Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Angiogenesis 3/2019

01-08-2019 | Kidney Cancer | Original Paper

A new prognostic model for survival in second line for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation

Authors: Lisa Derosa, Mohamed Amine Bayar, Laurence Albiges, Gwénaël Le Teuff, Bernard Escudier

Published in: Angiogenesis | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

In patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), the oncologic benefit of second-line treatment for high volume tumors or presence of more than five risk factors remain to be defined. Our aim was to develop and externally validate a new model most likely to correctly predict overall survival (OS) categories in second line.

Method

mRCC patients treated within clinical trials at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus (GRCC) formed the discovery set. Patients from two phase III trials from Pfizer database (PFIZERDB), AXIS (NCT00678392), and INTORSECT (NCT00474786), formed the external validation set. New prognostic factors were analyzed using a multivariable Cox model with a backward selection procedure. Performance of the GRCC model and the prognostic classification scheme derived from it, measuring by R2, c-index, and calibration, was evaluated on the validation set and compared to MSKCC and IMDC models.

Results

Two hundred and twenty-one patients were included in the GRCC cohort and 855 patients in the PFIZERDB. Median OS was similar in the discovery and validation cohorts (16.8 [95% CI 12.9–21.7] and 15.3 [13.6–17.2] months, respectively). Backward selection procedure identified time from first to second-line treatment and tumor burden as new independent prognostic factors significantly associated to OS after adjusting for IMDC prognostic factors (HR 1.68 [1.23–2.31] and 1.43 [1.03–1.99], respectively). Dividing patients into four risk groups, based on the number of factors selected in GRCC model, median OS from the start of second line in the validation cohort was not reached (NE) [95% CI 24.9–NE] in the favorable risk group (n = 20), 21.8 months [18.6–28.2] in the intermediate-risk group (n = 367), 12.7 months [11.0–15.8] in the low poor-risk group (n = 347), and 5.5 months [4.7–6.4] in the high poor-risk group (n = 121). Finally, this model and its prognostic classification scheme provided the better fit, with higher R2 and higher c-index compared to other possible classification schemes.

