Skip to main content
Top
Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2018

Open Access 01-12-2018 | Research

Kidney autotransplantation after nephrectomy and work bench surgery as an ultimate approach to nephron-sparing surgery

Authors: Martin W. W. Janssen, Johannes Linxweiler, Ines Philipps, Zentia Bütow, Stefan Siemer, Michael Stöckle, Carsten-Henning Ohlmann

Published in: World Journal of Surgical Oncology | Issue 1/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Kidney autotransplantation (KAT) is the ultimate approach for nephron-sparing surgery. It is a rarely used method in renal tumor surgery today as minimal invasive and open techniques for nephron-sparing surgery improve constantly. In this publication, the complication rate and the long-term functional and oncological outcome at a single center are analyzed.

Methods

A prospectively constructed database of patients with renal tumors who underwent renal surgery was retrospectively analyzed to identify patients with KAT and describe surgical and oncological outcomes and to obtain long-term follow-up. Data collection included detailed surgical technique, complications (Clavian-Dindo), and hospital stay, as well as functional and oncological outcome and long-term follow-up.

Results

Between 1976 and 2013, 12 patients (median age 50.5 years) underwent KAT for highly complex renal masses: in five cases for complex renal cell carcinoma (RCC), five cases for complex upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC), one case for a renal metastasis, and one case for nephroblastoma. The nephrectomy or nephron-ureterectomy was performed open via a flank or transabdominal. The median surgical time was 360 min (range 270–490 min). Intraoperatively, six cases required blood transfusions (50%). Six patients (50%) developed significant postoperative complications (Clavian-Dindo > 2). In two patients, intermittent hemodialysis for delayed graft function (16.6%) was needed, and in six cases (50%), additional blood transfusions postoperatively were necessary. At discharge from hospital, all patients had functioning grafts. The median hospital stay was 29.5 days (range 18–35).
At follow-up (median follow-up of 83.5 ± 40.7 months), six patients had died (50%)—all with functioning grafts (free from hemodialysis). In five cases, recurrence of primary tumor or metastatic disease was recorded. In four cases, the recurrent carcinoma could be resected; in detail, UTUC in three cases and one partial nephrectomy of the autotransplanted kidney was performed. One patient suffered from bone and lung metastasis. Two patients died finally tumor-related. Five patients (41.6%) are presently alive, without evidence of tumor relapse. One patient developed terminal renal failure requiring hemodialysis 105 months after autotransplantation. One additional patient was lost to follow-up; after 69 months, this patient had a functioning kidney and no evidence of disease-recurrence at the last follow-up. A cumulative number of 1424 months without hemodialysis was gained for these 12 patients.
In the literature to date, most KAT are performed in benign disease, with minor but frequent complication. Here, we report the largest series of KAT for malignant kidney tumors. The complication rates are similar, compared to the recently reported series for benign indications with an improved graft survival rate. Since KAT requires a complex and challenging surgical approach, it should be performed by experienced kidney transplant surgeons.

