Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2012

01-09-2012 | Original Article

International survey study of attitudes towards robotic surgery

Authors: Sheraz R. Markar, Ivana Kolic, Alan P. Karthikesalingam, Oliver Wagner, Monika E. Hagen

Published in: Journal of Robotic Surgery | Issue 3/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

The field of robotic surgery is rapidly advancing both in terms of the surgical procedures performed and the potential applications of this technology. This survey study attempts to evaluate the opinions of the public regarding a number of issues in robotic surgery. A web-based survey study was constructed using the web-based software “Kwiksurveys”. This survey was then advertised and distributed over the Internet to gain responders from a wide range of socio-economic groups and in a number of countries. Responses were collected over a six-month period. One-hundred and fifty-five participants took part in this survey study. The mean age of participants was 35.5 ± 3.4 years. The majority of participants (52%) were either comfortable or totally comfortable with the current version of robotic surgery during which a surgeon in the same room controls instruments inside the patient. Sixty-eight percent of responders reported they would be very uncomfortable with the idea of not seeing the operating surgeon in person before or after surgery. Forty-five percent of participants reported they would consider the idea of an internal robot operating internally with little or no external scarring. This survey study has demonstrated that currently the public seem to be comfortable with the current version of robotic surgery, with the operating surgeon in the same room as the patient. The results of this survey study show that even with technical advances in robotic surgery, patients will still want to have contact with their operating surgeon.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, Chang JJ, Huang SJ, Lin MT, Lee PH (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97(7):1007–1012PubMedCrossRef Lee PC, Lo C, Lai PS, Chang JJ, Huang SJ, Lin MT, Lee PH (2010) Randomized clinical trial of single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 97(7):1007–1012PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410PubMedCrossRef Binder J, Kramer W (2001) Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 87:408–410PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophagel reflux disease; systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6(2):125–131PubMed Markar SR, Karthikesalingam AP, Hagen ME, Talamini M, Horgan S, Wagner OJ (2010) Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Nissen fundoplication for gastro-oesophagel reflux disease; systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Med Robot 6(2):125–131PubMed
4.
go back to reference Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N, McClure R, Morady R, Peterson S, Smith S, Subotic V, Van Wynsberghe A, Primak S (2006) Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments. Int J Med Robot 2(3):216–224PubMedCrossRef Rayman R, Croome K, Galbraith N, McClure R, Morady R, Peterson S, Smith S, Subotic V, Van Wynsberghe A, Primak S (2006) Long-distance robotic telesurgery: a feasibility study for care in remote environments. Int J Med Robot 2(3):216–224PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Lum MJ, Rosen J, Lendvay TS, Wright AS, Sinanan MN, Hannaford B (2008) TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay—pilot study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:5597–600 Lum MJ, Rosen J, Lendvay TS, Wright AS, Sinanan MN, Hannaford B (2008) TeleRobotic fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS): effects of time delay—pilot study. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008:5597–600
6.
go back to reference Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1519–1525PubMedCrossRef Swanstrom LL, Volckmann E, Hungness E, Soper NJ (2009) Patient attitudes and expectations regarding natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 23:1519–1525PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Christen D, Morel P (2008) Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy 40(7):581–583PubMedCrossRef Hagen ME, Wagner OJ, Christen D, Morel P (2008) Cosmetic issues of abdominal surgery: results of an enquiry into possible grounds for a natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach. Endoscopy 40(7):581–583PubMedCrossRef
8.
9.
go back to reference Nguan CY, Morady R, Wang C, Harrison D, Browning D, Rayman R, Luke PP (2008) Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based tele-surgery. Int J Med Robot 4(1):10–14PubMedCrossRef Nguan CY, Morady R, Wang C, Harrison D, Browning D, Rayman R, Luke PP (2008) Robotic pyeloplasty using internet protocol and satellite network-based tele-surgery. Int J Med Robot 4(1):10–14PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Taylor D, Mulekar MS, Luterman A, Meyer FN, Richards WO, Rodning CB (2011) Spirituality within the patient-surgeon relationship. J Surg Educ 68(1):36–43PubMedCrossRef Taylor D, Mulekar MS, Luterman A, Meyer FN, Richards WO, Rodning CB (2011) Spirituality within the patient-surgeon relationship. J Surg Educ 68(1):36–43PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
International survey study of attitudes towards robotic surgery
Authors
Sheraz R. Markar
Ivana Kolic
Alan P. Karthikesalingam
Oliver Wagner
Monika E. Hagen
Publication date
01-09-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Robotic Surgery / Issue 3/2012
Print ISSN: 1863-2483
Electronic ISSN: 1863-2491
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-011-0301-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2012

Journal of Robotic Surgery 3/2012 Go to the issue