Published in:
01-06-2013 | Letter
Is automated peritoneal lavage a better way than an endovascular device to induce mild therapeutic hypothermia after resuscitated cardiac arrest?
Authors:
Pierre Esnault, Guillaume Lacroix, Jean Cotte, Pierre-Julien Cungi, Erwan D'Aranda, Bertrand Prunet
Published in:
Critical Care
|
Issue 3/2013
Login to get access
Excerpt
We read with great interest the study by de Waard and colleagues highlighting interest in continuous peritoneal lavage (PL) to induce mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) in unconscious patients after resuscitated cardiac arrest [
1]. It is now quite well established that MTH improves outcome [
2]. Compared with cooled intravenous infusion and cooled blankets, the authors showed that the target temperature was reached faster (30 minutes vs. 150 minutes) and had a lower coefficient of variation during the maintenance phase (0.5% vs. 1.5%) in the PL group [
1]. …