Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diabetes Therapy 2/2020

Open Access 01-02-2020 | Insulin Glargine | Commentary

Commentary to “Differential Effect of Hypoalbuminemia on Hypoglycemia on Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml and Insulin Degludec” by Kawaguchi et al. Diabetes Therapy 2019

Authors: Thomas R. Pieber, Lars Bardtrum, Joakim Isendahl, Lily Wagner, Rimei Nishimura

Published in: Diabetes Therapy | Issue 2/2020

Login to get access

Excerpt

Two publications from a small-scale cross-over study comparing insulin glargine 300 units/mL (glargine U300) with insulin degludec (degludec) in 30 patients with type 2 diabetes have been published recently.
The results from these studies indicate that glargine U300 was associated with a lower percentage of time in hypoglycaemia and that this lower risk of hypoglycaemia was in patients with low albumin concentrations.
However, this study was limited by the lack of adjustment in starting insulin dose, the short study period to assess continuous glucose monitoring and the heterogeneous background therapies of the patient group.
A post hoc analysis of the DEVOTE cardiovascular outcomes trial did not indicate an increased relative risk of hypoglycaemia for degludec versus insulin glargine 100 units/mL (glargine U100) and did not show any albumin-related safety signal concerning degludec.
We acknowledge that glargine U100 and U300 have different pharmacokinetic profiles that likely explain the higher hypoglycaemia risk of glargine U100 compared with glargine U300 and degludec.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Sawa J, Sakuma N, Kumeda Y. Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs insulin degludec in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, cross-over study using continuous glucose monitoring profiles. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10:343–51.CrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Sawa J, Sakuma N, Kumeda Y. Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine 300 U/mL vs insulin degludec in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, cross-over study using continuous glucose monitoring profiles. J Diabetes Investig. 2019;10:343–51.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kawaguchi Y, Sawa J, Hamai C, Kumeda Y. Differential effect of hypoalbuminemia on hypoglycemia on type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin glargine 300 U/ml and insulin degludec. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10:1535–41.CrossRef Kawaguchi Y, Sawa J, Hamai C, Kumeda Y. Differential effect of hypoalbuminemia on hypoglycemia on type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin glargine 300 U/ml and insulin degludec. Diabetes Ther. 2019;10:1535–41.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–603.CrossRef Battelino T, Danne T, Bergenstal RM, et al. Clinical targets for continuous glucose monitoring data interpretation: recommendations from the International Consensus on Time in Range. Diabetes Care. 2019;42:1593–603.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heise T, Norskov M, Nosek L, Kaplan K, Famulla S, Haahr HL. Insulin degludec: lower day-to-day and within-day variability in pharmacodynamic response compared with insulin glargine 300 U/mL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1032–9.CrossRef Heise T, Norskov M, Nosek L, Kaplan K, Famulla S, Haahr HL. Insulin degludec: lower day-to-day and within-day variability in pharmacodynamic response compared with insulin glargine 300 U/mL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19:1032–9.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Bailey TS, Pettus J, Roussel R, et al. Morning administration of 0.4U/kg/day insulin glargine 300U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-h pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100U/mL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44:15–21.CrossRef Bailey TS, Pettus J, Roussel R, et al. Morning administration of 0.4U/kg/day insulin glargine 300U/mL provides less fluctuating 24-h pharmacodynamics and more even pharmacokinetic profiles compared with insulin degludec 100U/mL in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Metab. 2018;44:15–21.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Heise T, Hövelmann U, Nosek L, Hermanski L, Bøttcher SG, Haahr H. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec and insulin glargine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11:1193–201.CrossRef Heise T, Hövelmann U, Nosek L, Hermanski L, Bøttcher SG, Haahr H. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec and insulin glargine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2015;11:1193–201.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, DEVOTE Study Group, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:723–32.CrossRef Marso SP, McGuire DK, Zinman B, DEVOTE Study Group, et al. Efficacy and safety of degludec versus glargine in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:723–32.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Commentary to “Differential Effect of Hypoalbuminemia on Hypoglycemia on Type 2 Diabetes Patients Treated with Insulin Glargine 300 U/ml and Insulin Degludec” by Kawaguchi et al. Diabetes Therapy 2019
Authors
Thomas R. Pieber
Lars Bardtrum
Joakim Isendahl
Lily Wagner
Rimei Nishimura
Publication date
01-02-2020
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Diabetes Therapy / Issue 2/2020
Print ISSN: 1869-6953
Electronic ISSN: 1869-6961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13300-019-00755-3

Other articles of this Issue 2/2020

Diabetes Therapy 2/2020 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine

Highlights from the ACC 2024 Congress

Year in Review: Pediatric cardiology

Watch Dr. Anne Marie Valente present the last year's highlights in pediatric and congenital heart disease in the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Pulmonary vascular disease

The last year's highlights in pulmonary vascular disease are presented by Dr. Jane Leopold in this official video from ACC.24.

Year in Review: Valvular heart disease

Watch Prof. William Zoghbi present the last year's highlights in valvular heart disease from the official ACC.24 Year in Review session.

Year in Review: Heart failure and cardiomyopathies

Watch this official video from ACC.24. Dr. Biykem Bozkurt discusses last year's major advances in heart failure and cardiomyopathies.