocured bonding material demonstrated significantly higher marginal adaptation (SI%) than PS, SF, and GG. The CLSM images corresponded with gaps observed in the SS-OCT images, indicating improved marginal sealing in the autocured group.

Conclusions

The new autocured universal bonding material exhibited comparable bond strength to a conventional light-cured material while demonstrating a superior marginal adaptation level. This finding suggested that the autocured material could be a valuable alternative, especially when extended light irradiation would pose a challenge. Further clinical studies would be warranted to evaluate the performance of the autocured bonding material in actual restorative dental practice.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Perdigão J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives Part I–microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(6):367–73.PubMed Perdigão J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives Part I–microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8(6):367–73.PubMed
2.
go back to reference Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21(9):864–81.CrossRefPubMed Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21(9):864–81.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):175–90.PubMed Van Landuyt KL, Mine A, De Munck J, Jaecques S, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Are one-step adhesives easier to use and better performing? Multifactorial assessment of contemporary one-step self-etching adhesives. J Adhes Dent. 2009;11(3):175–90.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Lee HL, Orlowski JA. Differences in the physical properties of composite dental restoratives. Suggested causes and clinical effects. J Oral Rehabil. 1977;4(3):227–36.CrossRefPubMed Lee HL, Orlowski JA. Differences in the physical properties of composite dental restoratives. Suggested causes and clinical effects. J Oral Rehabil. 1977;4(3):227–36.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater. 2010;26(3):215–22.CrossRefPubMed Van Ende A, De Munck J, Mine A, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Does a low-shrinking composite induce less stress at the adhesive interface? Dent Mater. 2010;26(3):215–22.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Wei S, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of double-application of three single-step self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding and mechanical properties of resin-dentin area. Oper Dent. 2009;34(6):716–24.CrossRefPubMed Wei S, Shimada Y, Sadr A, Tagami J. Effect of double-application of three single-step self-etch adhesives on dentin bonding and mechanical properties of resin-dentin area. Oper Dent. 2009;34(6):716–24.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent. 2002;30(2–3):83–90.CrossRefPubMed Pashley EL, Agee KA, Pashley DH, Tay FR. Effects of one versus two applications of an unfilled, all-in-one adhesive on dentine bonding. J Dent. 2002;30(2–3):83–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent. 2002;15(4):279–89.PubMed Hilton TJ. Can modern restorative procedures and materials reliably seal cavities? In vitro investigations. Part 2. Am J Dent. 2002;15(4):279–89.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent. 1998;11(5):229–34.PubMed Opdam NJ, Feilzer AJ, Roeters JJ, Smale I. Class I occlusal composite resin restorations: in vivo post-operative sensitivity, wall adaptation, and microleakage. Am J Dent. 1998;11(5):229–34.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent. 2004;32(5):379–83.CrossRefPubMed Opdam NJ, Loomans BA, Roeters FJ, Bronkhorst EM. Five-year clinical performance of posterior resin composite restorations placed by dental students. J Dent. 2004;32(5):379–83.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR. Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimensions of three dentinal bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1990;3(6):289–94.PubMed Rigsby DF, Retief DH, Russell CM, Denys FR. Marginal leakage and marginal gap dimensions of three dentinal bonding systems. Am J Dent. 1990;3(6):289–94.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Uyama S, Irokawa A, Iwasa M, Tonegawa M, Shibuya Y, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Influence of irradiation time on volumetric shrinkage and flexural properties of flowable resins. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(6):892–7.CrossRefPubMed Uyama S, Irokawa A, Iwasa M, Tonegawa M, Shibuya Y, Tsubota K, Takamizawa T, Miyazaki M. Influence of irradiation time on volumetric shrinkage and flexural properties of flowable resins. Dent Mater J. 2007;26(6):892–7.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Makishi P, Thitthaweerat S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Martins AL, Tagami J, Giannini M. Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity: Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater. 2015;31(9):e190-200.CrossRefPubMed Makishi P, Thitthaweerat S, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Martins AL, Tagami J, Giannini M. Assessment of current adhesives in class I cavity: Nondestructive imaging using optical coherence tomography and microtensile bond strength. Dent Mater. 2015;31(9):e190-200.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Huang D, Swanson EA, Lin CP, Schuman JS, Stinson WG, Chang W, Hee MR, Flotte T, Gregory K, Puliafito CA, et al. Optical coherence tomography. Science. 