Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2012

01-11-2012 | Shoulder

Influence of the initial rupture size and tendon subregion on three-dimensional biomechanical properties of single-row and double-row rotator cuff reconstructions

Authors: O. Lorbach, D. Pape, F. Raber, L. C. Busch, D. Kohn, M. Kieb

Published in: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy | Issue 11/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Influence of the initial rotator cuff tear size and of different subregions of the SSP tendon on the cyclic loading behavior of a modified single-row reconstruction compared to a suture-bridging double-row repair.

Methods

Artificial tears (25 and 35 mm) were created in the rotator cuff of 24 human cadaver shoulders. The reconstructions were performed as a single-row repair (SR) using a modified suture configuration or a suture-bridge double-row repair (DR). Radiostereometric analysis was used under cyclic loading (50 cycles, 10–180 N, 10–250 N) to calculate cyclic displacement in three different planes (anteroposterior (x), craniocaudal (y) and mediolateral (z) level). Cyclic displacement was recorded, and differences in cyclic displacement of the anterior compared to the posterior subregions of the tendon were calculated.

Results

In small-to-medium tears (25 mm) and medium-to-large tears (35 mm), significant lower cyclic displacement was seen for the SR-reconstruction compared to the DR-repair at 180 N (p ≤ 0.0001; p = 0.001) and 250 N (p = 0.001; p = 0.007) in the x-level. These results were confirmed in the y-level at 180 N (p = 0.001; p = 0.0022) and 250 N (p = 0.005; p = 0.0018). Comparison of the initial tear sizes demonstrated significant differences in cyclic displacement for the DR technique in the x-level at 180 N (p = 0.002) and 250 N (p = 0.004). Comparison of the anterior versus the posterior subregion of the tendon revealed significant lower gap formation in the posterior compared to the anterior subregions in the x-level for both tested rotator cuff repairs (p ≤ 0.05).

