Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Surgical Endoscopy 6/2014

01-06-2014

Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess

Authors: Jérémie Thereaux, Nicolas Veyrie, Nicola Corigliano, Stéphane Servajean, Sébastien Czernichow, Jean-Luc Bouillot

Published in: Surgical Endoscopy | Issue 6/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several studies have assessed feasibility and early outcomes of the laparoscopic approach for complicated appendicitis (CA). However, these studies suffer from limitations due to the heterogeneous definitions used for CA. No studies have assessed feasibility and early post-operative outcomes of the laparoscopic approach in the specific management of diffuse appendicular peritonitis (DAP). Consequently, outcomes of the laparoscopic approach for the management of DAP are poorly documented.

Methods

The laparoscopic approach is the first-line standardised procedure used by our team for the management of DAP. All patients (aged >16 years) who underwent laparoscopy for DAP (CA with the presence of purulent fluid with or without fibrin membranes in at least a hemi abdomen) between 2004 and 2012 were prospectively included. Post-operative outcomes were analysed according to the Clavien–Dindo classification.

Results

Laparoscopy for DAP was performed for 141 patients. Mean age was 39.6 ± 20 (16–92) years. A total of 45 patients (31.9 %) had pre-operative contracture. The mean pre-operative leukocyte count was 14,900 ± 4,380 mm−3. The mean pre-operative C-reactive protein (CRP) serum concentration was 135 ± 112 (2–418) mg/dl. The conversion rate was 3.5 %. The mean operative time was 80 ± 27 (20–180) min. There were no deaths. The rate of grade III morbidity was 6.5 %. Ten patients (7.1 %) experienced intra-abdominal abscess (IAA); seven of these cases were treated conservatively. The mean length of hospital stay was 6.9 ± 5 (2–36) days. A pre-operative leukocyte count >17,000 mm−3, and CRP serum concentration >200 mg/dl were significant predictive factors for IAA in multivariate analyses [odds ratio (OR) 25.0, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.4–250, p = 0.007 and OR 16.4, 95 % CI 1.6–166, p = 0.02, respectively].