1991;254(5035):1178–81.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Shimada Y, Sadr A, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Ozawa N, Sumi Y. Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Dent. 2010;38(8):655–65.CrossRefPubMed Shimada Y, Sadr A, Burrow MF, Tagami J, Ozawa N, Sumi Y. Validation of swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) for the diagnosis of occlusal caries. J Dent. 2010;38(8):655–65.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Shimada Y, Sadr A, Nazari A, Nakagawa H, Otsuki M, Tagami J, Sumi Y. 3D evaluation of composite resin restoration at practical training using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater J. 2012;31(3):409–17.CrossRefPubMed Shimada Y, Sadr A, Nazari A, Nakagawa H, Otsuki M, Tagami J, Sumi Y. 3D evaluation of composite resin restoration at practical training using swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT). Dent Mater J. 2012;31(3):409–17.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Park KJ, Schneider H, Haak R. Assessment of interfacial defects at composite restorations by swept source optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(7):076018.CrossRefPubMed Park KJ, Schneider H, Haak R. Assessment of interfacial defects at composite restorations by swept source optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(7):076018.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nazari A, Sadr A, Saghiri MA, Campillo-Funollet M, Hamba H, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-destructive characterization of voids in six flowable composites using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):278–86.CrossRefPubMed Nazari A, Sadr A, Saghiri MA, Campillo-Funollet M, Hamba H, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-destructive characterization of voids in six flowable composites using swept-source optical coherence tomography. Dent Mater. 2013;29(3):278–86.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference de Melo LS, de Araujo RE, Freitas AZ, Zezell D, Vieira ND, Girkin J, Hall A, Carvalho MT, Gomes AS. Evaluation of enamel dental restoration interface by optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10(6):064027.CrossRefPubMed de Melo LS, de Araujo RE, Freitas AZ, Zezell D, Vieira ND, Girkin J, Hall A, Carvalho MT, Gomes AS. Evaluation of enamel dental restoration interface by optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2005;10(6):064027.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Haak R, Schäfer P, Hanßen B, Ziebolz D, Park KJ, Häfer M, Schmalz G, Schneider H. OCT Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Interface Integrity of Class V Composite Restorations after 36 to 48 Months. J Adhes Dent. 2022;24(1):165–74.PubMed Haak R, Schäfer P, Hanßen B, Ziebolz D, Park KJ, Häfer M, Schmalz G, Schneider H. OCT Evaluation of Marginal and Internal Interface Integrity of Class V Composite Restorations after 36 to 48 Months. J Adhes Dent. 2022;24(1):165–74.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Haak R, Schmidt P, Park KJ, Häfer M, Krause F, Ziebolz D, Schneider H. OCT for early quality evaluation of tooth-composite bond in clinical trials. J Dent. 2018;76:46–51.CrossRefPubMed Haak R, Schmidt P, Park KJ, Häfer M, Krause F, Ziebolz D, Schneider H. OCT for early quality evaluation of tooth-composite bond in clinical trials. J Dent. 2018;76:46–51.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bista B, Sadr A, Nazari A, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Nondestructive assessment of current one-step self-etch dental adhesives using optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(7):76020.CrossRefPubMed Bista B, Sadr A, Nazari A, Shimada Y, Sumi Y, Tagami J. Nondestructive assessment of current one-step self-etch dental adhesives using optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt. 2013;18(7):76020.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Schneider H, Steigerwald-Otremba AS, Häfer M, Krause F, Scholz M, Haak R. Is optical coherence tomography a potential tool to evaluate marginal adaptation of class iii/iv composite restorations in vivo? Oper Dent. 2019;44(3):242–53.CrossRefPubMed Schneider H, Steigerwald-Otremba AS, Häfer M, Krause F, Scholz M, Haak R. Is optical coherence tomography a potential tool to evaluate marginal adaptation of class iii/iv composite restorations in vivo? Oper Dent. 2019;44(3):242–53.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Xu X, Sandras DA, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength with increasing light-guide distance from dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(1):19–27 discussion 28.CrossRefPubMed Xu X, Sandras DA, Burgess JO. Shear bond strength with increasing light-guide distance from dentin. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2006;18(1):19–27 discussion 28.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hariri I, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: an optical coherence tomography study. J Dent. 2012;40(5):387–96.CrossRefPubMed Hariri I, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Effects of structural orientation of enamel and dentine on light attenuation and local refractive index: an optical coherence tomography study. J Dent. 2012;40(5):387–96.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy. Dent Mater. 