Skip to main content
Top
Published in: BMC Oral Health 1/2023

Open Access 01-12-2023 | Research

Investigation on the application of digital guide templates guided dental implantation in China

Authors: Yunli Chen, Baohui Su

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this survey is to investigate the application of digital guide templates (DGTs) across China, and the views and attitudes of oral health professionals toward them.

Methods

This survey was prepared, distributed, and collected by WJX. Chinese oral health professionals were invited to participate in it. The basic information of respondents, the application of DGTs, and the views and attitudes toward their status quo and development were statistically described. Chi-square test was used to evaluate the correlation between the basic information of respondents and the application of DGTs as well as the views and attitudes toward them.

Results

A total of 276 questionnaires were collected, of which 273 were identified as valid. 269 (98.5%) respondents were dental clinical workers, 204 (74.7%) were dental clinical implant workers, and 152 (55.7%) had been engaged in the implant industry for more than five years. The chi-square test showed that working years were significantly correlated with the half-guided, tooth-supported, and mucosa-supported DGTs (P < 0.05); and professional backgrounds and working years presented significant differences in the views and attitudes toward the status quo and development of DGTs (P < 0.05). The questionnaires also made a preliminary investigation and evaluation on the factors influencing accuracy, indications, doctors’ recommendations and relevant training.

