Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Trials 1/2013

Open Access 01-12-2013 | Commentary

It’s plain and simple: transparency is good for science and in the public interest

Authors: Simon Denegri, Helene Faure

Published in: Trials | Issue 1/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

In the past couple of years, there has been a growing focus on the need to make scientific output accessible to a greater number of people, especially in the field of clinical research. The public are being urged to become more well-informed and to ask their doctors about taking part in clinical trials.
A key finding of a report from the Association of Medical Research Charities was that all published scientific papers would benefit from having a section in plain English. Researchers running a clinical trial are expected to provide a summary of their intended research at various stages of the research process. However, there is evidence that existing summaries are of variable length and quality and not always in plain English.
As a result, the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) commissioned a review of the guidance that is available to researchers. However, recent initiatives demonstrate that there are still a number of challenges in making current research both accessible and understandable by prospective participants.
BioMed Central also has a number of ongoing initiatives involving trial registration services and journals.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
Metadata
Title
It’s plain and simple: transparency is good for science and in the public interest
Authors
Simon Denegri
Helene Faure
Publication date
01-12-2013
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Trials / Issue 1/2013
Electronic ISSN: 1745-6215
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-215

Other articles of this Issue 1/2013

Trials 1/2013 Go to the issue