Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2017

Open Access 01-09-2017 | ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer

Authors: Michał Pędziwiatr, Magdalena Pisarska, Piotr Małczak, Piotr Major, Mateusz Wierdak, Dorota Radkowiak, Jan Kulawik, Marcin Dembiński, Andrzej Budzyński

Published in: Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery | Issue 6/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to discuss the feasibility of laparoscopic ‘uncinate first’ pancreatoduodenectomy.

Methods

The analysis included prospectively collected data from 12 consecutive patients undergoing elective pure laparoscopic ‘uncinate process first’ pancreatoduodenectomy (Group 1). They were compared with patients previously operated on with a classical laparoscopic approach (Group 2). The primary outcome was the quality of the resected specimen (lymph node (LN) yield, R0 rate, involved resection margins). Secondary outcomes were perioperative parameters.

Results

The LN yield in Group 1 was 19.3 and in Group 2 it was 13.9 (p = 0.03). R0 resection rates did not vary (66.7 vs. 63.2%, p = 0.84). Although the involvement of the superior mesenteric artery margin and uncinate process margin seemed lower in Group 1, the difference was not significant. Total operative time (467 vs. 425 min, p = 0.13) and resection time (221 vs. 232 min, p = 0.34) were similar in both groups. The estimated blood loss in Group 1 was 408 ml, whereas in Group 2 it was 392 ml (p = 0.33). Complication rates were 66.7% in Group 1 and 63.2% in Group 2 (p = 0.84). Median length of stay was 9 days in both groups (p = 0.36). Postoperative complication rates did not differ between groups.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic uncinate first approach is a feasible method for pancreatic head neoplasms. Achieved quality of the specimen is comparable with the traditional laparoscopic approach, whereas intra- and postoperative course is not inferior. However, further studies on larger cohorts are required to fully establish whether the novel approach has potential advantages over classical access in pancreatic head cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed Gagner M, Pomp A (1994) Laparoscopic pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy. Surg Endosc 8:408–410CrossRefPubMed
7.
20.
go back to reference Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN et al (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94:265–273. doi:10.1002/bjs.5716 CrossRefPubMed Michalski CW, Kleeff J, Wente MN et al (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard and extended lymphadenectomy in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer. Br J Surg 94:265–273. doi:10.​1002/​bjs.​5716 CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K et al (1995) Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion. Surgery 117:616–623CrossRefPubMed Kayahara M, Nagakawa T, Ueno K et al (1995) Surgical strategy for carcinoma of the pancreas head area based on clinicopathologic analysis of nodal involvement and plexus invasion. Surgery 117:616–623CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Peparini N, Chirletti P (2012) Clearance of the retropancreatic margin in pancreatic carcinomas: total mesopancreas excision or extended lymphadenectomy? Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1146–author reply 1147. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2012.07.004 Peparini N, Chirletti P (2012) Clearance of the retropancreatic margin in pancreatic carcinomas: total mesopancreas excision or extended lymphadenectomy? Eur J Surg Oncol 38:1146–author reply 1147. doi:10.​1016/​j.​ejso.​2012.​07.​004
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic uncinate process first pancreatoduodenectomy—feasibility study of a modified ‘artery first’ approach to pancreatic head cancer
Authors
Michał Pędziwiatr
Magdalena Pisarska
Piotr Małczak
Piotr Major
Mateusz Wierdak
Dorota Radkowiak
Jan Kulawik
Marcin Dembiński
Andrzej Budzyński
Publication date
01-09-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery / Issue 6/2017
Print ISSN: 1435-2443
Electronic ISSN: 1435-2451
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-017-1597-2

Other articles of this Issue 6/2017

Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 6/2017 Go to the issue