Conclusion

A new prognostic model was developed and validated to estimate overall survival of patients with previously treated mRCC. This model is an easy-to-use tool that allows accurate estimation of patient survival to inform decision making and follow-up after first line for mRCC.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Li H, Samawi H, Heng DYC (2015) The use of prognostic factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 33(12):509–516CrossRefPubMed Li H, Samawi H, Heng DYC (2015) The use of prognostic factors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 33(12):509–516CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Shinohara N, Abe T (2015) Prognostic factors and risk classifications for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 22(10):888–897CrossRefPubMed Shinohara N, Abe T (2015) Prognostic factors and risk classifications for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 22(10):888–897CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Schwartz LH, Reuter V, Russo P, Marion S et al (2004) Prognostic factors for survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 22(3):454–463CrossRefPubMed Motzer RJ, Bacik J, Schwartz LH, Reuter V, Russo P, Marion S et al (2004) Prognostic factors for survival in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 22(3):454–463CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Mekhail TM, Abou-Jawde RM, Boumerhi G, Malhi S, Wood L, Elson P et al (2005) Validation and extension of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering prognostic factors model for survival in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23(4):832–841CrossRefPubMed Mekhail TM, Abou-Jawde RM, Boumerhi G, Malhi S, Wood L, Elson P et al (2005) Validation and extension of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering prognostic factors model for survival in patients with previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 23(4):832–841CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Heng DYC, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C et al (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799CrossRefPubMed Heng DYC, Xie W, Regan MM, Warren MA, Golshayan AR, Sahi C et al (2009) Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol 27(34):5794–5799CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Ko JJ, Xie W, Kroeger N, Lee J-L, Rini BI, Knox JJ et al (2015) The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model as a prognostic tool in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with first-line targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(3):293–300CrossRefPubMed Ko JJ, Xie W, Kroeger N, Lee J-L, Rini BI, Knox JJ et al (2015) The International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium model as a prognostic tool in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma previously treated with first-line targeted therapy: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol 16(3):293–300CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Iacovelli R, Lanoy E, Albiges L, Escudier B (2012) Tumour burden is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 110(11):1747–1753CrossRefPubMed Iacovelli R, Lanoy E, Albiges L, Escudier B (2012) Tumour burden is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 110(11):1747–1753CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Al-Marrawi MY, Rini BI, Harshman LC, Bjarnason G, Wood L, Vaishampayan U et al (2013) The association of clinical outcome to first-line VEGF-targeted therapy with clinical outcome to second-line VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Target Oncol 8(3):203–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Al-Marrawi MY, Rini BI, Harshman LC, Bjarnason G, Wood L, Vaishampayan U et al (2013) The association of clinical outcome to first-line VEGF-targeted therapy with clinical outcome to second-line VEGF-targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients. Target Oncol 8(3):203–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Kaprin A, Szczylik C, Hutson TE et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet (London) 378(9807):1931–1939CrossRef Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Kaprin A, Szczylik C, Hutson TE et al (2011) Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet (London) 378(9807):1931–1939CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hutson TE, Escudier B, Esteban E, Bjarnason GA, Lim HY, Pittman KB et al (2014) Randomized phase III trial of temsirolimus versus sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 32(8):760–767CrossRefPubMed Hutson TE, Escudier B, Esteban E, Bjarnason GA, Lim HY, Pittman KB et al (2014) Randomized phase III trial of temsirolimus versus sorafenib as second-line therapy after sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 32(8):760–767CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (Oxf England 1990) 45(2):228–247CrossRef Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R et al (2009) New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer (Oxf England 1990) 45(2):228–247CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Basappa NS, Elson P, Golshayan A-R, Wood L, Garcia JA, Dreicer R et al (2011) The impact of tumor burden characteristics in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib. Cancer 117(6):1183–1189CrossRefPubMed Basappa NS, Elson P, Golshayan A-R, Wood L, Garcia JA, Dreicer R et al (2011) The impact of tumor burden characteristics in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib. Cancer 117(6):1183–1189CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Stein WD, Huang H, Menefee M, Edgerly M, Kotz H, Dwyer A et al (2009) Other paradigms: growth rate constants and tumor burden determined using computed tomography data correlate strongly with the overall survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer J (Sudbury) 15(5):441–447CrossRef Stein WD, Huang H, Menefee M, Edgerly M, Kotz H, Dwyer A et al (2009) Other paradigms: growth rate constants and tumor burden determined using computed tomography data correlate strongly with the overall survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma. Cancer J (Sudbury) 15(5):441–447CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Miyake H, Miyazaki A, Imai S, Harada K-I, Fujisawa M (2016) Early tumor shrinkage under treatment with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a predictor of overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study in Japan. Target Oncol 11(2):175–182CrossRefPubMed Miyake H, Miyazaki A, Imai S, Harada K-I, Fujisawa M (2016) Early tumor shrinkage under treatment with first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors as a predictor of overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective multi-institutional study in Japan. Target Oncol 11(2):175–182CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481CrossRef Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53(282):457–481CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Schemper M, Smith TL (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17(4):343–346CrossRef Schemper M, Smith TL (1996) A note on quantifying follow-up in studies of failure time. Control Clin Trials 17(4):343–346CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kent JT, O’quigley J (1988) Measures of dependence for censored survival data. Biometrika. 75(3):525–534CrossRef Kent JT, O’quigley J (1988) Measures of dependence for censored survival data. Biometrika. 75(3):525–534CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Wei LJ (2011) On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med 30(10):1105–1117PubMedPubMedCentral Uno H, Cai T, Pencina MJ, D’Agostino RB, Wei LJ (2011) On the C-statistics for evaluating overall adequacy of risk prediction procedures with censored survival data. Stat Med 30(10):1105–1117PubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Boisbunon A, Canu S, Fourdrinier D, Strawderman W, Wells MT (2014) Akaike’s information criterion, Cp and estimators of loss for elliptically symmetric DISTRIBUTIONS. Int Stat Rev 82(3):422–439CrossRef Boisbunon A, Canu S, Fourdrinier D, Strawderman W, Wells MT (2014) Akaike’s information criterion, Cp and estimators of loss for elliptically symmetric DISTRIBUTIONS. Int Stat Rev 82(3):422–439CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Heinzl H (2000) Using SAS to calculate the Kent and O’Quigley measure of dependence for Cox proportional hazards regression model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 63(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed Heinzl H (2000) Using SAS to calculate the Kent and O’Quigley measure of dependence for Cox proportional hazards regression model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 63(1):71–76CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ornstein MC, Wood LS, Elson P, Allman KD, Beach J, Martin A et al (2017) A phase II study of intermittent sunitinib in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35(16):1764–1769CrossRefPubMed Ornstein MC, Wood LS, Elson P, Allman KD, Beach J, Martin A et al (2017) A phase II study of intermittent sunitinib in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 35(16):1764–1769CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Ferté C, Koscielny S, Albiges L, Rocher L, Soria J-C, Iacovelli R et al (2014) Tumor growth rate provides useful information to evaluate sorafenib and everolimus treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: an integrated analysis of the TARGET and RECORD phase 3 trial data. Eur Urol 65(4):713–720CrossRefPubMed Ferté C, Koscielny S, Albiges L, Rocher L, Soria J-C, Iacovelli R et al (2014) Tumor growth rate provides useful information to evaluate sorafenib and everolimus treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: an integrated analysis of the TARGET and RECORD phase 3 trial data. Eur Urol 65(4):713–720CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
A new prognostic model for survival in second line for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation
Authors
Lisa Derosa
Mohamed Amine Bayar
Laurence Albiges
Gwénaël Le Teuff
Bernard Escudier
Publication date
01-08-2019
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Angiogenesis / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 0969-6970
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7209
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10456-019-09664-2

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Angiogenesis 3/2019 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.