Published in:
01-06-2016 | Technical Note - Functional
Is capsulectomy a feasible and useful measure in internal pulse generator replacement procedures? A technical note on the use of the PEAK PlasmaBladeTM
Authors:
Domenico Servello, Alberto R. Bona, Edvin Zekaj
Published in:
Acta Neurochirurgica
|
Issue 6/2016
Login to get access
Abstract
Background
Implantable pulse generator (IPG) replacement is considered a simple procedure, but in case of extension cable damage or IPG pocket infection, it can dramatically affect a patient’s quality of life. Higher risk of infection has been reported after IPG replacement procedures rather than after primary deep brain stimulation lead implantation, and some authors suggested that the IPG pocket capsule could play a pivotal role in causing it. In this technical note we present a capsulectomy technique adopted in IPG replacement procedures.
Methods
Between July and October 2015, we carried out ten outpatient IPG replacement procedures at the chest and abdomen under local anesthesia for battery depletion using the PEAK PlasmaBladeTM. All patients were followed for at least 2 months to rule out any hardware malfunction and infection.
Results
All ten procedures were uneventful. No extension cable damage occurred. No IPG pocket infection occurred, also not in the follow-up. Mean surgical time was 30 min.
Conclusions
Complete capsulectomy is not feasible with basic surgical instruments, and the PEAK PlasmaBladeTM pencil appears to be a helpful tool in carrying out the procedure.