Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3/2015

01-09-2015 | Review Article

Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review

Authors: Marcelo Coelho Goiato, Eduardo Piza Pellizzer, Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva, Liliane da Rocha Bonatto, Daniela Micheline dos Santos

Published in: Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery | Issue 3/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This systematic review aimed to evaluate if the internal connection is more efficient than the external connection and its associated influencing factors.

Methods

A specific question was formulated according to the Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome (PICO): Is internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? An electronic search of the MEDLINE and the Web of Knowledge databases was performed for relevant studies published in English up to November 2013 by two independent reviewers. The keywords used in the search included a combination of “dental implant” and “internal connection” or “Morse connection” or “external connection.” Selected studies were randomized clinical trials, prospective or retrospective studies, and in vitro studies with a clear aim of investigating the internal and/or external implant connection use.

Results

From an initial screening yield of 674 articles, 64 potentially relevant articles were selected after an evaluation of their titles and abstracts. Full texts of these articles were obtained with 29 articles fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Morse taper connection has the best sealing ability. Concerning crestal bone loss, internal connections presented better results than external connections. The limitation of the present study was the absence of randomized clinical trials that investigated if the internal connection was more efficient than the external connection.

Conclusions

The external and internal connections have different mechanical, biological, and esthetical characteristics. Besides all systems that show proper success rates and effectiveness, crestal bone level maintenance is more important around internal connections than external connections. The Morse taper connection seems to be more efficient concerning biological aspects, allowing lower bacterial leakage and bone loss in single implants, including aesthetic regions. Additionally, this connection type can be successfully indicated for fixed partial prostheses and overdenture planning, since it exhibits high mechanical stability.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mangano C, Mangano F, Piattelli A, Lezzi G, Mangano A, La Colla L (2010) Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 single-tooth morse taper-connection implants: a multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:394–400PubMed Mangano C, Mangano F, Piattelli A, Lezzi G, Mangano A, La Colla L (2010) Prospective clinical evaluation of 307 single-tooth morse taper-connection implants: a multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:394–400PubMed
3.
go back to reference Coppedê AR, Bersani E, de Mattos MG, Rodrigues RC, Sartori IA, Ribeiro RF (2009) Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 22:283–286PubMed Coppedê AR, Bersani E, de Mattos MG, Rodrigues RC, Sartori IA, Ribeiro RF (2009) Fracture resistance of the implant-abutment connection in implants with internal hex and internal conical connections under oblique compressive loading: an in vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 22:283–286PubMed
6.
go back to reference Almeida EO, Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Marotta L, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2013) Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:103–108. doi:10.11607/jomi.2443 CrossRefPubMed Almeida EO, Freitas AC Jr, Bonfante EA, Marotta L, Silva NR, Coelho PG (2013) Mechanical testing of implant-supported anterior crowns with different implant/abutment connections. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:103–108. doi:10.​11607/​jomi.​2443 CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Ribeiro CG, Maia MLC, Scherrer SS, Cardoso AC, Wiskott HWA (2011) Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing. J Appl Oral Sci 19:413–420PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Ribeiro CG, Maia MLC, Scherrer SS, Cardoso AC, Wiskott HWA (2011) Resistance of three implant-abutment interfaces to fatigue testing. J Appl Oral Sci 19:413–420PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Ricomini Filho AP, Fernandes FS, Straioto FG, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA (2010) Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant-abutment connection systems. Braz Dent J 21:123–129CrossRefPubMed Ricomini Filho AP, Fernandes FS, Straioto FG, da Silva WJ, Del Bel Cury AA (2010) Preload loss and bacterial penetration on different implant-abutment connection systems. Braz Dent J 21:123–129CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Goiato MC, Bannwart LC, Pesqueira AA, Dos Santos DM, Haddad MF, Santos MR, Castilho PU (2014) Immediate loading of overdentures: systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18:259–264. doi:10.1007/s10006-013-0421-6 PubMed Goiato MC, Bannwart LC, Pesqueira AA, Dos Santos DM, Haddad MF, Santos MR, Castilho PU (2014) Immediate loading of overdentures: systematic review. Oral Maxillofac Surg 18:259–264. doi:10.​1007/​s10006-013-0421-6 PubMed
10.