Conclusion

Most respondents held a positive attitude toward the accuracy and development of DGTs. This survey can point out the direction for the improvement of DGTs, and provide a reference for the study of factors affecting implant accuracy, the establishment of a training system, and the understanding of clinicians’ current views on DGTs.
Trial registration This survey was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of Chenghuaxinguanghua Dental Clinic (Approval NO. CDCIRB-D-2021-201).
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lou F, Rao P, Zhang M, Luo S, Lu S, Xiao J. Accuracy evaluation of partially guided and fully guided templates applied to implant surgery of anterior teeth: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23:117–30.CrossRef Lou F, Rao P, Zhang M, Luo S, Lu S, Xiao J. Accuracy evaluation of partially guided and fully guided templates applied to implant surgery of anterior teeth: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2021;23:117–30.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Li Jinmeng Ou, Guomin. Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement and influencing factors. West China J Stomatol. 2017;35(01):93–8. Li Jinmeng Ou, Guomin. Accuracy of computer-guided implant placement and influencing factors. West China J Stomatol. 2017;35(01):93–8.
3.
go back to reference Kelvin I, Afrashtehfar. Conventional free-hand, dynamic navigation and static guided implant surgery produce similar short-term patient-reported outcome measures and experiences. Evid-Based Dent. 2021;22:143–5.CrossRef Kelvin I, Afrashtehfar. Conventional free-hand, dynamic navigation and static guided implant surgery produce similar short-term patient-reported outcome measures and experiences. Evid-Based Dent. 2021;22:143–5.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(3):461–8.CrossRef Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71(3):461–8.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):267–71.CrossRef Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81(2):267–71.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontol. 2003;33:12–25.CrossRef Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients. Periodontol. 2003;33:12–25.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference de Zamora-Montes HA, Afrashtehfar KI. Template fabrication for tomographical diagnosis in implant dentistry: two clinical cases. J N J Dent Assoc. 2016;87(3):20–4. de Zamora-Montes HA, Afrashtehfar KI. Template fabrication for tomographical diagnosis in implant dentistry: two clinical cases. J N J Dent Assoc. 2016;87(3):20–4.
9.
go back to reference Nagata K, Fuchigami K, Hoshi N, et al. Accuracy of guided surgery using the silicon impression and digital impression method for the mandibular free end: a comparative study. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2021;7:2.CrossRef Nagata K, Fuchigami K, Hoshi N, et al. Accuracy of guided surgery using the silicon impression and digital impression method for the mandibular free end: a comparative study. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2021;7:2.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Varga JE, Antal M, Major L, Kiscsatári R, Braunitzer G, Piffkó J. Guidance means accuracy: a randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2020;31:417–30.CrossRef Varga JE, Antal M, Major L, Kiscsatári R, Braunitzer G, Piffkó J. Guidance means accuracy: a randomized clinical trial on freehand versus guided dental implantation. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2020;31:417–30.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chen Y, Zhang X, Wang M, Jiang Q, Mo A. Accuracy of full-guided and half-guided surgical templates in anterior immediate and delayed implantation: a retrospective study. Materials. 2021;14:26.CrossRef Chen Y, Zhang X, Wang M, Jiang Q, Mo A. Accuracy of full-guided and half-guided surgical templates in anterior immediate and delayed implantation: a retrospective study. Materials. 2021;14:26.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Schulz MC, Hofmann F, Range U, Lauer G, Haim D. Pilot-drill guided vs. full-guided implant insertion in artificial mandibles—a prospective laboratory study in fifth-year dental students. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2019;5:23.CrossRef Schulz MC, Hofmann F, Range U, Lauer G, Haim D. Pilot-drill guided vs. full-guided implant insertion in artificial mandibles—a prospective laboratory study in fifth-year dental students. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2019;5:23.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Søndergaard K, Hosseini M, Jensen SS, Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen K. Fully versus conventionally guided implant placement by dental students: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;00:1–13. Søndergaard K, Hosseini M, Jensen SS, Spin-Neto R, Gotfredsen K. Fully versus conventionally guided implant placement by dental students: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;00:1–13.
15.
