Top

Current Urology Reports

Published in:

13-02-2024 | Laser

Laser Technology Advancements in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Authors: David C. Dalton, T. Max Shelton, Marcelino Rivera

Published in: Current Urology Reports | Issue 4/2024

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Lasers have had a significant impact on the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy. This article attempts to distill the advancements in laser technology for the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) into key and understandable points to help make this topic more accessible to urologists.

Recent Findings

The holmium:yttrium–aluminum-garnet (YAG) laser, one of the most significant lasers in the field of urology, has recently been improved with pulse modulating technology (Moses™ technology). New thulium:YAG technology allows both pulsed and continuous wave modes. The thulium fiber laser is one of the newer lasers to come to market and has been shown to have effective and safe outcomes. GreenLight™ lasers are predominantly used in photovaporization procedures and have also been studied extensively, although less in recent years.

Summary

The modern urologist is fortunate to have many high-quality lasers and a wide variety of surgical techniques to choose from when treating BPH. Understanding the basic laser principles and applications will help urologists to select the best treatment options for their patients with BPH.

Zarrabi A, Gross AJ. The evolution of lasers in urology. Ther Adv Urol. 2011;3(2):81–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756287211400494.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

•• Schembri M, Sahu J, Aboumarzouk O, Pietropaolo A, Somani BK. Thulium fiber laser: the new kid on the block. Turk J Urol. 2020;46(Supp. 1):S1–10. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2020.20093. This article is an excellent overview of TFL technology and its surgical applications. As the article is devoted entirely to TFL, it explores fiber laser science in more detail, allowing the reader to gain a better understanding of the technology.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bach T, Muschter R, Sroka R, Gravas S, Skolarikos A, Herrmann TR, Bayer T, Knoll T, Abbou CC, Janetschek G, Bachmann A, Rassweiler JJ. Laser treatment of benign prostatic obstruction: basics and physical differences. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):317–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.009.CrossRefPubMed

Taratkin M, Azilgareeva C, Cacciamani GE, Enikeev D. Thulium fiber laser in urology: physics made simple. Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(2):166–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000967.CrossRefPubMed

Doizi S. Lasers for benign prostatic hyperplasia (hybrid, blue diode, TFL, Moses) Which one to choose? Curr Opin Urol. 2022;32(4):438–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000998.CrossRefPubMed

Herrmann TRW, Becker B, Netsch C. Thulium YAG is the best laser for the prostate because of versatility. Eur Urol Open Science. 2022;20(48):18–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.09.020.CrossRef

Sandhu JS, Bixler BR, Dahm P, et al. Management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH): AUA guideline amendment 2023. J Urol. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003698.CrossRefPubMed

Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Cresswell MD, Fraundorfer MR. Holmium laser resection of the prostate: preliminary results of a new method for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urol. 1996;47(1):48–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(99)80381-1.CrossRefPubMed

Huusmann S, Lafos M, Meyenburg I, Muschter R, Teichmann HO, Herrmann T. Tissue effects of a newly developed diode pumped pulsed Thulium:YAG laser compared to continuous wave Thulium:YAG and pulsed Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol. 2021;39(9):3503–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03634-4.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

10.

Elhilali MM, Badaan S, Ibrahim A, Andonian S. Use of the Moses technology to improve Holmium laser lithotripsy outcomes: a preclinical study. J Endourol. 2017;31(6):598–604. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0050.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

11.

Ramadhani MZ, Kloping YP, Rahman IA, Yogiswara N, Renaldo J, Wirjopranoto S. Comparative efficacy and safety of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using Moses technology and standard HoLEP: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022;12(81): 104280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104280.CrossRef

12.

• Nevo A, Faraj KS, Cheney SM, Moore JP, Stern KL, Borofsky M, Gnessin E, Humphreys MR. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate usingvs non-Moses: a randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2021;127(5):553–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15265. This is an excellent double-blinded, randomized control trial comparing Moses^TM and Moses^TM 2.0 technology. It highlights how advances in Moses^TM technology translate to enucleation efficiency.CrossRefPubMed

13.

Elmansy H, Zakaria AS, Hodhod A, Shabana W, Ahmad A, Oquendo F, Fathy M, Abbas L, Abdul Hadi R, Kelly R, Kotb A, Shahrour W. Holmium laser Xpeeda vaporization vs GreenLight XPS vaporization of the prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: 1-year results from a randomized controlled clinical study. J Endourol. 2023;37(6):706–12. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0727.CrossRefPubMed

14.

Elmansy HM, Elzayat E, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser ablation versus photoselective vaporization of prostate less than 60 cc: long-term results of a randomized trial. J Urol. 2010;184(5):2023–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.107.CrossRefPubMed

15.