Conclusion

The laparoscopic approach for DAP is a safe and feasible procedure with a low conversion rate and an acceptable rate of IAA in view of the severity of the disease. Pre-operative leukocyte counts >17,000 mm−3 and pre-operative CRP serum concentrations >200 mg/dl indicate a high risk of IAA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agence Technique de l’Information sur l’Hospitalisation (ATIH). French medicare database source Agence Technique de l’Information sur l’Hospitalisation (ATIH). French medicare database source
2.
go back to reference Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Leppaniemi A, Taviloglu K, van Goor H, Viale P, Lazzareschi DV, de Werra C, Marrelli D, Colizza S, Scibe R, Alis H, Torer N, Navarro S, Catani M, Kauhanen S, Augustin G, Sakakushev B, Massalou D, Pletinckx P, Kenig J, Di Saverio S, Guercioni G, Rausei S, Laine S, Major P, Skrovina M, Angst E, Pittet O, Gerych I, Tepp J, Weiss G, Vasquez G, Vladov N, Trana C, Vettoretto N, Delibegovic S, Dziki A, Giraudo G, Pereira J, Poiasina E, Tzerbinis H, Hutan M, Vereczkei A, Krasniqi A, Seretis C, Diaz-Nieto R, Mesina C, Rems M, Campanile FC, Agresta F, Coletta P, Uotila-Nieminen M, Dente M, Bouliaris K, Lasithiotakis K, Khokha V, Zivanovic D, Smirnov D, Marinis A, Negoi I, Ney L, Bini R, Leon M, Aloia S, Huchon C, Moldovanu R, de Melo RB, Giakoustidis D, Ioannidis O, Cucchi M, Pintar T, Jovine E (2012) Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: preliminary data from the first three months of the CIAO Study. World J Emerg Surg 7:15PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Leppaniemi A, Taviloglu K, van Goor H, Viale P, Lazzareschi DV, de Werra C, Marrelli D, Colizza S, Scibe R, Alis H, Torer N, Navarro S, Catani M, Kauhanen S, Augustin G, Sakakushev B, Massalou D, Pletinckx P, Kenig J, Di Saverio S, Guercioni G, Rausei S, Laine S, Major P, Skrovina M, Angst E, Pittet O, Gerych I, Tepp J, Weiss G, Vasquez G, Vladov N, Trana C, Vettoretto N, Delibegovic S, Dziki A, Giraudo G, Pereira J, Poiasina E, Tzerbinis H, Hutan M, Vereczkei A, Krasniqi A, Seretis C, Diaz-Nieto R, Mesina C, Rems M, Campanile FC, Agresta F, Coletta P, Uotila-Nieminen M, Dente M, Bouliaris K, Lasithiotakis K, Khokha V, Zivanovic D, Smirnov D, Marinis A, Negoi I, Ney L, Bini R, Leon M, Aloia S, Huchon C, Moldovanu R, de Melo RB, Giakoustidis D, Ioannidis O, Cucchi M, Pintar T, Jovine E (2012) Complicated intra-abdominal infections in Europe: preliminary data from the first three months of the CIAO Study. World J Emerg Surg 7:15PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Navez B, Delgadillo X, Cambier E, Richir C, Guiot P (2001) Laparoscopic approach for acute appendicular peritonitis: efficacy and safety: a report of 96 consecutive cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:313–316PubMedCrossRef Navez B, Delgadillo X, Cambier E, Richir C, Guiot P (2001) Laparoscopic approach for acute appendicular peritonitis: efficacy and safety: a report of 96 consecutive cases. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 11:313–316PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Frazee RC, Bohannon WT (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 131:509–511 discussion 511–503PubMedCrossRef Frazee RC, Bohannon WT (1996) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Arch Surg 131:509–511 discussion 511–503PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254:927–932PubMedCrossRef Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic and open appendectomy in management of uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. Ann Surg 254:927–932PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:2026–2040PubMedCrossRef Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K (2010) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 34:2026–2040PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Asarias JR, Schlussel AT, Cafasso DE, Carlson TL, Kasprenski MC, Washington EN, Lustik MB, Yamamura MS, Matayoshi EZ, Zagorski SM (2011) Incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses in open versus laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 25:2678–2683PubMedCrossRef Asarias JR, Schlussel AT, Cafasso DE, Carlson TL, Kasprenski MC, Washington EN, Lustik MB, Yamamura MS, Matayoshi EZ, Zagorski SM (2011) Incidence of postoperative intraabdominal abscesses in open versus laparoscopic appendectomies. Surg Endosc 25:2678–2683PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M (2009) The Clavien–Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546PubMed Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA (2002) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD001546PubMed
11.
go back to reference Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448 discussion 448–450PubMedCentralPubMed Katkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R (2005) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg 242:439–448 discussion 448–450PubMedCentralPubMed
12.
go back to reference Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2226–2231PubMedCrossRef Masoomi H, Mills S, Dolich MO, Ketana N, Carmichael JC, Nguyen NT, Stamos MJ (2011) Comparison of outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults: data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2006–2008. J Gastrointest Surg 15:2226–2231PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546PubMed Sauerland S, Jaschinski T, Neugebauer EA (2010) Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 10:CD001546PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1929–1939PubMedCrossRef Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, Nishiguchi Y, Maeda K, Hirakawa K (2012) Meta-analysis of the results of randomized controlled trials that compared laparoscopic and open surgery for acute appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 16:1929–1939PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dimitriou I, Reckmann B, Nephuth O, Betzler M (2013) Single institution’s experience in laparoscopic appendectomy as a suitable therapy for complicated appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:147–152PubMedCrossRef Dimitriou I, Reckmann B, Nephuth O, Betzler M (2013) Single institution’s experience in laparoscopic appendectomy