go back to reference Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A (2012) Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol 39:1097–1113. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.2012.01930.x CrossRefPubMed Annibali S, Bignozzi I, Cristalli MP, Graziani F, La Monaca G, Polimeni A (2012) Peri-implant marginal bone level: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing platform switching versus conventionally restored implants. J Clin Periodontol 39:1097–1113. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-051X.​2012.​01930.​x CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Flichy-Fernández AJ, Alonso-González R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Balaguer-Martínez, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2013) Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:1192–1200. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02562.x PubMed Peñarrocha-Diago MA, Flichy-Fernández AJ, Alonso-González R, Peñarrocha-Oltra D, Balaguer-Martínez, Peñarrocha-Diago M (2013) Influence of implant neck design and implant-abutment connection type on peri-implant health. Radiological study. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:1192–1200. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0501.​2012.​02562.​x PubMed
12.
go back to reference Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Seol YJ, Han JS, Kim TI, Lee YM, Ku Y, Wikesjö UM, Rhyu IC (2012) The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol 83:1104–1109. doi:10.1902/jop.2011.110456 CrossRefPubMed Koo KT, Lee EJ, Kim JY, Seol YJ, Han JS, Kim TI, Lee YM, Ku Y, Wikesjö UM, Rhyu IC (2012) The effect of internal versus external abutment connection modes on crestal bone changes around dental implants: a radiographic analysis. J Periodontol 83:1104–1109. doi:10.​1902/​jop.​2011.​110456 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Perriard J, Wiskott WA, Mellal A, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC (2002) Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors—a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:542–549CrossRefPubMed Perriard J, Wiskott WA, Mellal A, Scherrer SS, Botsis J, Belser UC (2002) Fatigue resistance of ITI implant-abutment connectors—a comparison of the standard cone with a novel internally keyed design. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:542–549CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ding TA, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL, Miller BH (2003) Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:865–872PubMed Ding TA, Woody RD, Higginbottom FL, Miller BH (2003) Evaluation of the ITI Morse taper implant/abutment design with an internal modification. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 18:865–872PubMed
15.
go back to reference Mangano C, Mangano F, Shibli JA, Tettamanti L, Figliuzzi M, d'Avila S, Sammons RL, Piattelli A (2011) Prospective evaluation of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data. J Periodontol 82:52–61. doi:10.1902/jop.2010.100243 CrossRefPubMed Mangano C, Mangano F, Shibli JA, Tettamanti L, Figliuzzi M, d'Avila S, Sammons RL, Piattelli A (2011) Prospective evaluation of 2,549 Morse taper connection implants: 1- to 6-year data. J Periodontol 82:52–61. doi:10.​1902/​jop.​2010.​100243 CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mangano C, Bartolucci EG (2001) Single tooth replacement by Morse taper connection implants: a retrospective study of 80 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16:675–680PubMed Mangano C, Bartolucci EG (2001) Single tooth replacement by Morse taper connection implants: a retrospective study of 80 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 16:675–680PubMed
17.
go back to reference Chou CT, Morris HF, Ochi S, Walker L, DesRosiers D (2004) AICRG, Part II: crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months. J Oral Implantol 30:134–143CrossRefPubMed Chou CT, Morris HF, Ochi S, Walker L, DesRosiers D (2004) AICRG, Part II: crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months. J Oral Implantol 30:134–143CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mangano C, Mangano F, Piatelli A, Lezzi G, Mangano A, La Colla L, Mangano A (2008) Single-tooth Morse taper connection implants after 1 year of functional loading: a multicentre study on 302 patients. Eur J Oral Implantol 1:305–315PubMed Mangano C, Mangano F, Piatelli A, Lezzi G, Mangano A, La Colla L, Mangano A (2008) Single-tooth Morse taper connection implants after 1 year of functional loading: a multicentre study on 302 patients. Eur J Oral Implantol 1:305–315PubMed
19.
20.
go back to reference Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD (1997) A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:173–179CrossRefPubMed Palmer RM, Smith BJ, Palmer PJ, Floyd PD (1997) A prospective study of Astra single tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:173–179CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pessoa RS, Muraru L, Júnior EM, Vaz LG, Sloten JV, Duyck J, Jaecques SV (2010) Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants—CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12:219–234. doi:10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00155.x PubMed Pessoa RS, Muraru L, Júnior EM, Vaz LG, Sloten JV, Duyck J, Jaecques SV (2010) Influence of implant connection type on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants—CT-based nonlinear, three-dimensional finite element analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 12:219–234. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1708-8208.​2009.​00155.​x PubMed
