Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Radiology 10/2019

Open Access 01-10-2019 | Interventional Radiology | Malpractice

Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center

Authors: Pieter F. van den Berg, Derya Yakar, Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans, Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx, Thomas C. Kwee

Published in: European Radiology | Issue 10/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To determine the frequency, nature (using standardized coding taxonomy), and temporal trends of patient complaints about the radiological service provided in a European tertiary care center.

Methods

This retrospective study included all written patient complaints received by the department of radiology of a European tertiary care center within a 9-year period.

Results

A total of 94 written patient complaints were included. Overall complaint frequency was 14.4 per 100,000 radiological procedures. Complaint frequencies per 100,000 procedures were 103.7 for interventional radiology, 13.9 for MRI, 6.9 for ultrasonography, 6.5 for CT, 4.5 for fluoroscopy, and 1.2 for conventional radiography. Interventional radiology received significantly more complaints than all other radiological procedures (p < 0.001), and cross-sectional imaging (CT, MRI, and ultrasonography) received significantly more complaints than conventional radiography (p < 0.001). Fifty-three (56.4%) complaints belonged to the clinical domain, 22 (23.4%) to the relationships domain, and 19 (20.2%) to the management domain. Quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%) constituted almost all complaint categories. Patient journey (19.1%), delays (18.1%), communication breakdown (16.0%), errors in diagnosis (11.7%), quality of care (9.6%), treatment (6.4%), and staff attitudes (2.1%) constituted almost all complaint subcategories. Annual frequency of complaints decreased over time (Mann-Kendall tau = − 0.429), although not significantly (p = 0.174).

Conclusion

Written patient complaints directed to a department of radiology at a European tertiary care center are relatively few in number and have not shown a temporal increase. Knowledge of sources of patient dissatisfaction may help to reduce the number of patient complaints and improve patient care.

Key Points

Approximately 14.4 written patient complaints per 100,000 radiological procedures are filed in a European tertiary care center, and they have not increased over a 9-year period.
Written patient complaints most frequently involve interventional radiology, and the main complaint categories are quality (34.0%), safety (22.3%), timing and access (18.1%), and communication (18.1%).
Knowledge of the nature of and circumstances under which patient complaints arise may reduce their number and improve patient care.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843CrossRefPubMed Sitzia J, Wood N (1997) Patient satisfaction: a review of issues and concepts. Soc Sci Med 45:1829–1843CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Salazar G, Quencer K, Aran S, Abujudeh H (2013) Patient satisfaction in radiology: qualitative analysis of written complaints generated over a 10-year period in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol 10:513–517CrossRefPubMed Salazar G, Quencer K, Aran S, Abujudeh H (2013) Patient satisfaction in radiology: qualitative analysis of written complaints generated over a 10-year period in an academic medical center. J Am Coll Radiol 10:513–517CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E et al (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 307(22):2400–2409CrossRefPubMed Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E et al (2012) Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA 307(22):2400–2409CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stacey CL, Henderson S, MacArthur KR, Dohan D (2009) Demanding patient or demanding encounter?: A case study of a cancer clinic. Soc Sci Med 69(5):729–737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stacey CL, Henderson S, MacArthur KR, Dohan D (2009) Demanding patient or demanding encounter?: A case study of a cancer clinic. Soc Sci Med 69(5):729–737CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
8.
go back to reference Gillespie A, Reader TW (2016) The Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool: development and reliability testing of a method for service monitoring and organisational learning. BMJ Qual Saf 25:937–946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Gillespie A, Reader TW (2016) The Healthcare Complaints Analysis Tool: development and reliability testing of a method for service monitoring and organisational learning. BMJ Qual Saf 25:937–946CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Snijders C, Van Der Schaaf TW, Klip H, Van Lingen RA, Fetter WP, Molendijk A (2009) Feasibility and reliability of PRISMA-Medical for specialty-based incident analysis. Qual Saf Heal Care 18:486–491 Snijders C, Van Der Schaaf TW, Klip H, Van Lingen RA, Fetter WP, Molendijk A (2009) Feasibility and reliability of PRISMA-Medical for specialty-based incident analysis. Qual Saf Heal Care 18:486–491
10.
go back to reference Tibble HM, Broughton NS, Studdert DM et al (2018) Why do surgeons receive more complaints than their physician peers? ANZ J Surg 88:269–273CrossRefPubMed Tibble HM, Broughton NS, Studdert DM et al (2018) Why do surgeons receive more complaints than their physician peers? ANZ J Surg 88:269–273CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Siskin GP, Bagla S, Sansivero GE, Mitchell NL (2004) The interventional radiology clinic: key ingredients for success. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:681–688CrossRefPubMed Siskin GP, Bagla S, Sansivero GE, Mitchell NL (2004) The interventional radiology clinic: key ingredients for success. J Vasc Interv Radiol 15:681–688CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Ollivier L, Apiou F, Leclère J et al (2009) Patient experiences and preferences: development of practice guidelines in a cancer imaging department. Cancer Imaging 9(Special issue A):92–97 Ollivier L, Apiou F, Leclère J et al (2009) Patient experiences and preferences: development of practice guidelines in a cancer imaging department. Cancer Imaging 9(Special issue A):92–97
14.
go back to reference Gutzeit A, Heiland R, Sudarski S et al (2019) Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care? Eur Radiol 29:224–231CrossRefPubMed Gutzeit A, Heiland R, Sudarski S et al (2019) Direct communication between radiologists and patients following imaging examinations. Should radiologists rethink their patient care? Eur Radiol 29:224–231CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient complaints in radiology: 9-year experience at a European tertiary care center
Authors
Pieter F. van den Berg
Derya Yakar
Andor W. J. M. Glaudemans
Rudi A. J. O. Dierckx
Thomas C. Kwee
Publication date
01-10-2019
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology / Issue 10/2019
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06158-z

Other articles of this Issue 10/2019

European Radiology 10/2019 Go to the issue