as a suitable therapy for complicated appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:147–152PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Sleem R, Fisher S, Gestring M, Cheng J, Sangosanya A, Stassen N, Bankey P (2009) Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? Surgery 146:731–737 discussion 737–738PubMedCrossRef Sleem R, Fisher S, Gestring M, Cheng J, Sangosanya A, Stassen N, Bankey P (2009) Perforated appendicitis: is early laparoscopic appendectomy appropriate? Surgery 146:731–737 discussion 737–738PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2007) Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery? World J Surg 31:744–749PubMedCrossRef Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2007) Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery? World J Surg 31:744–749PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214PubMedCrossRef Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Lin YM, Hsieh CH, Cheng CI, Tan BL, Liu HT (2012) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis does not result in increased surgical complications. Asian J Surg 35:113–116PubMedCrossRef Lin YM, Hsieh CH, Cheng CI, Tan BL, Liu HT (2012) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis does not result in increased surgical complications. Asian J Surg 35:113–116PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Complicated appendicitis—is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 73:737–741 discussion 741–732PubMed Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Complicated appendicitis—is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 73:737–741 discussion 741–732PubMed
21.
go back to reference Mancini GJ, Mancini ML, Nelson HS Jr (2005) Efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis. Am Surg 71:1–4 discussion 4–5PubMed Mancini GJ, Mancini ML, Nelson HS Jr (2005) Efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis. Am Surg 71:1–4 discussion 4–5PubMed
22.
go back to reference Kang KJ, Lim TJ, Kim YS (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:364–367PubMed Kang KJ, Lim TJ, Kim YS (2000) Laparoscopic appendectomy is feasible for the complicated appendicitis. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 10:364–367PubMed
23.
go back to reference Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH, Choi KW (2011) A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27:293–297PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lim SG, Ahn EJ, Kim SY, Chung IY, Park JM, Park SH, Choi KW (2011) A clinical comparison of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 27:293–297PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 18:969–973PubMedCrossRef Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors. Surg Endosc 18:969–973PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Allemann P, Probst H, Demartines N, Schäfer M (2011) Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis–the role of routine abdominal drainage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:63–68PubMedCrossRef Allemann P, Probst H, Demartines N, Schäfer M (2011) Prevention of infectious complications after laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis–the role of routine abdominal drainage. Langenbecks Arch Surg 396:63–68PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 205:60–65PubMedCrossRef Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 205:60–65PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vazquez-Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, Fajardo R, Valencia S, Poggi L, Balli J, Diaz J, Gonzalez R, Mansur JH, Franklin ME (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20:717–720PubMedCrossRef Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vazquez-Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, Fajardo R, Valencia S, Poggi L, Balli J, Diaz J, Gonzalez R, Mansur JH, Franklin ME (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20:717–720PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Wu JY, Chen HC, Lee SH, Chan RC, Lee CC, Chang SS (2012) Diagnostic role of procalcitonin in patients with suspected appendicitis. World J Surg 36:1744–1749PubMedCrossRef Wu JY, Chen HC, Lee SH, Chan RC, Lee CC, Chang SS (2012) Diagnostic role of procalcitonin in patients with suspected appendicitis. World J Surg 36:1744–1749PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Andersson RE, Hugander A, Ravn H, Offenbartl K, Ghazi SH, Nystrom PO, Olaison G (2000) Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis. World J Surg 24:479–485 discussion 485PubMedCrossRef Andersson RE, Hugander A, Ravn H, Offenbartl K, Ghazi SH, Nystrom PO, Olaison G (2000) Repeated clinical and laboratory examinations in patients with an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis. World J Surg 24:479–485 discussion 485PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW, Fike FB, Sharp SW, Juang D, Lanning D, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW, Ostlie DJ (2012) Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 256:581–585PubMedCrossRef St Peter SD, Adibe OO, Iqbal CW, Fike FB, Sharp SW, Juang D, Lanning D, Murphy JP, Andrews WS, Sharp RJ, Snyder CL, Holcomb GW, Ostlie DJ (2012) Irrigation versus suction alone during laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 256:581–585PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Reid RI, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA (1999) Risk factors for post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 69:373–374PubMedCrossRef Reid RI, Dobbs BR, Frizelle FA (1999) Risk factors for post-appendicectomy intra-abdominal abscess. Aust N Z J Surg 69:373–374PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is laparoscopy a safe approach for diffuse appendicular peritonitis? Feasibility and determination of risk factors for post-operative intra-abdominal abscess
Authors
Jérémie Thereaux
Nicolas Veyrie
Nicola Corigliano
Stéphane Servajean
Sébastien Czernichow
Jean-Luc Bouillot
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy / Issue 6/2014
Print ISSN: 0930-2794
Electronic ISSN: 1432-2218
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-013-3412-7

Other articles of this Issue 6/2014

Surgical Endoscopy 6/2014 Go to the issue