Conclusions

The tested single-row repair using a modified suture configuration achieved superior results in three-dimensional measurements of cyclic displacement compared to the tested double-row suture-bridge repair. The results were dependent on the initial rupture size of the rotator cuff tear. Furthermore, significant differences were found between tendon subregions of the rotator cuff with significantly higher gap formation for the anterior compared to the posterior subregions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Adam F, Pape D, Kohn D, Seil R (2002) Length of the patellar tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: a prospective clinical study using Roentgen stereometric analysis. Arthroscopy 18:859–864PubMedCrossRef Adam F, Pape D, Kohn D, Seil R (2002) Length of the patellar tendon after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft: a prospective clinical study using Roentgen stereometric analysis. Arthroscopy 18:859–864PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Adam F, Pape D, Schiel K et al (2004) Biomechanical properties of patellar and hamstring graft tibial fixation techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: experimental study with roentgen stereometric analysis. Am J Sports Med 32:71–78PubMedCrossRef Adam F, Pape D, Schiel K et al (2004) Biomechanical properties of patellar and hamstring graft tibial fixation techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: experimental study with roentgen stereometric analysis. Am J Sports Med 32:71–78PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Barber FA, Herbert MA, Schroeder FA et al (2010) Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy 26:316–323PubMedCrossRef Barber FA, Herbert MA, Schroeder FA et al (2010) Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy 26:316–323PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Barber F, Aziz-Jacobo J, Rapley JH, et al (2010) Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs—Author′s Reply. 26 874-876 Barber F, Aziz-Jacobo J, Rapley JH, et al (2010) Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs—Author′s Reply. 26 874-876
5.
go back to reference Bateman JE (1963) The diagnosis and treatment of ruptures of the rotator cuff. Surg Clin N Am 43:1523–1530PubMed Bateman JE (1963) The diagnosis and treatment of ruptures of the rotator cuff. Surg Clin N Am 43:1523–1530PubMed
6.
go back to reference Baums MH, Spahn G, Steckel H et al (2009) Comparative evaluation of the tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1466–1472PubMedCrossRef Baums MH, Spahn G, Steckel H et al (2009) Comparative evaluation of the tendon-bone interface contact pressure in different single- versus double-row suture anchor repair techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1466–1472PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N et al (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37:674–682PubMedCrossRef Burks RT, Crim J, Brown N et al (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing arthroscopic single- and double-row rotator cuff repair: magnetic resonance imaging and early clinical evaluation. Am J Sports Med 37:674–682PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Castagna A, Garofalo R, Conti M et al (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a triple-loaded suture anchor and a modified Mason-Allen technique (Alex stitch). Arthroscopy 23:440–444PubMed Castagna A, Garofalo R, Conti M et al (2007) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a triple-loaded suture anchor and a modified Mason-Allen technique (Alex stitch). Arthroscopy 23:440–444PubMed
9.
go back to reference Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD et al (2007) Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: a prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Am J Sports Med 35:1247–1253PubMedCrossRef Charousset C, Grimberg J, Duranthon LD et al (2007) Can a double-row anchorage technique improve tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair?: a prospective, nonrandomized, comparative study of double-row and single-row anchorage techniques with computed tomographic arthrography tendon healing assessment. Am J Sports Med 35:1247–1253PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Cummins CA, Strickland S, Appleyard RC et al (2003) Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: an in vivo and ex vivo investigation. Arthroscopy 19:239–248PubMedCrossRef Cummins CA, Strickland S, Appleyard RC et al (2003) Rotator cuff repair with bioabsorbable screws: an in vivo and ex vivo investigation. Arthroscopy 19:239–248PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience, New York Dahlberg G (1940) Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience, New York
12.
go back to reference Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG et al (2007) Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 35:1254–1260PubMedCrossRef Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG et al (2007) Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 35:1254–1260PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, et al (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 219–224 Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, et al (2004) The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A: 219–224
14.
go back to reference Gates JJ, Gilliland J, McGarry MH et al (2010) Influence of distinct anatomic subregions of the supraspinatus on humeral rotation. J Orthop Res 28:12–17PubMed Gates JJ, Gilliland J, McGarry MH et al (2010) Influence of distinct anatomic subregions of the supraspinatus on humeral rotation. J Orthop Res 28:12–17PubMed
15.
go back to reference Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C (1994) Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:43–53PubMed Gazielly DF, Gleyze P, Montagnon C (1994) Functional and anatomical results after rotator cuff repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 304:43–53PubMed
16.
go back to reference Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel U (1994) Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:371–380PubMed Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, Schlegel U (1994) Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br 76:371–380PubMed
17.
go back to reference Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Perren SM, Nyffeler RW (1999) Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1281–1290PubMed Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Perren SM, Nyffeler RW (1999) Experimental rotator cuff repair. A preliminary study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1281–1290PubMed
18.
go back to reference Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M et al (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12PubMedCrossRef Grasso A, Milano G, Salvatore M et al (2009) Single-row versus double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized clinical study. Arthroscopy 25:4–12PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang KY et al (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989PubMed Harryman DT, Mack LA, Wang KY et al (1991) Repairs of the rotator cuff. Correlation of functional results with integrity of the cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:982–989PubMed
20.
go back to reference Ide J, Maeda S, Takagi K (2005) A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 21:1090–1098PubMedCrossRef Ide J, Maeda S, Takagi K (2005) A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 21:1090–1098PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Karrholm J (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthop Scand 60:491–503PubMedCrossRef Karrholm J (1989) Roentgen stereophotogrammetry. Review of orthopedic applications. Acta Orthop Scand 60:491–503PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414PubMedCrossRef Kim DH, Elattrache NS, Tibone JE et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of a single-row versus double-row suture anchor technique for rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 34:407–414PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Koganti AK, Adamson GJ, Gregersen CS et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of traditional and locked suture configurations for arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 34:1832–1838PubMedCrossRef Koganti AK, Adamson GJ, Gregersen CS et al (2006) Biomechanical comparison of traditional and locked suture configurations for arthroscopic repairs of the rotator cuff. Am J Sports Med 34:1832–1838PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Lorbach O, Anagnostakos K, Vees J et al (2010) Three-dimensional evaluation of the cyclic loading behavior of different rotator cuff reconstructions. Arthroscopy 26:S95–S105PubMedCrossRef Lorbach O, Anagnostakos K, Vees J et al (2010) Three-dimensional evaluation of the cyclic loading behavior of different rotator cuff reconstructions. Arthroscopy 26:S95–S105PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J et al (2008) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1504–1510PubMedCrossRef Lorbach O, Bachelier F, Vees J et al (2008) Cyclic loading of rotator cuff reconstructions: single-row repair with modified suture configurations versus double-row repair. Am J Sports Med 36:1504–1510PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lorbach O, Pape D, Raber F et al (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a single-row of triple-loaded suture anchors with a modified suture configuration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1073–1076PubMedCrossRef Lorbach O, Pape D, Raber F et al (2011) Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a single-row of triple-loaded suture anchors with a modified suture configuration. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131:1073–1076PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:403–410PubMedCrossRef Ma CB, Comerford L, Wilson J, Puttlitz CM (2006) Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:403–410PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA et al (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868PubMedCrossRef Mazzocca AD, Millett PJ, Guanche CA et al (2005) Arthroscopic single-row versus double-row suture anchor rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med 33:1861–1868PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173PubMedCrossRef Meier SW, Meier JD (2006) The effect of double-row fixation on initial repair strength in rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Arthroscopy 22:1168–1173PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D et al (2008) Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:75–80PubMedCrossRef Milano G, Grasso A, Zarelli D et al (2008) Comparison between single-row and double-row rotator cuff repair: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:75–80PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Nho SJ, Yadav H, Pensak M et al (2007) Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 23:94–102PubMedCrossRef Nho SJ, Yadav H, Pensak M et al (2007) Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy 23:94–102PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Nyström L (1990) Algorithms and program system for roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Institute of Information and Processing, Department of Computer Science, University of Umea, Umea Nyström L (1990) Algorithms and program system for roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. Institute of Information and Processing, Department of Computer Science, University of Umea, Umea
33.
go back to reference Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH et al (2008) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 36:1310–1316PubMedCrossRef Park JY, Lhee SH, Choi JH et al (2008) Comparison of the clinical outcomes of single- and double-row repairs in rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med 36:1310–1316PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Park MC, Jun BJ, Park CJ et al (2007) The biomechanical effects of dynamic external rotation on rotator cuff repair compared to testing with the humerus fixed. Am J Sports Med 35:1931–1939PubMedCrossRef Park MC, Jun BJ, Park CJ et al (2007) The biomechanical effects of dynamic external rotation on rotator cuff repair compared to testing with the humerus fixed. Am J Sports Med 35:1931–1939PubMedCrossRef
35.
go back to reference Park MC, Tibone JE, Elattrache NS et al (2007) Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:469–476PubMedCrossRef Park MC, Tibone JE, Elattrache NS et al (2007) Part II: biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 16:469–476PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A et al (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26:1281–1288PubMedCrossRef Pauly S, Kieser B, Schill A et al (2010) Biomechanical comparison of 4 double-row suture-bridging rotator cuff repair techniques using different medial-row configurations. Arthroscopy 26:1281–1288PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Postel JM, Goutallier D, Lavau L, Bernageau J (1994) Anatomical results of rotator cuff repairs. Study of 57 cases controlled by arthrography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:20 Postel JM, Goutallier D, Lavau L, Bernageau J (1994) Anatomical results of rotator cuff repairs. Study of 57 cases controlled by arthrography. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:20
38.
go back to reference Ryd L (1992) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:56–65PubMed Ryd L (1992) Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of prosthetic fixation in the hip and knee joint. Clin Orthop Relat Res 276:56–65PubMed
39.
go back to reference Sano H, Yamashita T, Wakabayashi I, Itoi E (2007) Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon after tendon repair: suture anchors versus transosseous suture fixation. Am J Sports Med 35:542–546PubMedCrossRef Sano H, Yamashita T, Wakabayashi I, Itoi E (2007) Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon after tendon repair: suture anchors versus transosseous suture fixation. Am J Sports Med 35:542–546PubMedCrossRef
40.
go back to reference Saridakis P, Jones G (2010) Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:732–742PubMedCrossRef Saridakis P, Jones G (2010) Outcomes of single-row and double-row arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 92:732–742PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Schneeberger AG, von RA, Kalberer F, et al (2002) Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A: 2152–2160 Schneeberger AG, von RA, Kalberer F, et al (2002) Mechanical strength of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair techniques: an in vitro study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A: 2152–2160
43.
go back to reference Sharma P, Maffulli N (2005) Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:187–202PubMedCrossRef Sharma P, Maffulli N (2005) Tendon injury and tendinopathy: healing and repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:187–202PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Shea KP, O’Keefe RM Jr, Fulkerson JP (1992) Comparison of initial pull-out strength of arthroscopic suture and staple Bankart repair techniques. Arthroscopy 8:179–182PubMedCrossRef Shea KP, O’Keefe RM Jr, Fulkerson JP (1992) Comparison of initial pull-out strength of arthroscopic suture and staple Bankart repair techniques. Arthroscopy 8:179–182PubMedCrossRef
45.
go back to reference Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM et al (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2425–2431PubMedCrossRef Smith CD, Alexander S, Hill AM et al (2006) A biomechanical comparison of single and double-row fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:2425–2431PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Smith CK, Hull ML, Howell SM (2005) Migration of radio-opaque markers injected into tendon grafts: a study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Biomech Eng 127:887–890PubMedCrossRef Smith CK, Hull ML, Howell SM (2005) Migration of radio-opaque markers injected into tendon grafts: a study using roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). J Biomech Eng 127:887–890PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316PubMedCrossRef Sugaya H, Maeda K, Matsuki K, Moriishi J (2005) Functional and structural outcome after arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair: single-row versus dual-row fixation. Arthroscopy 21:1307–1316PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Wall LB, Keener JD, Brophy RH (2009) Clinical outcomes of double-row versus single-row rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy 25:1312–1318PubMedCrossRef Wall LB, Keener JD, Brophy RH (2009) Clinical outcomes of double-row versus single-row rotator cuff repairs. Arthroscopy 25:1312–1318PubMedCrossRef
49.
go back to reference Waltrip RL, Zheng N, Dugas JR, Andrews JR (2003) Rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical comparison of three techniques. Am J Sports Med 31:493–497PubMed Waltrip RL, Zheng N, Dugas JR, Andrews JR (2003) Rotator cuff repair. A biomechanical comparison of three techniques. Am J Sports Med 31:493–497PubMed
Metadata
Title
Influence of the initial rupture size and tendon subregion on three-dimensional biomechanical properties of single-row and double-row rotator cuff reconstructions
Authors
O. Lorbach
D. Pape
F. Raber
L. C. Busch
D. Kohn
M. Kieb
Publication date
01-11-2012
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy / Issue 11/2012
Print ISSN: 0942-2056
Electronic ISSN: 1433-7347
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-1892-y

Other articles of this Issue 11/2012

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 11/2012 Go to the issue