Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Laparoscopy | Research

Association of ileocolic pedicle division with postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis

Authors: Emmanouil Tzatzarakis, Florian Herrle, Wolfgang Reindl, Nora Altmayer, Dominik Minas, Peter Kienle, Christoph Reissfelder, Flavius Şandra-Petrescu

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

When performing a restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) with an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA), it is common practice to divide the ileocolic artery (ICA) if the patient has a tumor or dysplasia, or in order to gain sufficient length to secure a tension-free anastomosis. However, it is unclear whether there is an association between division of the ICA and the rate of postoperative complications.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed all patients with ulcerative colitis who underwent RPC and IPAA in our department between January 2010 and December 2016. These were divided in two groups, with regard to the ICA being preserved (PRE group) or divided (DIV group). Complications such as stenosis or leakage of the IPAA, perianal fistulas, abscess formation within the lesser pelvis and pouchitis were analysed and compared between both groups.

Results

We identified 130 patients meeting the study inclusion criteria, 49 patients in the PRE and 81 patients in the DIV group. No statistical significance was observed in IPAA leakages (p = 0.71), anastomotic strictures (p = 0.33), fistulas (p = 0.19) and pouchitis (p = 0.72). Abscess formation frequency was similar in both groups (p > 0.99). Moreover, short-term (p = 0.53) and long-term complications (p = 0.11) were similar in both groups. A higher conversion rate was observed in obese (p = 0.006) and male (p = 0.02) patients. Within the entire study population, fistulas and IPAA leakages were associated with a higher rate of anastomotic strictures (p = 0.008 and p = 0.02 respectively).

