Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Systems 4/2021

Open Access 01-04-2021 | Interventional Radiology | Image & Signal Processing

Mixed Reality Visualization of Radiation Dose for Health Professionals and Patients in Interventional Radiology

Authors: Takeshi Takata, Susumu Nakabayashi, Hiroshi Kondo, Masayoshi Yamamoto, Shigeru Furui, Kenshiro Shiraishi, Takenori Kobayashi, Hiroshi Oba, Takahide Okamoto, Jun’ichi Kotoku

Published in: Journal of Medical Systems | Issue 4/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

For interventional radiology, dose management has persisted as a crucially important issue to reduce radiation exposure to patients and medical staff. This study designed a real-time dose visualization system for interventional radiology designed with mixed reality technology and Monte Carlo simulation. An earlier report described a Monte-Carlo-based estimation system, which simulates a patient’s skin dose and air dose distributions, adopted for our system. We also developed a system of acquiring fluoroscopic conditions to input them into the Monte Carlo system. Then we combined the Monte Carlo system with a wearable device for three-dimensional holographic visualization. The estimated doses were transferred sequentially to the device. The patient’s dose distribution was then projected on the patient body. The visualization system also has a mechanism to detect one’s position in a room to estimate the user’s exposure dose to detect and display the exposure level. Qualitative tests were conducted to evaluate the workload and usability of our mixed reality system. An end-to-end system test was performed using a human phantom. The acquisition system accurately recognized conditions that were necessary for real-time dose estimation. The dose hologram represents the patient dose. The user dose was changed correctly, depending on conditions and positions. The perceived overall workload score (33.50) was lower than the scores reported in the literature for medical tasks (50.60) for computer activities (54.00). Mixed reality dose visualization is expected to improve exposure dose management for patients and health professionals by exhibiting the invisible radiation exposure in real space.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference den Boer A, de Feijter PJ, Serruys PW, Roelandt JRTC (2001) Real-Time Quantification and Display of Skin Radiation During Coronary Angiography and Intervention. Circulation 104:1779–1784.CrossRef den Boer A, de Feijter PJ, Serruys PW, Roelandt JRTC (2001) Real-Time Quantification and Display of Skin Radiation During Coronary Angiography and Intervention. Circulation 104:1779–1784.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Takata T, Kotoku J, Maejima H, Kumagai S, Arai N, Kobayashi T et al (2018) Fast skin dose estimation system for interventional radiology. J Radiat Res 59:233–239.CrossRef Takata T, Kotoku J, Maejima H, Kumagai S, Arai N, Kobayashi T et al (2018) Fast skin dose estimation system for interventional radiology. J Radiat Res 59:233–239.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Bednarek DR, Barbarits J, Rana VK, Nagaraja SP, Josan MS, Rudin S (2011) Verification of the performance accuracy of a real-time skin-dose tracking system for interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Physiol Behav 176:796127. Bednarek DR, Barbarits J, Rana VK, Nagaraja SP, Josan MS, Rudin S (2011) Verification of the performance accuracy of a real-time skin-dose tracking system for interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Physiol Behav 176:796127.
4.
go back to reference Kumagai S, Arai N, Takata T, Kon D, Saitoh T, Oba H (2020) First experience of 192 Ir source stuck event during high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan. J Contemp 12:53–60. Kumagai S, Arai N, Takata T, Kon D, Saitoh T, Oba H (2020) First experience of 192 Ir source stuck event during high-dose-rate brachytherapy in Japan. J Contemp 12:53–60.
5.
go back to reference Takata T, Kondo H, Yamamoto M, Shiraishi K, Kobayashi T, Furui S et al (2020) Immersive Radiation Experience for Interventional Radiology with Virtual Reality Radiation Dose Visualization Using Fast Monte Carlo Dose Estimation. Interventional Radiology 5:58–66.CrossRef Takata T, Kondo H, Yamamoto M, Shiraishi K, Kobayashi T, Furui S et al (2020) Immersive Radiation Experience for Interventional Radiology with Virtual Reality Radiation Dose Visualization Using Fast Monte Carlo Dose Estimation. Interventional Radiology 5:58–66.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Loy Rodas N, Padoy N, Loy N, Nicolas R, Loy Rodas N, Padoy N (2015) Seeing is believing: increasing intraoperative awareness to scattered radiation in interventional procedures by combining augmented reality, Monte Carlo simulations and wireless dosimeters. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:1181–1191.CrossRef Loy Rodas N, Padoy N, Loy N, Nicolas R, Loy Rodas N, Padoy N (2015) Seeing is believing: increasing intraoperative awareness to scattered radiation in interventional procedures by combining augmented reality, Monte Carlo simulations and wireless dosimeters. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:1181–1191.