2011;27(9):915–25.CrossRefPubMed Bakhsh TA, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. Non-invasive quantification of resin-dentin interfacial gaps using optical coherence tomography: validation against confocal microscopy. Dent Mater. 2011;27(9):915–25.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100–21.CrossRefPubMed Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Mine A, Van Ende A, Neves A, De Munck J. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e100–21.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength of dual-polymerizing cementing systems to dentin using different polymerizing modes. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(2):99–106.CrossRefPubMed Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA, Pashley DH. Microtensile bond strength of dual-polymerizing cementing systems to dentin using different polymerizing modes. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;97(2):99–106.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Lührs AK, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Composite cements benefit from light-curing. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):292–301.CrossRefPubMed Lührs AK, De Munck J, Geurtsen W, Van Meerbeek B. Composite cements benefit from light-curing. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):292–301.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Aguiar TR, Di Francescantonio M, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;93(1):122–7.CrossRefPubMed Aguiar TR, Di Francescantonio M, Ambrosano GM, Giannini M. Effect of curing mode on bond strength of self-adhesive resin luting cements to dentin. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2010;93(1):122–7.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Lee IB, Um CM. Thermal analysis on the cure speed of dual cured resin cements under porcelain inlays. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(2):186–97.CrossRefPubMed Lee IB, Um CM. Thermal analysis on the cure speed of dual cured resin cements under porcelain inlays. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(2):186–97.CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Kinetic analysis of monomer conversion in auto- and dual-polymerizing modes of commercial resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(2):128–36.CrossRefPubMed Arrais CA, Giannini M, Rueggeberg FA. Kinetic analysis of monomer conversion in auto- and dual-polymerizing modes of commercial resin luting cements. J Prosthet Dent. 2009;101(2):128–36.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Faria-e-Silva A, Boaro L, Braga R, Piva E, Arias V, Martins L. Effect of immediate or delayed light activation on curing kinetics and shrinkage stress of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent. 2011;36(2):196–204.CrossRefPubMed Faria-e-Silva A, Boaro L, Braga R, Piva E, Arias V, Martins L. Effect of immediate or delayed light activation on curing kinetics and shrinkage stress of dual-cure resin cements. Oper Dent. 2011;36(2):196–204.CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(11):1022–8.PubMed Hofmann N, Papsthart G, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Comparison of photo-activation versus chemical or dual-curing of resin-based luting cements regarding flexural strength, modulus and surface hardness. J Oral Rehabil. 2001;28(11):1022–8.PubMed
35.
go back to reference Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Yoshihara K, Matsumoto T. Flexural strength of resin core build-up materials: correlation to root dentin shear bond strength and pull-out force. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(12):2947.CrossRefPubMed Irie M, Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Yoshihara K, Matsumoto T. Flexural strength of resin core build-up materials: correlation to root dentin shear bond strength and pull-out force. Polymers (Basel). 2020;12(12):2947.CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Oguri M, Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Miyauchi T, Nakamura Y, Shimoda S, Hanabusa M, Momoi Y, Van Meerbeek B. Effects of functional monomers and photo-initiators on the degree of conversion of a dental adhesive. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(5):1928–34.CrossRefPubMed Oguri M, Yoshida Y, Yoshihara K, Miyauchi T, Nakamura Y, Shimoda S, Hanabusa M, Momoi Y, Van Meerbeek B. Effects of functional monomers and photo-initiators on the degree of conversion of a dental adhesive. Acta Biomater. 2012;8(5):1928–34.CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Madrigal EL, Tichy A, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Nakajima M, Tagami J. The effect of curing mode of dual-cure resin cements on bonding performance of universal adhesives to enamel, dentin and various restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(2):446–54.CrossRefPubMed Madrigal EL, Tichy A, Hosaka K, Ikeda M, Nakajima M, Tagami J. The effect of curing mode of dual-cure resin cements on bonding performance of universal adhesives to enamel, dentin and various restorative materials. Dent Mater J. 2021;40(2):446–54.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
In vitro performance of an autocured universal adhesive system in bonding to dentin
Authors
Kota Kibe
Takashi Hatayama
Yasushi Shimada
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keyword
Laser
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-03645-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue