Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2008

01-05-2008 | Original Article

Is it necessary to do retroperitoneal evaluation in borderline epithelial ovarian tumors?

Authors: Zehra Meltem Pirimoglu, Yasemin Afsin, Kadir Guzelmeric, Muberra Yilmaz, Orhan Unal, Mehmet Cem Turan

Published in: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics | Issue 5/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Borderline epithelial ovarian tumors have good prognosis without any adjuvant therapy. The advantage of aggressive surgical staging, especially retroperitoneal lymph node sampling is questionable in patients with borderline ovarian tumors. We designed this study to evaluate the necessity of retroperitoneal pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection in the treatment of borderline epithelial ovarian tumors.

Study design

From 1998 to 2007, 57 women who were diagnosed with borderline epithelial ovarian tumor in our hospital were prospectively accrued and evaluated; 27 of them (47.3%) had full surgical staging procedure including para-aortic and pelvic node dissection. Student’s t-test was used to compare follow-up times.

Results

Median follow-up time was 54.6 (12–96) months for all patients in the study. There was one recurrence of disease, which was in the complete staging group. Follow-up times of patients were not statistically different between lymph node evaluated and non-evaluated groups (p = 0.10). We did not find any metastasis in lymph nodes in 27 women who had complete surgical staging procedure.