go back to reference Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(6):721–32.CrossRef Younes F, Cosyn J, De Bruyckere T, Cleymaet R, Bouckaert E, Eghbali A. A randomized controlled study on the accuracy of free-handed, pilot-drill guided and fully guided implant surgery in partially edentulous patients. J Clin Periodontol. 2018;45(6):721–32.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Abduo J, Lau D. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: in vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2020;6:10.CrossRef Abduo J, Lau D. Accuracy of static computer-assisted implant placement in anterior and posterior sites by clinicians new to implant dentistry: in vitro comparison of fully guided, pilot-guided, and freehand protocols. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2020;6:10.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Raico Gallardo YN, Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28:602–12.CrossRef Raico Gallardo YN, Silva-Olivio IRT, Mukai E, Morimoto S, Sesma N, Cordaro L. Accuracy comparison of guided surgery for dental implants according to the tissue of support: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2017;28:602–12.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):416–35.CrossRef Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2018;29(Suppl 16):416–35.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position using surgical guides fabricated by additive and subtractive techniques. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):534–41.CrossRef Henprasert P, Dawson DV, El-Kerdani T, Song X, Couso-Queiruga E, Holloway JA. Comparison of the accuracy of implant position using surgical guides fabricated by additive and subtractive techniques. J Prosthodont. 2020;29(6):534–41.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Chai J, Liu X, Schweyen R, Setz J, Pan S, Liu J, Zhou Y. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:288.CrossRef Chai J, Liu X, Schweyen R, Setz J, Pan S, Liu J, Zhou Y. Accuracy of implant surgical guides fabricated using computer numerical control milling for edentulous jaws: a pilot clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:288.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Abduo J, Lau D. Effect of manufacturing technique on the accuracy of surgical guides for static computer-aided implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(5):931–8.CrossRef Abduo J, Lau D. Effect of manufacturing technique on the accuracy of surgical guides for static computer-aided implant surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2020;35(5):931–8.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Chang RJ, Chen HL, Huang LG, Wong YK. Accuracy of implant placement with a computer-aided fabricated surgical template with guided parallel pins: a pilot study. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018;81:970–6.CrossRef Chang RJ, Chen HL, Huang LG, Wong YK. Accuracy of implant placement with a computer-aided fabricated surgical template with guided parallel pins: a pilot study. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018;81:970–6.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Schneider D, Sax C, Sancho-Puchades M, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant plancement compared with conventional implant placement by hand—an in vitro study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;00:1–9. Schneider D, Sax C, Sancho-Puchades M, Hämmerle CHF, Jung RE. Accuracy of computer-assisted, template-guided implant plancement compared with conventional implant placement by hand—an in vitro study. Clin Oral Impl Res. 2021;00:1–9.
24.
go back to reference Murat S, Kamburoğlu K, Óizen T. Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study. J Oral Implantol. 2012;45(6):89. Murat S, Kamburoğlu K, Óizen T. Accuracy of a newly developed cone-beam computerized tomography-aided surgical guidance system for dental implant placement: an ex vivo study. J Oral Implantol. 2012;45(6):89.
25.
go back to reference Martelli N, Serrano C, Van den Brink H, Pineau J, Prognon P, Isabelle B, Batti SE. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159:6.CrossRef Martelli N, Serrano C, Van den Brink H, Pineau J, Prognon P, Isabelle B, Batti SE. Advantages and disadvantages of 3-dimensional printing in surgery: a systematic review. Surgery. 2016;159:6.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Komuro A, Yamada Y, Uesugi S, Terashima H, Kimura M, Kishimoto H, Lida T, Sakamoto K, Okuda K, Kusano K, Baba S, Sakamoto T. Accuracy and dimensional reproducibility by model scanning, intraoral scanning, and CBCT imaging for digital implant dentistry. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2021;7:63.CrossRef Komuro A, Yamada Y, Uesugi S, Terashima H, Kimura M, Kishimoto H, Lida T, Sakamoto K, Okuda K, Kusano K, Baba S, Sakamoto T. Accuracy and dimensional reproducibility by model scanning, intraoral scanning, and CBCT imaging for digital implant dentistry. Int J Implant Dentistry. 2021;7:63.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Woo HW, Mai HN, Lee DH. Comparison of the accuracy of image registration methods for merging optical scan and radiographic data in edentulous jaws. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:707–11.CrossRef Woo HW, Mai HN, Lee DH. Comparison of the accuracy of image registration methods for merging optical scan and radiographic data in edentulous jaws. J Prosthodont. 2020;29:707–11.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Ashtiani RE, Ghasemi Z, Nami M, Mighani F, Namdari M. Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: a systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;122:600–7.CrossRef Ashtiani RE, Ghasemi Z, Nami M, Mighani F, Namdari M. Accuracy of static digital surgical guides for dental implants based on the guide system: a systematic review. J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021;122:600–7.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Vasak C, Strbac GD, Huber CD, Lettner S, Gahleitner A, Zechner W. Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2015;17:1.CrossRef Vasak C, Strbac GD, Huber CD, Lettner S, Gahleitner A, Zechner W. Evaluation of three different validation procedures regarding the accuracy of template-guided implant placement: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dentistry Related Res. 2015;17:1.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Maida T, Cheng HC, Ou KL, Nezu T, Endo K. Stereolithographic surgical guide with a combination of tooth and bone support: accuracy of guided implant surgery in distal extension situation. J Clin Med. 2020;9:709.CrossRef Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Maida T, Cheng HC, Ou KL, Nezu T, Endo K. Stereolithographic surgical guide with a combination of tooth and bone support: accuracy of guided implant surgery in distal extension situation. J Clin Med. 2020;9:709.CrossRef
