Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Surgery 1/2021

Open Access 01-12-2021 | Laparoscopy | Research article

Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: preliminary experience with 10 cases

Authors: Ren-Chao Zhang, Xin-Jun Gan, Wei Song, Song-Tao Shi, Hui-Fang Yu, Yi-Ping Mou

Published in: BMC Surgery | Issue 1/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) which is a reasonable surgical approach for left-sided pancreatic cancer is emphasis on the complete resection of regional lymph nodes and tumor-free margin resection. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (LRAMPS) has been rarely performed, with only 49 cases indexed on PubMed. In this study, we present our experience of LRAMPS.

Methods

From December 2018 to February 2020, 10 patients underwent LRAMPS for pancreatic cancer at our department. The data of the patient demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, pathologic findings and follow-up were collected.

Results

LRAMPS was performed successfully in all the patients. The median operative time was 235 min (range 212–270 min), with an EBL of 120 ml (range 100–200 ml). Postoperative complications occurred in 5 (50.0%) patients. Three patients developed a grade B pancreatic fistula. There was no postoperative 30-day mortality and reoperation. The median postoperative hospital stay was 14 days (range 9–24 days).The median count of retrieved lymph nodes was 15 (range 13–21), and four patients (40%) had malignant-positive lymph nodes. All cases achieved a negative tangential margin and R0 resection. Median follow-up time was 11 months (range 3–14 m). Two patients developed disease recurrence (pancreatic bed recurrence and liver metastasis) 9 months, 10 months after surgery, respectively. Others survived without tumor recurrence or metastasis.

Conclusions

LRAMPS is technically safe and feasible procedure in well-selected patients with pancreatic cancer in the distal pancreas. The oncologically outcomes need to be further validated based on additional large-volume studies.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133(5):521–7.CrossRef Strasberg SM, Drebin JA, Linehan D. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy. Surgery. 2003;133(5):521–7.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):244–9.CrossRef Strasberg SM, Linehan DC, Hawkins WG. Radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas: ability to obtain negative tangential margins. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;204(2):244–9.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F. Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):46–52.CrossRef Mitchem JB, Hamilton N, Gao F. Long-term results of resection of adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas using radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy procedure. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214(1):46–52.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG. Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(7):432–41.CrossRef Grossman JG, Fields RC, Hawkins WG. Single institution results of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of pancreas in 78 patients. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2016;23(7):432–41.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Sunagawa H, Harumatsu T, Kinjo S. Ligament of Treitz approach in laparoscopic modified radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: report of three cases. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7(2):172–4.CrossRef Sunagawa H, Harumatsu T, Kinjo S. Ligament of Treitz approach in laparoscopic modified radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: report of three cases. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2014;7(2):172–4.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (> median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2848–55.CrossRef Lee SH, Kang CM, Hwang HK. Minimally invasive RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer within Yonsei criteria: long-term (> median 3 years) oncologic outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2014;28(10):2848–55.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Kim EY, Hong TH. Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):2.CrossRef Kim EY, Hong TH. Initial experience with laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer in a single institution: technical aspects and oncological outcomes. BMC Surg. 2017;17(1):2.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Ome Y, Hashida K, Yokota M. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4836–7.CrossRef Ome Y, Hashida K, Yokota M. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer using the ligament of Treitz approach. Surg Endosc. 2017;31(11):4836–7.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yamamoto M, Zaima M, Yamamoto H. New laparoscopic procedure for left-sided pancreatic cancer-artery-first approach laparoscopic RAMPS using 3D technique. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):213.CrossRef Yamamoto M, Zaima M, Yamamoto H. New laparoscopic procedure for left-sided pancreatic cancer-artery-first approach laparoscopic RAMPS using 3D technique. World J Surg Oncol. 2017;15(1):213.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Xu XW, Zhang RC, Mou YP. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of 12 cases. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi. 2018;56(3):212–6.PubMed Xu XW, Zhang RC, Mou YP. Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic adenocarcinoma: analysis of 12 cases. Zhonghua wai ke za zhi. 2018;56(3):212–6.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Kim S, Yoon YS, Han HS. Laparoscopic subtotal pancreatectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol. 2019;28:150.CrossRef Kim S, Yoon YS, Han HS. Laparoscopic subtotal pancreatectomy with radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for left-sided pancreatic cancer. Surg Oncol. 2019;28:150.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ. Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(7):1533–41.CrossRef Kang CM, Kim DH, Lee WJ. Ten years of experience with resection of left-sided pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: evolution and initial experience to a laparoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2010;24(7):1533–41.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2360–1.CrossRef Choi SH, Kang CM, Lee WJ. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic modified anterior RAMPS in well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer: technical feasibility and interim results. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(7):2360–1.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Han DH, Kang CM, Lee WJ. A five-year survivor without recurrence following robotic anterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for a well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(1):276–9.CrossRef Han DH, Kang CM, Lee WJ. A five-year survivor without recurrence following robotic anterior radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for a well-selected left-sided pancreatic cancer. Yonsei Med J. 2014;55(1):276–9.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13.CrossRef Bassi C, Dervenis C, Butturini G. Postoperative pancreatic fistula: an international study group (ISGPF) definition. Surgery. 2005;138(1):8–13.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–91.CrossRef Bassi C, Marchegiani G, Dervenis C. The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 years after. Surgery. 2017;161(3):584–91.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kooby DA, Vollmer CM. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: is a randomized trial necessary? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22(10):737–9.CrossRef Kooby DA, Vollmer CM. Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy: is a randomized trial necessary? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2015;22(10):737–9.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: It’s time to randomize. Surgery. 2015;157(1):45–55.CrossRef Mehrabi A, Hafezi M, Arvin J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas: It’s time to randomize. Surgery. 2015;157(1):45–55.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Yang DJ, Xiong JJ, Lu HM. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1159.CrossRef Yang DJ, Xiong JJ, Lu HM. The oncological safety in minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):1159.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chun YS. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):46–50.CrossRef Chun YS. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and pancreatic cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(1):46–50.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Latorre M, Ziparo V, Nigri G. Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 2013;79(11):1154–8.CrossRef Latorre M, Ziparo V, Nigri G. Standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy versus radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for body and tail pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Am Surg. 2013;79(11):1154–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Park HJ, You D, Choi DW. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):186–93.CrossRef Park HJ, You D, Choi DW. Role of radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy for adenocarcinoma of the body and tail of the pancreas. World J Surg. 2014;38(1):186–93.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y. Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2267–75.CrossRef Abe T, Ohuchida K, Miyasaka Y. Comparison of surgical outcomes between radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (RAMPS) and standard retrograde pancreatosplenectomy (SPRS) for left-sided pancreatic cancer. World J Surg. 2016;40(9):2267–75.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy: preliminary experience with 10 cases
Authors
Ren-Chao Zhang
Xin-Jun Gan
Wei Song
Song-Tao Shi
Hui-Fang Yu
Yi-Ping Mou
Publication date
01-12-2021
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Surgery / Issue 1/2021
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2482
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-021-01090-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2021

BMC Surgery 1/2021 Go to the issue