Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 3/2019

01-07-2019 | Original Article

Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals

Authors: Hideyuki Hasegawa, Ryo Nagaoka

Published in: Journal of Medical Ultrasonics | Issue 3/2019

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Ultrasound beamforming is required to obtain clinical ultrasound images. In the beamforming procedure, the distance between the receiving focal point and each transducer element is determined based on the assumed speed of sound in the tissue. However, the actual speed of sound in tissue is unknown and varies depending on the tissue type. To improve the performance of an ultrasonic beamformer by evaluating its focusing quality, the coherence factor (CF) was introduced in medical ultrasound imaging. The CF may be used to estimate the speed of sound in tissue because it can identify focusing errors in beamforming. In the present study, the feasibility of CF for estimating the speed of sound was examined through phantom experiments.

Method

To evaluate the dependency of CF on the assumed speed of sound in ultrasound beamforming, beamformed ultrasonic radio frequency (RF) signals and CFs were obtained at different assumed speeds of sound. CF is highest when the assumed speed of sound matches the true speed of sound in the medium. Therefore, the speed of sound in the medium was determined as the assumed speed of sound, which gives the highest CF. The proposed method was validated in a conventional line-by-line sequence with a focused transmit beam and ultrafast plane wave imaging.

Results

A homogeneous phantom (diffuse scattering medium) with a known speed of sound of 1540 m/s was used for validating the proposed method. Beamformed ultrasonic RF signals and CFs were obtained at an assumed speed of sound from 1480 to 1600 m/s varied at a pitch of 5 m/s. In the line-by-line sequence, CF reached the maximum at an assumed speed of sound of 1525.0 m/s (0.97% difference from the true value) when CFs at all spatial points in the region of interest (ROI) were averaged. On the other hand, the speed of sound was determined to be 1528.5 m/s (0.75% difference) when CFs at spatial points with CF-weighted echo amplitudes were larger than 20% of the maximum value. In plane wave imaging, the speed of sound was estimated to be 1544.5 m/s (0.29% difference) using CFs with CF-weighted echo amplitudes larger than 20% of the maximum value.

