Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2014

01-12-2014 | Technical Advances

Initial experience with a variable width and extreme tip angulation colonoscope

Authors: L. F. Lara, T. Erim, A. Schneider, N. Palekar, B. Jimenez, B. Murchie, R. R. Pimentel, R. J. Charles

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 12/2014

Login to get access

Excerpt

Screening and surveillance colonoscopies can be affected by colon looping, angulations, diverticulosis, previous surgeries, body mass index, ability to sedate or type of sedation, bowel preparation, and female sex. Incomplete colonoscopies can be economically and emotionally costly and may result in decreased compliance with screening for colon neoplasia [1]. Instruments that improve the cecal intubation and adenoma detection rate, reduce the number of incomplete colonoscopies and improve patient satisfaction are desirable. Studies have shown that pediatric as well as variable stiffness colonoscopes achieve cecal intubation rates similar to standard colonoscopes, but possibly with less pain and with faster cecal intubation times [2, 3]. More recently, ultrathin colonoscopes have been reported to be better at negotiating acute luminal angulations, and patients may require less sedation than when standard colonoscopes are used. However, looping, difficulty removing larger polyps, and a higher ileal intubation failure rate have been reported [1, 4, 5]. We are, to the best of our knowledge, the first to report the ease of use and initial impressions with a newly available variable width colonoscope with extreme tip angulation capability. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Wagh M (2012) Ultrathin-caliber colonoscopy: is thin truly in? Gastrointest Endosc 75:492–493 Wagh M (2012) Ultrathin-caliber colonoscopy: is thin truly in? Gastrointest Endosc 75:492–493
2.
go back to reference Sola-Vera J, Uceda F, Brotons A et al (2011) Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:593–597PubMedCrossRef Sola-Vera J, Uceda F, Brotons A et al (2011) Does the use of a variable stiffness colonoscope offer advantages during colonoscopy under deep sedation? Results of a randomized trial. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 23:593–597PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A et al (2009) Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 41:17–24PubMedCrossRef Othman MO, Bradley AG, Choudhary A et al (2009) Variable stiffness colonoscope versus regular adult colonoscope: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 41:17–24PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Luo DJY, Hui AJ, Yan KK et al (2012) A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 75:484–490PubMedCrossRef Luo DJY, Hui AJ, Yan KK et al (2012) A randomized comparison of ultrathin and standard colonoscope in cecal intubation rate and patient tolerance. Gastrointest Endosc 75:484–490PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Töx U, Schumacher B, Toermer T et al (2013) Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 45:439–444PubMedCrossRef Töx U, Schumacher B, Toermer T et al (2013) Propofol sedation for colonoscopy with a new ultrathin or a standard endoscope: a prospective randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 45:439–444PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28PubMedCrossRef Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112:24–28PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al (2010) The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 139:1128–1137PubMedCrossRef Singh H, Nugent Z, Demers AA et al (2010) The reduction in colorectal cancer mortality after colonoscopy varies by site of the cancer. Gastroenterology 139:1128–1137PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF et al (2010) Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest Endosc 71:542–550PubMedCrossRef DeMarco DC, Odstrcil E, Lara LF et al (2010) Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group. Gastrointest Endosc 71:542–550PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Anderson JC, Walker G, Birk JW et al (2007) Tapered colonsocope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1042–1047PubMedCrossRef Anderson JC, Walker G, Birk JW et al (2007) Tapered colonsocope performs better than the pediatric colonoscope in female patients: a direct comparison through tandem colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 65:1042–1047PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, Castro F (2012) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. Gastrointest Endosc 75:827–834PubMedCrossRef Lurix E, Hernandez AV, Thoma M, Castro F (2012) Adenoma detection rate is not influenced by full-day blocks, time, or modified queue position. Gastrointest Endosc 75:827–834PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Initial experience with a variable width and extreme tip angulation colonoscope
Authors
L. F. Lara
T. Erim
A. Schneider
N. Palekar
B. Jimenez
B. Murchie
R. R. Pimentel
R. J. Charles
Publication date
01-12-2014
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 12/2014
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-014-1223-z

Other articles of this Issue 12/2014

Techniques in Coloproctology 12/2014 Go to the issue