23.
go back to reference Balik A, Karatas MO, Keskin H (2012) Effects of different abutment connection designs on the stress distribution around five different implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 38(Spec No):491–496. doi:10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00127 CrossRefPubMed Balik A, Karatas MO, Keskin H (2012) Effects of different abutment connection designs on the stress distribution around five different implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. J Oral Implantol 38(Spec No):491–496. doi:10.​1563/​AAID-JOI-D-10-00127 CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Segundo RM, Oshima HM, da Silva IN, Burnett LH Jr, Mota EG, Silva LL (2009) Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis. Stomatologija 11:55–59PubMed Segundo RM, Oshima HM, da Silva IN, Burnett LH Jr, Mota EG, Silva LL (2009) Stress distribution of an internal connection implant prostheses set: a 3D finite element analysis. Stomatologija 11:55–59PubMed
26.
go back to reference Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M (2006) In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 33:75–78CrossRefPubMed Maeda Y, Satoh T, Sogo M (2006) In vitro differences of stress concentrations for internal and external hex implant-abutment connections: a short communication. J Oral Rehabil 33:75–78CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Jaworski ME, Melo AC, Picheth CM, Sartori IA (2012) Analysis of the bacterial seal at the implant-abutment interface in external-hexagon and Morse taper-connection implants: an in vitro study using a new methodology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1091–1095PubMed Jaworski ME, Melo AC, Picheth CM, Sartori IA (2012) Analysis of the bacterial seal at the implant-abutment interface in external-hexagon and Morse taper-connection implants: an in vitro study using a new methodology. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1091–1095PubMed
28.
go back to reference Tripodi D, Vantaggiato G, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, DʼErcole S (2012) An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections. Implant Dent 21:335–339. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e31825cd472 CrossRefPubMed Tripodi D, Vantaggiato G, Scarano A, Perrotti V, Piattelli A, Iezzi G, DʼErcole S (2012) An in vitro investigation concerning the bacterial leakage at implants with internal hexagon and Morse taper implant-abutment connections. Implant Dent 21:335–339. doi:10.​1097/​ID.​0b013e31825cd472​ CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Teixeira W, Ribeiro RF, Sato S, Pedrazzi V (2011) Microleakage into and from two-stage implants: an in vitro comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:56–62PubMed Teixeira W, Ribeiro RF, Sato S, Pedrazzi V (2011) Microleakage into and from two-stage implants: an in vitro comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:56–62PubMed
31.
go back to reference Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M (2005) In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:875–881PubMed Steinebrunner L, Wolfart S, Bossmann K, Kern M (2005) In vitro evaluation of bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface of different implant systems. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 20:875–881PubMed
33.
go back to reference Nascimento C, Miani PK, Pedrazzi V, Gonçalves RB, Ribeiro RF, Faria AC, Macedo AP, De Albuquerque RF Jr (2012) Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:551–560PubMed Nascimento C, Miani PK, Pedrazzi V, Gonçalves RB, Ribeiro RF, Faria AC, Macedo AP, De Albuquerque RF Jr (2012) Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:551–560PubMed
34.
go back to reference Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, Arnhart C, Barlattani A, Jackowski J (2009) Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent 101:293–305. doi:10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60060-3 CrossRefPubMed Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, Arnhart C, Barlattani A, Jackowski J (2009) Randomized controlled trial comparing a variable-thread novel tapered and a standard tapered implant: interim one-year results. J Prosthet Dent 101:293–305. doi:10.​1016/​S0022-3913(09)60060-3 CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Arlin ML (2002) Analysis of 435 screw-vent dental implants placed in 161 patients: software enhancement of clinical evaluation. Implant Dent 11:58–66CrossRefPubMed Arlin ML (2002) Analysis of 435 screw-vent dental implants placed in 161 patients: software enhancement of clinical evaluation. Implant Dent 11:58–66CrossRefPubMed
36.
go back to reference Akça K, Cehreli MC, Iplikçioğlu H (2003) Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:444–454CrossRefPubMed Akça K, Cehreli MC, Iplikçioğlu H (2003) Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant. A nonlinear finite element stress analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res 14:444–454CrossRefPubMed
37.