31.
go back to reference López DAS, García I, Salomao GDS, Laganá DC. Potential deviation factors affecting stereolithographic surgical guides: a systematic review. Implant Dent. 2019;28:68–73.CrossRef López DAS, García I, Salomao GDS, Laganá DC. Potential deviation factors affecting stereolithographic surgical guides: a systematic review. Implant Dent. 2019;28:68–73.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Kholy KE, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, Faerber K, Buser R, Buser D. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static computer-assisted Implant Surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:1067–75.CrossRef Kholy KE, Lazarin R, Janner SFM, Faerber K, Buser R, Buser D. Influence of surgical guide support and implant site location on accuracy of static computer-assisted Implant Surgery. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019;30:1067–75.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tang T, Huang Z, Liao L, Gu X, Zhang J, Zhang X. Factors that influence direction deviation in freehand implant placement. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:511–8.CrossRef Tang T, Huang Z, Liao L, Gu X, Zhang J, Zhang X. Factors that influence direction deviation in freehand implant placement. J Prosthodont. 2019;28:511–8.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, Kuo CL, Shafer DM. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2018;18(1):28–40.CrossRef Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, Kuo CL, Shafer DM. Clinical factors affecting the accuracy of guided implant surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Evid Base Dent Pract. 2018;18(1):28–40.CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Vinci R, Manacorda M, Abundo R, Lucchina AG, Scarano A, Crocetta C, Lo Muzio L, Gherlone EF, Mastrangelo F. Accuracy of edentulous computer-aided implant surgery as compared to virtual planning: a retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2020;9:774.CrossRef Vinci R, Manacorda M, Abundo R, Lucchina AG, Scarano A, Crocetta C, Lo Muzio L, Gherlone EF, Mastrangelo F. Accuracy of edentulous computer-aided implant surgery as compared to virtual planning: a retrospective multicenter study. J Clin Med. 2020;9:774.CrossRef
36.
go back to reference Schnutenhaus S, Brunken L, Edelmann C, Drehaupt J, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Alveolar ridge preservation and primary stability as influencing factors on the transfer accuracy of static guided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:178.CrossRef Schnutenhaus S, Brunken L, Edelmann C, Drehaupt J, Rudolph H, Luthardt RG. Alveolar ridge preservation and primary stability as influencing factors on the transfer accuracy of static guided implant placement: a prospective clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20:178.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Kivovics M, Pénzes D, Nemeth O, Mijiritsky E. The influence of surgical experience and bone density on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws using a mucosa-supported surgical template with a half-guided implant placement protocol-a randomized clinical study. Materials. 2020;13:5759.CrossRef Kivovics M, Pénzes D, Nemeth O, Mijiritsky E. The influence of surgical experience and bone density on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery in edentulous jaws using a mucosa-supported surgical template with a half-guided implant placement protocol-a randomized clinical study. Materials. 2020;13:5759.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Lim JH, Bayarsaikhan E, Shin SH, Nam NE, Shim JS, Kim JE. Effects of groove sealing of the posterior occlusal surface and offset of the internal surface on the internal fit and accuracy of implant placements using 3D-printed surgical guides: an in vitro study. Polymers. 2021;13:1236.CrossRef Lim JH, Bayarsaikhan E, Shin SH, Nam NE, Shim JS, Kim JE. Effects of groove sealing of the posterior occlusal surface and offset of the internal surface on the internal fit and accuracy of implant placements using 3D-printed surgical guides: an in vitro study. Polymers. 2021;13:1236.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Huang BH, Huang MS, Cheng HC, Maida T, Nezu T, Endo K. In vitro accuracy of static guided implant surgery measured by optical scan: examining the impact of operator experience. Appl Sci. 2020;10:2718.CrossRef Lin CC, Ishikawa M, Huang BH, Huang MS, Cheng HC, Maida T, Nezu T, Endo K. In vitro accuracy of static guided implant surgery measured by optical scan: examining the impact of operator experience. Appl Sci. 2020;10:2718.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JYK, Schutyser F, Boumans T. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience. The J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015;114(3):89.CrossRef Rungcharassaeng K, Caruso JM, Kan JYK, Schutyser F, Boumans T. Accuracy of computer-guided surgery: a comparison of operator experience. The J Prosthetic Dentistry. 2015;114(3):89.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Investigation on the application of digital guide templates guided dental implantation in China
Authors
Yunli Chen
Baohui Su
Publication date
01-12-2023
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2023
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02750-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2023

BMC Oral Health 1/2023 Go to the issue