Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2023

01-12-2023 | Laparoscopy | STUDY PROTOCOL

Does 3D laparoscopic video technology affect long-term survival in right hemicolectomy for cancer compared to standard 2D? A propensity score study

Authors: Giuseppe Portale, Roberto Marconato, Sabrina Pedon, Patrizia Bartolotta, Dario Gregori, Alberto Morabito, Teodoro Sava, Valentino Fiscon

Published in: International Journal of Colorectal Disease | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

There are few studies focused on the short-term results of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy performed with 2D (two-dimension) or 3D (three-dimension) video technology and none on the oncologic effects. The aim of the study was to assess the long-term results of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) with intracorporeal anastomosis using 3D or 2D video in patients with right colon cancer with at least three years of oncologic follow-up.

Methods

Data from patients undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) with intracorporeal anastomosis for cancer in an 11-year period (June 2008–June 2019) and ≥ 3 years of follow-up were prospectively collected. Surgical procedures were performed by two expert laparoscopic surgeons.

Results

111 patients were included in the study: 56 (50.5%) in the 3D group and 55 (49.5%) in the 2D group. Tumor stage and number of lymph nodes harvested were similar. Overall and disease-free survival were not different in the two groups. Local recurrence occurred in none of the patients, and distant metachronous metastases were similar in the two groups. A propensity score weighting approach was used to account for potential confounding related to patients’ nonrandom allocation to the 2 groups. The effects of the intervention on postoperative outcomes were assessed with a weighted regression approach.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic 3D technology allows similar oncological results as 2D vision in LRH with intracorporeal anastomosis. Larger prospective randomized studies might confirm these results in the long-term follow-up.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed Colon Cancer Laparoscopic or Open Resection Study Group et al (2009) Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol 10:44–52CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Lacy AM et al (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM et al (2008) The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Ann Surg 248:1–7CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Herron DM, Lantis JC II, Maykel J, Basu C, Schwaitzberg SD (1999) The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display: a quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 13:751–755CrossRefPubMed Herron DM, Lantis JC II, Maykel J, Basu C, Schwaitzberg SD (1999) The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display: a quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies. Surg Endosc 13:751–755CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472CrossRefPubMed Mueller MD, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W (1999) Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy. Surg Endosc 13:469–472CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Usta TA et al (2015) An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 29:2305–2313CrossRefPubMed Usta TA et al (2015) An assessment of the new generation three-dimensional high definition laparoscopic vision system on surgical skills: a randomized prospective study. Surg Endosc 29:2305–2313CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Anania G et al (2020) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis. Surg Endosc 34:4788–4800CrossRefPubMed Anania G et al (2020) Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis. Surg Endosc 34:4788–4800CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Tao K, Liu X, Deng M, Shi W, Gao J (2016) Three-dimensional against 2-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon c7ancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:324–327CrossRefPubMed Tao K, Liu X, Deng M, Shi W, Gao J (2016) Three-dimensional against 2-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for right-sided colon c7ancer. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 26:324–327CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, Navarra G (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:213–217CrossRefPubMed Currò G, Cogliandolo A, Bartolotta M, Navarra G (2016) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 26:213–217CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Bracale U et al (2020) Does a 3D laparoscopic approach improve surgical outcome of mininvasive right colectomy? A retrospective case-control study. Updat Surg 72:445–451CrossRef Bracale U et al (2020) Does a 3D laparoscopic approach improve surgical outcome of mininvasive right colectomy? A retrospective case-control study. Updat Surg 72:445–451CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Costa G et al (2021) 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: a propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 13:597–619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Costa G et al (2021) 2D vs 3D laparoscopic right colectomy: a propensity score-matching comparison of personal experience with systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 13:597–619CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Portale G, Pedon S, Benacchio L, Cipollari C, Fiscon V (2020) Two-dimensional (2-D) vs. three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: comparison of short-term results. Surg Endosc 35:5279–5286CrossRefPubMed Portale G, Pedon S, Benacchio L, Cipollari C, Fiscon V (2020) Two-dimensional (2-D) vs. three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis for colon cancer: comparison of short-term results. Surg Endosc 35:5279–5286CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Benedetto U, Head SJ, Angelini