Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Urogynecology Journal 5/2004

01-10-2004 | Original Article

Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS)

Authors: W. Auwad, R. M. Freeman, S. Swift

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal | Issue 5/2004

Login to get access

Abstract

The authors performed a web-based questionnaire survey of 667 members of the ICS and AUGS to determine the current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POPQ) system by members of the professional societies which have advocated its use. Three hundred and eighty (57%) gynecologists responded. This international survey shows that only 40.2% of ICS and AUGS members who responded routinely use the POPQ system in their clinical practice and provides information on the most common reasons for not using it. The results highlight some of the concerns regarding the complex nature of the system and its acceptance and use by specialists worldwide. It also suggests the need for a simplified version of the classification system that is user-friendly and can be adopted by all practitioners.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Scanzoni FW (1875) Senkung und Vorfall des uterus und der scheide. In: Scanzoni FW (ed) Lehrbuch der Krankheiten der weiblichen geschlechstorgane, 5th edn. Braumueller W, Vienna, pp 654–664 Scanzoni FW (1875) Senkung und Vorfall des uterus und der scheide. In: Scanzoni FW (ed) Lehrbuch der Krankheiten der weiblichen geschlechstorgane, 5th edn. Braumueller W, Vienna, pp 654–664
2.
go back to reference Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker L, DeLancey JOL, Klarscov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 175:10–17 Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker L, DeLancey JOL, Klarscov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 175:10–17
3.
go back to reference Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and the American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 175:1467–1471 Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GC, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons, and the American Urogynecologic Society Pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 175:1467–1471
4.
go back to reference Kobak WH, Rosenberger K, Walters MD (1996) Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Urogynecol 7:121–124 Kobak WH, Rosenberger K, Walters MD (1996) Interobserver variation in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Urogynecol 7:121–124
5.
go back to reference Athanasiou S, Hill S, Gleeson C, Anders K, Cardozo L (1995) Validation of the ICS proposed pelvic prolapse descriptive system (abstract). Neurourol Urodynam 14:414–415 Athanasiou S, Hill S, Gleeson C, Anders K, Cardozo L (1995) Validation of the ICS proposed pelvic prolapse descriptive system (abstract). Neurourol Urodynam 14:414–415
6.
go back to reference Schussler B, Peschers U (1995) Standardization of terminology of female genital prolapse according to the new ICS criteria: inter-examiner reliability (abstract). Neurourol Urodynam 14:437–438 Schussler B, Peschers U (1995) Standardization of terminology of female genital prolapse according to the new ICS criteria: inter-examiner reliability (abstract). Neurourol Urodynam 14:437–438
7.
go back to reference Scotti RJ, Flora R, Greston WM, Budnick L, Hutchinson-Colas J (2000) Characterizing and reporting pelvic floor defects: the revised New York classification system. Int J Urogynecol 11:48–60CrossRef Scotti RJ, Flora R, Greston WM, Budnick L, Hutchinson-Colas J (2000) Characterizing and reporting pelvic floor defects: the revised New York classification system. Int J Urogynecol 11:48–60CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad T (2001) Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res 35:1347–1355PubMed Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad T (2001) Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res 35:1347–1355PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kustner O (1912) Prolapsus uteri et vaginea. In: Kustner O, Bumm E, Doederlein A, Kroening B, Menge C (eds) Kurzes Lehrbuch der Gynaekologie. G Fishers Publishers, Jena, pp 159–181 Kustner O (1912) Prolapsus uteri et vaginea. In: Kustner O, Bumm E, Doederlein A, Kroening B, Menge C (eds) Kurzes Lehrbuch der Gynaekologie. G Fishers Publishers, Jena, pp 159–181
10.
go back to reference Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:1048–1054 Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:1048–1054
11.
go back to reference Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:1055–1069 Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Physical diagnosis in the evaluation of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynaecol 15:1055–1069
12.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1995) Pelvic organ prolapse. ACOG Technical Bulletin 214, Washington, D.C. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1995) Pelvic organ prolapse. ACOG Technical Bulletin 214, Washington, D.C.
13.
go back to reference Brubaker L, Norton P (1996) Current clinical nomenclature for description of pelvic organ prolapse. J Pelvic Surg 2:257–259 Brubaker L, Norton P (1996) Current clinical nomenclature for description of pelvic organ prolapse. J Pelvic Surg 2:257–259
Metadata
Title
Is the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system (POPQ) being used? A survey of members of the International Continence Society (ICS) and the American Urogynecologic Society (AUGS)
Authors
W. Auwad
R. M. Freeman
S. Swift
Publication date
01-10-2004
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal / Issue 5/2004
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-004-1175-3

Other articles of this Issue 5/2004

International Urogynecology Journal 5/2004 Go to the issue