Conclusion

Patients with borderline epithelial tumors who had full surgical staging procedure do not have survival advantage over those who had no lymph node evaluation and yet were patients with malignant ovarian tumors.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Taylor HC Jr (1929) Malignant and semimalignant tumors of the ovary. Surg Gynecol Obstet 48:204–230 Taylor HC Jr (1929) Malignant and semimalignant tumors of the ovary. Surg Gynecol Obstet 48:204–230
2.
go back to reference Staging announcement (1986) FIGO cancer committee. Gynecol Oncol 25:383–385CrossRef Staging announcement (1986) FIGO cancer committee. Gynecol Oncol 25:383–385CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Serov SF, Scully RE, Sobin LH (1973) International histological typing of ovarian tumour, 9, histological typing of ovarian tumours. World Health Organization, Geneva Serov SF, Scully RE, Sobin LH (1973) International histological typing of ovarian tumour, 9, histological typing of ovarian tumours. World Health Organization, Geneva
4.
go back to reference Seidman JD, Soslow RA, Vang R et al (2004) Borderline ovarian tumors: diverse contemporary viewpoints on terminology and diagnostic criteria with illustrative images. Hum Pathol 35:918–933PubMedCrossRef Seidman JD, Soslow RA, Vang R et al (2004) Borderline ovarian tumors: diverse contemporary viewpoints on terminology and diagnostic criteria with illustrative images. Hum Pathol 35:918–933PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bell DA, Longacre TA, Prat J (2004) Serous borderline (low malignant potential, atypical proliferative) ovarian tumors: workshop perspectives. Hum Pathol 35:934–948PubMedCrossRef Bell DA, Longacre TA, Prat J (2004) Serous borderline (low malignant potential, atypical proliferative) ovarian tumors: workshop perspectives. Hum Pathol 35:934–948PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Russell P (1984) Borderline tumors of the ovary. A conceptual dilemma. Clin Obstet Gynecol 11:259–277 Russell P (1984) Borderline tumors of the ovary. A conceptual dilemma. Clin Obstet Gynecol 11:259–277
7.
go back to reference Yazigi R, Sandstad J, Munoy AK (1998) Primary staging in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 31:402–408CrossRef Yazigi R, Sandstad J, Munoy AK (1998) Primary staging in ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 31:402–408CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Leake JF, Rader JS, Woodruff JD, Rosenhein NB (1991) Retroperitoneal lymphatic involvement with epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 42:124–130PubMedCrossRef Leake JF, Rader JS, Woodruff JD, Rosenhein NB (1991) Retroperitoneal lymphatic involvement with epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 42:124–130PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Snider DB, Stuart GC, Nation JG, Robertson DI (1991) Evaluation of surgical staging in Stage 1 low malignancy potential ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 40:129–132PubMedCrossRef Snider DB, Stuart GC, Nation JG, Robertson DI (1991) Evaluation of surgical staging in Stage 1 low malignancy potential ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 40:129–132PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Jones MB (2006) Borderline ovarian tumors: current concepts for prognostic factors and clinical management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49:517–525PubMedCrossRef Jones MB (2006) Borderline ovarian tumors: current concepts for prognostic factors and clinical management. Clin Obstet Gynecol 49:517–525PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Pecorelli S, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P et al (1998) FIGO annual report of the results of treatment in gynaecological cancer. Carcinoma of the ovary. J Epidemiol Biostat 3:75 Pecorelli S, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P et al (1998) FIGO annual report of the results of treatment in gynaecological cancer. Carcinoma of the ovary. J Epidemiol Biostat 3:75
12.
go back to reference Kaern J, Trope CG, Abeler VM (1993) A retrospective study of 370 borderline tumors of the ovary treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospitl from 1970 to 1982. Cancer 71:1810–1820PubMedCrossRef Kaern J, Trope CG, Abeler VM (1993) A retrospective study of 370 borderline tumors of the ovary treated at the Norwegian Radium Hospitl from 1970 to 1982. Cancer 71:1810–1820PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Trimble CL, Trimble EL (1994) Management of epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 55:52–61CrossRef Trimble CL, Trimble EL (1994) Management of epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Gynecol Oncol 55:52–61CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Trimble CL, Trimble EL (2003) Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:1563 Trimble CL, Trimble EL (2003) Ovarian tumors of low malignant potential. Oncology (Huntingt) 17:1563
15.
go back to reference Rota SM, Zanetta G, Iede N et al (1999) Clinical relevance of retroperitoneal involvement from epithelial ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 9:477–480PubMedCrossRef Rota SM, Zanetta G, Iede N et al (1999) Clinical relevance of retroperitoneal involvement from epithelial ovarian tumors of borderline malignancy. Int J Gynecol Cancer 9:477–480PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Morice P, Camatte S, Rey A et al (2003) Prognostic factors for patients with advanced stage serous borderline tumours of the ovary. Ann Oncol 14:592PubMedCrossRef Morice P, Camatte S, Rey A et al (2003) Prognostic factors for patients with advanced stage serous borderline tumours of the ovary. Ann Oncol 14:592PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kaern J, Trope CG, Kristensen GB, Abeler VM (1993) DNA ploidy; the most important prognostic factor in patients with borderline tumors of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Cancer 3:349PubMedCrossRef Kaern J, Trope CG, Kristensen GB, Abeler VM (1993) DNA ploidy; the most important prognostic factor in patients with borderline tumors of the ovary. Int J Gynecol Cancer 3:349PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Buttin BM, Herzog TJ, Powell MA, Rader JS (2002) Epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential: the role of microinvasion. Obstet Gynecol 99:11PubMedCrossRef Buttin BM, Herzog TJ, Powell MA, Rader JS (2002) Epithelial ovarian tumors of low malignant potential: the role of microinvasion. Obstet Gynecol 99:11PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Sood AK, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR et al (2005) Fifth international conference on ovarian cancer: challenges and opportunities. Gynecol Oncol 97:916PubMedCrossRef Sood AK, Abu-Rustum NR, Barakat RR et al (2005) Fifth international conference on ovarian cancer: challenges and opportunities. Gynecol Oncol 97:916PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Geomini P, Bremer G, Kruitwagen R, Mol BW (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis. Gynecol Oncol 96:1PubMedCrossRef Geomini P, Bremer G, Kruitwagen R, Mol BW (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of frozen section diagnosis of the adnexal mass: a metaanalysis. Gynecol Oncol 96:1PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Boriboonhirusam D, Sermboon A (2004) Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor. J Obstet Gyneacol Research 30:394–398CrossRef Boriboonhirusam D, Sermboon A (2004) Accuracy of frozen section in the diagnosis of malignant ovarian tumor. J Obstet Gyneacol Research 30:394–398CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Boran N, Cil AP, Tulunay G et al (2005) Fertility and recurrence results of conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 97:845PubMedCrossRef Boran N, Cil AP, Tulunay G et al (2005) Fertility and recurrence results of conservative surgery for borderline ovarian tumors. Gynecol Oncol 97:845PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Morice P, Camette S, El Hassan J et al (2001) Clinical outcomes and fertility after conservative treatment of ovarian borderline tumors. Fertil Steril 75:92PubMedCrossRef Morice P, Camette S, El Hassan J et al (2001) Clinical outcomes and fertility after conservative treatment of ovarian borderline tumors. Fertil Steril 75:92PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Suh-Burgmann E (2006) Long-term outcomes following conservative surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary: a large population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 103:841PubMedCrossRef Suh-Burgmann E (2006) Long-term outcomes following conservative surgery for borderline tumor of the ovary: a large population-based study. Gynecol Oncol 103:841PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Zanetta G, Rota S, Chiari S et al (2001) Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 19:2658PubMed Zanetta G, Rota S, Chiari S et al (2001) Behavior of borderline tumors with particular interest to persistence, recurrence, and progression to invasive carcinoma: a prospective study. J Clin Oncol 19:2658PubMed
27.
go back to reference NIH Consensus Conference (1995) Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and follow-up. JAMA 273:491CrossRef NIH Consensus Conference (1995) Ovarian cancer: screening, treatment, and follow-up. JAMA 273:491CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Is it necessary to do retroperitoneal evaluation in borderline epithelial ovarian tumors?
Authors
Zehra Meltem Pirimoglu
Yasemin Afsin
Kadir Guzelmeric
Muberra Yilmaz
Orhan Unal
Mehmet Cem Turan
Publication date
01-05-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics / Issue 5/2008
Print ISSN: 0932-0067
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0711
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0478-2

Other articles of this Issue 5/2008

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 5/2008 Go to the issue