GD, Blackstone EH (2018) Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg 53:1112–1117CrossRef Benedetto U, Head SJ, Angelini GD, Blackstone EH (2018) Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardio-Thorac Surg 53:1112–1117CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Imai K, Ratkovic M (2014) Covariate balancing propensity score. J R Stat Soc 76:243–263CrossRef Imai K, Ratkovic M (2014) Covariate balancing propensity score. J R Stat Soc 76:243–263CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Williamson EJ, Forbes A, White IR (2014) Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score. Stat Med 33:721–737CrossRefPubMed Williamson EJ, Forbes A, White IR (2014) Variance reduction in randomised trials by inverse probability weighting using the propensity score. Stat Med 33:721–737CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Conover MM et al (2021) Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: a plasmode simulation. Stat Med 40:2101–2112CrossRefPubMed Conover MM et al (2021) Propensity score trimming mitigates bias due to covariate measurement error in inverse probability of treatment weighted analyses: a plasmode simulation. Stat Med 40:2101–2112CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Cole SR, Hernán MA (2004) Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75:45–49CrossRefPubMed Cole SR, Hernán MA (2004) Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75:45–49CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA, Larmarange J (2021) Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary Package. R J 13:570CrossRef Sjoberg DD, Whiting K, Curry M, Lavery JA, Larmarange J (2021) Reproducible summary tables with the gtsummary Package. R J 13:570CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Feng X et al (2015) 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon. Surg Endosc 29:1231–1239CrossRefPubMed Feng X et al (2015) 3-Dimensional (3D) laparoscopy improves operating time in small spaces without impact on hemodynamics and psychomental stress parameters of the surgeon. Surg Endosc 29:1231–1239CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Vettoretto N et al (2018) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1799–1801CrossRefPubMed Vettoretto N et al (2018) Three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 33:1799–1801CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Arezzo A et al (2019) The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 33:3251–3274CrossRefPubMed Arezzo A et al (2019) The use of 3D laparoscopic imaging systems in surgery: EAES consensus development conference 2018. Surg Endosc 33:3251–3274CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Miyamoto Y et al (2020) Postoperative complications are associated with poor survival outcome after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score analysis. J Surg Oncol 122:344–349CrossRefPubMed Miyamoto Y et al (2020) Postoperative complications are associated with poor survival outcome after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a propensity-score analysis. J Surg Oncol 122:344–349CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Cienfuegos JA et al (2015) Impact of perineural and lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22:916–923CrossRefPubMed Cienfuegos JA et al (2015) Impact of perineural and lymphovascular invasion on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 22:916–923CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Le Voyer TE et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919CrossRef Le Voyer TE et al (2003) Colon cancer survival is associated with increasing number of lymph nodes analyzed: a secondary survey of intergroup trial INT-0089. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 21:2912–2919CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions and recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011 Amato A, Pescatori M (2006) Perioperative blood transfusions and recurrence of colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011
30.
go back to reference Gunka I, Dostalik J, Martinek L, Gunkova P, Mazur M (2013) Impact of blood transfusions on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer surgery. Indian J Surg 75:94–101CrossRefPubMed Gunka I, Dostalik J, Martinek L, Gunkova P, Mazur M (2013) Impact of blood transfusions on survival and recurrence in colorectal cancer surgery. Indian J Surg 75:94–101CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Mörner MEM, Gunnarsson U, Jestin P, Svanfeldt M (2012) The importance of blood loss during colon cancer surgery for long-term survival: an epidemiological study based on a population based register. Ann Surg 255:1126–1128CrossRefPubMed Mörner MEM, Gunnarsson U, Jestin P, Svanfeldt M (2012) The importance of blood loss during colon cancer surgery for long-term survival: an epidemiological study based on a population based register. Ann Surg 255:1126–1128CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Yang Y-W et al (2022) Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a 3-year follow-up study. J Minimal Access Surg 18:289–294CrossRef Yang Y-W et al (2022) Three-dimensional versus conventional two-dimensional laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer: a 3-year follow-up study. J Minimal Access Surg 18:289–294CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Does 3D laparoscopic video technology affect long-term survival in right hemicolectomy for cancer compared to standard 2D? A propensity score study
Authors
Giuseppe Portale
Roberto Marconato
Sabrina Pedon
Patrizia Bartolotta
Dario Gregori
Alberto Morabito
Teodoro Sava
Valentino Fiscon
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Journal of Colorectal Disease / Issue 1/2023
Print ISSN: 0179-1958
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1262
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-022-04297-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

International Journal of Colorectal Disease 1/2023 Go to the issue