go back to reference Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Iezzi G, Leghissa GC, Quaranta A, Tortora P, Piattelli A (2005) A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol 31:269–275CrossRefPubMed Scarano A, Assenza B, Piattelli M, Iezzi G, Leghissa GC, Quaranta A, Tortora P, Piattelli A (2005) A 16-year study of the microgap between 272 human titanium implants and their abutments. J Oral Implantol 31:269–275CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Novaes AB Jr, de Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Papalexiou V, Taba M (2006) The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a morse cone connection and a platform switch: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 77:1839–1849CrossRefPubMed Novaes AB Jr, de Oliveira RR, Muglia VA, Papalexiou V, Taba M (2006) The effects of interimplant distances on papilla formation and crestal resorption in implants with a morse cone connection and a platform switch: a histomorphometric study in dogs. J Periodontol 77:1839–1849CrossRefPubMed
39.
go back to reference de Oliveira RR, Novaes AB Jr, Taba M Jr, Papalexiou V, Muglia VA (2009) Bone remodeling adjacent to Morse cone-connection implants with platform switch: a fluorescence study in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:257–266PubMed de Oliveira RR, Novaes AB Jr, Taba M Jr, Papalexiou V, Muglia VA (2009) Bone remodeling adjacent to Morse cone-connection implants with platform switch: a fluorescence study in the dog mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:257–266PubMed
40.
go back to reference Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y, Matsumura H (2008) Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal anti-rotation configuration. Dent Mater J 27:29–34CrossRefPubMed Tsuge T, Hagiwara Y, Matsumura H (2008) Marginal fit and microgaps of implant-abutment interface with internal anti-rotation configuration. Dent Mater J 27:29–34CrossRefPubMed
42.
go back to reference Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, de Melo LG, Bosco AF (2010) Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:540–547PubMed Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bell M, de Melo LG, Bosco AF (2010) Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:540–547PubMed
43.
go back to reference Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bosco AF, de Melo LG (2011) Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:941–946PubMed Weng D, Nagata MJ, Bosco AF, de Melo LG (2011) Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss around submerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:941–946PubMed
44.
go back to reference Weng D, Nagata MJ, Leite CM, de Melo LG, Bosco AF (2011) Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Prosthodont 24:445–452PubMed Weng D, Nagata MJ, Leite CM, de Melo LG, Bosco AF (2011) Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs. Int J Prosthodont 24:445–452PubMed
46.
go back to reference Bernardes SR, de Araujo CA, Neto AJ, Simamoto Junior P, das Neves FD (2009) Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:781–789PubMed Bernardes SR, de Araujo CA, Neto AJ, Simamoto Junior P, das Neves FD (2009) Photoelastic analysis of stress patterns from different implant-abutment interfaces. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 24:781–789PubMed
47.
go back to reference Novaes AB Jr, Barros RR, Muglia VA, Borges GJ (2009) Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Oral Implantol 35:18–27. doi:10.1563/1548-1336-35.1.18 CrossRefPubMed Novaes AB Jr, Barros RR, Muglia VA, Borges GJ (2009) Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs. J Oral Implantol 35:18–27. doi:10.​1563/​1548-1336-35.​1.​18 CrossRefPubMed
48.
go back to reference Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr, Muglia VA, Iezzi G, Piattelli A (2010) Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1(21):371–378. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01860.x CrossRef Barros RR, Novaes AB Jr, Muglia VA, Iezzi G, Piattelli A (2010) Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs. Clin Oral Implants Res 1(21):371–378. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1600-0501.​2009.​01860.​x CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, Rodado-Alonso C, Méndez-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles M (2009) Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 29:479–487 Rodríguez-Ciurana X, Vela-Nebot X, Segalà-Torres M, Rodado-Alonso C, Méndez-Blanco V, Mata-Bugueroles M (2009) Biomechanical repercussions of bone resorption related to biologic width: a finite element analysis of three implant-abutment configurations. Int J Periodontics Restor Dent 29:479–487
50.
go back to reference Nishioka RS, Nishioka LN, Abreu CW, de Vasconcellos LG, Balducci I (2010) Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis. J Appl Oral Sci 18:225–230CrossRefPubMed Nishioka RS, Nishioka LN, Abreu CW, de Vasconcellos LG, Balducci I (2010) Machined and plastic copings in three-element prostheses with different types of implant-abutment joints: a strain gauge comparative analysis. J Appl Oral Sci 18:225–230CrossRefPubMed
51.
go back to reference Jesus Tavarez RR, Bonachela WC, Xible AA (2011) Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment. J Appl Oral Sci 19:16–21CrossRefPubMed Jesus Tavarez RR, Bonachela WC, Xible AA (2011) Effect of cyclic load on vertical misfit of prefabricated and cast implant single abutment. J Appl Oral Sci 19:16–21CrossRefPubMed
52.
go back to reference Nishioka RS, de Vasconcellos LG, de Melo Nishioka GN (2011) Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configuration. Implant Dent 20:e24–e32. doi:10.1097/ID.0b013e318211fce8 CrossRefPubMed Nishioka RS, de Vasconcellos LG, de Melo Nishioka GN (2011) Comparative strain gauge analysis of external and internal hexagon, Morse taper, and influence of straight and offset implant configuration. Implant Dent 20:e24–e32. doi:10.​1097/​ID.​0b013e318211fce8​ CrossRefPubMed