Elzayat EA, Al-Mandil MS, Khalaf I, Elhilali MM. Holmium laser ablation of the prostate versus photoselective vaporization of prostate 60 cc or less: short-term results of a prospective randomized trial. J Urol. 2009;182(1):133–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2009.02.117.CrossRefPubMed

16.

Whiles BB, Martin AJ, Brevik A, Carrera RV, Thompson JA, Molina WR, Thurmon KL. Utilization of Moses modulated pulse mode results in improved efficiency in Holmium:YAG laser ablation of the prostate. Urol. 2021;149:187–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.12.024.CrossRefPubMed

17.

Lerner LB, Rajender A. Laser prostate enucleation techniques. Can J Urol. 2015;22(51):53–9.PubMed

18.

Xia SJ, Zhang YN, Lu J, Sun XW, Zhang J, Zhu YY, Li WG. Thulium laser resection of prostate-tangerine technique in treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2005;85(45):3225–8. Chinese.PubMed

19.

Herrmann TR, Bach T, Imkamp F, Georgiou A, Burchardt M, Oelke M, Gross AJ. Thulium laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuLEP): transurethral anatomical prostatectomy with laser support. Introduction of a novel technique for the treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol. 2010;28:45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-009-0503-0.CrossRefPubMed

20.

Hartung FO, Kowalewski KF, von Hardenberg J, Worst TS, Kriegmair MC, Nuhn P, Herrmann TRW, Michel MS, Herrmann J. Holmium versus thulium laser enucleation of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Urol Focus. 2022;8(2):545–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.024.CrossRefPubMed

21.

Hashim H, Worthington J, Abrams P, Young G, Taylor H, Noble SM, Brookes ST, Cotterill N, Page T, Swami KS, Lane JA UNBLOCS Trial Group. Thulium laser transurethral vaporesection of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate for men with lower urinary tract symptoms or urinary retention (UNBLOCS): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2020;396(10243):50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30537-7.CrossRef

22.

Sharaf A. PD24-10 Evaluation of the learning curve for thulium laser transurethral varoresection of the prostate (ThuVARP). J Urol. 2016;195(4S): e515.CrossRef

23.

Deng Z, Sun M, Zhu Y, Zhuo J, Zhao F, Xia S, Han B, Herrmann TRW. Thulium laser VapoResection of the prostate versus traditional transurethral resection of the prostate or transurethral plasmakinetic resection of prostate for benign prostatic obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol. 2018;36(9):1355–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2287-6.CrossRefPubMed

24.

• Perri D, Mazzoleni F, Besana U, Pacchetti A, Morini E, Berti L, Calandriello M, Pastore AL, Romero-Otero J, Bruyere F, Sighinolfi MC, Rocco B, Micali S, Gozen AS, Liatsikos E, Roche JB, Bozzini G. Pulsed-wave vs continuous-wave thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP): a comparison of perioperative outcomes. Urol. 2023;178:120–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2023.05.013. This study assesses outcomes of prostate enucleation using the new TFL. It assesses the use of this laser in both pulsed and continuous wave modes, and the authors conclude that both settings are safe and effective.CrossRefPubMed

25.

Castellani D, Di Rosa M, Gómez Sancha F, Rodríguez Socarrás M, Mahajan A, Taif Bendigeri M, Taratkin M, Enikeev D, Dellabella M, Gadzhiev N, Somani BK, Herrmann TRW, Gauhar V. Holmium laser with Moses technology (MoLEP) vs thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate (ThuFLEP) in a real-world setting. Mid-term outcomes from a multicenter propensity score analysis. World J Urol. 2023;41(11):2915–2923. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04524-7.

26.

Bachmann A, Ruszat R. The KTP-(greenlight-) laser–principles and experiences. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2007;16(1):5–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645700601157885.CrossRefPubMed

27.

Zorn KC, Liberman D. GreenLight 180W XPS photovaporization of the prostate: how I do it. Can J Urol. 2011;18(5):5918–26.PubMed

28.

Corsi N, Nguyen DD, Arezki A, Sadri I, Law K, Bouhadana D, Deyirmendjian C, Bhojani N, Elterman DS, Bruyère F, Cindolo L, Ferrari G, Vasquez-Lastra C, Borelli-Bovo T, Becher EF, Cash H, Reimann M, Rijo E, Misrai V, Chughtai B, Zorn KC. Functional outcomes of GreenLight 180-W photoselective vaporization in patients with large (≥ 80 cc) prostates: an analysis of over 3000 men in the Global Greenlight Group (GGG) database. World J Urol. 2023;41(2):529–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04260-4.CrossRefPubMed

29.