Conclusion

In very complex cases involving renal tumors and multi-morbidity, patients should be counseled well before KAT is considered. At the same time, KAT should not be abandoned in these very rare cases, especially when a nephron-sparing approach is otherwise not feasible. KAT can maintain renal function and quality of life and extend expectancy of life.
Literature
1.
go back to reference MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, Omar MI, Lam TB, Hilvano-Cabungcal AM, Royle P, Stewart F, MacLennan G, MacLennan SJ, et al. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1097–117.CrossRefPubMed MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC, Omar MI, Lam TB, Hilvano-Cabungcal AM, Royle P, Stewart F, MacLennan G, MacLennan SJ, et al. Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer. Eur Urol. 2012;62:1097–117.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Foley RN, Hakim RM. Why is the mortality of dialysis patients in the United States much higher than the rest of the world? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1432–5.CrossRefPubMed Foley RN, Hakim RM. Why is the mortality of dialysis patients in the United States much higher than the rest of the world? J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:1432–5.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Volpe A, Garrou D, Amparore D, De Naeyer G, Porpiglia F, Ficarra V, Mottrie A. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity. BJU Int. 2014;114:903–9.CrossRefPubMed Volpe A, Garrou D, Amparore D, De Naeyer G, Porpiglia F, Ficarra V, Mottrie A. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity. BJU Int. 2014;114:903–9.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ruiz M, Hevia V, Fabuel JJ, Fernandez AA, Gomez V, Burgos FJ. Kidney autotransplantation: long-term outcomes and complications. Experience in a tertiary hospital and literature review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49:1929–35.CrossRefPubMed Ruiz M, Hevia V, Fabuel JJ, Fernandez AA, Gomez V, Burgos FJ. Kidney autotransplantation: long-term outcomes and complications. Experience in a tertiary hospital and literature review. Int Urol Nephrol. 2017;49:1929–35.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Novick AC, Jackson CL, Straffon RA. The role of renal autotransplantation in complex urological reconstruction. J Urol. 1990;143:452–7.CrossRefPubMed Novick AC, Jackson CL, Straffon RA. The role of renal autotransplantation in complex urological reconstruction. J Urol. 1990;143:452–7.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hardy JD, Eraslan S. Autotransplantation of the kidney for high ureteral injury. J Urol. 1963;90:563–74.CrossRefPubMed Hardy JD, Eraslan S. Autotransplantation of the kidney for high ureteral injury. J Urol. 1963;90:563–74.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Anderstrom C, Johansson SL, Pettersson S, Wahlqvist L. Carcinoma of the ureter—a clinicopathologic study of 49 cases. J Urol. 1989;142:280–3.CrossRefPubMed Anderstrom C, Johansson SL, Pettersson S, Wahlqvist L. Carcinoma of the ureter—a clinicopathologic study of 49 cases. J Urol. 1989;142:280–3.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gordon ZN, Angell J, Abaza R. Completely intracorporeal robotic renal autotransplantation. J Urol. 2014;192:1516–22.CrossRefPubMed Gordon ZN, Angell J, Abaza R. Completely intracorporeal robotic renal autotransplantation. J Urol. 2014;192:1516–22.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Fazlalizadeh R, Obi Y, Foster CE, Stamos MJ, Ichii H. A nationwide analysis of kidney autotransplantation. Am Surg. 2017;83:162–9.PubMed Moghadamyeghaneh Z, Hanna MH, Fazlalizadeh R, Obi Y, Foster CE, Stamos MJ, Ichii H. A nationwide analysis of kidney autotransplantation. Am Surg. 2017;83:162–9.PubMed
10.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefPubMed Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, et al. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009;250:187–96.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, Artibani W. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786–93.CrossRefPubMed Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, Macchi V, Porzionato A, De Caro R, Artibani W. Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol. 2009;56:786–93.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kemmer H, Siemer S, Stockle M. Nephrectomy, work bench surgery, and autotransplantation: a case of a solitary left kidney with an extensive centrally located renal cell carcinoma and a tumour thrombus entering the vena cava. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1518–20.CrossRefPubMed Kemmer H, Siemer S, Stockle M. Nephrectomy, work bench surgery, and autotransplantation: a case of a solitary left kidney with an extensive centrally located renal cell carcinoma and a tumour thrombus entering the vena cava. Eur Urol. 2007;52:1518–20.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Morgan WR, Zincke H. Progression and survival after renal-conserving surgery for renal-cell carcinoma experience in 104 patients and extended follow-up. J Urol. 1990;144:852–8.CrossRefPubMed Morgan WR, Zincke H. Progression and survival after renal-conserving surgery for renal-cell carcinoma experience in 104 patients and extended follow-up. J Urol. 1990;144:852–8.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Tran G, Ramaswamy K, Chi T, Meng M, Freise C, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation: safety, efficacy and long-term durability. J Urol. 2015;194:738–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tran G, Ramaswamy K, Chi T, Meng M, Freise C, Stoller ML. Laparoscopic nephrectomy with autotransplantation: safety, efficacy and long-term durability. J Urol. 2015;194:738–43.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M, Ficarra V, Ahlawat R, Moon DA, Porpiglia F, Challacombe BJ, Dasgupta P, Brunocilla E, et al. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int. 2017;119:456–63.CrossRefPubMed Schiavina R, Novara G, Borghesi M, Ficarra V, Ahlawat R, Moon DA, Porpiglia F, Challacombe BJ, Dasgupta P, Brunocilla E, et al. PADUA and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scores correlate with perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: analysis of the Vattikuti Global Quality Initiative in Robotic Urologic Surgery (GQI-RUS) database. BJU Int. 2017;119:456–63.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Kidney autotransplantation after nephrectomy and work bench surgery as an ultimate approach to nephron-sparing surgery
Authors
Martin W. W. Janssen
Johannes Linxweiler
Ines Philipps
Zentia Bütow
Stefan Siemer
Michael Stöckle
Carsten-Henning Ohlmann
Publication date
01-12-2018
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
World Journal of Surgical Oncology / Issue 1/2018
Electronic ISSN: 1477-7819
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-018-1338-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2018

World Journal of Surgical Oncology 1/2018 Go to the issue