53.
go back to reference Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G (2011) Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:169–178PubMed Pieri F, Aldini NN, Marchetti C, Corinaldesi G (2011) Influence of implant-abutment interface design on bone and soft tissue levels around immediately placed and restored single-tooth implants: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:169–178PubMed
55.
go back to reference Pessoa RS, Coelho PG, Muraru L, Marcantonio E Jr, Vaz LG, Vander Sloten J, Jaecques SV (2011) Influence of implant design on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants: computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:1279–1287PubMed Pessoa RS, Coelho PG, Muraru L, Marcantonio E Jr, Vaz LG, Vander Sloten J, Jaecques SV (2011) Influence of implant design on the biomechanical environment of immediately placed implants: computed tomography-based nonlinear three-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:1279–1287PubMed
56.
go back to reference Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD (2012) All-on-three delayed implant loading concept for the completely edentulous maxilla and mandible: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1584–1592PubMed Oliva J, Oliva X, Oliva JD (2012) All-on-three delayed implant loading concept for the completely edentulous maxilla and mandible: a retrospective 5-year follow-up study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1584–1592PubMed
57.
go back to reference Diez JS, Brigagão VC, Cunha L, Neves AC, da Silva-Concilio LR (2012) Influence of diamondlike carbon-coated screws on the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1055–1060PubMed Diez JS, Brigagão VC, Cunha L, Neves AC, da Silva-Concilio LR (2012) Influence of diamondlike carbon-coated screws on the implant-abutment interface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 27:1055–1060PubMed
58.
go back to reference Arnhart C, Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, Jackowski J, Lorenzoni M et al (2012) Comparison of variable-thread tapered implant designs to a standard tapered implant design after immediate loading. A 3-year multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 5:123–136PubMed Arnhart C, Kielbassa AM, Martinez-de Fuentes R, Goldstein M, Jackowski J, Lorenzoni M et al (2012) Comparison of variable-thread tapered implant designs to a standard tapered implant design after immediate loading. A 3-year multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 5:123–136PubMed
60.
go back to reference Tang CB, Liul SY, Zhou GX, Yu JH, Zhang GD, Bao YD, Wang QJ (2012) Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs. Int J Oral Sci 4:101–108PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Tang CB, Liul SY, Zhou GX, Yu JH, Zhang GD, Bao YD, Wang QJ (2012) Nonlinear finite element analysis of three implant- abutment interface designs. Int J Oral Sci 4:101–108PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
61.
go back to reference Rack T, Zabler S, Rack A, Riesemeier H, Nelson K (2013) An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:44–50. doi:10.11607/jomi.2748 CrossRefPubMed Rack T, Zabler S, Rack A, Riesemeier H, Nelson K (2013) An in vitro pilot study of abutment stability during loading in new and fatigue-loaded conical dental implants using synchrotron-based radiography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:44–50. doi:10.​11607/​jomi.​2748 CrossRefPubMed
62.
63.
go back to reference Gehrke SA (2013) Importance of crown height ratios in dental implants on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.1111/cid.12165 Gehrke SA (2013) Importance of crown height ratios in dental implants on the fracture strength of different connection designs: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. doi:10.​1111/​cid.​12165
65.
go back to reference Jorge JR, Barao VA, Delben JA, Assuncao WG (2013) The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:415–422. doi:10.11607/jomi.2727 CrossRefPubMed Jorge JR, Barao VA, Delben JA, Assuncao WG (2013) The role of implant/abutment system on torque maintenance of retention screws and vertical misfit of implant-supported crowns before and after mechanical cycling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:415–422. doi:10.​11607/​jomi.​2727 CrossRefPubMed
66.
go back to reference Das Neves FD, Verissimo AG, Da Silva Neto JP, Do Prado CJ, De Araújo CA (2013) Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:e39-44. doi:10.11607/jomi.2157 PubMed Das Neves FD, Verissimo AG, Da Silva Neto JP, Do Prado CJ, De Araújo CA (2013) Photoelastic stress analysis of different wide implant/abutment interfaces under oblique loading. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:e39-44. doi:10.​11607/​jomi.​2157 PubMed
Metadata
Title
Is the internal connection more efficient than external connection in mechanical, biological, and esthetical point of views? A systematic review
Authors
Marcelo Coelho Goiato
Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Emily Vivianne Freitas da Silva
Liliane da Rocha Bonatto
Daniela Micheline dos Santos
Publication date
01-09-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery / Issue 3/2015
Print ISSN: 1865-1550
Electronic ISSN: 1865-1569
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-015-0494-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2015

Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 3/2015 Go to the issue