• Nguyen DD, Misraï V, Bach T, Bhojani N, Lingeman JE, Elterman DS, Zorn KC. Operative time comparison of aquablation, Greenlight PVP, ThuLEP, GreenLEP, and HoLEP. World J Urol. 2020;38(12):3227–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03137-8. This interesting study compares operative times for various surgical techniques used to treat BPH. In regard to laser technology, it demonstrates that surgical technique plays a role in operative efficiency.CrossRefPubMed

30.

Gasmi A, Khene ZE, Guérin S, Bensalah K, Peyronnet B, Mathieu R, Roupret M, Rijo E, Pradère B, Misrai V. Propensity-score analysis comparing perioperative and functional outcomes between XPS 180 W-photovaporization and GreenLight laser enucleation of the prostate: reasons to discard vaporization and move to enucleation. World J Urol. 2021;39(7):2269–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03590-z.CrossRefPubMed

31.

Elshal AM, Elkoushy MA, El-Nahas AR, Shoma AM, Nabeeh A, Carrier S, Elhilali MM. GreenLight™ laser (XPS) photoselective vapo-enucleation versus Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled study. J Urol. 2015;193(3):927–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.097.CrossRefPubMed

32.

van Kollenburg RAA, van Riel LAMJG, Bloemen PR, Oddens JR, de Reijke TM, Beerlage HP, de Bruin DM. Transperineal laser ablation treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostatic obstruction: protocol for a prospective in vivo pilot study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2020;9(1):e15687. https://doi.org/10.2196/15687.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

33.

de Rienzo G, Lorusso A, Minafra P, Zingarelli M, Papapicco G, Lucarelli G, Battaglia M, Ditonno P. Transperineal interstitial laser ablation of the prostate, a novel option for minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. Eur Urol. 2021;80(1):95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.018.CrossRefPubMed

34.

Huang L, He J, Fan Y, Wu M. Influence of 980-nm diode laser vaporization on sexual function: a short-term follow-up study. J Endourol. 2018;32(11):1065–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2018.0440.CrossRefPubMed

35.

• He G, Shu Y, Wang B, Du C, Chen J, Wen J. Comparison of Diode Laser (980 nm) Enucleation vs Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a randomized controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. J Endourol. 2019;33(10):843–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0341. An excellent randomized control trial comparing the new 980 nm diode laser technology to Holmium in prostate enucleation procedures.CrossRefPubMed

36.

Chun SS, Razvi HA, Denstedt JD. Laser prostatectomy with the Holmium: YAG laser. Tech Urol. 1995;1(4):217–21.PubMed

37.

Muschter R, de la Rosette JJ, Whitfield H, Pellerin JP, Madersbacher S, Gillatt D. Initial human clinical experience with diode laser interstitial treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology. 1996;48(2):223–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00156-2.CrossRefPubMed

38.

Kuo RL, Paterson RF, Kim SC, Siqueira TM Jr, Elhilali MM, Lingeman JE. Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): a technical update. World J Surg Oncol. 2003;1(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-1-6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

39.

Bouchier-Hayes DM, Anderson P, Van Appledorn S, Bugeja P, Costello AJ. KTP laser versus transurethral resection: early results of a randomized trial. J Endourol. 2006;20(8):580–5. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.20.580.CrossRefPubMed

40.

Netsch C, Pohlmann L, Herrmann TR, Gross AJ, Bach T. 120-W 2-µm thulium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet vapoenucleation of the prostate: 12-month follow-up. BJU Int. 2012;110(1):96–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10767.x.CrossRefPubMed

41.

Ibrahim A, Elhilali MM, Fahmy N, Carrier S, Andonian S. Double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing regular and Moses modes of Holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol. 2020;34(5):624–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2019.0695.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

42.

Enikeev D, Glybochko P, Rapoport L, Okhunov Z, O’Leary M, Potoldykova N, Sukhanov R, Enikeev M, Laukhtina E, Taratkin M. Impact of endoscopic enucleation of the prostate with thulium fiber laser on the erectile function. BMC Urol. 2018;18(1):87. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-018-0400-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

43.

Nottingham CU, Large T, Agarwal DK, Rivera ME, Krambeck AE. Comparison of newly optimized Moses technology vs standard Holmium:YAG for endoscopic laser enucleation of the prostate. J Endourol. 2021;35(9):1393–9. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0996.CrossRefPubMed

Title: Laser Technology Advancements in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Authors: David C. Dalton
T. Max Shelton
Marcelino Rivera
Publication date: 13-02-2024
Publisher: Springer US
Keywords: Laser
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy
Transurethral Prostate Resection
Published in: Current Urology Reports / Issue 4/2024
Print ISSN: 1527-2737
Electronic ISSN: 1534-6285
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-024-01197-6

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Laser Technology Advancements in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Recent Findings

Summary

Please log in to get access to this content