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Zhou Z, Yang Z, Jiang S, Zhang F, Yan H (2019) Design and validation of a surgical navigation system for brachytherapy based on mixed reality. Med Phys 46:3709–3718.CrossRef Zhou Z, Yang Z, Jiang S, Zhang F, Yan H (2019) Design and validation of a surgical navigation system for brachytherapy based on mixed reality. Med Phys 46:3709–3718.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Brun H, Bugge RAB, Suther LKR, Birkeland S, Kumar R, Pelanis E et al (2019) Mixed reality holograms for heart surgery planning: first user experience in congenital heart disease. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:883–888.CrossRef Brun H, Bugge RAB, Suther LKR, Birkeland S, Kumar R, Pelanis E et al (2019) Mixed reality holograms for heart surgery planning: first user experience in congenital heart disease. Eur Hear J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:883–888.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Condino S, Turini G, Parchi PD, Viglialoro RM, Piolanti N, Gesi M et al (2018) How to Build a Patient-Specific Hybrid Simulator for Orthopaedic Open Surgery: Benefits and Limits of Mixed-Reality Using the Microsoft HoloLens. J Healthc Eng 2018:1–12.CrossRef Condino S, Turini G, Parchi PD, Viglialoro RM, Piolanti N, Gesi M et al (2018) How to Build a Patient-Specific Hybrid Simulator for Orthopaedic Open Surgery: Benefits and Limits of Mixed-Reality Using the Microsoft HoloLens. J Healthc Eng 2018:1–12.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Rae E, Lasso A, Holden MS, Morin E, Levy R, Fichtinger G (2018) Neurosurgical burr hole placement using the Microsoft HoloLens. Med Imaging 2018 Image-Guided Proced Robot Interv Model. 20. Rae E, Lasso A, Holden MS, Morin E, Levy R, Fichtinger G (2018) Neurosurgical burr hole placement using the Microsoft HoloLens. Med Imaging 2018 Image-Guided Proced Robot Interv Model. 20.
12.
go back to reference Vassallo R, Rankin A, Chen ECS, Peters TM (2017) Hologram stability evaluation for Microsoft HoloLens. Med Imaging 2017 Image Perception, Obs Performance, Technol Assess. 10136:1013614. Vassallo R, Rankin A, Chen ECS, Peters TM (2017) Hologram stability evaluation for Microsoft HoloLens. Med Imaging 2017 Image Perception, Obs Performance, Technol Assess. 10136:1013614.
13.
go back to reference ICRP. Conversion Coefficients for use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation. ICRP Publication 74. Ann ICRP 26 (3-4). 1996. ICRP. Conversion Coefficients for use in Radiological Protection against External Radiation. ICRP Publication 74. Ann ICRP 26 (3-4). 1996.
14.
go back to reference Soomro SR, Javed MA, Memon FA (2012) Vehicle Number Recognition System for automatic toll tax collection. 2012 Int Conf Robot Artif Intell. 2012;125–129. Soomro SR, Javed MA, Memon FA (2012) Vehicle Number Recognition System for automatic toll tax collection. 2012 Int Conf Robot Artif Intell. 2012;125–129.
15.
go back to reference Elrefaei LA, Bajaber A, Natheir S, Abusanab N, Bazi M (2015) Automatic electricity meter reading based on image processing. 2015 IEEE Jordan Conf Appl Electr Eng Comput Technol 2015;4–8. Elrefaei LA, Bajaber A, Natheir S, Abusanab N, Bazi M (2015) Automatic electricity meter reading based on image processing. 2015 IEEE Jordan Conf Appl Electr Eng Comput Technol 2015;4–8.
16.
go back to reference Brunelli R (2009) Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice. Template Matching Tech. Comput. Vis. Theory Pract.CrossRef Brunelli R (2009) Template Matching Techniques in Computer Vision: Theory and Practice. Template Matching Tech. Comput. Vis. Theory Pract.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Mattoccia S, Tombari F, Di Stefano L (2008) Reliable rejection of mismatching candidates for efficient ZNCC template matching. 2008 15th IEEE Int Conf Image Process 849–852. Mattoccia S, Tombari F, Di Stefano L (2008) Reliable rejection of mismatching candidates for efficient ZNCC template matching. 2008 15th IEEE Int Conf Image Process 849–852.
18.
go back to reference Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Adv Psychol 52:139–183.CrossRef Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. Adv Psychol 52:139–183.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Grier RA (2015) How High is High? A Meta-Analysis of NASA-TLX Global Workload Scores. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 59(1):1727–1731.CrossRef Grier RA (2015) How High is High? A Meta-Analysis of NASA-TLX Global Workload Scores. Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 59(1):1727–1731.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Mixed Reality Visualization of Radiation Dose for Health Professionals and Patients in Interventional Radiology
Authors
Takeshi Takata
Susumu Nakabayashi
Hiroshi Kondo
Masayoshi Yamamoto
Shigeru Furui
Kenshiro Shiraishi
Takenori Kobayashi
Hiroshi Oba
Takahide Okamoto
Jun’ichi Kotoku
Publication date
01-04-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Medical Systems / Issue 4/2021
Print ISSN: 0148-5598
Electronic ISSN: 1573-689X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01700-9

Other articles of this Issue 4/2021

Journal of Medical Systems 4/2021 Go to the issue