Published in:
01-02-2020 | Irritable Bowel Syndrome | Concise Commentary
Concise Commentary: Prebiotic, Probiotic, Whatever—It’s All Good for IBS-C
Authors:
Giuseppe Chiarioni, Eugenio Marconato
Published in:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
|
Issue 2/2020
Login to get access
Excerpt
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder characterized by abdominal pain and altered bowel habits [
1,
2]. The etiology of IBS, which is currently unclear, is likely multifactorial [
1,
2]. Nevertheless, alterations of the intestinal microbiota associated with disordered local immunity, low-grade inflammation, visceral hypersensitivity, and increased permeability of the brain–gut axis have all been implicated [
1]. Although alteration of the microbiota is associated with improved IBS symptoms in most studies, the mechanism of action is unclear [
1,
3]. According to the World Health Organization, probiotics are living bacteria that confer health benefits when given in adequate amounts [
1,
3]. On the contrary, prebiotics are non-viable dietary substances such as non-digestible polysaccharides that serve as microbial nutrients [
1,
3]. A combination of prebiotics and probiotics (so-called symbiotic mixture) seems to be a worthwhile add-on to benefit IBS symptoms [
1]. In this issue of
Digestive Diseases and Sciences, Bahrudin and coworkers report the results of a randomized one-week controlled trial conducted in 163 IBS patients with prevalent constipation (IBS-C) in order to investigate the efficacy of a sterilized probiotic drink containing
Lactobacillus helveticus (with or without 5.85 g polydextrose added as a prebiotic) on gastrointestinal symptoms and intestinal physiology [
3]. IBS-C patients were of Asian heritage, mostly female (78.6%), and diagnosed according to Rome III criteria [
4]. Physiologic measurements such as transit time measured with carmine red, fecal weight, and pH testing, and clinical evaluation using the Garrigues constipation questionnaire on related symptoms were conducted pre- and post-intervention. Intestinal transit time was shortened in both groups compared to baseline, whereas the fecal weight and pH were variable. Constipation-related symptoms were again equally improved compared with baseline by both probiotic and symbiotic drinks. The weaknesses of the study were the short treatment interval and the lack of a placebo group; strengths included a large sample size, a randomized, prospective design, the use of standardized criteria to diagnose IBS, and the objective evaluation of intestinal physiology and symptoms. In conclusion, probiotics and prebiotics benefit constipation symptoms in IBS-C associated with shortening intestinal transit time. The mechanism of action of probiotics in IBS is likely complex and deserves additional evaluation, but feeding beneficial bacteria does not appear to be the way to improve IBS treatment outcome. …