Conclusion

Our data suggest similar IPAA related complications after either division or preservation of the ICA. Further trials are required in order to examine the trends observed in this study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kirat HT, Remzi FH. Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(4):239–47.CrossRef Kirat HT, Remzi FH. Technical aspects of ileoanal pouch surgery in patients with ulcerative colitis. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(4):239–47.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lovegrove RE, et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(4):310–20.CrossRef Lovegrove RE, et al. Meta-analysis of short-term and long-term outcomes of J, W and S ileal reservoirs for restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(4):310–20.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Smith L, et al. The superior mesenteric artery. The critical factor in the pouch pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(11):741–4.CrossRef Smith L, et al. The superior mesenteric artery. The critical factor in the pouch pull-through procedure. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(11):741–4.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):549–73.CrossRef Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77(3):549–73.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Hesp FL, et al. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. Effects of infection on experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(7):462–7.CrossRef Hesp FL, et al. Wound healing in the intestinal wall. Effects of infection on experimental ileal and colonic anastomoses. Dis Colon Rectum. 1984;27(7):462–7.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Uraiqat AA, Byrne CMD, Phillips RKS. Gaining length in ileal-anal pouch reconstruction: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(7):657–61.CrossRef Uraiqat AA, Byrne CMD, Phillips RKS. Gaining length in ileal-anal pouch reconstruction: a review. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(7):657–61.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Martel P, et al. Mesenteric lengthening in ileoanal pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: is high division of the superior mesenteric pedicle a safe procedure? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(7):862–6.CrossRef Martel P, et al. Mesenteric lengthening in ileoanal pouch anastomosis for ulcerative colitis: is high division of the superior mesenteric pedicle a safe procedure? Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(7):862–6.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Utsunomiya J, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23(7):459–66.CrossRef Utsunomiya J, et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1980;23(7):459–66.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Goes RN, et al. Lengthening of the mesentery using the marginal vascular arcade of the right colon as the blood supply to the ileal pouch. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(8):893–5.CrossRef Goes RN, et al. Lengthening of the mesentery using the marginal vascular arcade of the right colon as the blood supply to the ileal pouch. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38(8):893–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ismail E, et al. Comparison of mesenteric lengthening techniques in IPAA: an anatomic and angiographic study on fresh cadavers. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(8):979–87.CrossRef Ismail E, et al. Comparison of mesenteric lengthening techniques in IPAA: an anatomic and angiographic study on fresh cadavers. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(8):979–87.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Thirlby RC. Optimizing results and techniques of mesenteric lengthening in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1995;169(5):499–502.CrossRef Thirlby RC. Optimizing results and techniques of mesenteric lengthening in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Am J Surg. 1995;169(5):499–502.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Araki T, et al. The effect on morbidity of mesentery lengthening techniques and the use of a covering stoma after ileoanal pouch surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(5):621–8.CrossRef Araki T, et al. The effect on morbidity of mesentery lengthening techniques and the use of a covering stoma after ileoanal pouch surgery. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49(5):621–8.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tocchi A, et al. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal resection for complicated diverticular disease. Am J Surg. 2001;182(2):162–7.CrossRef Tocchi A, et al. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery in colorectal resection for complicated diverticular disease. Am J Surg. 2001;182(2):162–7.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Masoni L, et al. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):199–206.CrossRef Masoni L, et al. Preservation of the inferior mesenteric artery via laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy performed for diverticular disease: real benefit or technical challenge: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27(1):199–206.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Hardt J, Kienle P. The technique of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal Jpouch: standards and controversies. Chirurg. 2017;88(7):559–65.CrossRef Hardt J, Kienle P. The technique of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal Jpouch: standards and controversies. Chirurg. 2017;88(7):559–65.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Gorgun E, Remzi FH. Complications of ileoanal pouches. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17(1):43–55.CrossRef Gorgun E, Remzi FH. Complications of ileoanal pouches. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2004;17(1):43–55.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Freeha K, Bo S. Complications related to j-pouch surgery. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;14(10):571–6. Freeha K, Bo S. Complications related to j-pouch surgery. Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2018;14(10):571–6.
18.
go back to reference Peyrin-Biroulet L, Germain A, Patel AS, Lindsay JO. Systematic review: outcomes and post-operative complications following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(8):807–16.CrossRef Peyrin-Biroulet L, Germain A, Patel AS, Lindsay JO. Systematic review: outcomes and post-operative complications following colectomy for ulcerative colitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016;44(8):807–16.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Francone TD, Champagne B. Considerations and complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(1):107–43.CrossRef Francone TD, Champagne B. Considerations and complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93(1):107–43.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Wu XR, et al. The impact of mesenteric tension on pouch outcome and quality of life in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(12):986–94.CrossRef Wu XR, et al. The impact of mesenteric tension on pouch outcome and quality of life in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2014;16(12):986–94.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Fazio VW, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):679–85.CrossRef Fazio VW, et al. Ileal pouch anal anastomosis: analysis of outcome and quality of life in 3707 patients. Ann Surg. 2013;257(4):679–85.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Sagar PM, Pemberton JH. Intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems with ileoanal pouches. Br J Surg. 2012;99(4):454–68.CrossRef Sagar PM, Pemberton JH. Intraoperative, postoperative and reoperative problems with ileoanal pouches. Br J Surg. 2012;99(4):454–68.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Pemberton JH. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85(6):800–3.CrossRef Meagher AP, Farouk R, Dozois RR, Kelly KA, Pemberton JH. J ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis: complications and long-term outcome in 1310 patients. Br J Surg. 1998;85(6):800–3.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: a review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(31):4320–42.CrossRef Ng KS, Gonsalves SJ, Sagar PM. Ileal-anal pouches: a review of its history, indications, and complications. World J Gastroenterol. 2019;25(31):4320–42.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Farouk R, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(10):1239–43.CrossRef Farouk R, Dozois RR, Pemberton JH, Larson D. Incidence and subsequent impact of pelvic abscess after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for chronic ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41(10):1239–43.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Klos CL, et al. Obesity increases risk for pouch-related complications following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):573–9.CrossRef Klos CL, et al. Obesity increases risk for pouch-related complications following restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18(3):573–9.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Martel P, Blanc P, Bothereau H, Malafosse M, Gallot D. Comparative anatomical study of division of the ileocolic pedicle or the superior mesenteric pedicle for mesenteric lengthening. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):775–8.CrossRef Martel P, Blanc P, Bothereau H, Malafosse M, Gallot D. Comparative anatomical study of division of the ileocolic pedicle or the superior mesenteric pedicle for mesenteric lengthening. Br J Surg. 2002;89(6):775–8.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Rickard MJ, Young CJ, Bissett IP, Stitz R, Solomon MJ. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Australasian experience. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(2):139–45.CrossRef Rickard MJ, Young CJ, Bissett IP, Stitz R, Solomon MJ. Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: the Australasian experience. Colorectal Dis. 2007;9(2):139–45.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Uchino M, et al. Pouch functional outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch reconstruction in patients with ulcerative colitis: Japanese multi-center nationwide cohort study. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(5):642–51.CrossRef Uchino M, et al. Pouch functional outcomes after restorative proctocolectomy with ileal-pouch reconstruction in patients with ulcerative colitis: Japanese multi-center nationwide cohort study. J Gastroenterol. 2018;53(5):642–51.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Sherman J, Greenstein AJ, Greenstein AJ. Ileal j pouch complications and surgical solutions: a review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(9):1678–85.CrossRef Sherman J, Greenstein AJ, Greenstein AJ. Ileal j pouch complications and surgical solutions: a review. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2014;20(9):1678–85.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Association of ileocolic pedicle division with postoperative complications after restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis
Authors
Emmanouil Tzatzarakis
Florian Herrle
Wolfgang Reindl
Nora Altmayer
Dominik Minas
Peter Kienle
Christoph Reissfelder
Flavius Şandra-Petrescu
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01428-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue