Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 1/2024

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Insulins | Review

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec compared to once-daily insulin g U-100 in patients with type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors: Syed Zia Saleem, Areeba Fareed, Syed Muhammad Muneeb Akhtar, Solay Farhat, Amira Mohamed Taha, Aymar Akilimali

Published in: Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background//Objective

Diabetes affects millions of people globally, despite treatment options, adherence and other factors pose obstacles. Once-weekly Insulin Icodec, a novel basal Insulin analog with a week-long half-life, offers potential benefits, enhancing convenience, adherence, and quality of life for improved glycemic control. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of once-weekly Insulin Icodec compared to once-daily Insulin Glargine U-100 in individuals with type II diabetes (T2D).

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, and Cochrane Library databases before September 2023 to identify relevant Randomized control trials (RCTs) with no language restrictions following PRISMA guidelines. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used for quality assessment. All statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan (version 5.4; Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014).

Result

Four RCTs published from 2020 to 2023 with a cumulative sample size of 1035 were included. The pooled mean difference (MD) revealed a 4.68% longer TIR (%) with Insulin Icodec compared to Insulin Glargine U-100 [{95% CI (0.69, 8.68), p = 0.02}], the estimated mean changes in HbA1c (%) and FPG (mg%) were found to be insignificant between the two groups [MD = − 0.12 {95% CI (− 0.26, 0.01), p = 0.07}] and [MD = − 2.59 {95% CI (− 6.95, 1.78), p = 0.25}], respectively. The overall OR for hypoglycemia was also nonsignificant between the two regimens 1.04 [{95% CI (0.71, 1.52), p = 0.84}]. Other safety parameters were similar between the two groups.

Conclusions

Switching from daily Insulin Glargine U-100 to weekly Insulin Icodec showed longer TIR (%) as well as similar blood glycemic control and safety profile. Hence, it may be a good alternate option for management of longstanding T2D.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Global diabetes cases to soar from 529 million to 1.3 billion by 2050 | The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Accessed 18 Dec 2023. Global diabetes cases to soar from 529 million to 1.3 billion by 2050 | The Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Accessed 18 Dec 2023.
3.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Henry RR. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1299–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Polonsky WH, Henry RR. Poor medication adherence in type 2 diabetes: recognizing the scope of the problem and its key contributors. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:1299–306.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
5.
go back to reference Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29:682–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Peyrot M, Barnett AH, Meneghini LF, Schumm-Draeger PM. Insulin adherence behaviours and barriers in the multinational global attitudes of patients and physicians in insulin therapy study. Diabet Med. 2012;29:682–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C, Crosson JC, Parker MM, Swain BE, et al. Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:733–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Karter AJ, Subramanian U, Saha C, Crosson JC, Parker MM, Swain BE, et al. Barriers to insulin initiation: the translating research into action for diabetes insulin starts project. Diabetes Care. 2010;33:733–5.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Escalada J, Orozco-Beltran D, Morillas C, Alvarez-Guisasola F, Gomez-Peralta F, Mata-Cases M, et al. Attitudes towards insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes patients among healthcare providers: a survey research. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;122:46–53.CrossRefPubMed Escalada J, Orozco-Beltran D, Morillas C, Alvarez-Guisasola F, Gomez-Peralta F, Mata-Cases M, et al. Attitudes towards insulin initiation in type 2 diabetes patients among healthcare providers: a survey research. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2016;122:46–53.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Bruhn D, Best JH. Patient perspectives on once-weekly medications for diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:144–9.CrossRefPubMed Polonsky WH, Fisher L, Hessler D, Bruhn D, Best JH. Patient perspectives on once-weekly medications for diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13:144–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;2021:372. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;2021:372.
14.
go back to reference Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;18(343):343. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Juni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;18(343):343.
15.
go back to reference R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021.
17.
go back to reference Rosenstock J, Bajaj HS, Janež A, Silver R, Begtrup K, Hansen MV, et al. Once-weekly insulin for type 2 diabetes without previous insulin treatment. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2107–16.CrossRefPubMed Rosenstock J, Bajaj HS, Janež A, Silver R, Begtrup K, Hansen MV, et al. Once-weekly insulin for type 2 diabetes without previous insulin treatment. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2107–16.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Lingvay I, Buse JB, Franek E, Hansen MV, Koefoed MM, Mathieu C, et al. A randomized, open-label comparison of once-weekly insulin icodec titration strategies versus once-daily insulin glargine U100. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:1595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lingvay I, Buse JB, Franek E, Hansen MV, Koefoed MM, Mathieu C, et al. A randomized, open-label comparison of once-weekly insulin icodec titration strategies versus once-daily insulin glargine U100. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:1595–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Bajaj HS, Bergenstal RM, Christoffersen A, Davies MJ, Gowda A, Isendahl J, et al. Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on daily basal insulin: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:1586–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bajaj HS, Bergenstal RM, Christoffersen A, Davies MJ, Gowda A, Isendahl J, et al. Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on daily basal insulin: a phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2021;44:1586–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Mathieu C, Ásbjörnsdóttir B, Bajaj HS, Lane W, Matos ALSA, Murthy S, et al. Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2023;401:1929–40.CrossRef Mathieu C, Ásbjörnsdóttir B, Bajaj HS, Lane W, Matos ALSA, Murthy S, et al. Switching to once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily insulin glargine U100 in individuals with basal-bolus insulin-treated type 2 diabetes (ONWARDS 4): a phase 3a, randomised, open-label, multicentre, treat-to-target, non-inferiority trial. The Lancet. 2023;401:1929–40.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference An N, Wang X, He A, Chen W. Current status of weekly insulin analogs and their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation by the euglycemic clamp technique. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2023;12:849–55.CrossRefPubMed An N, Wang X, He A, Chen W. Current status of weekly insulin analogs and their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation by the euglycemic clamp technique. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2023;12:849–55.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Bajaj HS, Goldenberg RM. Insulin icodec weekly: a basal insulin analogue for type 2 diabetes. touchREVIEWS Endocrinol. 2023;19:4.CrossRef Bajaj HS, Goldenberg RM. Insulin icodec weekly: a basal insulin analogue for type 2 diabetes. touchREVIEWS Endocrinol. 2023;19:4.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Singh AK, Singh A, Singh R, Misra A. Once-weekly basal insulin icodec: looking ONWARDS from pharmacology to clinical trials. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022;16(9):102615.CrossRefPubMed Singh AK, Singh A, Singh R, Misra A. Once-weekly basal insulin icodec: looking ONWARDS from pharmacology to clinical trials. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022;16(9):102615.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, Amiel SA, Beck R, Biester T, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the international consensus on time in range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Abuelazm M, Ibrahim AA, Khlidj Y, et al. Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily long-acting insulin for type II diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endocr Soc. 2023;8(2):177.CrossRef Abuelazm M, Ibrahim AA, Khlidj Y, et al. Once-weekly insulin icodec versus once-daily long-acting insulin for type II diabetes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Endocr Soc. 2023;8(2):177.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Shetty S, Suvarna R. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of ONWARDS phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(3):1069–81.CrossRefPubMed Shetty S, Suvarna R. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of ONWARDS phase 3 randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2024;26(3):1069–81.CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Wang P, Zhang Y, Xu W, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin regimes on glycemic control for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16(1):3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Wang P, Zhang Y, Xu W, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin regimes on glycemic control for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2024;16(1):3.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Efficacy and safety of once-weekly insulin icodec compared to once-daily insulin g U-100 in patients with type II diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors
Syed Zia Saleem
Areeba Fareed
Syed Muhammad Muneeb Akhtar
Solay Farhat
Amira Mohamed Taha
Aymar Akilimali
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1758-5996
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-024-01305-z

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 1/2024 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.