Top

Published in:

08-07-2022 | Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring | Special Issue Insight

Invasive arterial pressure monitoring: much more than mean arterial pressure!

Authors: Glenn Hernandez, Antonio Messina, Eduardo Kattan

Published in: Intensive Care Medicine | Issue 10/2022

Excerpt

Invasive arterial pressure monitoring is a standard practice in critically ill patients [1] since it allows accurate and beat to beat assessment of mean arterial pressure (MAP), and also delivers valuable information about cardiac function, heart–lung interactions, the arterial system and valvular diseases [2]. Although several guidelines recommend a MAP target during initial hermodynamic resuscitation [3], focusing only on MAP is an oversimplification, since patients with similar values may have considerable differences in underlying pathophysiological conditions [4]. Therefore, all the components derived from arterial pressure monitoring should be considered for diagnostic or therapeutic decisions when facing an acute circulatory dysfunction, as will be addressed in this article. …

Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M et al (2014) Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 40:1795–1815. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-014-3525-zCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Esper SA, Pinsky MR (2014) Arterial waveform analysis. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 28:363–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2014.08.002CrossRefPubMed

Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W et al (2021) Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-yCrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Bakker J, Kattan E, Annane D et al (2021) Current practice and evolving concepts in septic shock resuscitation. Intensive Care Med. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06595-9CrossRefPubMed

Berger T, Green J, Horeczko T et al (2013) Shock index and early recognition of sepsis in the Emergency Department: pilot study. West J Emerg Med 14:168–174. https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2012.8.11546CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Mutschler M, Nienaber U, Münzberg M et al (2013) The Shock Index revisited - a fast guide to transfusion requirement? A retrospective analysis on 21,853 patients derived from the TraumaRegister DGU^®. Crit Care. https://doi.org/10.1186/cc12851CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT et al (2014) A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med 370:1683–1693. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1401602CrossRefPubMed

Hamzaoui O, Teboul JL (2019) Importance of diastolic arterial pressure in septic shock: PRO. J Crit Care 51:238–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.10.032CrossRefPubMed

Ospina-Tascón GA, Hernandez G, Alvarez I et al (2020) Effects of very early start of norepinephrine in patients with septic shock: a propensity score-based analysis. Crit Care 24:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-2756-3CrossRef

10.

Kattan E, Bakker J, Estenssoro E, Ospina-Tascón GA, Biasi Cavalcanti A, De Backer D, Vieillard-Baron A, Teboul JL, Castro RHG (2022) Hemodynamic phenotype-based, capillary refill time-targeted resuscitation in early septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Randomized Clinical Trial study protocol. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva 34:1–11. https://doi.org/10.5935/0103-507X.202200CrossRef

11.

Ospina-Tascón GA, Teboul JL, Hernandez G et al (2020) Diastolic shock index and clinical outcomes in patients with septic shock. Ann Intensive Care 10:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00658-8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

12.

Westerhof N, Lankhaar JW, Westerhof BE (2009) The arterial Windkessel. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:131–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-008-0359-2CrossRefPubMed

13.

Rosen I, White H (1926) The relation of pulse pressure to stroke volume. Am J Physiol 78:168–184CrossRef

14.

Marquez J, McCurry K, Severyn DA, Pinsky MR (2008) Ability of pulse power, esophageal Doppler, and arterial pulse pressure to estimate rapid changes in stroke volume in humans. Crit Care Med 36:3001–3007. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0b013e31818b31f0CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral

15.

Monnet X, Teboul JL (2018) Assessment of fluid responsiveness: recent advances. Curr Opin Crit Care 24:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000501CrossRefPubMed

Title: Invasive arterial pressure monitoring: much more than mean arterial pressure!
Authors: Glenn Hernandez
Antonio Messina
Eduardo Kattan
Publication date: 08-07-2022
Publisher: Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Keywords: Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring
Septic Shock
Published in: Intensive Care Medicine / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0342-4642
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1238
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-022-06798-8

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Invasive arterial pressure monitoring: much more than mean arterial pressure!

Excerpt

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Excerpt

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 10/2022

The physiological underpinnings of life-saving respiratory support

Update on prevention of intra-vascular accesses complications

Timing of early mobilization to optimize outcomes in mechanically ventilated ICU patients

EEG monitoring after cardiac arrest

Machines that help machines to help patients: optimising antimicrobial dosing in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and renal replacement therapy using dosing software

How to improve intubation in the intensive care unit. Update on knowledge and devices