Conclusion

The speed of sound of a homogeneous medium could be determined by the proposed method with errors of less than 1% using CFs obtained from ultrasonic echo signals selected based on the CF-weighted echo amplitudes, i.e., when echo signals with better signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were used.
Literature
1.
go back to reference O’Donnell M, Flax SW. Phase aberration measurements in medical ultrasound. Ultrason Imaging. 1988;10:1–11.CrossRefPubMed O’Donnell M, Flax SW. Phase aberration measurements in medical ultrasound. Ultrason Imaging. 1988;10:1–11.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Li Y. Phase aberration correction using near-field signal redundancy. I. Principles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1997;44:355–71.CrossRefPubMed Li Y. Phase aberration correction using near-field signal redundancy. I. Principles. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1997;44:355–71.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fontanarosa D, van der Meer S, Harris E, et al. A CT based correction method for speed of sound aberration for ultrasound based image guided radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2011;38:2665–73.CrossRefPubMed Fontanarosa D, van der Meer S, Harris E, et al. A CT based correction method for speed of sound aberration for ultrasound based image guided radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2011;38:2665–73.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Greenleaf JF, Johnson A, Bahn RC, et al. Quantitative crosssectional imaging of ultrasound parameters. Ultrason Symp Proc. New York, NY:IEEE; 1977. p. 989–95. Greenleaf JF, Johnson A, Bahn RC, et al. Quantitative crosssectional imaging of ultrasound parameters. Ultrason Symp Proc. New York, NY:IEEE; 1977. p. 989–95.
5.
go back to reference Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized to- mography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981;28:177–85.CrossRefPubMed Greenleaf JF, Bahn RC. Clinical imaging with transmissive ultrasonic computerized to- mography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1981;28:177–85.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Scherzinger AL, Belgam RA, Carson PL, et al. Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15:21–8.CrossRefPubMed Scherzinger AL, Belgam RA, Carson PL, et al. Assessment of ultrasonic computed tomography in symptomatic breast patients by discriminant analysis. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1989;15:21–8.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Terada T, Yamanaka K, Suzuki A, et al. Highly precise acoustic calibration method of ring-shaped ultrasound transducer array for plane-wave- based ultrasound tomography. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2017;56:07JF07.CrossRef Terada T, Yamanaka K, Suzuki A, et al. Highly precise acoustic calibration method of ring-shaped ultrasound transducer array for plane-wave- based ultrasound tomography. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2017;56:07JF07.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Ophir J, Yazdi Y. A transaxial compression technique (TACT) for localized pulse-echo estimation of sound speed in biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1990;12:35–46.CrossRefPubMed Ophir J, Yazdi Y. A transaxial compression technique (TACT) for localized pulse-echo estimation of sound speed in biological tissues. Ultrason Imaging. 1990;12:35–46.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nitta N, Aoki T, Hyodo K, et al. Direct measurement of speed of sound in cartilage in situ using ultrasound and magnetic resonance images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:6063–6.PubMed Nitta N, Aoki T, Hyodo K, et al. Direct measurement of speed of sound in cartilage in situ using ultrasound and magnetic resonance images. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2013;2013:6063–6.PubMed
11.
go back to reference Pereira FR, Machado JC, Pereira WCA. Ultrasonic speed measurement using the time- delay profile of rf-backscattered signals: simulation and experimental results. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111:1445–53.CrossRefPubMed Pereira FR, Machado JC, Pereira WCA. Ultrasonic speed measurement using the time- delay profile of rf-backscattered signals: simulation and experimental results. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;111:1445–53.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Onodera G, Taki H, Kanai H. Estimation of sound velocity distribution from time delay received at each element of ultrasonic probe. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Ultrasonic Electronics. vol. 37; 2016, p. 1P5–7. Onodera G, Taki H, Kanai H. Estimation of sound velocity distribution from time delay received at each element of ultrasonic probe. In: Proceedings of Symposium on Ultrasonic Electronics. vol. 37; 2016, p. 1P5–7.
13.
go back to reference Imbault M, Faccinetto A, Osmanski B, et al. Robust sound speed estimation for ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis assess- ment. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3582–98.CrossRefPubMed Imbault M, Faccinetto A, Osmanski B, et al. Robust sound speed estimation for ultrasound-based hepatic steatosis assess- ment. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3582–98.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mallart R, Fink M. Adaptive focusing in scattering media through sound-speed inhomogeneities: the van Cittert Zernike approach and focusing criterion. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;96:3721–32.CrossRef Mallart R, Fink M. Adaptive focusing in scattering media through sound-speed inhomogeneities: the van Cittert Zernike approach and focusing criterion. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;96:3721–32.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Dahl JJ, Hyun D, Lediju M, et al. Lesion detectability in diagnostic ultrasound with short-lag spatial coherence imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 2011;33:119–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dahl JJ, Hyun D, Lediju M, et al. Lesion detectability in diagnostic ultrasound with short-lag spatial coherence imaging. Ultrason Imaging. 2011;33:119–33.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Lediju BMA, Goswami R, Kisslo JA, et al. Short-lag spatial coher- ence imaging of cardiac ultrasound data: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1861–74.CrossRef Lediju BMA, Goswami R, Kisslo JA, et al. Short-lag spatial coher- ence imaging of cardiac ultrasound data: initial clinical results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39:1861–74.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hollman KW, Rigby KW, O’Donnell M. Coherence factor of speckle from a multi-row probe. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. IEEE; 1999, p. 1257–60. Hollman KW, Rigby KW, O’Donnell M. Coherence factor of speckle from a multi-row probe. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium. IEEE; 1999, p. 1257–60.
18.
go back to reference Li P, Li M. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003;50:128–41.CrossRefPubMed Li P, Li M. Adaptive imaging using the generalized coherence factor. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003;50:128–41.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yoon C, Kang J, Han S, et al. Enhancement of photoacoustic image quality by sound speed correction: ex vivo evaluation. Opt Express. 2012;20:3082–90.CrossRefPubMed Yoon C, Kang J, Han S, et al. Enhancement of photoacoustic image quality by sound speed correction: ex vivo evaluation. Opt Express. 2012;20:3082–90.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cho S, Kang J, Kang J, et al. Phantom and in vivo evaluation of sound speed estimation methods: preliminary results. In: IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. Chicago, IL, USA: IEEE; 2014, p. 1678-81. Cho S, Kang J, Kang J, et al. Phantom and in vivo evaluation of sound speed estimation methods: preliminary results. In: IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium. Chicago, IL, USA: IEEE; 2014, p. 1678-81.
21.
22.
go back to reference Hasegawa H. Improvement of penetration of modified amplitude and phase estimation beamformer. J Med Ultrason. 2017;44:3–11.CrossRef Hasegawa H. Improvement of penetration of modified amplitude and phase estimation beamformer. J Med Ultrason. 2017;44:3–11.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Hasegawa H. Improvement of range spatial resolution of medical ultrasound imaging by element-domain signal processing. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2017;56:07JF02.CrossRef Hasegawa H. Improvement of range spatial resolution of medical ultrasound imaging by element-domain signal processing. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2017;56:07JF02.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Mozumi M, Nagaoka R, Hasegawa H. Improvement of high range resolution imaging method by considering change in ultrasonic waveform during propagation. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2018;57:07LF23.CrossRef Mozumi M, Nagaoka R, Hasegawa H. Improvement of high range resolution imaging method by considering change in ultrasonic waveform during propagation. Jpn J Appl Phys. 2018;57:07LF23.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hasegawa H, Nagaoka R. Investigation on improvement of performance of ultrasonic beamformer. IEICE Technical Report. November 2018 (in press). Hasegawa H, Nagaoka R. Investigation on improvement of performance of ultrasonic beamformer. IEICE Technical Report. November 2018 (in press).
26.
go back to reference Hasegawa H. Apodized adaptive beamformer. J Med Ultrason. 2017;44:155–65.CrossRef Hasegawa H. Apodized adaptive beamformer. J Med Ultrason. 2017;44:155–65.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jensen J, Stuart MB, Jensen JA. Optimized plane wave imaging for fast and high-quality ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016;63:1922–34.CrossRefPubMed Jensen J, Stuart MB, Jensen JA. Optimized plane wave imaging for fast and high-quality ultrasound imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016;63:1922–34.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Initial phantom study on estimation of speed of sound in medium using coherence among received echo signals
Authors
Hideyuki Hasegawa
Ryo Nagaoka
Publication date
01-07-2019
Publisher
Springer Singapore
Published in
Journal of Medical Ultrasonics / Issue 3/2019
Print ISSN: 1346-4523
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2254
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10396-019-00936-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2019

Journal of Medical Ultrasonics 3/2019 Go to the issue